Air India: What you need to know after crash – DW – 06/12/2025
An Air India passenger plane with over 240 people on board crashed Thursday in India's northwestern city of Ahmedabad shortly after takeoff.
The aircraft, a Boeing 787-8 Dreamliner, was bound for London's Gatwick Airport.
It's one of the worst aviation disasters in the South Asian nation's history.
The accident comes as the airline's owner, the Tata Group, is working to revamp the carrier.
Airline with a rich history
Founded in 1932 as Tata Airlines by Indian business tycoon J. R. D. Tata, Air India was once a national icon.
The Indian government took over and nationalized the airline in 1953.
Years of mismanagement and government interference in business operations turned the then national carrier into an inefficient, money-losing enterprise.
After India opened up the civil aviation sector to private players in the 1990s, Air India struggled further with rising competition, particularly in the low-cost segment, leading to ballooning debts.
Air India returns to the Tatas
The Indian government's initial attempts to privatize Air India yielded no results due to the carrier's heavy debt burden.
New Delhi also wanted to keep a share in the airline.
No apparent survivors in Air India plane crash
To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video
As it struggled to find a buyer, the government ultimately gave up on retaining a stake and also settled for the buyer covering only a fraction of the airline's debts.
Then, in 2022, India's largest and oldest conglomerate, the Tata Group, bought Air India for roughly $2.4 billion, marking the carrier's return to the Tata fold nearly seven decades after it was nationalized.
How big is Air India?
Prior to acquiring Air India, Tata had been operating two other airlines of its own, the budget carrier AirAsia India with Malaysian airline AirAsia Berhad, and full-service carrier Vistara, in a partnership with Singapore airlines.
Last year, the company consolidated all the different airlines under its ownership into a combined Air India Group, which is currently the second-biggest airline in the South Asian nation in terms of passenger numbers, trailing only IndiGo in that respect.
It commands a roughly 30% share of India's domestic traffic and accounts for 56% of international passengers among the country's airlines.
The group has a fleet of about 300 aircraft, both narrow- and wide-body models from both Airbus and Boeing, and carried a total of 45.8 million domestic air passengers in 2024, according to Business Standard, an Indian daily.
Air India's global network spans 31 countries across five continents, connecting India with destinations in Europe, North America and Asia Pacific.
What did the Tatas do to revamp Air India?
After the Tata Group purchased Air India, many hoped it would swiftly revive the airline's fortunes.
The conglomerate has since sought to turn around the ailing carrier by ordering new jets and upgrading its existing fleet.
It placed a major order for new planes — 470 in total — from Airbus and Boeing in February 2023.
Last December, the airline announced it would buy a further 100 jets from Airbus.
And Reuters news agency reported earlier in June that Air India was in talks with Airbus and Boeing for a major new aircraft deal including some 200 extra single-aisle planes.
Air India flight crashes more withthan 240 people on board
To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video
The company also unveiled a new logo and branding in mid-2023, in addition to plans to modernize its aircraft interiors, among other measures.
In September 2024, Air India kicked off a $400 million (€345 million) refit program to revamp some legacy aircraft in its fleet.
Some operational and internal issues related to the airlines' merger, however, are still being ironed out.
What's the state of India's aviation market?
India's aviation sector has witnessed rapid growth over the past decade amid robust economic expansion and people's rising disposable incomes.
The industry is projected to maintain its growth path in the coming years, with more passengers, aircraft and airports.
At present, India is the world's fourth-largest air market, including both domestic and international travel.
The International Air Transport Association projects that it will become the third biggest over the next decade.
The Indian government is also pumping billions into building new airports, as well as expanding and modernizing existing ones, earmarking around $11 billion for the purpose.
It wants to increase the number of airports to between 350 and 400 by 2047, the centenary of India's independence.
Additionally, India has become the world's largest aircraft purchaser after the US and China, with its fleet size set to grow from 713 to upwards of 2,000 over the next decade.
Edited by: Wesley Rahn
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Int'l Business Times
7 hours ago
- Int'l Business Times
Modi Pushes Further India-Africa Cooperation On Ghana Visit
Indian Prime Minister Nerendra Modi on Thursday outlined plans for deeper ties between his country and Africa, as New Delhi increasingly vies for a stronger economic presence on the continent along with China and Russia. In a speech to Ghana's parliament, Modi highlighted a major rail project that opened in the west African nation last year, financed by the India Export-Import Bank. He also underlined his country's expanding diplomatic development and business footprint in Africa. "Over 200 projects across the continent enhance connectivity, infrastructure and Industrial capacity," Modi said. On the political front he welcomed "the establishment of Ghana-India Parliamentary Friendship Society in your parliament". Modi's visit is the first to Ghana by an Indian leader in three decades. But India's rival China remains the most important backer of infrastructure across the continent, a position only strengthened as the United States and other Western powers slash aid programmes. In a meeting Wednesday, Modi and Ghanaian President John Mahama agreed to deepen security and mining ties. In November 2024, the Indian prime minister visited Nigeria, discussing trade and security at a time when Indian companies had expressed interest in investing in Nigerian industries including steel. The Indian prime minister also on Thursday called for a greater global diplomatic role for both his country and Africa, warning that "the world order created after the Second World War is changing fast". Modi noted that the African Union had been admitted as a permanent member to the G20 while India held the rotating presidency of the bloc. Progress on worldwide challenges including climate change, diplomacy, "terrorism" and pandemics "cannot come without giving voice to the Global South", he added. India, the world's most populous country and a nuclear-armed power, has close ties with Russia but is often in rivalry with China. Resource-rich Ghana is Modi's first stop in a tour that will take the Indian premier to four other countries in Africa, the Caribbean and South America. The visit to Accra came as he made his way to Brazil for a summit of the BRICS group of emerging economies on Sunday and Monday. Highlighting his own country's economic development aspirations to become a "developed nation by 2047," Modi said "India remains a committed partner in Africa's development journey." This was the first visit to the west African nation by an Indian leader in three decades AFP
DW
15 hours ago
- DW
What is BRICS and why does it matter? – DW – 07/03/2025
BRICS leaders meet in Brazil this weekend to advance plans to challenge Western dominance. As more nations join the economic bloc, how will BRICS reshape power, trade and influence in a rapidly shifting world? Leaders of the world's fast-growing BRICS economies gather in Rio de Janeiro this weekend, promising to strengthen trade and technology exchange within the bloc in the shadow of US President Donald Trump's tariff threat. Brazilian President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva will host the three-day talks, attended by Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Chinese Premier Li Qiang among others. The Kremlin has said that Russian President Vladimir Putin, who has an outstanding arrest warrant from the International Criminal Court (ICC) for alleged war crimes over Moscow's invasion of Ukraine, will not be appearing. DW recaps the history of BRICS and the nascent bloc's plans to take on the West. Goldman Sachs economist Jim O'Neill coined the term BRIC in 2001 to identify Brazil, Russia, India, and China as fast-growing economies with the potential to become global economic powers by 2050. The term highlighted their rising gross domestic product (GDP), large populations, and increasing global influence. Despite diverse political ideologies and social structures, policymakers in Brazil, Russia, India and China then took up the baton, initially holding informal talks between foreign ministers to lay the groundwork for collaboration. The first BRICS leaders' summit was held in Russia's Yekaterinburg in 2009. A year later, South Africa was invited to join the emerging bloc, and an 'S' was added to the BRIC acronym. The creation of BRICS has since been described as a major challenge to the US-led global political, economic, and financial systems that have dominated since World War II. The original members have advocated for a multipolar world order and a greater voice for fast-developing countries of the Global South in world affairs. BRICS has since created an alternative to the World Bank, which funds infrastructure and development projects, as well as a new mechanism to provide financial support during economic crises, partially rivaling the role of the International Monetary Fund (IMF). BRICS policymakers have also mooted the possibility of launching their own currency to challenge the US dollar, the world's reserve currency, but progress has been slow. The bloc has been keen to sign up other developing nations, especially those seeking greater alignment with other fast-growing economies. BRICS now comprises 10 countries — the original five, along with Egypt, Ethiopia, Iran, the United Arab Emirates and Indonesia, which joined earlier this year. Although it remains an informal bloc, the Brazilian Center for International Relations (CEBRI) last week labeled BRICS "the first-ever transregional association of non-Western States," in a preview report for this weekend's Brazil summit. Despite having no founding treaty, supporting secretariat or headquarters, BRICS has — on paper — grown into a significant geopolitical and economic power. The bloc represents more than 40% of the world's population and more than a third of global economic growth, based on purchasing power parity, exceeding that of the G7 group of developed nations. BRICS countries also control significant commodity markets, including around 40% of global oil production, thanks to new members like Iran and the UAE. The bloc also controls nearly three-quarters of rare earth materials, according to the BRICS website. Mutual trade among members has already surpassed $1 trillion (€0.85 trillion), the website says. According to CEBRI, BRICS nations applied for 44 million patents between 2009 and 2023, more than half of all patents registered globally. Through its New Development Bank (NDB), BRICS has approved over $39 billion for 120 projects, focusing on infrastructure, clean energy, and sustainable development. The BRICS chair position rotates every year among the different members, where the bloc's leaders have pushed for reform of global institutions like the United Nations Security Council, IMF and World Bank. BRICS nations also continue to diversify from US dollar-denominated trade — a process known as dedollarization. Intra-BRICS trade is increasingly done in local currencies and alternative payment systems to the Western-backed Society for Worldwide Interbank Financial Telecommunication (SWIFT). Plans for a BRICS currency have hit a stumbling block, however, due to resistance from some members, particularly India, over China's economic dominance. The plans were further stymied when Trump warned BRICS that the bloc would face 100% tariffs on imports to the US if a common currency was announced. BRICS is set for explosive growth, with 44 nations either formally applying for membership or making exploratory moves toward joining, according to the bloc's website. This year alone, Belarus, Bolivia, Cuba, Kazakhstan, Malaysia, Thailand, Vietnam, Uganda and Uzbekistan became partner countries, a prelude to formal membership, under the moniker BRICS+. Other nations expressing interest in joining include: Azerbaijan, Bahrain, Bangladesh, Burkina Faso, Cambodia, Chad, Colombia, the Republic of the Congo, Equatorial Guinea, Honduras, Laos, Kuwait, Morocco, Myanmar, Nicaragua, Pakistan, the Palestinian territories, Senegal, South Sudan, Sri Lanka, Syria, Venezuela, and Zimbabwe. Saudi Arabia, which has strong ties with the United States, was slated to join BRICS last year, but has not yet made a final decision. The BRICS website, however, still has the Kingdom listed as a member. Turkey's plan to join was vetoed by India, citing Ankara's close ties with foe Pakistan. Argentina had applied to join, but its application was withdrawn under President Javier Milei in December 2023, citing a preference to maintain close ties with the West. BRICS is poised for massive expansion, with some analysts predicting it could further challenge Western-led global institutions, while others argue that internal divisions and competing national interests may impede its progress. China and Russia actively position BRICS as a counterweight to Western hegemony, while India and Brazil prioritize economic cooperation over geopolitical confrontation, potentially creating tensions within the bloc. As well as China and India's border dispute, rivalries between Saudi Arabia — if it joins — and Iran, or Egypt and Ethiopia over the Nile River dam, could hinder consensus on political issues and dilute the bloc's ability to advance its interests. The US currency's entrenched role in global trade and Beijing's curbs on the Chinese yuan's use in international trade could hamper the push for dedollarization, which some see more as an attempt by Beijing and Moscow to circumvent Western sanctions than a realistic strategy for a new reserve currency. The US and European Union imposed punitive measures on Russia following its full-scale invasion of Ukraine in 2022 and Iran's economy is similarly hurt by sanctions over Tehran's nuclear program. Other countries are supportive of plans for an alternative financial system to hedge their bets in case they face similar sanctions in the future, say analysts. Economic disparities among members pose another challenge for BRICS as the bloc grows. China's GDP far exceeds that of South Africa or newer members like Ethiopia and risks skewing priorities toward Beijing's interests. There are also growing concerns about how democracies like India and Brazil can align with autocracies like China, Iran and Russia. O'Neill, who coined the term BRIC, now thinks the grouping is a failed project, writing in November that BRICS "serves no real purpose beyond generating symbolic gestures and lofty rhetoric."
DW
a day ago
- DW
Amid severe heat wave, EU pitches flexible 2040 climate goal – DW – 07/02/2025
The EU has unveiled its new climate target, a 90% reduction in emissions by 2040. But not all member states are on board, while a provision to outsource part of the climate efforts abroad has generated controversy. With large parts of Europe gripped in a record-breaking heat wave, the European Commission has proposed that the bloc reduce its net greenhouse gas emissions 90% by 2040. That's in comparison to levels back in 1990, and on track to meet the target of net-zero emissions by 2050. The binding emissions reduction target was first proposed last year, and came after months of tough negotiations among member states. The existing target requires the EU to reduce net emissions by at least 55% by 2030; in May, the Commission said the bloc had already cut climate-warming emissions by 37%. The new target will give certainty to investors, "strengthen industrial leadership of our businesses, and increase Europe's energy security," the commission said in a statement on Wednesday. But not all member states are on board with the plan, and a controversial flexibility clause on buying carbon credits on international markets has activists crying foul. Under the proposal, EU member states could purchase international carbon credits on green projects in third countries from 2036 onward, using them to offset up to 3% of the benchmark 1990 emissions. "This can provide a safety-net to ensure a 90% target is achievable as we are closing on climate neutrality," the commission said. But activists have said the flexibility clause was included due to pressure from member states like France and Germany, along with major industry lobbyists, at the cost of reduced investments at home. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Mathieu Mal, a climate and agriculture expert at the European Environment Bureau, said the 3% flexibility clause was a "bad idea" for a variety of reasons. "What this means is that the EU would be investing in other countries outside the bloc to reduce their emissions, and that's problematic because we need these investments within the EU. We also have our sectors to decarbonize and we need funds for energy transformation here," he said. "Every country across the world needs to commit to climate action. If the EU counts these carbon credits towards its own goals then what about the countries who also need to reduce their emissions and achieve their own targets?" In May, the European Scientific Advisory Board on Climate Change advised against outsourcing part of the bloc's climate efforts, saying it "risk[s] diverting resources from domestic investments and could undermine environmental integrity." It called on all reduction toward net zero to be "achieved through domestic action." Critics of the clause have called it a ruse for heavy polluters who find it cost intensive to decarbonize in Europe and easier to invest in projects abroad that lack sufficient oversight. "The use of carbon credits is simply magical thinking for a bloc unwilling to live up to its responsibility for causing the climate catastrophe we're already living through," said Friends of the Earth Europe. "Carbon credits have a long record of failure and ultimately do not stop Europe emitting more than its fair share of carbon emissions." Speaking with DW, Mal highlighted previous concerns about green investments in third nations. "There have been lots of issues in the past. Projects carried out in some countries often don't have high standards, they often remain just on paper. There are questions if they were ever materialized," he said. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video The Commission's new target has the backing of at least some of the EU member states. As Denmark takes over the EU's rotating presidency this week, it has listed the 2040 target as one of its top priorities. "Anyone who says that the green transformation cannot be achieved with high ambition and social justice at the same time should come to Denmark," said Villy Sövndal, a lawmaker with the European Greens group and Denmark's former foreign minister. "Competitiveness in the 21st century is not linked to fossil fuels but to the advancement of the energy transition," Pedro Sanchez, Spain's socialist prime minister, said last week at the EU summit in Brussels. But other countries consider the 2040 target to be too ambitious. Italy has said an 80-85% target for 2040 would be more realistic, and the Czech Republic said Wednesday it disagreed with the commission's proposal. Speaking at the EU summit, French President Emmanuel Macron also indicated it was still too early to agree to setting the target for 2040. "The reality is that I want to get my 2030 target right first," he said, "and take the democratic and political time to convince others to get to 2040." While Germany and France both back the 3% flexibility clause, France expects an even higher percentage of the overall goal to be met by purchasing international carbon credits, with some reports suggesting up to 10%. According to Teresa Ribera, the EU's green transition chief, some political groups in the EU continue to deny climate change whereas others lack courage in confronting their constituents about steps required to combat the problem. "Political courage is needed to understand that there is a difficulty," she said in an interview with on Wednesday. "You need to face it with honesty." The EU's climate plans have raised concerns around the costs of green transition and disruption to industrial growth and livelihood, if decarbonization is carried out without adequate support. However, Ribera believes there is no time to waste. "Sorry, but it'll be much more expensive if we don't act," she said. According to a Eurobarometer survey released this week, 85% of Europeans believe climate change is a serious problem and tackling it should be a priority, while 77% agreed that the cost of damage due to climate change is much higher than the investment needed for a net-zero transition. "As European citizens increasingly feel the impact of climate change, they expect Europe to act," the European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen said on Wednesday. The proposal still needs the stamp of approval from the European Parliament and member states, and Climate Commissioner Wopke Hoekstra said he hoped an agreement could be reached before the UN climate change conference in Brazil in November. But time is short, and there are still doubts as to whether the proposal in its current form will be adopted as law.
