logo
Former staff of Hong Kong news outlet Channel C launch new media platform with support of ‘white knight'

Former staff of Hong Kong news outlet Channel C launch new media platform with support of ‘white knight'

HKFP5 days ago
A group of former staff from Hong Kong independent media outlet Channel C has launched a new online news platform with the financial support of a 'white knight.'
Ronson Chan, a former reporter at Channel C, told HKFP on Thursday that he and some former colleagues had set up a new media outlet called Channel We.
The new media outlet published its first story on Facebook, Instagram and Threads on Thursday morning, reporting that Chung Pui-kuen, former chief editor of the defunct outlet Stand News, was released from prison after serving one year and nine months for a sedition conviction.
Channel C staff stopped working after the company failed to pay its employees from April 23, Channel We said in a statement.
'After our persistent efforts for over two months, we have finally found a 'white knight' to support us, and therefore we will continue to report on Channel We,' the new news outlet added.
Channel We 'produces content that 'we' should care about and delivers information about 'we' Hongkongers,' according to its description on Facebook.
Chan, former chair of the Hong Kong Journalists Association and former Stand News journalist, shared a Channel We post on his Facebook page on Thursday.
'We will continue to report news, do live-streaming, and report news about Hongkongers,' Chan wrote in Chinese.
Channel C halted operations
Channel C was founded by a small group of former Apple Daily employees in July 2021 following the closure of the Hong Kong pro-democracy newspaper.
However, Channel C halted operations in April this year after at least one director at its parent company was arrested for allegedly defrauding a government loan programme.
The defunct media outlet owes 29 editorial staff members HK$660,000 in salaries, pension contributions, and other miscellaneous expenses, a source familiar with the matter told HKFP.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Hong Kong universities told to handle student misconduct ‘seriously' after AI-generated images scandal
Hong Kong universities told to handle student misconduct ‘seriously' after AI-generated images scandal

HKFP

time2 hours ago

  • HKFP

Hong Kong universities told to handle student misconduct ‘seriously' after AI-generated images scandal

Chief Executive John Lee has urged Hong Kong universities to handle student misconduct 'seriously,' after a male student allegedly created AI-generated indecent images of more than 20 women. Universities shoulder the responsibility of developing students' moral character, and any misconduct that infringes on individual rights and privacy should be dealt with seriously, Lee said at a weekly press conference on Tuesday. 'While some misconduct may be dealt with under internal university rules, any act that may contravene the law should be reported to law enforcement agencies for action,' the chief executive said. Lee's remarks come after a male law student at the University of Hong Kong (HKU) was accused of creating pornographic images of around 20 to 30 women, including his classmates and teachers, without their consent. The student allegedly used photos he found on the women's social media accounts to generate pornographic images using free online artificial intelligence (AI) tools. HKU said in a statement on Saturday that the university had issued a warning letter to the male student and demanded that he make a formal apology to the women affected. But it was revealed that some women had requested that HKU involve the university's Disciplinary Committee to handle the matter, according to three anonymous victims who posted a summary of the accusations on Instagram. The victims said their request did not go through as HKU cited legal opinions in telling them that the male student likely did not commit an offence that could be addressed by the Disciplinary Committee. Lee on Tuesday said most of Hong Kong's laws apply to online behaviours, drawing attention to offences under the Crimes Ordinance and the Personal Data (Privacy) Ordinance. For example, both 'publication or threatened publication of intimate images without consent' and 'access to a computer with dishonest intent' are offences under the Crimes Ordinance, each carrying a maximum punishment of five years in jail. Lee also said that in April, the government's Digital Policy Office published a guideline for generative AI use, promoting the 'safe and responsible development' of the technology and its related activities. The chief executive did not mention any proposal for legislation regarding AI. 'AI is an emergent technology that evolves very rapidly, with new capabilities and developments changing in a very short period of time,' he said. He added that the government would monitor the development of AI and study overseas regulations of the technology.

Hong Kong democrat found guilty in landmark nat. sec case described as ‘diligent' legislator at appeal hearing
Hong Kong democrat found guilty in landmark nat. sec case described as ‘diligent' legislator at appeal hearing

HKFP

time2 hours ago

  • HKFP

Hong Kong democrat found guilty in landmark nat. sec case described as ‘diligent' legislator at appeal hearing

An ex-lawmaker who was found guilty in Hong Kong's largest national security case and jailed for six and a half years was a 'diligent' legislator who believed what he was doing was lawful, a court has heard. Raymond Chan, along with 10 other pro-democracy activists, appeared at the West Kowloon Law Courts Building on Tuesday for the second day of the case's appeal hearings. He wore a black jacket over a white collared shirt and appeared visibly thinner. They were among the 45 activists convicted of conspiring to commit subversion over their role in an unofficial primary in 2020 aimed at strategising votes for an upcoming Legislative Council election. Out of the 47 people charged, only two were cleared, and the government is appealing one of the acquittals. Chan's barrister, David Ma, told the court that his client served Hong Kong as a lawmaker for eight years. He was a 'diligent' legislator who had a meeting attendance rate of 99 per cent, Ma said. Chan was 'no doubt' very familiar with the functions and duties of the Legislative Council as described in the Basic Law, Hong Kong's mini-constitution, the barrister said. 'So with all this background and disposition… his propensity in committing a serious crime that is subversion would be brought into question,' Ma added. At the crux of the case is the prosecution's argument that the defendants had agreed to indiscriminately veto the government budget and force the chief executive to step down, a mechanism provided for under the Basic Law. Ma said Chan had a track record of working with the pro-establishment camp and supporting the government. He suggested that Chan had 'genuinely and honestly believed' that what he intended to do was lawful, and that the trial judges' conclusion that he intended to subvert the government was not a 'safe' inference. Chan and 11 others who pleaded guilty are applying for leave to appeal their convictions and sentences. They include activists Owen Chow, Gordon Ng and Gwyneth Ho, who received some of the longest jail terms in the case, of up to seven years and nine months. Activist Wong Ji-yuet, who pleaded guilty, is applying for leave to appeal her sentence. She was jailed for four years and five months. 'No evidence' Ex-lawmakers Lam Cheuk-ting and Helena Wong are also appealing their sentences and convictions. Lam was sentenced to six years and nine months, and Wong to six years and six months. Barrister Erik Shum, representing both former lawmakers, drew comparisons between his clients' verdicts and those of Lawrence Lau, who was one of the two defendants cleared of their charges. The government is appealing Lau's acquittal. Shum said Lau's name appeared as a signatory to the Inked Without Regret declaration, one of the key documents associated with more radical ideals and which was cited by the prosecution in their reasons for convicting the activists. The barrister said that neither Lam nor Wong signed the document, and there was 'no evidence' they were even aware of it. Representing ex-district councillor Clarisse Yeung, barrister Cheung Yiu-leung said his client was among the participants with the 'least level of participation in this matter.' Cheung brought up one of the points that the trial judges relied on when explaining their reasons for finding her guilty. He said that while police found documents on Yeung's 'office computer notebook' relating to the primaries, there was no evidence that the device was hers. Yeung cast doubt on the ownership of the laptop and who might have put the documents on it. Cheung also cited the judges' point that her name appeared on the Inked Without Regret declaration, but the declaration was not posted on her Facebook page like it was on other candidates'. Her lawyer said her name might have been written by someone else. 10-day hearing Tuesday marked the second day of the appeal hearings, which are scheduled to last 10 days. The hearings are taking place more than a year after High Court judges convicted the activists and sentenced them, with the longest sentence of 10 years going to ex-University of Hong Kong law professor Benny Tai. The prosecution said Tai was the 'mastermind' behind the scheme. On Monday, Michael Pang – one of the defendants found guilty and who was initially appealing his conviction and sentence – announced he was dropping his challenge. Wednesday's hearing will continue with arguments by Shum, who represents ex-lawmakers Lam and Wong. In June 2020, Beijing inserted national security legislation directly into Hong Kong's mini-constitution – bypassing the local legislature – following a year of pro-democracy protests and unrest. It criminalised subversion, secession, collusion with foreign forces and terrorist acts, which were broadly defined to include disruption to transport and other infrastructure. The move gave police sweeping new powers, alarming democrats, civil society groups and trade partners, as such laws have been used broadly to silence and punish dissidents in China. However, the authorities say it has restored stability and peace to the city.

Foreign media slammed for NSL comments
Foreign media slammed for NSL comments

RTHK

time5 hours ago

  • RTHK

Foreign media slammed for NSL comments

Foreign media slammed for NSL comments The Office of the Commissioner of the Foreign Ministry in Hong Kong says some foreign media outlets tarnished the reputation of the NSL. File photo: RTHK The Office of the Commissioner of the Foreign Ministry in Hong Kong on Tuesday strongly condemned certain foreign media, including BBC News Chinese and Japan's Nikkei newspaper, for their reports relating to the recent fifth anniversary of the implementation of National Security Law (NSL) in Hong Kong. In a statement, the office said the media outlets deliberately tarnished the reputation of the NSL and made disparaging remarks about the successful implementation of One Country, Two Systems in Hong Kong. It told them to remove their "coloured glasses" and stop making erroneous remarks about Hong Kong. The commissioner's office also said Hong Kong has returned to stability with the economy back on track following the implementation of the NSL.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store