&w=3840&q=100)
'There will be framework': Dalai Lama hints succession plan ahead of 90th birthday
Tibetan spiritual leader the Dalai Lama greets devotees as he arrives at the Tsuglakhang temple in Dharmsala, India, Tuesday, Aug. 29, 2017. (Photo: AP)
The Dalai Lama will address a major three-day gathering of Buddhist religious figures this week ahead of his 90th birthday, as his followers wait for the Tibetan spiritual leader to share details about his succession in a move that could irk China.
Beijing views the Dalai Lama, who fled Tibet in 1959 after a failed uprising against Chinese rule, as a separatist and says it will choose his successor. The Dalai Lama has said his successor will be born outside China and urged his followers to reject anyone chosen by Beijing.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Tibetan Buddhists hold that enlightened monks are reborn to carry forward their spiritual legacy. The 14th Dalai Lama will turn 90 on Sunday and has said he would consult senior monks and others at this time to share possible clues on where his successor, a boy or a girl, could be found following his death.
'The rest of my life I will dedicate for the benefit of others, as much as possible, as extensive as possible,' the Dalai Lama told a gathering of his followers on Monday as they offered prayers for his long life.
'There will be some kind of a framework within which we can talk about the continuation of the institution of the Dalai Lamas,' he said, without elaborating on the framework.
He has previously said he could possibly reincarnate in India, where he lives in exile near the northern Himalayan town of Dharamshala. He was identified as the reincarnation of his predecessor when he was two.
Dolma Tsering Teykhang, the deputy speaker of the Tibetan parliament-in-exile in Dharamshala, said it was important for the world to hear directly from the Dalai Lama on the issue because while China 'tries to vilify him at every chance … it is trying to frame rules and regulations on how to have the reincarnation of the Dalai Lama in their hand'.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
'China is trying to grab this institution … for its political purpose,' she said.
'We want the incarnation of the Dalai Lama to be born not only for the survival of Tibet as a distinct culture, religion and nation, but also for the well-being of the whole humanity.'
Thupten Ngodup, Tibet's chief state oracle, said typically such discussions on the reincarnation do not take place when a monk is still alive but things are different now mainly because the 'Chinese government is interfering'.
Beijing said in March that the Dalai Lama was a political exile who had 'no right to represent the Tibetan people at all'. China has said it is open to discussing his future if he recognises that Tibet and Taiwan are inalienable parts of China, a proposal the Tibetan government in exile has rejected.
'As if he's not there'
The religious conference this week, being held for the first time since 2019, will be attended by more than 100 Tibetan Buddhist leaders and will feature a video statement from the Dalai Lama.
Hollywood star Richard Gere, a long-time follower of Tibetan Buddhism, will be among those attending, organisers have said.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
The Dalai Lama will attend prayers called by the Tibetan government in exile on July 5 and participate in his birthday celebrations a day later, according to a schedule shared by the organisers.
He will speak at the celebrations for about half an hour. India's parliamentary affairs minister, Kiren Rijiju, and some other Indian officials are expected to attend.
Tibetans have been praying for his long health, especially since knee surgery in the U.S. last year, although the Dalai Lama told Reuters in December that he could live until he was 110. The previous Dalai Lama died earlier than expected at 58.
The Dalai Lama and Tibetan officials say there is a system in place for the government-in-exile to continue its political work while officers of the Dalai Lama's Gaden Phodrang Foundation search and recognise the next Dalai Lama.
The current Dalai Lama set up the foundation in 2015 and its senior officers include several of his aides.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Teykhang and other Tibetan officials said the Dalai Lama has been preparing his people for the day when he is gone, especially through his 2011 decision to hand his political role to a democratically elected government, ending a 368-year-old tradition of being both spiritual and temporal head of Tibetans.
'Since he has come in the form of a human, we have to agree that there will be a moment when he is not with us,' said Teykhang. 'His Holiness has really prepared us for that day, he made us act as if he's not there.'
(This is an agency copy. Except for the headline, the copy has not been edited by Firstpost staff.)
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
News18
36 minutes ago
- News18
SCO Summit: India, Pakistan And The Curious Case Of Missing Fingers
How Defence Minister Rajnath Singh's SCO gambit is a case of a Bharat rising confidently, self-assuredly and surefootedly Not every agreement inked from a position of strength translates into strategic triumph. The 1971 war is a telling reminder. Bharat's decisive victory split Pakistan, created Bangladesh, and saw 93,000 Pakistani soldiers surrendering in Dhaka—one of the most humiliating defeats in modern military history. Yet, just months later, the Simla Agreement of 1972 exposed how battlefield gains could be squandered at the diplomatic table. Despite explicit warnings from then RAW chief RN Kao to 'count her fingers" after shaking hands with Zulfikar Ali Bhutto, Mrs Indira Gandhi fell for his charm, unilaterally agreeing to release the Pakistani prisoners without even securing the return of Indian soldiers languishing in Pakistani jails. If all treaties signed from a point of strength are not success stories, then all treaties not signed aren't failures either. Last week, when Defence Minister Rajnath Singh refused to sign the SCO's joint statement on countering terrorism, he not only safeguarded Bharat's core security interests but also offered a glimpse of a country willing to stand firm—alone if necessary—in pursuit of its national priorities. The Defence Minister's conduct at the SCO summit reflects a growing confidence, maturity, and self-assuredness of the country while dealing with global powers. Unlike in the past, when New Delhi would have been tempted to make a compromise for the sake of 'consensus" or 'regional solidarity", today's Bharat doesn't mind walking that extra mile on treacherous terrains if the country's long-term interest so demands. The SCO draft statement was a watered-down document that, with Chinese collusion, sought to downplay Pakistan's terror connections. It also refused to acknowledge, far less condemn, Islamabad's sinister role in not just waging but also spreading global jihad. What particularly irked New Delhi was the refusal to give the dastardly Pahalgam attack a place in the draft statement. For Bharat—having borne the brunt of Pakistan-sponsored terrorism for decades—any endorsement of such a document would have compromised its core security interests. More so in the wake of the much successful Operation Sindoor, where Bharat drew for Pakistan—and the world—a new Lakshman Rekha on terrorism. Critics argue that Bharat should reconsider its engagement with institutions like the SCO, given their internal dynamics and frequent tilt against Bharat's interests. But there is a compelling counterpoint: Bharat's very participation forces these blocs to confront their inconsistencies. By attending and then refusing to endorse a flawed document, Bharat highlighted the SCO's duplicity on terrorism. New Delhi's presence gives the SCO a democratic legitimacy, especially when most of its member states lack genuine democratic credentials. At the same time, it does moderate the innate anti-Bharat tendencies of such institutions. Yet, the incident is also a reminder of the solitary nature of Bharat's fight against Pakistan-sponsored terrorism. The West's support often stops at rhetoric. Washington's Bharat policy is still largely China-driven, focused on counterbalancing Beijing rather than addressing Islamabad's terror machinery. Europe, preoccupied with internal crises, besides being wary of disturbing its fragile equations with Islamic states, rarely ventures beyond routine condemnations, followed by an exhortation to both sides to return to talks. Russia, Bharat's time-tested partner and an SCO member, finds itself increasingly aligned with China, compelled by geopolitical realities and economic compulsions after the Ukraine war. Moscow's growing dependence on Beijing inevitably narrows the space for unequivocal support to New Delhi, especially on issues where Chinese and Pakistani interests converge. Perhaps the most sobering takeaway from the SCO saga is the fact that Bharat is, in many ways, alone in its fight against terrorism emanating from Pakistan. While Western capitals may occasionally put up rhetorical support in Bharat's favour, very few will be willing to shun, far less confront, Pakistan for its terror connections. However, the path ahead is not without challenges. Bharat will likely face more such moments where standing up for its core interests may mean standing alone. The international system is inherently transactional. Allies shift their positions, interests evolve, and moral arguments often give way to strategic calculations. This reality makes it imperative for Bharat to continue diversifying its partnerships—deepening ties not just with the Quad countries but also with nations in Europe, ASEAN, Africa, and the Middle East. Simultaneously, Bharat must persist in exposing Pakistan's duplicity on terror at every available forum, denying Islamabad the international space it needs to whitewash its record. Be that as it may, the fact of the matter is that Bharat's conduct at the SCO summit reflects the case of a confident, self-assured, and surefooted nation. Yes, there is this concern of finding itself isolated on the international platform, but one needs to see it in the larger context of Bharat rising at an unprecedented pace and scale—a pace and scale that seem to be unnerving its friends and foes alike. The next couple of decades will be critical. As Bharat continues its unprecedented economic and geopolitical ascent, it will inevitably unsettle entrenched interests, both among rivals and even some partners. How deftly Bharat navigates this phase—balancing assertion with strategic partnerships, principle with pragmatism—will determine how swiftly it cements its place as a global power. The good thing is, as Rajnath Singh's resolute stance at the SCO shows, Naya Bharat not just counts the fingers after shaking hands with other powers; it has also started making them accountable if some of the fingers go missing after the handshake! About the Author Utpal Kumar Utpal Kumar is Opinion Editor, News18 and Firstpost. He can be reached at He tweets @utpal_kumar1 First Published:
India Gazette
an hour ago
- India Gazette
"Kiska Saath, Kiska Vikas?": Rahul Gandhi over growing dependence on Chinese fertilisers
New Delhi [India], July 2 (ANI): Lok Sabha LoP Rahul Gandhi, on Wednesday, raised concerns over India's growing dependence on 'Made in China' products, calling it a serious threat to the nation's agricultural backbone. In a post on X, Rahul cited a media report that claimed that India's agricultural sector, the backbone of its economy, is facing a severe crisis due to foreign dependence on essential fertilisers. The country imports 80% of its specialty fertilisers from China, and the recent halt in supplies has sent shockwaves through the farming community. 'India is an agrarian country, and the farmer is the backbone of our economy. But today, that very backbone is bending under the weight of foreign dependence. India imports 80% of its speciality fertilisers from China, and now China has halted the supply,' he said. Rahul Gandhi said that the farmers are already struggling with shortages of essential fertilisers like urea and DAP. The addition of specialty fertilisers to the list of scarce resources has further exacerbated the situation. 'This isn't the first time, farmers across the country are still struggling with shortages of essential fertilisers like urea and DAP, and now a new 'Chinese crisis' looms over speciality fertilisers. On one hand, the Prime Minister is busy printing his photos on fertiliser sacks, while on the other, our farmers are becoming increasingly dependent on 'Made in China,' Rahul Gandhi said. Further, the Congress MP accused the government of negligence and failing to promote domestic production despite repeated warnings, adding that the government has failed to formulate a policy or plan to promote domestic production of fertilisers, leaving farmers dependent on imports. 'Despite knowing that this supply could be disrupted at any moment, the government made no preparations. When the need of the hour was to promote domestic production, they made no policy, no plan,' Rahul said. 'Will the Indian farmer now be helpless even in his own soil? As precious time and healthy crops are lost, the farmer, drowning in debt and despair, is asking: 'Kiska Sath, Kiska Vikas,' he added. Earlier on Tuesday, as India marked eight years of the Goods and Services Tax, Congress leader Rahul Gandhi slammed the Modi government and termed the GST rolled out by it as a 'brutal tool of economic injustice and corporate cronyism.' The Congress leader alleged that the GST rolled out by the government was designed to 'punish the poor, crush MSMEs, undermine states, and benefit a few billionaire friends of Prime Minister Narendra Modi.' (ANI)
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Dalai Lama defies China: Reincarnation will be Tibetan-led; what it means for Xi Jinping
AI image for representation only. Tibet's spiritual leader, the Dalai Lama , confirmed on Wednesday that he will reincarnate, putting an end to speculation that the centuries-old institution could end with him. Speaking via recorded video message at prayer celebrations in Dharamshala, just days before his 90th birthday, he emphasized that the next Dalai Lama will be selected following established Tibetan Buddhist traditions. "I am affirming that the institution of the Dalai Lama will continue," he said. "No one else has any such authority to interfere in this matter." This stance explicitly challenges China's claim that it alone has the power to approve the Dalai Lama's successor-a position that has deepened tensions between Beijing and the Tibetan exile community. Why it matters The Dalai Lama's reincarnation question reaches far beyond religious rituals or spiritual continuity-it represents a critical intersection of geopolitics, cultural identity, and human rights. For Tibetans, the Dalai Lama's succession is an existential issue. He is not only their spiritual leader but the most powerful symbol of Tibetan identity, autonomy, and peaceful resistance to Chinese authority. Tibetans revere him as a living manifestation of Chenrezig, the god of compassion, making his reincarnation deeply sacred. His insistence on Tibetan-controlled reincarnation is a direct rebuke of China's authoritarian efforts to dominate religious and cultural life in Tibet. By claiming sole authority to recognize his successor, the Dalai Lama is asserting a powerful form of cultural autonomy, safeguarding the future of Tibetan Buddhism from political manipulation. For China, controlling the Dalai Lama's reincarnation would cement its political and ideological grip over Tibet. The Communist Party seeks to integrate Tibetan Buddhism within state control, diluting its potential to foster dissent or resistance. China's past actions, such as its installation of the Panchen Lama , demonstrate its resolve to maintain ideological dominance. China's immediate rejection of the Dalai Lama's announcement underscores the depth of this conflict, signaling its willingness to confront international criticism to maintain authority in Tibet. Beijing insists the reincarnation must be Chinese-approved, a position that Amnesty International calls a direct threat to religious freedom. For the broader international community, the Dalai Lama's reincarnation is a potent symbol of religious freedom and human rights at stake in an increasingly authoritarian global landscape. It serves as a litmus test for democratic nations' willingness and ability to confront Chinese influence-politically, economically, and culturally. What it means for India India, home to over 100,000 Tibetan refugees, remains crucial in providing sanctuary for a Tibetan-recognized reincarnation. The Dalai Lama's insistence on reincarnating outside China also presents India with diplomatic complexities. India hosts the Dalai Lama and the Tibetan government-in-exile, but economic ties with China remain crucial. The Dalai Lama's succession process may bolster India's strategic leverage against China. Moreover, India's recognition of a Dalai Lama chosen outside China could strengthen its soft power among Buddhists globally. How India navigates this succession issue could significantly impact its geopolitical relations with China and its global image. Between the lines This Dalai Lama vs China confrontation is rooted in historical precedent. In 1995, when the Dalai Lama identified the 11th Panchen Lama-a position second only to his own-China responded by abducting the child and installing its own candidate, whom many Tibetans dismiss as illegitimate. The international community broadly condemned this move, but China remained steadfast. Observers now fear a similar scenario with dueling Dalai Lamas-one appointed by Beijing and another recognized by Tibetan authorities outside China. The Dalai Lama has explicitly instructed his followers not to accept a Chinese-appointed successor, warning against political interference. Penpa Tsering, president of Tibet's government-in-exile, reinforced this stance clearly: "We not only strongly condemn the People's Republic of China's usage of reincarnation subject for their political gain and will never accept it," Tsering said. Zoom in At the heart of the Dalai Lama's succession plan is the Gaden Phodrang Trust, a non-profit organization established by the Dalai Lama himself in 2011. Registered in Dharamshala, where the Dalai Lama has resided since fleeing Tibet in 1959, the Trust oversees matters related to his spiritual duties. Members include senior Tibetan monks and close aides, with the Dalai Lama himself serving as its head. Senior Trust official Samdhong Rinpoche clarified that the future Dalai Lama could be of any gender and nationality, effectively broadening the potential locations and conditions for the reincarnation search. "They should accordingly carry out the procedures of search and recognition in accordance with past tradition," the Dalai Lama reiterated. The Gaden Phodrang Trust's role firmly sidelines any Chinese claim, marking a significant rejection of Beijing's authority. What they're saying China immediately rejected the Dalai Lama's claims, doubling down on its longstanding position that the Chinese government must have final approval. Chinese foreign ministry spokesperson Mao Ning reiterated at a press briefing: "The reincarnation of the Dalai Lama must adhere to the principles of domestic search in China and approval by the central government." China cites a Qing dynasty-era "golden urn" lottery method introduced in 1793 as justification for its involvement, framing it as essential to religious tradition. However, Tibetans widely view this claim as a pretext for political control. Penpa Tsering underscored this point, labeling China's intervention a violation of religious freedom and Tibetan sovereignty: "It is inappropriate for Chinese Communists, who reject religion, to meddle in the system of reincarnation of lamas, let alone that of the Dalai Lama." The intrigue The Dalai Lama's reincarnation question comes amid escalating geopolitical tensions between China and Western democracies, particularly the US, which has consistently criticized Beijing's human rights record, including in Tibet. US lawmakers have previously vowed not to allow China to influence the Dalai Lama's successor, passing legislation to back up their stance with potential sanctions against Chinese officials interfering in religious freedoms. While President Donald Trump's past statements about alliances like Nato have increased anxieties about US commitments abroad, the Tibetan issue remains a rare point of bipartisan consensus in the US, with both parties vowing to prevent Chinese interference. But China's economic power complicates this resistance. Few world leaders have met the Dalai Lama recently due to Chinese diplomatic pressure, with Barack Obama being the last US president to publicly host him in 2016. The Dalai Lama's insistence on reincarnation therefore is not only about Tibet's future, but a broader struggle over the ability of democratic nations to uphold human rights and religious freedoms in the face of Chinese pressure. What's next? The succession issue could intensify further in coming years, especially if rival Dalai Lamas emerge. While the Dalai Lama, currently in good health, intends to provide clear written instructions for his succession, no formal document exists yet. Chinese President Xi Jinping faces a strategic dilemma: aggressively enforcing a CCP-approved Dalai Lama risks escalating tensions with India and the West, while inaction could embolden Tibetan exiles and their supporters. China's insistence that the reincarnation must follow its laws and occur in China may be perceived as futile if the global Tibetan community rallies behind the trust's choice, forcing Xi to expend political capital to suppress dissent. Beijing may intensify diplomatic efforts to pressure nations into recognizing its eventual choice, leveraging economic and political ties. However, the EU has already stated publicly that it opposes government interference in religious succession processes, aligning itself indirectly with the Dalai Lama's position. A prolonged international dispute could lead to intensified activism by Tibetans abroad, potentially galvanizing a stronger push for Tibetan autonomy or even independence, especially among younger generations. As Penpa Tsering recently remarked to the Economist, 'If there's one thing China can't handle, it's unpredictability.'
