Students risk falling through ‘qualifications gap' under post-16 plans
A report by the Protect Student Choice campaign warned reducing student choice for post-16 qualifications risks 'reversing' progress in widening access to higher education and it could lead to more young people not in employment.
The coalition – which includes organisations representing students and staff in colleges and schools – is calling on the curriculum and assessment review to recommend 'reversing the ban on AGQ diplomas and extended diplomas in T-level areas' in its final report which is due to be published in the autumn.
AGQs are Level 3 qualifications, which include BTecs, for students who want to undertake a broad study of a specific vocational area.
In December, the Labour Government announced 157 vocational qualifications, which the previous Conservative administration had planned to remove funding from, would be retained beyond July this year until reformed qualifications become more established in the system.
Following a review of Level 3 qualifications that 'overlap' with T-levels, the Government said 57 qualifications in digital, construction and health and science would be funded until July 2026.
A further 100 qualifications in engineering, agriculture, business and creative would retain their funding until July 2027.
The first T-level courses – which are considered to be broadly equivalent to three A-levels – were launched in 2020 in England and they are being rolled out gradually.
Department for Education (DfE) guidance, published in February, has outlined plans to remove funding from 'large qualifications' in a number of T-level subject areas in the future.
An analysis from the Protect Student Choice campaign suggests there could be 52,000 fewer young people studying health and science courses each year if funding is removed for AGQs in this area, and it added that nearly 11,000 fewer young people could study digital courses each year.
It said more than 200,000 students are currently studying AGQs that are 'either being scrapped or have an uncertain future' which makes it 'difficult' for colleges and schools to plan their curriculum, recruit and train the right staff, or to provide appropriate guidance to younger pupils.
The report warned: 'We are deeply concerned that the Government's blanket ban on diplomas and extended diplomas will create a qualifications gap that tens of thousands of students will potentially fall through, leaving many young people without a suitable pathway in the future.'
Labour MP Gareth Snell, chairman of the All-Party Parliamentary Group on Sixth Form Education, said: 'Sixth forms and colleges up and down the country know the vital role that AGQs play in helping students to progress to higher education or skilled employment.
'Limiting the choice of qualification in certain subjects to T-levels will leave some young people without a suitable pathway at the age of 16, and some employers without the skilled workforce they need.'
Professor Martin Green, chief executive of Care England, said: 'Qualifications like the diploma and extended diploma in health and social care are highly valued by providers of adult social care in England as a source of introducing younger people to a career in social care.
'Scrapping these qualifications would close off a well-established pathway to entering the profession and exacerbate the workforce crisis in the care sector for a younger population we are keen to promote access to.'
Anne Murdoch, college leadership adviser at the Association of School and College Leaders (ASCL), said: 'We strongly urge the Government to retain these popular and valued applied general qualifications.
'We support the introduction of T-levels, but we do not understand why this must be at the expense of other tried and trusted vocational qualifications which work well for many students.
'At a time when we are seeing rising numbers of young people who are not in education, employment or training, it is surely essential that we provide a choice of post-16 pathways rather than narrowing their options and making matters worse.'
A DfE spokeswoman said: 'Through our plan for change we are building a skills system that will drive forward opportunity and deliver the growth that our economy needs.
'T-levels will be at the forefront of our technical education offer. Alongside them, newly reformed qualifications will become available for delivery at Level 3 at the start of the next academic year.
'These are high-quality, aligned to occupational standards in technical routes and offer learners clear routes to higher education or skilled employment.
'The department's position on further plans for reform to Level 3 qualifications will be set out soon, informed by the independent curriculum and assessment review.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
8 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Revealed: The councils pushing for a four-day week
Councils are increasingly pushing to let staff work a four-day week, analysis by The Telegraph has found. Five councils across the UK have publicly expressed interest in the overhaul, which would see council employees get full pay while working only 80 per cent of their usual hours. South Cambridgeshire became the first council to permanently adopt a four-day week last week, including for bin collectors, council tax administrators and social housing officials. Glasgow, Edinburgh, Belfast and Fermanagh and Omagh have also taken steps to explore the idea, such as launching feasibility studies or passing motions to investigate. All five councils have taken steps towards a four-day week while increasing council taxes, with hikes of between three per cent and eight per cent forced on locals last year. It is understood around 25 councils are also privately talking to the Four Day Week Foundation, the campaign pushing for the change. Elliot Keck, the head of campaigns at the TaxPayers' Alliance, a group that scrutinises government waste, said: 'Millions of local taxpayers still face the looming threat of a part-time council if these radical experiments are allowed to begin. ' Angela Rayner [the Communities Secretary] should immediately link central government funding to whether these trials go ahead. 'This would simply involve calculating the budgets of staffing bills at local authorities where the trials are taking place and reducing grants by an amount equal to one fifth of that budget.' Supporters of the four-day week claim it can deliver more efficient working and attract better candidates for jobs. Paul Holmes, the Conservative shadow housing minister, said: 'The residents are being short-changed by these councils. 'Despite paying for full levels of council tax – yet another tax that is rising under this Labour Government – residents are now getting part-time representation, with the councils seemingly more concerned with pursuing these mad ideologies than delivering the services local people need. 'The Conservatives have never tolerated this nonsense and will keep fighting to give the public the representation they deserve.' Nothing to stop councils When the Tories were in office, they attempted to order councils not to pursue four-day weeks in guidance the party issued in October 2023. One line in the guidance read: 'Councils which are undertaking four-day working week activities should cease immediately and others should not seek to pursue in any format.' But it is for councils, not the central Government, to decide whether to adopt the approach, meaning there is nothing strictly stopping local government leaders from making the change. South Cambridgeshire district council voted last week to become the first council in the UK to permanently adopt a four-day week for its staff. It described the new approach as staff carrying out '100 per cent of their work in around 80 per cent of their contracted hours without reduction in pay '. The vote made permanent a trial that has been running since 2023. Currently, 735 of the council employees are now on a four-day week, according to a council source. Four staff members have opted out of the change. South Cambridgeshire district council is run by the Liberal Democrats. An independent analysis cited by the council found that 21 out of 24 of its services improved or stayed the same during the trial period. However, a survey of residents looking at 13 services found that nine became worse under the scheme, four stayed the same and none improved during the trial. Council tax increases At least four other councils have taken steps to investigate a four-day week. The City of Edinburgh council passed a motion to explore the approach. Glasgow city council carried out a feasibility study, though no decision has been taken on its results. Belfast city council is considering launching a trial of the four-day week. Fermanagh and Omagh district council is talking to South Cambridgeshire to better understand the idea. All five councils, which run local services for a combined population of 1.8 million, increased council taxes – or the Northern Ireland equivalent – this year. The increases were 2.99 per cent (South Cambridgeshire), 3.76 per cent (Fermanagh and Omagh), 5.99 per cent (Belfast), 7.5 per cent (Glasgow), and eight per cent (Edinburgh). All five councils are also not currently run by the Tories or Reform UK, who have both been critics of the four-day working week. Edinburgh has a Labour council leader, Glasgow has an SNP minority administration, Belfast has no party in overall control, while the Fermanagh and Omagh district is run by Sinn Féin. Joe Ryle, the campaign director of the Four Day Week Foundation, said: 'As hundreds of British companies in the private sector have already shown, a four-day week with no loss of pay can be a win-win for both businesses and workers. 'The extremely positive results from the first council trial should be the catalyst for more councils across the country to modernise and transform their ways of working by adopting a four-day week. 'The five-day working week was invented 100 years ago and no longer suits the realities of modern life. We are long overdue an update.'
The Independent
37 minutes ago
- The Independent
Asylum seekers to lose housing and support if they refuse to move out of hotels
Asylum seekers who refuse to move out of hotels into new accommodation will have financial and housing support removed from them, the government has warned. The new crackdown has been ordered by Keir Starmer's government as it attempts to demonstrate it is taking action amid fears of a repeat of last year's summer riots, with violence already seen in Epping in Essex after the far right fuelled protests at an asylum hotel. But the move also appears to be an attempt to get to grips with the continuing small boats crisis on the Channel, with fears of record crossings this summer. The issue has been seen as a key reason why Nigel Farage's Reform UK is leading in the polls and taking votes away from Labour in their traditional heartlands. The announcement also comes amid a row over the language being used by senior Tory figures, which some fear is 'stoking division' and 'inciting violence'. The latest rant on social media came from shadow justice secretary Robert Jenrick, who many believe is positioning himself to be a rightwing candidate in a new leadership bid to replace Kemi Badenoch. In an inflammatory post on X, the former immigration minister took the side of protesters in Epping, saying: 'I don't want my young daughters to share a neighbourhood with men who broke into this country illegally and about whom we know next to nothing. 'And I don't want anyone else's family to have this forced on them either. 'When I see mothers and fathers peacefully protesting in Epping, I see decent, fair-minded people being pushed to breaking point.' The violence and protests in Epping, which have seen 16 arrested, broke out after accusations were made about asylum seekers sexually abusing local women. Mr Jenrick accused Sir Keir of 'being oblivious' to men pretending to be children to game the system, or migrants carrying guns and knives and, he claimed, security briefings suggesting that they pose a terrorist threat. 'It's high time Starmer took his head out the sand and listened to what communities are saying and experiencing. It's time he went and spoke to the law-abiding citizens who are being made to suffer the consequences of the failure to control our borders. Communities like Epping.' It came just 24 hours after it emerged that asylum seekers may be using payment cards intended for buying essentials for gambling. A Freedom of Information request made by PoliticsHome revealed more than 6,500 payments in gambling settings were attempted by asylum seekers in the past year, with shadow home secretary Chris Philp saying 'this madness has to end'. Meanwhile, fellow Tory MP Louie French took to X saying: 'Deport the migrants.' Mr Jenrick's outburst provoked a furious response from Labour. A Labour source said: 'Robert Jenrick was at the heart of a Conservative government that let the asylum system spiral into chaos. He had the power to act - and didn't. How dare he talk about a 'gutless elite' when for years he sat around the cabinet table and in the Home Office doing nothing? 'This Labour government is taking decisive action to regain control of our borders - cracking down on criminal gangs, clearing the asylum backlog, and ending the costly hotel use left behind by the Tories.' Among the measures to tackle the crisis is the government's new failure to travel policy which will be published today and is designed to tackle non-compliance by asylum seekers. It will ensure individuals who are moved from hotels to suitable alternative accommodation must take it. Those who refuse to move without a valid reason will now risk losing their housing and support. It is a firm but fair approach, aimed to end abuse of asylum support and contribute towards the closure of costly hotel accommodation. While the government has a duty to support all asylum seekers who would otherwise be destitute in appropriate accommodation, the new policy establishes clear consequences for those who game the system whilst protecting the vulnerable. At the peak of the crisis under the previous administration, 400 hotels were being used to accommodate asylum seekers, costing £9 million per day. The government made a clear commitment to end that practice, and is delivering. In the first three months of 2025 the number of asylum seekers in hotels fell by almost 6,000, a 15 per cent reduction since December. The number of hotels in use has now halved from its peak in 2023. Minister for Border Security and Asylum, Dame Angela Eagle, said: 'We inherited an asylum system on the brink of collapse - mismanaged, under strain, and costing the public a fortune. We are getting a grip. 'We are working to close hotels, restore order, and put fairness and value for money at the heart of our asylum system. This government is making those necessary decisions to protect the taxpayer and uphold the integrity of our borders. 'These reforms to the Failure to Travel policy are another example of this government's action to transform the asylum accommodation system and crack down on those who abuse our system, so it operates fairly and saves the taxpayer money.'
ITV News
37 minutes ago
- ITV News
A75 improvements: Dumfries and Galloway villages could be bypassed as £3m pledged
The UK Government has announced it is giving an extra £3.45m to the Scottish Government to look at improvements to the A75 in Dumfries and Galloway. The Scottish Secretary says it means the UK Government is providing the "full" funding for the feasibility study to consider bypassing two villages on the road. The A75, which is a primary trunk road in Scotland, connects Stranraer and ferry ports at Cairnryan to the M6 and A74(M) at Gretna. It serves as a crucial route for traffic heading between Northern Ireland, England, and the rest of Scotland, particularly for those using the ferries to Northern Ireland. It is largely single-carriageway, which can lead to congestion, and longstanding safety concerns. In 2023, the then Conservative government at Westminster announced it would provide £8m for the research into upgrading the A75. After Labour won the general election, they announced at the Budget in October 2024 they would provide up to £5m towards the study. They say today's funding comes "on top" of that. John Cooper, the Conservative MP for Dumfries and Galloway, wrote on social media: "After a lot of scaremongering from the SNP, the [UK government] confirms what the previous administration committed to." Decisions over transport are devolved to Holyrood, and any work to complete improvements to the road would likely have to come out of the Scottish Government's budget. Transport Scotland, the Scottish Government's transport agency, said they recognise the "strategic importance" of the A75 and have completed six major improvement projects on the road, but face "significant pressures" on their budget for infrastructure. Today's announcement is part of £66m announced by the Chancellor for Scottish transport improvements. The UK Government describes the A75 as a "key road... vital to UK connectivity and growing the economy." On the topic, Scottish Secretary Ian Murray said: "the A75 is strategically important just not within but beyond Scotland. Its upgrading is long overdue. I am pleased that the UK Government has stepped up to fund the delivery of the A75 feasibility study in full. "This investment is yet another example of how the UK Government is building the foundations for a stronger, more prosperous future that benefits communities right across Scotland." Transport Scotland says: 'The strategic importance of both the A75 and A77 to Scotland's economy is recognised by this Government. We value the critical link they provide to the wider markets in the rest of the UK and Europe by connecting the ports at Cairnryan to the wider trunk road network. 'Ministers have chaired the Convention of South of Scotland discussion on transport, met the Leaders of Dumfries and Galloway and South Ayrshire Councils, had a roundtable discussion with campaigners calling for road improvements to the A75 and A77 in Girvan, and also extended an offer to form a 'South West Scotland Roads – Focus Group'. The purpose of this group is to improve the flow of information with the campaign groups and wider stakeholders, and look at longer term strategic investment for both the A75 and A77. 'In terms of the A75 we have completed six major roads improvement projects with a total value of over £50 million. While the UK Autumn Budget marked a step in the right direction, it does not make up for fourteen years of underinvestment – austerity cannot be undone in one year. We are still facing significant pressures on our capital budget, which is significantly affecting our ability to maintain investment on all of Scotland's transport infrastructure. 'Additionally, we have wasted no time in progressing the design and assessment work to consider options for realigning the A75 trunk road at the villages of Springholm and Crocketford." This comes weeks after campaigners in Dumfries and Galloway expressed frustration that no money was announced for the A75 in the UK Government's spending review. At the time, Springholm and Crocketford residents said this was an opportunity to commit project funding, and were disappointed both the UK Government and the Scottish Government hadn't dedicated money to feasibility study.
