&w=3840&q=100)
Was Rising Lion's history in Iran behind Netanyahu naming Israel's operation?
Israel's latest military offensive against Iran, named 'Operation Rising Lion' has drawn attention not only for its strategic objectives but also for its symbolic messaging, particularly its historical resonance with Iran's monarchical past.
According to Israeli media reports confirmed by officials, the name was chosen to echo the 'Lion and Sun' emblem. This centuries-old symbol represented Iran during the Qajar and Pahlavi dynasties. Known in Persian as Shir o Khorshid, the emblem featured prominently on Iran's national flag until the Islamic Revolution of 1979, when it was replaced by a new insignia aligned with the Islamic Republic's ideological identity.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
In a post on X (formerly Twitter) on Tuesday, Israel's official Persian-language account appeared to underscore the symbolic intent behind the operation's name. The post featured imagery referencing the imperial Lion and Sun emblem associated with Iran's former Pahlavi dynasty, accompanied by the Persian caption: 'The rise of the lions for the victory of light over darkness.'
خیزش شیران برای پیروزی نور بر تاریکی. pic.twitter.com/73Wp1gh2LI — اسرائیل به فارسی (@IsraelPersian) June 17, 2025
The emblem historically combined the lion symbolising strength and courage, with the sun, representing power and divine glory. It became emblematic of the Persian monarchy and Shi'a Islam, before being discarded by the post-revolutionary regime.
By referencing this lost royal iconography, Israeli officials appear to be sending a message that goes beyond military force. Analysts suggest that the operation's name serves as psychological warfare, reminding Iran's leadership of its pre-revolutionary identity and appealing, perhaps, to internal divisions between regime loyalists and those nostalgic for the monarchy.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
While the Israeli government has not issued an official explanation, the choice of name is widely interpreted as a calculated move that infuses historical symbolism into an escalating conflict between two regional adversaries.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
Will AI take over your child's classroom?
'Selfish Hamas': US, Israel Spring A 'Surprise' By Cutting Short Gaza Truce-Hostage Release Talks Efforts to secure a long-awaited ceasefire and hostage release in Gaza have hit a fresh roadblock, as both Israel and the United States recalled their negotiators from Doha. The talks, underway since July 6, aimed to facilitate a 60-day ceasefire in exchange for the release of 10 living Israeli hostages and the bodies of 18 others, alongside a reciprocal release of Palestinian prisoners. U.S. Special Envoy Steve Witkoff called Hamas' latest response 'selfish', stating the group was not acting in good faith. His remarks were echoed in Washington and Jerusalem, though both nations clarified that negotiations had not collapsed. Israeli officials insisted that this was not a crisis, but rather a moment of 'evidence of Hamas' rejectionist approach.' In response, Hamas condemned Witkoff's comments, calling them 'negative' and 'untrue.' In an official statement, the group claimed its proposal was made in consultation with Palestinian factions and had been welcomed by other mediators, reaffirming its commitment to ending hostilities. Amid these diplomatic tensions, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu warned Hamas that any misinterpretation of Israel's openness as weakness would be a grave mistake. 'We are determined to bring everyone back,' he declared. Watch. 1.3K views | 3 hours ago
Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
Iran To Launch Longer War Against Israel? IRGC Commander Spills The Beans
'Selfish Hamas': US, Israel Spring A 'Surprise' By Cutting Short Gaza Truce-Hostage Release Talks Efforts to secure a long-awaited ceasefire and hostage release in Gaza have hit a fresh roadblock, as both Israel and the United States recalled their negotiators from Doha. The talks, underway since July 6, aimed to facilitate a 60-day ceasefire in exchange for the release of 10 living Israeli hostages and the bodies of 18 others, alongside a reciprocal release of Palestinian prisoners. U.S. Special Envoy Steve Witkoff called Hamas' latest response 'selfish', stating the group was not acting in good faith. His remarks were echoed in Washington and Jerusalem, though both nations clarified that negotiations had not collapsed. Israeli officials insisted that this was not a crisis, but rather a moment of 'evidence of Hamas' rejectionist approach.' In response, Hamas condemned Witkoff's comments, calling them 'negative' and 'untrue.' In an official statement, the group claimed its proposal was made in consultation with Palestinian factions and had been welcomed by other mediators, reaffirming its commitment to ending hostilities. Amid these diplomatic tensions, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu warned Hamas that any misinterpretation of Israel's openness as weakness would be a grave mistake. 'We are determined to bring everyone back,' he declared. Watch. 979 views | 2 hours ago
Hindustan Times
2 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
Gazans Are Finished With Hamas
While most of Gaza continues to suffer under the ongoing war between Hamas and Israel, things are very different for thousands living in eastern Rafah—for us, the war is already over. The Popular Forces, an independent Palestinian group under my leadership, have secured several square kilometers of land that have been home to my Bedouin tribe, the Tarabin, for generations. We aren't an ideological movement, but a pragmatic one. Our primary goal is to separate Palestinians who have nothing to do with Hamas from the fire of war. For the past seven weeks, our neighborhood has become the only area in Gaza governed by a Palestinian administration not affiliated with Hamas since 2007. Our armed patrols have successfully kept Hamas and other militant groups out. As a result, life here no longer feels like life in Gaza. In eastern Rafah, people have access to shelter, food, water, and basic medical supplies—all without fear of Hamas stealing aid or being caught in the crossfire with the Israeli military. The effect has been tremendous: no more airstrike casualties, no chaotic aid lines, no evacuation orders, and no fear of booby-trapped homes or children being used as human shields by Hamas. While there is still much to improve, people now sleep at night without fear of death. This should not be the exception in Gaza—it can be the model, the new norm. The vast majority of Gazans reject Hamas. They don't want it to remain in power after the war ends. But though they hate Hamas, they still fear it. Since protests began earlier this year calling for the group's removal, demonstrators have been killed, tortured or forced into hiding. My own family didn't take part in those protests, but when Hamas killed my brother, Fathi Abu Shabab, and my cousin, Ibrahim Abu Shabab, for trying to secure aid for our family—and when 52 civilians under our care were murdered in their homes—I realized that silence is no longer an option. If we remain quiet now, we will never be free, cease-fire or not. This may be our only chance to secure a future that rejects violence and embraces reason. What has prevented most Gazans from expressing their true anger at Hamas is the lack of a viable alternative. Hamas still controls aid access and dominates institutions like the U.N. Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East, or Unrwa. Hamas still turns aid centers into hubs for its own operations. In some areas, the only thing preventing people from fleeing is the presence of Israeli troops, which might withdraw as part of a cease-fire. No one else has been willing to step up and risk publicly breaking with Hamas. Those fears lost their meaning for me after my brother and cousin were murdered. Hamas has labeled me a criminal and collaborator, but I am not intimidated by them. I won't surrender. Through our efforts, we have shown a glimpse of what a new Gaza could look like. We have already received requests from many families to relocate to eastern Rafah. With proper support, we are ready to take responsibility for the rest of Rafah. Within months, more than 600,000 people—nearly a third of Gaza's population—could be living outside the cycle of war. We need only three things to make this vision a reality: financial support to prevent Hamas's return, humanitarian aid to meet the population's immediate needs for food and shelter, and safe corridors so people can move around. In a short time, we could transform most of Gaza from a war zone into functioning communities. When the rebuilding has begun, Hamas can negotiate with Israel for the release of hostages in exchange for safe passage out of Gaza. Let them go to Qatar, Turkey or wherever their enablers will have them. We don't want them among us. What comes next for Gaza must be determined by the people themselves, a choice we have been denied for nearly two decades. For now, our focus remains on saving as many lives as possible and laying the foundations for a better future. On behalf of the overwhelming majority of Palestinians in Gaza, the Popular Forces call on the U.S. and Arab countries formally to recognize and support an independent Palestinian administration under our leadership. From eastern Rafah—where families now sleep safely under civil protection—I can see Gaza's future. The question is: Will the world help build it with us, free from the ideologies of violence and terror? Mr. Shabab is commander of the Popular Forces in Gaza.
