Sexual orientation question to appear on census for first time in 2026
While Statistics Canada has asked about sexual orientation in past surveys, next year will mark the first time the question will appear on the long-form census questionnaire that will go out to 25 per cent of Canadian residents in May 2026.
The questions will not be included in the short-form census that goes out to 75 per cent of Canadian residents.
The long-form census will also feature questions about homelessness and health problems for the first time.
The questions for the census, which is conducted every five years, were approved by Prime Minister Mark Carney's cabinet on June 13. Most of them touch on the usual census topics such as the ethnic background of respondents and their families, education, housing, employment, citizenship and languages spoken.
While Canadians are required by law to fill out the questionnaires, their answers remain confidential. They're used to produce statistics about Canada's population and often help inform where services are needed across the country.
The question will provide a more complete picture of where people of different sexual orientations live across the country, and their socioeconomic backgrounds.
The questions to be asked in next year's census include a respondent's sex at birth, with the option to select male or female. Respondents are also asked to provide their gender, with the option to choose man (or boy), woman (or girl) or write in their own answer.
The census questionnaire also provides a definition of gender to guide respondents.
"Gender refers to an individual's personal and social identity as a man (or boy), a woman (or a girl) or a person who is not exclusively a man (or a boy) or a woman (or a girl) for example, non-binary, agender, gender fluid, queer or two-spirit."
Question 36, which is only to be asked for those aged 15 years and older, asks directly about sexual orientation, explaining that the information is being collected "to inform programs that promote equal opportunity for everyone living in Canada to share in its social, cultural and economic life."
Respondents can choose between "heterosexual (i.e. straight), lesbian or gay, bisexual or pansexual" or write in their own answer.
Sébastien Larochelle-Côté, director general of socioeconomic statistics and social data integration for Statistics Canada, says the question of sexual orientation was identified as a data gap about Canada's population in consultations leading up to the census questionnaire.
"That's the primary reason why we are including sexual orientation in the census of population," Larochelle-Côté said.
He said this will also allow the census data to be paired with information about transgender and non-binary people in Canada that the agency has been collecting through separate surveys.
"We'll be able to get insights about the 2SLGBTQ+ population as a whole. And so that, in our view, is going to be providing very, very insightful information."
Larochelle-Côté said the answers will also help inform government decision-making.
"We know that sexual orientation has been identified as a motive of discrimination by the Canadian Human Rights Act," he said. "We know as well that there is a federal task force that recommended the 2SLGBTQ+ population as an equity group … we wanted to move with the times."
Larochelle-Côté said other countries like the United Kingdom, Australia and New Zealand also ask about sexual orientation in their censuses, but he said it has not yet been asked in the United States, which conducts a census every 10 years.
Information about homelessness in Canada is another information gap that Statistics Canada is hoping to fill. It also comes as the federal government has vowed to increase home-building across the country.
Larochelle-Côté said Statistics Canada won't be able to reach those who are currently homeless on May 12, 2026, because the questionnaire is sent to homes and collective dwellings. But it will provide more information about people who have been homeless.
The first question will ask whether a respondent "stayed in a shelter, on the street or in parks, in a makeshift shelter, in a vehicle or in an abandoned building" over the previous 12 months. The second will ask whether a respondent has lived temporarily with friends, family or others over the previous 12 months because they had nowhere else to live.
Larochelle-Côté said the answers to those questions will shed light on where people are experiencing homelessness and can be cross-referenced with the socioeconomic characteristics of a respondent from the answers to other census questions.
"We'll be able to have a better understanding of who is most at risk of experiencing homelessness," he said.
Next year's census will also include new questions about the health of respondents, including whether the respondent has difficulty seeing, hearing, walking using stairs or using their hands or fingers. It will ask respondents if they have difficulty learning, remembering or concentrating, whether they have emotional, psychological or mental health conditions as well as whether they have other health problems or long-term conditions that have lasted or are expected to last for six months or more.
The census will include a general question about how the respondent rates their health.
This will help "better predict the demand for health-care services across the country, down to the lowest level of geography possible," said Larochelle-Côté.
While similar questions have been asked in other surveys, Larochelle-Côté said this will be the first time they are asked in the Canadian census.
Details of next year's census will be made public on July 4.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
N.S. premier must keep focus on remedy plan for people with disabilities: advocates
HALIFAX — An advocacy group says Nova Scotia's premier should make a five-year plan to overhaul housing and care of people with disabilities a major policy priority. On Friday, an independent monitor said the province had notable delays in delivering new programs and services, two years into the legally mandated program to move people with disabilities out of institutions and off wait-lists. In a new release, the Disability Rights Coalition says Tim Houston's office needs to improve co-operation among key departments that support people moving from large facilities into community. The monitor's report says this co-operation is crucial in setting up mental health support programs and rapid response teams to cope with issues that may arise during the transitions. In 2021, the coalition won an Appeal Court decision that identified systemic discrimination against people with disabilities seeking housing and supports in the community. A human rights board of inquiry subsequently created a list of reforms required to address the province's shortcomings, with annual reports on progress by University of Victoria professor Michael Prince. This report by The Canadian Press was first published Aug. 5, 2025. The Canadian Press
%3Amax_bytes(150000)%3Astrip_icc()%2FTAL-us-visa-passport-USBONDVISA0825-3455f61a288c4cf1be34ff4905c9ce44.jpg&w=3840&q=100)
Travel + Leisure
2 hours ago
- Travel + Leisure
The U.S. Is Proposing a Visa Bond of Up to $15,000 for Travelers—What to Know
Potential travelers to the U.S. need to be aware of a new proposed travel visa scheme that might require them to put up $15,000. The U.S. Department of State recently announced a proposed 12-month long visa bond pilot program that could apply to leisure and business travelers who are applying for visas from countries that have high visa overstay rates, according to the State Department. The program would require travelers seeking visas to potentially post a bond of $5000 to $15,000, as well as to travel to specific US airports as their port of entry, which will be announced at a later date. Countries that are part of the Visa Waiver Program, including Canada and Mexico, will be exempt for the bond pilot program. A similar program was set to be implemented in November 2020 during the first Trump administration, but was never fully implemented due to the slowdown in travel during the COVID-19 pandemic. 'By its design and intention, the Pilot Program is a tool of diplomacy, intended to encourage foreign governments to take immediate action to reduce the overstay rates of their nationals when traveling to the United States for temporary visits, and to encourage countries to improve screening and vetting and the security of travel and civil documents, including in the granting of citizenship,' the State Department statement says. 'As such, the rule properly is described as a key pillar of the Trump Administration's foreign policy to protect the United States from the clear national security threat posed by visa overstays and deficient screening and vetting.' If travelers are required to post a bond, the funds will be returned if they leave the U.S. as required by the terms of their visas. At the moment, it is unclear which countries will be affected by the pilot program, though some countries with high rates of overstays are also on the list of countries affected by Trump's travel ban. 'The Department, through consular officers, has broad authority to require a visa applicant to post a bond in such sum and with such conditions as would help ensure the alien's timely departure from the United States,' the Department of State said in a statement. 'During the course of the visa interview, a consular officer will determine if an applicant is otherwise eligible for a visa, and if the applicant falls within the scope of the Pilot Program. If the applicant falls within the scope of the Pilot Program, the consular officer will inform the applicant of the bond requirement and the amount of the required bond, whether $5,000, $10,000, or $15,000.'
Skift
3 hours ago
- Skift
'Never Seen a Drop Like This:' U.S. Politics Drive Meeting Attendees Away
The sharp decline in global attendance at a recent international medical congress is more than a one-off, it's a red flag. As political rhetoric escalates, the U.S. is becoming a less viable destination for truly international meetings. Attendance at the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis Congress in Washington, D.C. this June fell well below expectations, a warning to organizers who rely on the U.S. as a global meetings hub. The group expected 6,000 attendees, but just 4,500 showed up. Canadian participation alone plummeted 55% from the 2023 meeting in Montreal, while attendance from the UK, France, and the Netherlands was down nearly 30%. An additional 500 U.S.-based registrants was not enough to compensate for the decline in international participation. 'We have never seen a drop like this,' said Thomas Reiser, executive director of ISTH. 'Our numbers are very low for a truly international congress.' In total, 55% of attendees came from outside the U.S., a drop from the typical 75%. U.S. Political Climate a Deterrent A mix of factors drove the decline, said Reiser. The biggest was a growing discomfort with the U.S. political environment. In addition, some European countries as well as Canada have issued advisories for travelers to the U.S., and some international scientific organizations have recommended against sending researchers to the U.S., said Resier. 'U.S. politics, more so than geopolitics, although the Middle East conflict also played a role, particularly with the U.S.'s greater involvement in the weeks before the congress had an impact. We received information from quite a few members in particular, Canada, the UK, and Western Europe, typically some of the strongest membership and registration countries, that either they themselves did not feel comfortable attending or their institutions had travel advisories, including recommendations not to go to the U.S.,' said Reiser. Although actual travel and border entry went smoothly for those who attended, perception damage had already been done. 'Media reports about possible questioning, detentions, and refusal of entry into the U.S. did not help,' he said. Revenue Takes a Hit The consequences are not just a decline in attendees. 'We heard from several participants, exhibitors, and sponsors that they would have expected higher numbers overall,' said Reiser. 'With an overall reduction in numbers of an estimated 20 to 25%, this of course has a significant financial impact on the meeting and the society. This may also have a bit of an impact on future congresses, if sponsors and exhibitors believe our registration numbers are closer to 4,500 than 6,000.' Next year's meeting will be in Paris. The 2027 meeting, which should be in North America due to event rotation, is under review. 'We're in the midst of considering whether the U.S. is the right destination for an international meeting like ours,' Reiser said. 'It's an unfortunate situation. The way the U.S. is perceived is having a real impact in the scientific space.'
