logo
The C-Word: Let's talk about cancer – starting with my own.

The C-Word: Let's talk about cancer – starting with my own.

Boston Globe01-05-2025
The following is a lightly edited transcript of the May 1 episode of the 'Say More' podcast.
Shirley Leung:
Welcome to 'Say More' from Boston Globe Opinion. I'm Shirley Leung. This is the first episode of our series, 'The C-Word: Stories of Cancer.'
When I was diagnosed with cancer, it's like I was waiting for it my entire life.
Because when I was 12, my mom's mom, my Wai Po, died of breast cancer. I watched my chubby cheeked grandma waste away after chemotherapy and a double mastectomy.
She, like me, had been diagnosed with breast cancer in her forties, but unlike me, she didn't have the advantage of early detection in the 1970s. There were no annual mammograms. She found the lump herself, and by then, the cancer had spread.
Wai Po was only 55 when she passed away in 1984. She had fled Mao Zedong's communist China, but couldn't outrun cancer.
Back then it was like the Dark Ages. A diagnosis felt like a death sentence.
A 1979 photo of Shirley Leung (l) when she was 7 years old with her grandmother at Longwood Gardens in Pennsylvania.
Handout/Kam-Ken Leung
For the next month on 'Say More,' we'll be sharing stories of cancer, starting with my own. Some of these stories end in tragedy, some lead to new beginnings. When my cancer journey started, I didn't know whether I was headed for death or a new start.
For now, I'm fully cured, but in some ways I'll never quite get over cancer.
I'm in the studio with 'Say More' producer Anna Kusmer.
Anna Kusmer:
I remember the first time you told me you had cancer, we were having dinner together and you mentioned it sort of offhand, and I was really intrigued.
I was like, 'I've known Shirley for a while now and I didn't know this about her.'
I had a million questions, but I didn't know if it was okay to just grill you about it. Over time I did hear more of your story. How long has it been since your cancer diagnosis and what kind did you have?
Leung:
So it's been eight years since my successful treatment.
I had early-stage breast cancer. Mine was caught by an annual mammogram. It was stage one; I had a single side mastectomy. My left breast is gone now, and I have an implant. I had five years of a drug called Tamoxifen. It's a type of hormone therapy that reduces the chances of my cancer coming back.
Kusmer:
So you write a lot about your personal life in your columns but you've never written about your cancer. Why did you wait so long to talk publicly about this?
Leung:
When I was first diagnosed, I thought about writing about it. Between my diagnosis and my first surgery, I was thinking about doing it and I got this really good advice from somebody who said, 'Don't write about it now, you are going to be going through so much surgery and a diagnosis. You need to focus on your treatment.'
That was the best advice I got during that period because I would later learn that it took me probably two years until I stopped thinking about cancer every single day. And to stop thinking about the idea that I might die of cancer.
Kusmer:
Can you take me back to eight years ago when you first found out you had cancer? What were those first couple days like?
Leung:
I was about 45 years old and I just had my annual mammogram. I got a call back saying, 'I think we want to call you back. Can you do another mammogram?'
So I came back and then they said, 'Oh, we want you to have a biopsy now.'
So I went in for a biopsy and they took two biopsies in two different places in my left breast. Then I had to wait. It was actually very excruciating to wait. I think from my first mammogram to my biopsy result, it was probably almost three or four weeks, and I was kind of in limbo.
And I remember, I got a call from the doctor's office.
Kusmer:
You were at work, right?
Leung:
I was at work.
I'm thinking, 'Well, I must not have cancer. Who calls you up and tells you over the phone that you have cancer?' So it was almost a relief that the doctor's office called.
But no, I learned that no, they actually do give you your cancer diagnosis over the phone.
Kusmer:
Oh my God.
Leung:
And I couldn't believe it. So I'm sitting in the office at the Boston Globe. It was literally the week that we were moving from our old headquarters on Morrissey Boulevard in Dorchester into 53 State Street, here. So it was a pretty empty newsroom. I'm unpacking my boxes. I'm trying to file a
It was like my world stopped. It was just like all those movies where you're told you have cancer or, some horrible thing and you know, the world, the room was just like spinning.
Once the nurse on the other line said ,'You have cancer,' I just stopped listening. I couldn't even understand what she was saying. I have no idea what she said after that. I just knew I had to get off the phone and call my husband right away.
Kusmer:
So what kind of breast cancer did you have?
Leung:
So I had something called Ductal carcinoma in Situ (DCIS). It's the kind of breast cancer you wanna have, as my doctor was explaining to me. It's both very treatable and beatable. It's a kind of cancer that's supposed to stay in the breast, which means it's not supposed to break out and spread throughout your body.
But I had very aggressive tumors, and if left untreated, it probably would've become invasive. My prognosis was good, but having cancer, it's like a series of cliffhangers. You get diagnosed, then you meet with a lot of different doctors. Then you go through surgery, there's more biopsies. They're trying to figure out if it spread.
Not only did they take my left breast, but they took the first lymph node to just make sure the cancer had not spread. And then after that, I didn't have to do chemo. I didn't have to do radiation. But I did have to take five years of a drug called Tamoxifen, and that prevents cancer from recurring, because now they're concerned about my right breast. So they're making sure it doesn't come back.
Kusmer:
So you didn't come out publicly about your cancer for understandable reasons, but who did you tell? Did you tell your little kids that you had cancer?
Leung:
It wasn't hard telling my kids. They were only four and six. They had no idea what cancer was or what it could do.
Of course I told friends and colleagues about my diagnosis, but the hardest conversation was with my mom. And that surprised me. I actually think I waited a bit to tell her.
That's because her mom died of breast cancer and I'm a mom now, and if one of my kids called me up and said 'I have cancer,' it would've crushed me. And so I didn't want to break her heart, telling her that her daughter has breast cancer just like her mom.
Leung as a young girl with her grandmother in New York City's Chinatown in an undated photo.
Photo by Lou Chen
Kusmer:
So how did that conversation go with your mom?
Leung:
It was a hard conversation. I remember she had called me about something else. I think we were talking about summer vacation plans and then I blurted out I can't do any of that because I have cancer. And we both just started crying. I have very vivid memories of that call.
When doing this series, I was curious what my mom remembered of that call. We actually never talked about it.
Kusmer:
Your mom who lives in California, we connected with her via Zoom. We wanted to see what she remembered.
Leung (recording of call to mom):
Hello. Ma?
Leung's mom:
Hello. In the office, is it now your home?
Leung:
Yeah, in my office.
She was really nervous, Anna. She must really love me if she was willing to go on my podcast
Kusmer:
She told us a little bit about her memory of the call.
Leung:
Do you remember that day? When I gave you a call?
Leung's Mom:
Yeah. It was morning time. I was shocked, crying. 'Why do you have cancer? You are so young.'
'It's people my age who have cancer, not your age.'
Leung:
I asked my mom if she was scared about me having cancer.
Leung's mom:
Of course. Scared. And sad, very sad.
Leung:
Why were you sad?
Leung's mom (translated by Leung):
Your kids are so young and if they lost their mother, the family would be broken.
Leung:
I asked my mom if she was really nervous for me because her own mother had died of breast cancer, and I was really surprised by her answer.
Leung's mom:
My mom had breast cancer so long ago, 40 years ago, and there are so many advances in medicine and treatment.
Leung as a young girl with her grandmother in front of her home in Jackson Heights, New York in an undated photo.
Photo by Lou Chen
Leung:
My mom knew, I think deep down, that I'm not going to be my grandmother.
Anna, you and I went to Dana-Farber. I hadn't been to Dana-Farber Cancer Institute until I had my cancer. Had you been to Dana-Farber?
Kusmer:
I've definitely heard of Dana-Farber. The Jimmy Fund, a philanthropic wing of Dana-Farber loomed extremely large in my childhood. I remember every time we'd go to the movies, there'd be buckets passed around to raise money for the Jimmy Fund.
So I've always been aware of this world class cancer institution in Boston, but I've never been inside and it was really interesting to go there with you.
Leung (clip from Dana-Farber visit):
All right, so we're outside Dana-Farber. This is the main building, right?
Leung:
I called it the Four Seasons of Hospitals because it's just so welcoming, but also it's very sobering being in there because some of the people there are very sick.
Kusmer:
When you first walk in there, there's really high ceilings. Tons of light coming in through the atrium. It does look like a hotel lobby. And the juxtaposition between that and what you know about it, it's mostly full of cancer patients, those two things together makes you feel like this is a place of great purpose and importance.
Leung:
I think purpose is the right word. Often when we talk about cancer, we talk about it as the war on cancer, right? You do feel like this is a place where you are on the front lines of fighting cancer and you have doctors and nurses and staff and researchers helping you battle cancer.
Leung (clip from Dana-Farber visit):
There's this garden, serene garden, and I remember sometimes you can come in here, it's a healing garden. You don't see this in other hospitals.
Kusmer:
One place we went to together was this indoor garden. I've never seen that in a hospital before. Did you go there when you were getting treatment?
Leung:
I did. I did because it's such a special place. Maybe you're waiting in between appointments or before your appointment. After an appointment, you go into this garden and you have these benches and it's warm and it's sunlit and you can just sit there and meditate. As much as cancer is a physical disease, it's also a mind game.
Kusmer:
It seems like this garden is a physical representation of the fact that it's not just the physical biological support you need in this journey. You also need these other supports like spiritual places to contemplate your life.
Leung:
It's something my oncologist, Ann Partridge, seemed to really get.
Kusmer:
Actually right after the garden, we went to see her.
Leung (clip from Dana-Farber visit):
You look good.
Ann Partridge:
Thank you, my friend. How about you? How are you?
Kusmer:
Tell me a bit about Dr. Partridge. Why did you choose her? What did you like about her?
Leung:
Her specialty is dealing with younger women who have breast cancer. I think the average age of a woman who gets breast cancer in the US is in her early sixties, and so her specialty is women in their twenties, thirties, and early forties.
She said she was inspired to work with younger women with breast cancer because of a friend of hers who was diagnosed when she was 30.
Partridge:
She presented with a lump and sure enough, it was breast cancer.
What that did do, at a tender young age for me, was open my eyes to some of the things that the medical community doesn't focus on.
So you're focusing on the disease and what treatment do they need? What surgery do they need? Should we give them chemo or not? And she was also grappling with starting to date a guy. 'When do I tell him?'
'And what kind of camisole do I get if I choose to have a mastectomy? And when can I do the reconstruction?'
And things that, kind of as a doctor, you're like, 'Talk to the nurses. Go to the boutique.'
But when you are either a patient or you're close enough to a patient, when they're sharing those things, you're like, 'Oh, what's she going to do?'
We don't know any of this stuff. And more importantly, how is she going to feel in a couple of years as the dust settles with her decisions, decisions about fertility, decisions about reconstruction. So there's a whole Pandora's box that gets opened for our youngest patients, especially that there wasn't as much research to tell us what to think about her future risks, let alone how to counsel her.
So that's an area that we focused on a lot to try and bring more information to the table as people are making these difficult decisions.
Kusmer:
One thing that I really liked about Dr. Partridge is that it seems like she took listening to her patients and really understanding her patients to be one of her biggest jobs besides the technical work of treating cancer, like understanding what their values were in life, what their fears were, and truly trying to get patients to open up to her about these really deep life or death questions. That doesn't seem like every type of doctor would have to wrestle with that.
Partridge:
I see it as, 'What can I do to make this better for this person?'
That's true for everybody that I take care of. How can I make their journey better? I find that as both an extraordinary privilege and responsibility because in order to help make a person's journey better, whether they have low-risk early-stage breast cancer, or they're living with an advanced disease, you have to get to know that person.
And that's part of what pulled me into cancer, breast cancer specifically, because it's a long haul journey. Even when they're ultimately going to die of the disease, we often can get them on a treatment that contains it for some time. So to me, that was part of the compelling draw, to take care of patients who are dealing with something very serious. Each bring their own unique gifts and baggage to it, so you can help to get to know them and take care of them and hopefully make their journey better.
Leung:
Ann, and other oncologists that we talked to for this series, so much of their focus was on quality of life. It wasn't about, 'We are going to do everything possible to kill the cancer, even if it almost kills the patient.'
I feel like before it was one size fits all for cancer treatment, and now it's like, 'No, we can customize your treatment so you don't lose all your hair or you don't lose both breasts.'
The advances are about allowing people to live better and fuller lives. It's not just about survival.
Kusmer:
Dr. Partridge also talked a lot about the mental health journey of the cancer patient. She said even mental health experts with cancer struggle.
Partridge:
I had a patient this past year, who is a psychiatrist. During a forum, she said, 'I'm a psychiatrist. I teach people how to cope. And all of my usual coping mechanisms are not working.'
And that's not an uncommon phenomenon.
Kusmer:
So one thing that surprised me, Shirley, is that you mentioned earlier that you weren't exactly relieved when you found out that you were cancer free. Can you explain that?
Leung:
Yeah, I was surprised, too.
After surgery they test the lymph node so that they know if I am definitely going to beat this cancer. And the doctors are eager, actually to declare you cancer free. And as a cancer patient, I mean, those are the magic words you wanna hear. You are waiting for that moment.
And yet I didn't feel cancer free because there's another C-word. Cured. And that can land just as hard.
And, I found out, it's just as complicated. And I remember talking to Dr. Partridge about, 'Why don't I feel better? Why don't I feel relieved? This was supposed to be amazing.'
She was the one that suggested, I see a therapist and Dana-Farber has a therapist who specializes with cancer patients. And so I went to see a therapist for the first time.
Kusmer:
So what did you learn?
Leung:
Well, I learned that it was pretty common for patients to feel this way. I also learned that I still equated cancer with death because of my grandmother's death, and I needed to be reminded that I am not my grandmother. It was hard for me to relax because of cancer.
And it was like having a ticking time bomb inside me. And I mean, how many of us know people who beat cancer only for it to return with a vengeance? And I was like, is that going to be me? And I didn't want to jinx it. I didn't want to think that I'd actually beat cancer.
Kusmer:
So one of the themes of this series is the ways that people who have cancer are treated differently once they do come out and tell people.
How did you feel about the way people talked to you and treated you and kind of talked about your cancer while you were going through it?
Leung:
In the beginning it was awkward. Still to this day, some people still ask me, 'How's your health?' And I'm thinking, 'It's been eight years.'
It comes from a good place, right? That they want to recognize that you had cancer, and it was a tough period for you. So I appreciate it. But you are treated differently. People won't talk to you the same way.
And it can be a little awkward now because so much of the narrative around cancer is like, 'You are a survivor. You are a warrior.' And I didn't feel like either one of those.
I felt lucky, really lucky, that I had a very treatable and beatable cancer. Yes, I had this major surgery, but as cancer goes, it was pretty good. But you can see that cancer has done something to my mind because it's taken me eight years to finally really talk about it.
Kusmer:
So how do you think having cancer changed you as a person?
Leung:
I wish I could say it's made me Mother Theresa.
When I'm having a bad day or if I'm fighting with my kids or they're upsetting me, I do think, 'Hey, I'm just really glad I'm still here and I can live through these moments.'
I also saw, and I think every cancer patient will tell you this, I saw the humanity.
I had so many friends, colleagues, and also, people I barely know who came out of the woodwork to support me, to bring me meals, to babysit my kids. I just saw a side of humanity that made me really hopeful and optimistic. And now when other people have cancer or go through some really tough period, I'm there for them.
Kusmer:
So your little boys from earlier in your story, that 4-year-old and 6-year-old, they aren't so little anymore. I think they're what, 12 and 14 now?
Leung:
They're taller than me!
Kusmer:
So what do you want them to know about cancer now that they're old enough to understand?
Leung:
For them, their first association with cancer, it won't be about death.
It'll be about Mom living. Now, one of my son's friends, their father passed away from cancer last year, so they do know that some people die of cancer, but I think it's important for them and that generation to know that cancer can be treatable, can be beatable, and it's a real testament to the advances of medicine.
They can actually say 'cancer' and not be scared. Maybe in their lifetime, cancer will be more like heart disease or diabetes. It's a disease that can be managed. It's chronic for some people. Cancer won't haunt them like it did me.
Kusmer:
Thank you Shirley, so much for sharing your story. I hope other people will reach out and share their own stories and stick around for the rest of these episodes.
Leung:
Anna, thanks for being on this journey with me. We hope you'll stick around for more episodes on the C-word.
Listen to more 'Say More' episodes at
Kara Mihm of the Globe staff contributed to this report.
Shirley Leung is a Business columnist. She can be reached at
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Dark Age detoxes sometimes resembled TikTok health trends
Dark Age detoxes sometimes resembled TikTok health trends

Yahoo

time17-07-2025

  • Yahoo

Dark Age detoxes sometimes resembled TikTok health trends

There are countless so-called wellness tips permeating platforms like TikTok on any given day. And while many are little better than pseudoscience, some treatments like acupuncture are based on legitimate medicinal practices dating back millennia. This mix of both good and bad health remedies is nothing new, but according to researchers compiling a growing database of centuries' old medical manuscripts, some of today's social media suggestions aren't that far off from prescriptions documented in the Dark Ages. But whether that's a positive or a negative sort of depends on how you view things. 'People were engaging with medicine on a much broader scale than had previously been thought,' Meg Leja, a Binghamton University medieval historian, said in a recent profile. 'They were concerned about cures, they wanted to observe the natural world and jot down bits of information wherever they could in this period known as the 'Dark Ages.'' Leja is also a contributor to the Corpus of Early Medieval Latin Medicine (CEMLM), an international collaboration between universities to expand the known catalog of pre-11th century Latin medical manuscripts. Many of these old texts haven't been included in other digital collections. So far, their work has almost doubled the number of known Dark Age medical manuscripts. After reviewing the still-expanding library, researchers now believe that the era's remedies weren't always quite as dubious as you might think. Many books recommend topical ointments and detox cleanses made from ingredients like dried herbs and distilled alcohols. One book's headache cure, for example, suggests mixing crushed peach pit with rose oil before rubbing it onto your forehead. As strange as it sounds, one study from 2017 indicates rose oil may help with migraine pains. As expected, others don't hold up to present-day scrutiny. Contrary to one famous 9th century CE codex, vulture eyes wrapped in a fox pelt will not reduce your own eye pains. Neither will a pregnant woman's labor progress more quickly if you tie the bird's feathers to her left leg. Meanwhile, other treatments seem to straddle the line between valid and absurd. Another 9th century manuscript's suggestion for improving hair health starts sensibly enough— covering the head with herbal-infused salt and vinegar will help to disinfect the scalp of parasites. But to really make those locks extra luscious, it then recommends applying a salve of oils with the 'ashes of a burnt green lizard.' The main takeaway Leja's team stresses is that while the Dark Ages were 'dark' in the sense that a large number of sources have not survived the centuries, many of the era's experts were truly interested in researching real medical treatments. Leja even goes so far as to push back on the notion that people then were 'anti-science.' 'People in the early Middle Ages were quite into science, into observation, into figuring out the utility of different natural substances, and trying to identify patterns and make predictions,' she explained. Of course, rigorous research standards must be maintained to ensure ingredients like 'lizard ash' stay out of today's prescription shampoos. Meanwhile, a medieval doctor would be forgiven for thinking social media's ability to amplify bad science amounts to demonology. In any case, hearsay, like in the Dark Ages, shouldn't be taken at its word—be it in an ancient codex, or the latest hashtag.

‘Panic is for wimps': What do Trump's funding cuts mean for Boston hospitals?
‘Panic is for wimps': What do Trump's funding cuts mean for Boston hospitals?

Boston Globe

time11-07-2025

  • Boston Globe

‘Panic is for wimps': What do Trump's funding cuts mean for Boston hospitals?

The following is a lightly edited transcript of the July 10 episode of the 'Say More' podcast. Shirley Leung: I'm Shirley Leung. Welcome to 'Say More.' It's a uniquely challenging time for our nation's medical community. The Trump administration has set its sights on slashing federal funding for healthcare and research by tens of billions of dollars, which could be catastrophic for the National Institute of Health (NIH) and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) funding is tenuous to say the least. Then there's mounting political pressure to restrict access to care for low income families on Medicaid plus care for at-risk health groups like transgender Americans and immigrants. So how are healthcare leaders navigating these uncertain times? Today we're bringing you a live episode recorded at the Boston Globe's Health Equity Summit. It was held in May at Cambridge's Sanofi headquarters. It's a conversation with Dr. Kevin Churchwell, CEO of Boston Children's Hospital. We discuss how major changes at the federal level are impacting healthcare workers and patient care in Boston, and beyond. Okay. Here's the show: Dr. Churchwell, thank you for being on 'Say More.' Kevin Churchwell: It's a pleasure to be here. Leung: So, Dr. Churchwell, can you tell me about that moment when you realized your year wouldn't go as planned? Churchwell: I think it's been my decade. So, usually that moment happens on a Friday, at about four o'clock when there is an announcement about reducing the facility's administrative rate for NIH funding to 15 percent. And you could imagine the amount of angst and just a bit of panic that occurred when that was announced. I tell my team, my phrase is 'panic is for wimps.' In pediatric critical care, you just can't panic in an environment like that. And so taking that was our mantra. We basically then said, 'Okay, what's the next step? What is going to happen? What does this really mean?' And it took a period of time. It takes that weekend to understand it and to understand what will be the next step in terms of things go to court, things get stopped, and then how do we deal with that moving forward. Leung: So when you heard about this 15 percent cap, how much funding is at risk then at Boston Children's? Churchwell: So, the first calculations for us would be, each year we would lose about $80 million. As you can imagine, you just can't find that on the street. And that would change just existentially what we can do in research, if that would go through from that standpoint. Leung: Can you talk about specific projects that won't get done if these cuts stick? Churchwell: Well, it's just not the projects that are happening now, but the new projects or the new opportunities that are just being held up right now. You know, research is not just about the present, it's about the future. And what we do at Boston Children's is continue to support that present future by finding and supporting the next investigators that have great ideas, that are looking at particular mechanisms of how sales work, diseases, et cetera. What that funding does is support those individuals to start that work that ultimately leads to treatments and cures. Ultimately, it leads to what we were talking about outside in terms of what's happening with the care of the individual with Cystic Fibrosis or the care of the individual with sickle cell disease. Leung: Can you talk about, just in your career, the progress made in terms of treating Cystic Fibrosis and if you could explain what the disease does and how it affects children. Churchwell: Absolutely. Cystic Fibrosis is a problem in how cells really process sodium and potassium electrolytes. That leads to a problem in how lungs clears mucus. As an example, it also leads to how the pancreas works and et cetera. It's a disease that for a long period of time, had a mortality. And what I mean by that is that the kids who had the disease knew that at some point in their life they were going to die prematurely. And so they really developed their life based upon that for a period of time, they would die in adolescence. We got better in terms of the treatment, and these children would sort of then have a life in their twenties and their thirties, but still, they knew that at some point their life was going to stop. Leung: It was a hard life too, right? Churchwell: It's a tough life every two weeks, every four weeks back in the hospital. With the research that occurred, first understanding the fundamental mechanisms of how cells work, ion transport, understanding the genetic defect in the disease, and then asking the question, 'Can we actually affect that defect?' You were talking 30 years of work, 20 to 30 years of work, which ultimately led to the development of drugs. There's a three-drug cocktail that 90 percent of the kids with Cystic Fibrosis can take, that has totally changed their life. It's phenomenal what we've seen, and it's due to that discovery that's occurred. Leung: And a lot of it was federal funding, right? Churchwell: Federal funding, plus foundation funding and Joe O'Donnell's work with Cystic Fibrosis locally here. It's just incredible work. It took a lot of dollars that needed to really fund that sort of understanding of the mechanisms and then the drug development. That was the relationship that we've had, this partnership with the federal government for 80 years, which has led to incredible discoveries across the board of medicine on all parts of science. Leung: You mentioned earlier that federal dollars support research, support the future. So when those dollars are cut, what are you most worried about that won't get done? Churchwell: I'm worried about who we will not be able to support these individuals who have these great ideas. And I'm worried about how they will decide, 'I don't think I'll go into medicine or biological research. I think I'll be a computer scientist because that's where the money is.' These are brilliant individuals. They could probably do anything they want in life. These individuals, if we can support them, change the world, change individuals, change our children and give them a real future. And that's what I worry about. Leung: I want to ask about a specific Boston Children's program. It's the first pediatric and adolescent transgender health program in the country. President Trump, through a series of executive orders, has stripped away many rights of trans and non-binary individuals, including defunding gender affirming care for youth. Even before Trump was elected, there were some questions about paying for this type of care. And now he's really doubled down with threats of withholding federal funds and other penalties. So do these headwinds make Boston Children's rethink how you provide care to these patients? Churchwell: They've not created an environment where we're rethinking. We are totally committed to the care of all of our kids and the goal of any pediatric hospital, especially Boston Children's Hospital, is to work to create the best future for that child, so our gender affirming care program is a great example of that. The important part that I would stress to everyone is that these kids have a real issue that they're grappling with, that is affecting their life from a medical, physical, and mental standpoint. And our ability to intercede and support them has been transformative for that child, for that adolescent, for that young adult that they can see a future for themselves. And so our commitment to that is straightforward, has not wavered, and we have committed our support to our gender-affirming care program. In that regard, I will tell you that our state leaders have been incredibly supportive. Our governor has been incredibly supportive. Our attorney general has been incredibly supportive of the work that we're doing because it's work that really supports that individual child, that family. And so we continue that work because we know that there are headwinds. And, we've seen this across the country. A little known fact is that, we see a lot of kids, families from other states now because they can't get care in their state, so they're coming to us, in that regard. There will be, and there are going to be, challenges moving forward. We're trying to be very smart about it. We're working to make sure we're supporting our caregivers in that regard, in the care and in the work that they're doing. Leung: Do you depend on any federal funding or government funding for this type of care? What do you do if that funding disappears? Churchwell: Right now, the support and care of those kids really comes from either commercial insurance or Medicaid. And that's where the rubber may meet the road there, in terms of decisions made about Medicaid funding or how the commercial payers decide about that support Leung: As a black doctor and now the hospital's CEO, you've long championed health equity. If DEI programs are to be rolled back, do you think they will be hard to re-implement? Churchwell: That's an important question. I've never seen DEI as some separate thing. It's a separate program that sort of sits out there, as opposed to integrating it into what we do every day. And that's always been my goal and that's what I've always tried to help lead in terms of what we've put in place. And so given that, we will continue to do the work that we have done, in terms of providing an environment where every child gets the best opportunity for care that they can receive at our hospital. Part of that is the work that we've done in diversity, equity, inclusion, and you can call it another name. Whatever you want to call it, it's integrated in what we do, and it's for every child. To me, the discussion kind of gets lost when the discussion tries to pit it as something that's different or wrong, as opposed to, 'No, it's the ability for us as a society, us as a children's hospital to provide the best care. The most optimal care for every child that we see.' Now, what does that mean in reality terms? Well, we work to try to understand where the child and the family are coming from. And in doing that, we're better able to actually provide care for the child, who they interact with, how the interaction occurs, how we are viewed from their standpoint. You know, if you walk into our children's hospital and you stand in the lobby, it's always a great thing. I always encourage everybody to do that because what you'll see is the United Nations. You'll see everybody from all parts of Boston, the New England region, and all over the world. So the question is, given that, how can we best provide the most excellent care if we don't reflect who they are and we're able to pull from the entire range of talent that's out there? And so that's what we're trying to do and that's how we've integrated it into what we do. That's how I view it. We'll continue to move forward. Leung: So in higher education, we're seeing some presidents, like at Harvard University and Princeton University, stand up to the Trump administration over proposed funding cuts. Do you see hospital CEOs doing the same thing? Churchwell: Yes. I'll say that we believe in what we are doing and the importance of it. The issues that our colleagues are facing, our brethren are facing in the university setting, those issues are profoundly important and what Harvard has done is so important, and it is going to be that question that has to be answered, in terms of the ability for universities to teach and to educate in a way that is across the spectrum. It has never been the question for me who's right and who's wrong, that you shouldn't talk or they shouldn't talk. Everyone should be able to talk of course, and present views and have the discussion because that's how we learn. That's how we were able to move things forward. And to preserve that ability for our universities to do that, I think is profoundly important. Leung: At Children's, we think of you as seeing patients, the clinical side, but you also do a lot of research. Often you work with the universities, too. Your fates are kind of tied together. So I was just wondering if you could talk about when we read about what's happening at Harvard or Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) there are layoffs, they're pausing research, there's a hiring freeze. What is happening at Boston Children's Hospital? Have you had to do any of that? Churchwell: What we've done is take a very measured approach around what's happening. We have paused what we call our 'capital projects.' These are major projects that run into the 500 million range because they are associated with what we call our 'planning exercise,' a 10-year capital plan with the assumptions that we've made, that have been very consistent about where dollars would come from, like from the federal government, so that we can move forward. So what has been created is an incredible instability. You can't plan right now. I've told our folks, our board, that I think the next six to eight months will clear that fog. We call it a 'fog,' in terms of the rules of the road here. And given that, we will then figure out how we can move forward. But right now we've paused those major things. We've paused any major recruitments. We've also really maintained that those that are part of Boston Children's Hospital, we are supporting, especially our research community. How do we bridge them, as we get through this fog that we're dealing with right now? Leung: When we were talking earlier, you said you have about 14,000 to 15,000 employees, right? At Children's, it's quite a big enterprise, between clinical and research, so anxiety must be really high among your employees right now? Churchwell: Yes. Shirley: How do you talk to them? What do you say to them during these uncertain times? Churchwell: Well, we talk a lot and we try to do it in multiple forums to try to answer their questions. We've tried to be very transparent. Every third answer is, 'I don't know. I can't give you an answer.' But, that's okay. It's more the ability for them to ask the question and to actually know that we're thinking about it. What our promise to them is that we will continue to follow up and continue to have that dialogue. And so we are doing that on a regular basis in as many forms as we can: email, town halls, Zoom, and et cetera to try to keep everybody up to date and try to let everyone know where we are and what's going on as we go through this. Leung: Is it like another pandemic for you? Churchwell: It's like the pandemic. It's kind of like Groundhog Day. I thought I was not gonna hear Sonny & Cher, but I keep hearing Sonny & Cher. Leung: This has been a heavy conversation. It's been like this all day long at the Health Equity Summit. So I was just wondering, in light of everything that is going on, what gives you hope during this time? Churchwell: Let's all remember the arc of justice, and let's remember that we live in a country that has a phenomenal history, but an important history. It's never been just roses and incarnations. The work to continue to move forward has been important work, difficult work, but work that we all are committed to continue to move us forward as a country. My mom was born in 1931. My dad was born in 1917, so my dad went through two world wars. He was born at the end of World War I, he went through World War II and I, and I'll tell you, he didn't volunteer. He then started his work as a newspaper man at a daily southern newspaper. Leung: I didn't know that. You buried the lead. Churchwell: I buried the lead. He's actually in the Smithsonian Institution. So looking back on their life, what they went through, I missed it. I missed it just by a few years in terms of colored bathrooms. Now I have brothers that are eight years older than I am, and they went through it. And so just to appreciate the arc of our country. It's never been easy. It's been hard. You keep moving forward and I think that we have to continue to keep moving forward in this piece of work. Leung: Dr. Churchwell is the CEO of Boston Children's Hospital. Thanks for joining us on 'Say More.' Listen to more 'Say More' episodes at Kara Mihm of the Globe staff contributed to this report. Shirley Leung is a Business columnist. She can be reached at

The 2025 measles outbreak is largest in three decades
The 2025 measles outbreak is largest in three decades

Politico

time09-07-2025

  • Politico

The 2025 measles outbreak is largest in three decades

Kennedy has pointed to the much higher measles rates and death toll in Europe in arguing that the U.S. response to the outbreak 'is a model for the rest of the world.' He's asked the CDC to develop new guidance for treating the disease. 'People should be getting healthier. We've got more solutions. Medicine is advancing, and yet you're seeing people turning away from it,' said Dr. Amesh Adalja, an expert on infectious disease and senior scholar at the Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security. 'To me, this is the mentality of the Dark Ages.' The outbreak is primarily centered in Texas, where at least 750 cases have been reported . It's also spread to nearby communities in New Mexico and Kansas. The vast majority of cases have been in unvaccinated people, and the outbreak began in a religious community with a long history of vaccine skepticism. Three people in connection with the Texas outbreak this year — including 2 children — according to the CDC, and 162 people have been hospitalized. Both children were 'school-age,' according to the Texas Department of Health, and unvaccinated. Most U.S. states have seen at least one case of measles in 2025. Yearly measles cases dropped sharply in the 1990s after the CDC's panel of vaccine experts decided to add a second dose of the MMR vaccine to the childhood vaccine schedule. The disease was declared eliminated in the U.S. in 2000 because of widespread immunity through vaccinations, but public health experts have said that, this year, the U.S. is at risk of losing that designation . — Key context: The 2019 outbreak — like the 2025 Texas outbreak — was tied to close-knit religious communities with a history of vaccine skepticism. But national coverage for the measles, mumps and rubella vaccine has fallen steadily in kindergarteners since the the Covid-19 pandemic — a trend public health experts and officials have said is likely tied to increased vaccine skepticism. The latest CDC data, for the 2022-2023 school year, found a two percent drop in the vaccination rate among kindergarteners compared to before the pandemic . Kennedy has shifted on his messaging around the outbreak, sometimes saying that vaccination is the best way to prevent the disease, but at other times inaccurately claiming the shot contains 'aborted fetus debris.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store