India sends geologists to Zambia to explore copper and cobalt deposits: Sources
The Zambian government this year agreed to allocate 9,000 square km (3,475 square miles) to India for the exploration of cobalt - a key component in batteries for electric vehicles and mobile phones - as well as for scouting copper, which is widely used in power generation, electronics, and construction.
The exploration project will last for three years and most of the analysis will be done in laboratories in India, one of the sources said.
The team is expected to make multiple visits over the course of the entire project, said the sources, who declined to be identified because the information is not public.
After assessing the mining potential, the Indian government will seek a mining lease from the Zambian government and may also invite private-sector companies to participate in the project, the sources said.
India's Ministry of Mines did not respond to a request for comment.
New Delhi has been in talks with several African countries to acquire critical mineral blocks on a government-to-government basis, while also exploring opportunities in Australia and Latin America.
India is also in discussions with the Democratic Republic of Congo to sign an initial agreement to secure supplies of cobalt and copper, Reuters reported in March.
An Indian delegation attended a mining conference in Congo last month and toured local mines, the ministry said in a post on X.
India has held internal discussions over its growing vulnerability to a tightening global copper market and plans to explore ways to secure supply from resource-rich countries during ongoing trade negotiations, Reuters reported last week.
India's copper imports have risen sharply since the 2018 closure of Vedanta's Sterlite Copper smelter. The country imported 1.2 million metric tons of copper in the fiscal year ending March 2025, up 4 percent from the previous year.
India is almost entirely dependent on cobalt imports and shipments of cobalt oxide rose 20 percent in 2024/25 to 693 metric tons, government data showed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Arab News
an hour ago
- Arab News
Can BRICS reshape the global financial order?
In August 2023, the leaders of the BRICS nations — Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa — gathered in Johannesburg to declare their ambition to rewire the international system. A centerpiece of that ambition was a call to reduce dependence on the US dollar. For some, the idea sounded like deja vu; de-dollarization has been a recurring theme in emerging markets since the early 2000s. But this time, the stakes feel different. Global polarization is intensifying, financial weaponization has become normalized and the credibility of existing multilateral institutions is eroding. Yet, for all the hype, the BRICS project remains deeply flawed and uneven. The notion that BRICS could reshape the global financial order rests more on aspiration than reality. While dollar dominance is indeed being reassessed — not just by geopolitical rivals but also by pragmatic middle powers — building a credible alternative requires more than shared discontent. It demands deep capital markets, interoperable infrastructure, credible institutions and — above all — mutual trust. On all these counts, BRICS is still struggling. The desire to reduce dollar reliance is not simply ideological but a reaction to a financial architecture long shaped by US interests. The 2008 financial crisis exposed the dangers of global dependency on Wall Street. The 2022 sanctions on Russia, which froze hundreds of billions in central bank reserves and cut Moscow off from SWIFT, sent a clear signal to other BRICS members: your assets can be turned into weapons overnight. The desire to reduce dollar reliance is not simply ideological but a reaction to a financial architecture long shaped by US interests Dr. John Sfakianakis But does fear translate into capability? Not necessarily. Incremental moves are already underway. China has expanded its Cross-Border Interbank Payment System and accelerated digital yuan pilots across Asia and Africa. India has begun settling some trade in rupees, particularly with Russia and the UAE. Russia is developing Mir and the System for Transfer of Financial Messages to bypass Western financial rails. Brazil and South Africa are exploring fintech-led payment corridors. Yet, taken together, these initiatives remain fragmented, politically fragile and institutionally weak. The internal contradictions of BRICS are glaring. China's outsized role in the bloc breeds discomfort among its partners. The yuan remains nonconvertible. India and China are strategic competitors. Russia is economically isolated. Brazil and South Africa are preoccupied with their own fiscal instability. What unites them is not a shared monetary strategy but a defensive impulse — a desire to insulate themselves from the coercive tools of the current system without agreeing on a viable alternative to replace it. In this respect, the BRICS bloc echoes the spirit of the Non-Aligned Movement of the 1960s — born from frustration with superpower domination, yet too ideologically and strategically diverse to forge a coherent economic alternative. These aspirations are further undercut by a chronic lack of fiscal and data transparency across the bloc, which undermines investor confidence and complicates efforts to build trust in any shared monetary or institutional arrangement. Moreover, the dollar is not just a medium of exchange — it is an ecosystem. From commodity pricing and bond issuance to foreign exchange markets and central bank reserves, it is woven into the plumbing of global capitalism. Displacing it would require an alternative that is not only politically palatable but technically superior. BRICS is nowhere near delivering that. The New Development Bank and the Contingent Reserve Arrangement — touted as BRICS' answer to the International Monetary Fund and the World Bank — have underperformed. Lending volumes are limited. Governance structures are opaque. And the credibility of any shared macroeconomic framework remains questionable in the absence of institutional convergence. Even digital currencies, often billed as a leapfrog solution, are no silver bullet. China's e-CNY remains tightly controlled and untested at scale. Interoperability with other BRICS central bank digital currencies remains aspirational. Moreover, few of these economies inspire enough investor confidence to turn their currencies into regional, let alone global, anchors. Displacing the dollar would require an alternative that is not only politically palatable but technically superior Dr. John Sfakianakis One point bears repeating: the US may well benefit from a credible external challenge. A push from BRICS could serve as a cold slap in the face — forcing America to reckon with the fragility of its own advantages. For too long, dollar dominance has bred complacency. If confronted with a viable challenge, the US could rediscover its competitive edge — leveraging innovation, capital markets and entrepreneurial dynamism to future-proof its leadership. But let's be clear: BRICS is not that challenge yet. It is a concept in search of coherence — a geopolitical brand lacking operational capacity. Its declarations are bold but its execution remains underwhelming. The underutilization of the New Development Bank, for example, is telling: with lending volumes far below expectations and project delivery uneven, the institution reflects the broader gap between BRICS' ambitions and its administrative muscle. As for the Gulf states and other middle powers watching this evolution, caution — not commitment — is the prudent course. Strategic hedging makes sense. Deepening financial links with BRICS, especially through trade settlement, infrastructure finance and digital innovation, is worth exploring. But abandoning the Western-led system is neither practical nor desirable. The future is hybrid. Gulf countries will continue to invest the bulk of their sovereign assets in Western markets, manage reserves in dollars and euros, and rely on Western institutions for legal recourse and financial stability. Take Saudi Arabia's Public Investment Fund, for instance: despite deepening ties with China and India, 40 percent of its portfolio remains invested in the US — across equities, tech, infrastructure and real estate. Engagement with BRICS must be pragmatic, flexible and bounded by clear-eyed realism. The global financial order is evolving — but slowly and with considerable friction. The shift from sterling to the dollar took decades and two world wars. Even the EU, despite decades of political and economic integration and the introduction of the euro, continues to wrestle with internal divisions and incomplete fiscal unity. This ongoing struggle underscores how extraordinarily difficult it is to build a credible alternative currency system. The notion that a loosely stitched alliance of emerging economies can replicate such a transformation — absent deep coordination, robust institutions and global trust — is, at best, premature and, at worst, a triumph of hope over infrastructure. If BRICS truly wants to reshape the financial order, it must start by getting its own house in order. Until then, it will remain more a rhetorical vehicle than a real force for monetary transformation.
Al Arabiya
an hour ago
- Al Arabiya
Nigeria needs to recalibrate its budget for lower oil prices, says IMF
Nigeria needs to adapt its 2025 budget to lower oil prices and scale up cash transfers to shield the most vulnerable parts of its population that face hunger and poverty, the International Monetary Fund said on Wednesday. Releasing the results of its routine 'Article IV' assessment of Nigeria's economic policies, the IMF said economic growth had been steady but too low in per capita terms with inflation remaining high. The Fund predicted the country's economy would expand at 3.4 percent this year and 3.2 percent in 2026. As Africa's largest oil producer, Nigeria is under strain from relatively low international crude prices, which traded around $68 a barrel on Wednesday. 'The international economic environment that Nigeria lives in and operates in is marked by the very, very large uncertainty, and in particular, international oil price volatility impacts Nigeria directly through the fiscal and the external balances as well as inflation,' said Axel Schimmelpfennig, the Fund's mission chief for Nigeria. The complex outlook made it especially important for policymakers to build and maintain buffers while being ready to respond to shocks or seize opportunities. 'Turning to our policy messages, the key challenge now is to tackle high poverty and food insecurity,' he said further. Nigeria's government has supported the poorest part of its population through direct cash transfers since 2007 but has struggled to scale them up because of a lack of data on their impact and as large numbers of the population have no bank account. The 2025 budget is squeezed by Nigeria's assumption of oil production of 2 million barrels per day and an oil price of $75 a barrel. International Brent crude futures spiked higher last month in response to tension in the Middle East but are under pressure from a shift in policy by the OPEC+ group, of which Nigeria is a member, to regain market share rather than curtail supply. 'Achieving the government's 2025 budget targets will require additional measures, largely reflecting the drop in oil prices compared to when, when the budget was approved,' Schimmelpfennig said in a briefing to journalists. 'Keeping the fiscal deficit a percent of GDP unchanged, compared to 2024 will be important to support the fight against inflation,' he added. Recouping fuel subsidy savings and making administrative gains could mobilize some domestic revenues, but the central bank needed to maintain a tight stance and a positive real rate to bring down inflation and support stability, the Fund said. It said savings from fuel subsidies would amount to 2 percent of 2024 GDP. Asked about the naira currency and Nigeria's FX markets, Schimmelpfennig said reforms by the government and central bank had been far reaching and fundamental with the result supply and demand was more in balance. 'When we talk to investors, they're happy. They can invest in Nigeria, and when they want, they can bring their proceeds out,' he said. 'You look at the parallel market and the official rate, they're aligned.'
Al Arabiya
7 hours ago
- Al Arabiya
After Prada ‘sandal scandal', Indian brands tap heritage pride to boost sales
Indian footwear sellers and artisans are tapping into nationalist pride stoked by the Prada 'sandal scandal' in a bid to boost sales of ethnic slippers with history dating back to the 12th century, raising hopes of reviving a struggling craft. Sales are surging over the past week for the 'Kolhapuri' sandals that have garnered global attention after Prada sparked a controversy by showcasing similar designs in Milan, without initially crediting the footwear's origins. After viral photos from a fashion show drew criticism from Indian artisans who make the sandals - named after a historic city in Maharashtra state - Prada was forced to acknowledge that its new open-toe footwear was inspired by ancient Indian designs. 'Prada 0: Kolhapur 1,' said an Instagram post by e-commerce website Shopkop, whose founder Rahul Parasu Kamble's open letter to Prada pointing out the footwear is 'soaked in tradition' was reshared 36,000 times on social media. 'I saw the controversy as a way to promote Kolhapuri,' said Kamble, 33, who has seen sales of sandals he sources from local artisans touch 50,000 rupees ($584) in three days, five times the average. Social media has been abuzz in recent days with criticism and sarcastic memes, with politicians, artisans and a trade body demanding due credit to Indian heritage. Prada has said it will arrange follow-up meetings with artisans. In a statement to Reuters on Tuesday, it added the Italian group intends to make the sandals in India in collaboration with local manufacturers, if it commercializes them. Breezy ads, big discounts India's luxury market is small but growing, with the rich splurging on Lamborghini cars and pricey watches. Prada does not have a single retail store in India and its products are usually reserved for the super rich - its men's leather sandals start retailing at $844, while Kolhapuris can be priced as low as $12. But linking of the Prada name to the Kolhapuri sandals, which are made by around 7,000 artisans, is providing a business opportunity for some. Mumbai-based Ira Soles is running new Facebook and Instagram advertisements which proclaim its $32 'Tan Handcrafted Kolhapuris just walked the ramp at Prada ... Limited stock. Global spotlight. Own a piece of what the world is applauding.'. E-commerce website Niira is offering up to 50 percent discounts on its Kolhapuri slippers it says are 'rooted in tradition'. Its sales of $18 sandals, that looked like the one Prada showcased in Milan, have tripled, founder Nishant Raut said. 'Why can't an Indian Kolhapuri brand become as big as a Birkenstock,' he said. Handmade in small factories, Kolhapuri sandals, or chappals as they are called in Hindi, are often paired with Indian attire. Similar designs are sold in big outlets of Bata India and Metro Brands, and also on Amazon and Walmart's Flipkart. In 2021, India's government said the sandals could achieve $1 billion a year in exports. Though latest estimates are not available, artisans say the business has struggled as consumers increasingly opt for more fashionable, upmarket footwear. Still, the Prada controversy is breathing new life into a craft that Lalit Gandhi, president of Maharashtra's main industry lobby group, says is 'a dying art'. Gandhi said he is in talks with Prada to develop a co-branded, limited-edition sandal. Kolhapur craftsmen Ashok Doiphode, 50, is pinning hopes on a Prada boost. He hand-stitches sandals for nine hours daily but can sell a pair for just 400 rupees ($5). 'If big companies like Prada come, craftsman like me can get a good price.'
