
US judge clears the way for imminent deportation of 8 migrants to South Sudan
WASHINGTON : Eight migrants lost their last-ditch effort to halt their deportation to South Sudan by the Trump administration on Friday afternoon, clearing the way for their imminent transfer after a judge in Massachusetts denied their request.
Lawyers for the US justice department said the men were scheduled to be flown to South Sudan on Friday at 7.00pm Eastern Time after two courts considered the request on an emergency basis on July 4, when courts are otherwise closed for the Independence Day holiday.
The group of migrants had filed new claims in Washington late Thursday after the US Supreme Court clarified that Judge Brian Murphy in Boston could no longer require the US department of homeland securityy to hold them.
US district judge Randolph Moss in Washington paused the deportation briefly on Friday when lawyers for the migrants filed new claims in his court and sent the case back to Boston, where Murphy denied the claim.
Lawyers for the migrants and a spokesperson for homeland security did not immediately respond to requests for comment.
The administration has detained the men for six weeks on a military base in Djibouti rather than bring them back to the US.
The order was the latest round in the fight over the legality of the Trump administration's campaign to deter immigration through high-profile deportations to countries where migrants say they face safety concerns, which has already gone from lower courts to the Supreme Court twice.
Department of justice attorney Hashim Mooppan told Moss during the hearing that court orders halting agreed-upon deportations pose a serious problem for US diplomatic relations and would make foreign countries less likely to accept transfers of migrants in the future.
The group of men have been convicted of various crimes, with four of them convicted of murder, the department of homeland security has said.
South Sudan has long been dangerous even for locals. The US state department advises citizens not to travel there due to violent crime and armed conflict. The UN has said the African country's political crisis could reignite a brutal civil war that ended in 2018.
The eight men, whose lawyers said are from Cuba, Laos, Mexico, Burma, Sudan and Vietnam, argue their deportations to South Sudan would violate the US Constitution, which prohibits 'cruel and unusual' punishment.
Moss said that he would transfer the case to Massachusetts rather than hear it himself but remarked that if they proved their allegations that US authorities had sought to subject the migrants to potential abuse after deportation as a form of punishment, they would likely have a valid claim.
'It seems to me almost self-evident that the US government cannot take human beings and send them to circumstances in which their physical well-being is at risk simply either to punish them or send a signal to others,' Moss said during the hearing.
The Friday effort to prevent the deportations came after months of back and forth between a Boston judge, the Supreme Court, and the Trump administration.
US district judge Brian Murphy in Boston in May blocked the US from immediately moving the men to South Sudan after he found that officials had violated his earlier ruling in a class action lawsuit concerning the due process rights of migrants.
That ruling, in April, had blocked the administration from sending migrants to countries where they have no ties without giving them the chance to raise safety concerns.
The Supreme Court on June 23 put Murphy's April injunction on hold. But Murphy that same day said the high court ruling did not apply to his May order.
Calling Murphy's decision a 'lawless act ofdefiance',' the justice department the next day urged the Supreme Court to clarify its decision.
The nine-member Supreme Court on Thursday, over the dissent of two of its liberal justices, sided with the Trump administration and said its decision serves to reverse Murphy's May order blocking the deportations to South Sudan.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Free Malaysia Today
10 hours ago
- Free Malaysia Today
Trump's 40% penalty for tariff dodging still missing key details
Many of the firms and factories had shifted from China in response to US President Donald Trump's first trade war with Beijing. (AP pic) WASHINGTON : President Donald Trump has threatened to pile an additional 40% tariff on any product that Washington determines to be 'transshipped' through another country, a punishment aimed at stopping goods mainly from China, dodging US duties. That penalty was included in the White House announcement yesterday evening that laid out global tariff rates from 10% to 41%. However, many countries are still missing the 'rules of origin' details necessary to determine what the US considers transshipped. 'It is still not clear how this will be implemented in practice,' Leah Fahy, chief economist at Capital Economics, said in a note Friday. A decision on those rules will be made in the coming weeks, a senior US official said in Washington yesterday. The US had earlier said the issue would be resolved before Aug 1. The details are particularly important for countries in Southeast Asia, such as Vietnam, which have emerged as key suppliers of goods to the US. Many of the firms and factories had shifted from China in response to Trump's first trade war with Beijing and most still rely on Chinese inputs for production. Thailand's deputy minister of commerce Chantawit Tantasith, for instance, said the country's 19% tariff rate allows it to maintain a competitive edge, as it's on par with Malaysia, Indonesia, Cambodia and the Philippines, and below Vietnam's 20%. However, the transshipment issue is still unresolved. 'We must await further clarification from the US regarding the negotiation process and rules of origin,' Chantawit said today in a statement. The country's finance minister Pichai Chunhavajira said in a separate statement that local content should be more than 40% to be classified as a Thai product, but that the country hasn't reached an agreement with the US on those details. The unspoken target of the rule has been China, which Trump has blamed for abusing free-trade rules to hollow out American manufacturing and jobs with cheaper imports. Trump is set to make the final call on maintaining a tariff truce with China before it expires in two weeks. Stephen Olson, a former US trade negotiator now with the ISEAS-Yusof Ishak Institute in Singapore, sees the transshipment issue complicating those talks. 'China will correctly perceive the transshipment provisions as directed against its interests,' Olson said. 'And it will inevitably spill over into its ongoing trade negotiations with the US,' he said. Some analysts expect the punitive tariff to have little impact on China or the ability of its manufacturers to get goods to American buyers – directly or indirectly. 'Enforcement is likely to be challenging. 'Even if outright rerouting is reduced, trade diversion will continue to dampen the impact of US tariffs on China's aggregate export performance,' Fahy wrote.


Malay Mail
12 hours ago
- Malay Mail
Boeing faces lawsuit from Alaska Airlines crew over MAX 9 mid-air blowout
SEATTLE, Aug 1 — Four flight attendants on the Alaska Airlines 737 MAX 9 plane that experienced a mid-air cabin panel blowout in January last year are suing Boeing for physical and emotional injuries. In separate lawsuits, they are seeking compensation for past and future economic damages, citing physical and mental injuries, emotional distress and other financial costs. 'Each of the four flight attendants acted courageously, following their training and putting their passengers' safety first while fearing for their lives,' Tracy Brammeier, the attorney representing each of the plaintiffs, said. 'They deserve to be wholly compensated for this life-altering traumatic experience.' Boeing declined to comment, while Alaska Airlines did not immediately respond to Reuters' request for comment. The lawsuits were filed on Tuesday in Seattle's King County Superior Court and accuse Boeing of negligence and failure to exercise reasonable care in the production, sale and repair of 737 MAX jets and its parts. 'Boeing knew or should have known of the quality control issues present in its production of the 737 MAX line of aircraft,' the filings said. The incident sparked a crisis for the planemaker and prompted the US Justice Department to open a criminal investigation into the company and declare that Boeing was not in compliance with a 2021 deferred prosecution agreement. Last month, the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) said Boeing had failed to provide adequate training, guidance and oversight to prevent the incident. The board criticised Boeing's safety culture and its failure to install four key bolts in the panel during production, and accused the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) of ineffective oversight. — Reuters

Malay Mail
15 hours ago
- Malay Mail
‘Rewarding Hamas': Trump slams allies' push for Palestinian statehood
WASHINGTON, Aug 1 — President Donald Trump has expressed displeasure with leaders of France, the United Kingdom and Canada for saying they plan to recognise a Palestinian state in September, Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt said Thursday. Recent announcements by some of Washington's closest allies have only hardened the US president's stance against the move. While Trump slammed Canada for announcing its intention to recognise Palestinian statehood at a United Nations meeting in September, he has been milder in his criticism of French President Emmanuel Macron and British Prime Minister Keir Starmer. He dismissed Macron's decision, which got the ball rolling last week for other countries to consider similar steps, saying the statement did not 'matter' and 'doesn't carry much weight.' Starmer this week said the UK will formally recognise a Palestinian state in September unless Israel takes 'substantive' steps, including agreeing to a ceasefire in Gaza. Asked about Britain's decision after a trip to Scotland and talks with Starmer, Trump said he was 'not in that camp, to be honest.' According to Leavitt, Trump is now more critical of the push for recognition and believes it amounts to 'rewarding Hamas at a time where Hamas is the true impediment to a cease fire and to the release of all of the hostages.' — AFP