1984 Anti Sikh riots: Witness tells court Tytler softly threatened him by claiming killing of hundreds of Sikhs
This person told the court that in 2011, he had a meeting with Jagdish Tytler where he was softly threatened by Tytler by claiming that he had killed hundreds of Sikhs.
This witness also stated that Tytler claimed that he would be the chief minister.
Special Judge Jitendra Singh recorded the statement of Ravindra Singh Chauhan. His statement was recorded in the presence of CBI Prosecutor, Senior Advocate H S Phoolka, and Kamna Vohra.
During the recording of the statement witness deposed before the Court that he had a meeting with Tytler in connection with the dispute related to arbitration.
Ravindra Singh Chauhan deposed before the court, 'In the meeting held between him and Jagdish Tytler on December 8, 2011, at around 10:15 PM, my sole motive was to get the dispute settled, but Tytler was trying to softly threaten me, his son being a Director in a company having Swiss Accounts, appointing High Court Judges, transfer of hawala money and generally he was discussing about the future Delhi election in which he is the Chief Minister candidate and this entire thing regarding fake arbitration was gone to media, it will destroy his career.'
The witness further stated that Tytler also spoke about many other things which were recorded in the video and part of the record. He also identified Jagdish Tytler in the court.
This witness also stated that his statement was also recorded by the Crime Branch in 2022 in a complaint lodged by Jagdish Tytler regarding the fakeness of the video published in the media. 'My statement was also recorded by the CBI during the investigation,' the witness said.
The CD was played in the court. This witness deposed that CD contains five clips. He also identified that the person in the CD is Jagdish Tytler and the third person is Abhishak Verma.
Defence counsel Anil Kumar Sharma, along with Apoorv Sharma and Anuj Sharma, cross-examined the witness Ravindra Singh Chauhan.
Defence counsel submitted that this video and audio are nowhere connected with the Gurudwara Pul Bangash.
During the cross-examination witness deposed that he didn't know that Abhishek Verma had moved an application to become a witness in this case.
It was argued by the defence counsel that the CBI had stated before the court of ACJM Karkardooma Court that Abhishek Verma is involved in several cases. He can not be made a witness.
It is wrong to suggest that he knows that this video is moped, manipulated and edited to target the accused, the witness said in the cross-examination.
It is wrong to suggest his statement has been recorded to implicate the accused, Chauhan submitted. (ANI)
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
14 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Congress slams Shinde for backing Kadam: ‘Which version of Hindutva allows dance bars'
A day after Deputy Chief Minister Eknath Shinde extended support to his party colleague and Minister of State (Home) Yogesh Kadam, who has been facing flak over connections with a dance bar, opposition Congress Monday questioned whether Shinde's Hindutva allows running dance bars. 'How can Deputy Chief Minister Eknath Shinde justify supporting a dance bar? For someone who claims to uphold the ideals of Hindutva, in which version of Hindutva does making girls dance in bars find a place?' asked state Congress chief Harshvardhan Sapkal. On Sunday, speaking at a public function at Khed in Ratnagiri, Shinde had come out in support of Kadam saying not only him but the entire party stands firmly with Yogesh Kadam. 'It is wrong to demand resignation (of Kadam). The entire party and myself stand firmly with Yogesh Kadam. Those who themselves are buried under the mud of corruption are attacking others,' Shinde had said. Kadam had landed in controversy after a dance bar named Sawali in Kandivali was being operated under a licence held by his mother. 'Shinde shamelessly defended a minister who is linked to a dance bar This is the height of brazenness. If not for public decency, at least have some conscience,' said Sapkal. Sapkal said, 'On one hand, they claim to be brothers to their beloved sisters benefited under Majhi Ladki Bahin scheme, and on the other hand, they support dance bars that shatter those very sisters' lives—how can they do this with a straight face? Minister Yogesh Kadam must be dismissed from the cabinet.' Meanwhile, Sena leader Sheetal Mhatre slammed Sapkal saying he should not dare to talk ill about Shinde. 'Sapkal should avoid making such unsubstantiated allegations. His words have no truth and if he keeps on making such statements then he will face the wrath of Shiv Sena's women wing,' said Mhatre.
News18
22 minutes ago
- News18
Congress govt in Tgana to meet President to seek assent for BC quota bills
Last Updated: Hyderabad, Jul 28 (PTI) Telangana Chief Minister A Revanth Reddy would seek President Droupadi Murmu's appointment to meet her to request assent for the Assembly bills providing 42 per cent reservation to Backward Classes, Minister Ponnam Prabhakar said on Monday. Briefing reporters after a meeting of the state cabinet Monday night, Backward Classes Welfare Minister Ponnam Prabhakar said the Congress government has decided to garner support from all friendly parties at the national level, including Members of Parliament across party lines for providing 42 per cent reservation to Backward Classes (BCs) in local body polls and in education and employment opportunities. 'The chief minister is seeking appointment of opposition leaders in Parliament on August 5, 6 and 7. The Congress party along with its friendly parties and their members in Parliament, Telangana MLAs,MLCs and BC intellectuals will go to Delhi and request the President (for assent)," Prabhakar said adding ministers also would seek President Murmu's appointment. Top leaders Rahul Gandhi and Mallikarjun Kharge are also seeking the President's appointment, he added. The bills were passed in March and sent to the Governor and it is pending assent from the President. Prabhakar sought support from all the political parties in Telangana in order to secure Presidential assent to the bills. The Telangana government earlier this month issued an ordinance facilitating 42 per cent reservation to Backward Classes in local body polls by amending an Act that was passed by the State Assembly in 2018. On June 25, the Telangana High Court directed the state government to hold elections for local bodies within three months. PTI SJR GDK KH VGN (This story has not been edited by News18 staff and is published from a syndicated news agency feed - PTI) view comments First Published: July 28, 2025, 23:15 IST Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
Time of India
24 minutes ago
- Time of India
Operation Sindoor sparks firestorm in Parliament: Govt hails strike, opposition questions ceasefire and secrecy
NEW DELHI: A marathon debate on Operation Sindoor in Parliament turned into a political battlefield on Monday, as the government lauded India's cross-border military action following the April 22 Pahalgam terror attack, while the Opposition grilled the Centre over transparency, strategic choices, and Donald Trump's claims of mediating a ceasefire between India and Pakistan. The session saw pointed attacks, dramatic rhetoric, emotional appeals, and deep divisions over what India's strongest post-Sindoor operation truly achieved. Government: Military precision, diplomatic success External affairs minister S Jaishankar led the defence, asserting that the operation, launched on May 7 and concluded on May 10, was India's sovereign response to Pakistan-backed terror. He categorically denied that trade was used as leverage by the US. He said, 'At no stage was there any discussion about trade during this time. The request for halting military action came from the Pakistani side, through the DGMO channel.' He added that India's diplomatic outreach was successful, with only three countries (besides Pakistan) opposing India at the UN. 'There was overwhelming recognition that terror was unacceptable, and India had the right to respond.' Opposition: Questions on ceasefire, secrecy, and Trump Congress MP Gaurav Gogoi delivered a sharp attack, citing Donald Trump's 26 public claims that he brokered the ceasefire by threatening to withdraw trade privileges, 'If Pakistan was ready to kneel, why did we stop? Before whom did the Prime Minister surrender?' He also accused the government of dodging key questions about how many Rafale jets were lost, and why China, reportedly backing Pakistan during the operation, was never named. Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Emergency Generators in Tbilisi: (Prices May Surprise You) Emergency Generator | Search Ads Search Now Undo by Taboola by Taboola Deepender Hooda: 'Historic strategic mistake' Congress MP Deepender Hooda accused the government of giving a 'clean chit' to Pakistan by choosing not to strike military targets. He said, 'The foreign minister said we weren't targeting military or civilian infrastructure. That was a historic mistake. The world knows there's no difference between Pakistan's army , government, and terrorists.' He also said, 'The biggest strategic mistake during Operation Sindoor was when the foreign minister said that we were not targeting military or civilian infrastructure. By making that statement, the government effectively gave a clean chit to the Pakistani army and government.' He further elaborated, 'You have repeatedly said, and even the world acknowledges, that there is no difference between Pakistan's government, its military, and the terrorists. They are one and the same. Yet, by declaring that only terror infrastructure was being targeted, you ended up sending a different message to the world. That was a historic mistake.' Anurag Thakur's barrage: 'Rahul occupied Congress' BJP MP Anurag Thakur launched a blistering personal attack on Congress and Rahul Gandhi. On Rahul Gandhi's political standing, Thakur said, 'Let me tell you, the leader you talk about, twice the people of the country did not even give him enough votes to become the leader of the opposition... He has become LoB from LoP. LoB stands for Leader Opposing Bharat. Opposing India and the Prime Minister is his agenda. I don't know whether he becomes the poster boy of Congress or not, but he has become the poster boy of Pakistan's propaganda. ..' On the 'half front' of internal opposition during the conflict, Thakur said, 'India fought on two and a half fronts, everyone knows about the two fronts, but in this half front, there is also a Rahul Occupied Congress. Look at the social media, in the last two months, Rahul Occupied Congress has made disgusting and insulting cartoons against the Prime Minister and the Indian Army... Rahul Occupied Congress called the Army chief a roadside goon. Rahul Gandhi should apologise to the entire country and the Indian Army...' On opposition silence over gruesome terrorist acts, Thakur further said, 'Of all the opposition MPs who have spoken here till now, not even one MP has stood up and said that in this terrorist attack, people were asked about their religion and asked to recite Kalma, their pants were removed, and then they were killed. Tell me what pain did the Opposition MPs have in saying this? When the defence minister was discussing the achievements of the Indian Army, there was no applause, no one was thumping the table. ..' Rajnath Singh: 'Army losses not for public debate' Defence minister Rajnath Singh maintained that the Opposition's repeated demand to know the number of jets lost or pilots killed was inappropriate and disconnected from the national mood. 'The country is proud of its soldiers. Not everything needs to be counted in public.' Outlining the operation's success and India's firm stance against terrorism, Rajnath asserted, 'At no stage in any conversation with US was there any linkage of trade with Operation Sindoor.' He emphasized the Indian Army's achievements, reinforcing the government's narrative of decisive action. C harged exchange between BJP MP Tejasvi Surya and NCP (SP) MP Supriya Sule Tejasvi Surya sparked controversy with his historical assertions. He said, 'At the very beginning of our Independence, at the dawn of this nation as an Independent country, Pandit Nehruji had a state policy that India did not require an army. Nehruji said this to General Lockhart that no plans for the modernisation of the army are required and that India's policy is ahimsa (non-violence)...we don't need the army, the police will do its job. ' Surya blamed Jawaharlal Nehru for neglecting defence. He said, 'Nehru had said India didn't need an army—only the police. He refused to modernise the armed forces.' Supriya Sule hit back at Tejasvi Surya's remarks, calling them an insult to the armed forces. 'I would like to tell Tejasvi Surya and put it on record, he said that Jawaharlal Nehruji, the first Prime Minister of India, never encouraged the defence forces and we have never done anything, this is the first time India has done exceptionally well in its armed forces. He has not only insulted thousands and lakhs of Indian force and armies and their families who have stood so that you and I can be safe.' She added, 'I object to the statement that he has Surya, if you haven't read history, then read it... When it comes to the country, the country comes first, then the state, then the party, then the family... When we got a call from Kiren Rijiju, he just told me on the phone that Supriya, you will have to give 10 days for the country... It was the greatness of the Prime Minister that he showed faith in the opposition leaders to lead the delegations. .. At the all-party meeting, the Congress party was the first to say that the Congress party and the entire opposition will stand with Narendra Modi's government with full strength.' Rajbhar: 'We wanted Operation Tandoor, not Sindoor' SP MP Ramashankar Rajbhar used vivid imagery to critique the government, he said, 'The country wanted Operation Tandoor, not Sindoor. We should've roasted the terrorists.' He also mocked Trump's alleged influence, saying, 'If Trump is telling the truth, then who's the real Vishwaguru—Modi or the man in the White House?' Premachandran, Chamala: Govt escaped early debate RSP MP N K Premachandran and Congress MP Kiran Kumar Chamala accused the government of avoiding early scrutiny. 'We had demanded a special session in April. They refused. Now they claim we're not being constructive.' Lalan Singh, TDP hail Op Sindoor as calculated response JD(U)'s Lalan Singh said the operation sent a strong message by neutralising 100 terrorists and disabling 11 airbases, without civilian casualties. He said, 'India showed it can act with strength and restraint.' TDP MP Lavu Sri Krishna Devarayalu added, 'The Pahalgam massacre was a slaughter. The response was not only justified, but essential.' Tharoor Silent, Chidambaram doubts foreign hand While Shashi Tharoor refused to comment, 'Maunvrat, Maunvrat,' he said when asked. Congress veteran P Chidambaram questioned whether the attackers were even foreign: 'What proof do we have? They could have been homegrown. Let's not make assumptions.' Ceasefire: India vs Trump's narrative While Trump has repeatedly claimed he stopped India using the threat of withdrawing trade benefits, India insists that the ceasefire understanding followed a Pakistani request through military channels. The Opposition demanded clarity. 'Why hasn't the PM publicly refuted Trump if he's lying?' asked Gogoi.
