
L.A. law enforcement's treatment of journalists during protests is once again under scrutiny
Sensing a confrontation, Márquez said, he raised his press credential and 'kept yelling press, press, press,' even as he turned and began running in the opposite direction. He barely made it a few feet before he felt a stinging pain as first one foam round, then another slammed into his buttocks and his back.
'They just unloaded,' he said of the deputies.
He was nearly struck again a short time later, when deputies riding by in an armored vehicle sprayed foam rounds into a gas station parking lot where Márquez and a KTLA-TV news crew had sought cover, he said. He was shaken, but said that he felt compelled to keep reporting.
'I got hit and what not but I'm glad I was there to document it,' he said.
The incident was one of dozens in which journalists have been shot with less-lethal police rounds, tear-gassed, shoved and detained while chronicling the ongoing civil unrest and military intervention in the nation's second largest city, according to interviews and video footage reviewed by The Times.
The police actions have drawn angry condemnation from public officials and 1st Amendment advocates. There have been multiple reported instances of reporters of not only being struck by projectiles, but also having their bags searched, being threatened with arrest, and getting blocked from areas where they had a right under state law to observe police activity.
Among those hit by police projectiles were several Times reporters in the course of covering protests in downtown L.A. over the past few days.
The LAPD and L.A. County Sheriff's Department have faced criticism and lawsuits over their treatment of news media during past crises, but some covering the recent events say the situation has only gotten worse with the inflammatory anti-media messaging coming from the Trump White House.
'The price for free speech should not be this high,' said Arturo Carmona, president and publisher of Caló News, a news site that covers issues that matter to English-speaking Latinos. 'Several of our reporters, several of whom are women of color, have been harassed and attacked by law enforcement.'
In one high-profile case, a CNN reporter was briefly detained by officers while doing a live-on air segment.
In another, Australian TV news reporter Lauren Tomasi was shot in the leg by a less-lethal round by an riot gear-clad officer moments after she wrapped up a live on-air segment. The incident became an international affair, with Australian Prime Minister Tony Albanese calling it 'horrific.'
L.A. Mayor Karen Bass said it 'sends a terrible message,' and several city councilmembers referenced it while grilling LAPD Chief Jim McDonnell on Tuesday about his department's response to the protests.
In a statement, the Sheriff's Department said it was reviewing video footage from several incidents involving the news media to determine whether any of its deputies were involved.
The department said it is 'committed to maintaining an open and transparent relationship with the media and ensuring that journalists can safely perform their duties, especially during protests, acts of civil disobedience, and public gatherings.'
'Our goal is to support press freedom while upholding public safety and operational integrity,' the statement said.
LAPD Deputy Chief Michael Rimkunas said that two of the roughly 15 complaints the department was investigating as of Tuesday involved possible mistreatment of journalists — a number that is expected to grow in the coming days and weeks
Rimkunas said the department decided to launch an investigation of the Tomasi incident on its own, but has since been in contact with the Australian consulate.
A coalition of 27 press and civil liberties advocacy groups wrote to U.S. Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem on Tuesday 'to express alarm that federal officers may have violated the First Amendment rights of journalists covering recent protests and unrest related to immigration enforcement in the Los Angeles area.'
Multiple journalists who covered the protests told The Times that officers and deputies used physical force or the threat of arrest to remove them from areas where they have a right to be.
In doing so, the journalists said, police were ignoring protections established by state law for journalists covering protests, as well as their own departments' policies adopted after mass protests after George Floyd's murder in 2020 and over the clearance of a homeless encampment in Echo Park in 2021.
On Saturday, journalist Ben Camacho was documenting the scene in Paramount, where images of people vandalizing and burning cars dominated the nightly newscasts. Wearing his press pass and with a camera hanging around his neck, he watched in shock as law enforcement opened fire on the crowd with less-lethal munitions, striking Nick Stern, a British news photographer, who crumbled to the ground in front of him.
After helping carry Stern to safety, Camacho said he too was struck by a round in the kneecap.
'I start to screaming pretty much at the top of my lungs,' he said. 'It was like a sledgehammer.'
He noted that many people are working on freelance contracts that don't offer medical insurance, and said officers sometimes brush aside reporters with credentials from smaller independent outlets, which have an important role in monitoring events on the ground.
Some police officials — who were not authorized to speak publicly — said officers try their best to accommodate reporters, but the situation on the street involves split-second decisions in a chaotic environment where they find themselves being attacked. They also contend that journalists from newer outlets or those who primarily post on social media act in adversarial or confrontational ways toward officers.
Los Angeles Press Club Press Rights Chair Adam Rose said he has been collecting examples of officers from local, state and federal agencies violating the rights of journalists — seemingly ignoring the lessons learned and promises made the wake of past protests.
Rose said many of the incidents were documented in videos that journalists themselves posted on social media. As of Wednesday morning, the tally was 43 and counting.
The mistreatment of journalists at the recent protests are part of a 'history of ugly treatment by police,' Rose said, which included the 1970 killing of one of the city's leading Latino media voices, Ruben Salazar, who had been covering a Chicano rights protest when he was struck by a tear-gas canister fired by a sheriff's deputy.
Even in cases where police abuses are well-documented on video, discipline of the offending officers is rare, Rose said.
With plunging revenues leading to the downsizing of many legacy newsrooms, a new generation of citizen journalists have taken a vital role in covering communities across the country — their reporting is protected as their mainstream counterparts, he said.
'The reality is police are not the ones who're allowed to decide who is press,' he said.
Some larger news companies have taken to hiring protective details for their reporters in the field, largely in response to aggressive crowds.
On Saturday, L.A. Daily News reporter Ryanne Mena was struck in the head by a projectile fired by law enforcement during a demonstration in Paramount.
She wasn't sure whether it was a tear gas canister or less-lethal munition, but said she later sought medical treatment and was diagnosed with a concussion. The day before she was hit in the thigh by another projectile while reporting downtown outside the jail, she said.
Covering a few prior protests had taught her to always be mindful of her surroundings and to 'never have my back toward anyone with a weapon.'
'It's still kind of unbelievable that that happened,' she said of her concussion. 'It's unacceptable that that happened that other journalists were targeted.'
Times staff writers Connor Sheets and David Zahniser contributed to this report.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
BHP, Vale accused of 'cheating' UK law firm out of $1.7 billion in fees
By Sam Tobin LONDON (Reuters) -BHP and Vale are facing a London lawsuit from the law firm representing hundreds of thousands of people over Brazil's worst environmental disaster, alleging the companies sought to cheat the firm out of legal fees by procuring settlements. BHP said it rejected the allegations "in their entirety" and would contest them. Vale declined to comment. Pogust Goodhead, which represents the claimants in an ongoing case against BHP over the 2015 collapse of the Fundao dam in Mariana, southeastern Brazil, says it will seek 1.3 billion pounds ($1.7 billion) for unpaid fees. The firm was representing more than 600,000 Brazilians in the case at London's High Court. A June presentation by BHP and Vale's Samarco joint venture – which owned and operated the dam – said around 130,000 people had settled. In a legal letter sent on Pogust Goodhead's behalf, lawyers representing the firm allege BHP, Vale and Samarco pressured claimants to "settle their claims at far below their true value". Pogust Goodhead also alleges that a 170 billion-reais ($30.3 billion) compensation agreement which Brazil signed with BHP, Vale and Samarco in October 2024 prevented claimants from discussing the deal with the firm or paying its legal fees. The firm says it has also incurred an extra $1 billion in borrowing costs to finance the English case over the dam's collapse. BHP DENIES ALLEGATIONS "We reject Pogust Goodhead's claims and allegations in their entirety and dispute their factual and legal basis," a BHP spokesperson said in a statement. "These allegations and threatened claims are entirely without merit and BHP rejects and will vigorously contest them." The BHP spokesperson pointed to last year's compensation deal, saying: "We continue to believe Brazil is the most appropriate, effective, and efficient place for compensation for the Fundao dam failure from Samarco to be delivered." Pogust Goodhead's threat of legal action - in a so-called "letter before action" that is required as part of the process - is the latest development in the litigation, after the High Court last month ruled BHP should face a full contempt of court hearing for funding parallel litigation in Brazil. BHP, meanwhile, still awaits judgment following a trial of the underlying lawsuit over the dam collapse, in which Pogust Goodhead said it was seeking damages of up to 36 billion pounds. When the dam burst in 2015, it unleashed a wave of toxic sludge that killed 19 people, left thousands homeless, flooded forests and polluted the length of the Doce River. The trial began in October and finished in March. BHP denies liability and says the case duplicates legal proceedings and reparation and repair programs in Brazil.


Newsweek
an hour ago
- Newsweek
Map Shows Where China and Russia Are Expanding Bases in Antarctica
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Expansion by Russia and China in Antarctica has raised concerns about the countries' military and mining ambitions for the territory. China has announced that it will build a sixth permanent research station on the icy continent, while Russia is reopening and upgrading stations and building a new runway. The 1961 Antarctic Treaty prohibits military activity on the continent, but experts have sounded the alarm that moves by Russia and China may transform it into another object of territorial competition. Newsweek has mapped the extent of the countries' existing operations around the South Pole and has contacted the Chinese and Russian foreign ministries for comment. Why It Matters The status of Antarctica as a pristine research reserve has been challenged by infrastructure and logistic expansions by China and Russia, which have prompted alarm about whether the countries have nonscientific motivations for the southern land. Meanwhile, the White House has announced $60 million cuts to its Antarctic funding, and representatives of the 58 Antarctic Treaty signatories discussed this month how the southern territory can remain a place for science and peace. This image taken on March 13, 2014, shows a Chinese base on King George Island in Antarctica. This image taken on March 13, 2014, shows a Chinese base on King George Island in To Know The Antarctic Treaty promotes international collaboration and lays aside the territorial claims of seven countries, which have all agreed not to act on their claimed ownership. Expansion plans are within the rights of the Antarctic Treaty, but China and Russia have raised suspicions about whether their intentions will remain peaceful and are also accused of undermining conservation efforts by blocking new protections for marine areas. In June, the United Kingdom's parliamentary environmental audit committee released a report that questioned whether Russian seismic surveys were for potential oil prospecting, rather than scientific exploration. The report also said both Russia and China were seen as pursuing strategic interests in the region—with Moscow looking to assert its status as a polar power, while China continues to expand its Antarctic infrastructure. China wants to build its sixth research station at Marie Byrd Land in the west of the continent to be opened in 2027. Beijing said there was no "geopolitical motive" behind the plans, according to the Australian outlet ABC. Newsweek's map shows China's Antarctic sites, three of which are permanent and three seasonal. They are Kunlun, Taishan, Zhongshan, Qinling, Great Wall Station and a site at Inexpressible Island. The map also shows 11 Russian sites, five of which are permanent, five seasonal and one temporarily closed. The permanent ones are at Molodezhnaya, Mirny, Novolazarevskaya, Bellingshausen and Vostok. A U.S. Defense Department report in 2022 said China's increased presence in Antarctica was likely intended to strengthen claims to natural resources and maritime access. Bill Muntean, a nonresident senior associate at the Center for Strategic and International Studies, told ABC that there were "significant questions" about Russia's and China's scientific explorations on the continent. Jeffrey McGee, an expert in the Antarctic treaty from Australia's University of Tasmania, told the outlet that some scientific equipment installed by the countries could have dual scientific and military uses, such as infrared telescopes, GPS and ground-station receivers that can communicate with satellites. Worries about dual-use equipment were highlighted in a June 2022 report for the Sea Power Centre Australia, which concluded that while the Antarctic has not yet reached a period of militarization, it is no longer fully nonmilitarized and used solely for peaceful purposes. While the U.S. is the main player in the Antarctic region, the White House has announced cuts of about $60 million to its Antarctic funding, sparking concerns among experts. Muntean told The New York Times that the U.S. has been steadily retreating from activities in Antarctica. He said that while the country isn't closing any stations, it's not repairing them or building them and has been reducing some logistics capacity. What People Are Saying Bill Muntean, a nonresident senior associate at the Center for Strategic and International Studies, told Australia's ABC: "There are significant questions and concerns over activities in the oceans off Antarctica. … What are Russia and China doing with their scientific explorations?" A U.K. parliamentary environmental audit committee report released in June said: "With rising geopolitical tensions, particularly from countries like Russia and China, the U.K.'s role in supporting the Antarctic Treaty System is growing in importance." Sea Power Centre Australia wrote in a June 2022 report: "One of the main challenges Russia and China pose to the stability of the ATS is linked to suspicions of dual-purpose activities in the Antarctic, and notably military intelligence operation." What Happens Next China has said there is no "geopolitical motive" behind the expansion of its operations in Antarctica, but international concerns over the intentions of Beijing and Moscow in the icy continent are likely to continue.


CBS News
an hour ago
- CBS News
Encino community leaders expected to present written demands to city officials for improved public safety
Community leaders in Encino are planning to present written demands to city officials for improved public safety Thursday morning. The demands come after a rise in home invasions, burglaries and the killing of "American Idol" executive Robin Kaye and her husband, Thomas Deluca, who were allegedly shot with their own gun, Los Angeles County District Attorney Nathan Hochman said. The written demands are expected to be presented at 10 a.m. in front of the Van Nuys City Hall. In a written letter, Encino community members allege the Los Angeles Police Department responded to two 911 calls at Kaye and Deluca's home but left the property after they didn't find any crime had been committed. They also claim that following the killing, several other "high-profile home invasions and burglaries, including a homeowner shooting an intruder." "These daily crimes have shaken our community and underscore the urgent need for action and improved protection of public safety in Encino," the community letter says. The letter is calling for an increase of LAPD resources in Encino, the enforcement of existing no-camping laws in the Sepulveda Basin and an accountability plan. Community members will also be holding a virtual meeting on Thursday evening with Mayor Karen Bass, Councilmember Nithya Raman, LAPD officials, State Senator Henry Stern and Deputy Mayor for Public Safety Robert Clark.