logo
"India has decoupled economic growth from emissions": Dy Chairman Rajya Sabha Harivansh at BRICS forum

"India has decoupled economic growth from emissions": Dy Chairman Rajya Sabha Harivansh at BRICS forum

India Gazette05-06-2025

Brasilia [Brazil], June 5 (ANI): Underlining India's key achievements and initiatives in its fight against climate change, Harivansh Narayan Singh, Deputy Chairman of the Rajya Sabha, said that India has decoupled economic growth from emissions. He was addressing a forum on Climate and sustainability at the 11th BRICS Parliamentary Forum in Brasilia, Brazil, on Thursday.
Harivansh informed the forum that India's climate actions are based on equity and the principle of common but differentiated responsibilities.
'India has progressively continued decoupling economic growth from emissions. Between 2005 and 2020, India's emission intensity of Gross Domestic Product reduced by 36%,' he said.
'India has installed 232 gigawatt of non-fossil electric capacity, thereby already achieving its Nationally Determined Contribution (NDC) almost 8 years ahead of schedule,' he added.
He also hoped that the upcoming COP30 in Brazil would be a critical milestone in global adaptation and resilience efforts.
He urged the BRICS nations to join global sustainability initiatives such as the International Solar Alliance, the Leadership Group for Industry Transition, and the Global Biofuel Alliance to facilitate the ongoing efforts to address climate change.
Earlier on Wednesday, the Deputy Chairman, in his remarks on the Global Health Alliance, underscored the urgent need for collective action for coordinated responses to emerging health challenges. He noted that Neglected Tropical Diseases remain deeply relevant areas of discussion, especially for low- and middle-income countries.
In his address, Harivansh underlined various initiatives by the Indian government to expand and improve the quality of healthcare provided to its citizens.
'Our Pradhan Mantri Jan Arogya Yojana is the world's largest health insurance program, which covers hospitalisation costs up to approx. 6000 USD to cover approximately 155 million families and has reduced out-of-pocket health expenditure by 30%. This scheme has now been extended to cover all citizens over 70 years of age. To transform India into a digitally empowered society, we have implemented the 'Ayushman Bharat Digital Health Mission'. We also have a scheme to address gaps in health infrastructure, disease surveillance, and research,' he said.
Earlier, he also delivered his remarks on the Alliance for Global Health. The Indian delegation is being led by Lok Sabha Speaker Om Birla, along with other Members of Parliament.
The BRICS Parliamentary Forum discusses several other topics, such as 'New Paths for Economic Development', 'Co-operation for responsible and inclusive Artificial Intelligence', and 'Reform of Multilateral Peace and Security Architecture'. (ANI)

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

White House says Trump share strong ties with PM Modi, confirms US-India trade deal 'very close'
White House says Trump share strong ties with PM Modi, confirms US-India trade deal 'very close'

India.com

time14 minutes ago

  • India.com

White House says Trump share strong ties with PM Modi, confirms US-India trade deal 'very close'

White House says Trump share strong ties with PM Modi, confirms US-India trade deal 'very close' White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt called India a 'key friend' of the United States in the Indo-Pacific region, during a press briefing on Monday. She was speaking about the ongoing trade talks between the two countries and said that President Donald Trump and Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi have a strong and friendly relationship. 'India remains a very strategic ally in the Asia Pacific and the President has a very good relationship with Prime Minister Modi, and he will continue to have that,' says White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt replying to ANI's question regarding how the US President sees the China's role and its influence in the Indo-Pacific region. #WATCH | 'India remains a very strategic ally in the Asia Pacific and the President has a very good relationship with Prime Minister Modi, and he will continue to have that, 'says White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt replying to ANI's question regarding how the US… — ANI (@ANI) June 30, 2025 Leavitt mentioned that the trade deal between the US and India is nearly ready. 'Yes, the President said that last week (that the US and India are very close to a trade deal), and it remains true. I just spoke to our Secretary of Commerce about it. He was in the Oval Office with the President. They are finalising these agreements, and you'll hear from the President and his trade team very soon when it comes to India, 'says White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt in response to the ANI's question, when asked about the US President's last week announcement that the trade deal with India is close and this could happen anytime soon. When asked about China's influence in the Indo-Pacific, Leavitt again highlighted the importance of India, saying, 'India is a very important partner for us in the region. The President values his relationship with Prime Minister Modi and that will continue.' Her comments came while Indian External Affairs Minister S. Jaishankar was in the US for the QUAD Foreign Ministers' meeting. The QUAD, made up of India, the US, Japan, and Australia—focuses on keeping the Indo-Pacific free, open, and secure. The group first came together in 2004 to help with relief efforts after the Indian Ocean tsunami and has since grown into a key regional partnership. Earlier on June 18, it was confirmed that US President Donald Trump has accepted Prime Minister Narendra Modi's invitation to attend the upcoming QUAD Summit in New Delhi. Foreign Secretary Vikram Misri shared the update in a video message, saying, 'For the next QUAD meeting, Prime Minister Modi invited President Trump to visit India. President Trump gladly accepted the invitation and said he is looking forward to the visit.' India-US Trade Talks: Progress Toward Early Deal India and the United States started a fresh round of trade talks on June 26, aiming to finalize an early agreement before the US begins imposing new tariffs on imports from 57 countries, including India, starting July 9. According to various reports, the Indian delegation, led by Chief Negotiator and Special Secretary for Commerce Rajesh Agrawal, traveled to Washington for a two-day meeting. The main focus is to resolve ongoing trade issues and work toward an interim deal that could serve as the foundation for a full Bilateral Trade Agreement (BTA) by September or October 2025. Once this early deal is in place, both nations are expected to move toward negotiating a complete Free Trade Agreement (FTA), with the goal of doubling their trade to USD 500 billion by 2030. India has also urged the US to cancel all current and upcoming retaliatory tariffs, including a 26 per cent duty, made up of a 10 per cent charge already in effect since April 5 and an additional 16 per cent set to begin on July 9.

Indian team in US extends stay, trade talks in final phase
Indian team in US extends stay, trade talks in final phase

New Indian Express

time14 minutes ago

  • New Indian Express

Indian team in US extends stay, trade talks in final phase

NEW DELHI: Indian negotiators currently in the US for last-minute talks to finalise an interim trade deal on Monday extended their stay by three more days, raising hopes of a deal before the July 9 deadline when the Trump tariffs will kick in if there is no pact. A commerce ministry official said the Indian team would stay till July 1. The negotiators were originally scheduled to stay for two days — June 26 and 27. The Indian team is headed by Rajesh Agrawal, special secretary, Department of Commerce. Last week, US President Donald Trump had hinted at the possibility of a big trade agreement with India. 'We are having some great deals. We have one coming up, maybe with India, a very big one, where we're going to open up India,' Trump had said during an event at the White House last Thursday. India's trade officials had earlier said they were 'not desperate' for a deal before July 9 at the cost of India's interests, the extended parleys suggest a deal is likely to be sealed. The US has already decided not to levy a 26% import tariff on Indian goods till July 8. If both the countries failed to finalise an interim deal by that date, then Indian goods exported to the US would attract a higher tariff than the existing 10%. American authorities have already said that the July 9 deadline would not be extended.

Measuring poverty shouldn't be about calories. India needs a thali index
Measuring poverty shouldn't be about calories. India needs a thali index

Indian Express

time21 minutes ago

  • Indian Express

Measuring poverty shouldn't be about calories. India needs a thali index

The publication of the survey of household consumption expenditure for 2023-24 by the National Statistics Office in January 2025 has been followed by a flurry of estimates of poverty in India. Of these, two have received the most attention. The first off the block was a report from SBI in January, which was followed by one from the World Bank. They report more or less similar findings. The former flags 'a remarkable decline in rural poverty, estimated at 4.86 per cent in FY24… urban poverty estimated at 4.09 per cent'. The World Bank's report is far more optimistic, pegging 'extreme poverty' at 2.8 per cent for rural India and 1.1 per cent for urban India in 2022-23. If poverty in India is what these estimates show, it would be a matter for rejoicing, as it would have been virtually eradicated. These estimates of poverty have brought forth many responses. The Narendra Modi government's votaries have been quick to claim that the outcome reflects the success of its policies. Critics have focused on the non-comparability of the latest consumption data with those for 2011-12 as the survey methods have undergone change since. Both neglect the issue of the standard of living in India, and whether the extant methodology of poverty measurement underlying these estimates can lead to anything at all being said on the matter. Finally, more detached observers have brought up the question of what the 'historic low' in poverty implies for the subsidy regime. Officially approved poverty measurement in India has involved estimating the level of consumption expenditure sufficient to enable the minimum calorie intake necessary for living and working. As calories measure the energy ingested through food and drink, the methodology represents a physiological approach. Arguably, though, there can be another approach. This is to recognise that humans view food in terms of the energy, nutritional value and satisfaction that it provides. Societies have over time arrived at a geographically and culturally mediated norm for food consumption. In India, arguably, this would be represented by a thali, a serving of food comprising carbohydrates, protein and vitamins. Though it may be referred to differently across the country, a thali would be understood to include rice/roti, lentils and vegetables, with dairy/meat/fish extra according to diet and affordability. Indians recognise the thali as a fairly complete and nutritionally balanced unit of food consumption, a meal. Given the centrality of the thali in Indian life, it would be appropriate to treat it as the metric by which to measure the standard of living. This implies measuring the standard of living in terms of food, but then we believe that the level of food consumption should be treated as its most important constituent. Now, a meaningful question to ask would be, 'How many thalis does the daily consumption expenditure on food translate into?' We use the price of a vegetarian thali to measure the level of food consumption across the population as it is the most basic meal. The price of a thali at Rs 30 was taken from the rating agency Crisil, which calculates the cost of a home-cooked thali using data on the cost of its ingredients sourced from the east, west, north and south of India. The value of food consumption per capita given in the consumption survey for 2023-24 was expanded to include items purchased from the public distribution system and items received free as part of social welfare programmes. We found that in 2023-24, up to 40 per cent of the rural population could not afford two thalis a day. In urban India, up to 10 per cent of the population could not afford two thalis a day. These findings indicate that levels of food deprivation are much higher than what are implied by the poverty estimates using the same data, which we recounted at the outset. A possible reason for the difference between our estimate of the standard of living and the poverty estimates from the SBI and the World Bank is that we take the expenditure on food as opposed to total consumption expenditure as the relevant measure of consumption. The reasoning was as follows. There are five items of essential expenditure – housing, conveyance, telephony, health and education – that a household cannot forgo if it is to ensure its livelihood. Now, expenditure on food ends up as the residual. Therefore, when appraising the standard of living in terms of food consumption, basing it on the actual expenditure on food would be realistic. Poverty estimation needs a food standard that is based on goods. The thali index serves this purpose while being compatible with accounting for the calorific value of food intake. We may now address the issue of subsidies. Basing their argument on the much-publicised recent estimates of poverty, some observers have queried whether subsidies in general should be persisted with in economic policy. We believe that this is a discussion that needs to take place, as for too long the discourse on subsidies has been hijacked by political parties to justify competitive welfarism. However, our findings using a thali index of consumption implies that the food subsidy needs more to be rationalised rather than eliminated. For instance, in rural India, the per capita subsidy at the 70th percentile is not much lower than it is at the fifth, even though those in the former class can afford more than twice the number of thalis even without subsidisation. Eliminating the food subsidy at the upper reaches of the distribution while enhancing it at the lower levels would now be optimal. Balakrishnan is honorary visiting professor, Centre for Development Studies, Thiruvananthapuram and Raj is an economist based in Patna

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store