Google is working on a new Gemini logo with familiar colors
Just when we thought Gemini couldn't be Google-fied anymore, the Mountain View, California-based company succeeded in surprising us.
Soon after the tech giant began rolling out Song Search on the Android Gemini app, paired with support for Scheduled Actions, it now seems to be giving the Gemini app and its logo a more Google-esque look.
The app's familiar blue and purple tone, which can be observed across instances of the Gemini branding, is in the midst of being replaced with a more colorful hue — one that looks similar to Google Assistants signature multicolored branding.
Hints about the redesign were spotted in the latest Google app beta build (version 16.24.66.sa.arm64 beta) by the folks over at Android Authority, surfacing Google's well-known color palette across the app's UI.
Old, new, old, new
The change was observed in the app's splash screen, which highlights an animated red, yellow, green, and blue Gemini logo for a brief second when you open a new instance of the app. Similarly, the logo on the onboarding screen appears in the same Google-themed colors, as seen in the screenshots above.
Eagle-eyed users would have also spotted the lack of blue and purple on the "Get to know Gemini, your AI assistant" text at the top. The change also makes its way to the Gemini logo that appears above the AI tool's responses.
These aren't huge changes by any means, and won't change the way users utilize Gemini. However, the refresh does make the experience feel a little more aligned and consistent with Google's overall brand identity.
For what it's worth, these changes were manually enabled, and they won't surface for you in the beta build of the app just yet. The changes will likely make their way out widely with a future update, which might happen around the time when Google Assistant is fully phased out later this year.
Google Gemini
Google LLC
PRODUCTIVITY
Price: Free
4.5
Download
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
30 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Joor's Solution to Fashion's Need for Speed is a Digital Trade Show
In today's retail relay, growth hinges on handing buyers the baton of evergreen bestsellers and fresh-drop stock primed to ship at the speed of style. After all, McKinsey reported last November, one-third of consumers now expect same-day delivery to keep pace with their fashion fix. In response to these evolving demands, Joor developed a first-of-its-kind digital show to unite fashion brands with inventory available to sell (ATS) now. The fashion apparel sector's wholesale management ecosystem is calling it the Ready-To-Ship Style digital event, as developed to address the evolving needs of the industry's retail landscape. More from Sourcing Journal FedEx Faces $170M in Tariff Headwinds as US Cracks Down on De Minimis China Port Volumes Hit Record Highs on US Tariff Truce Footwear Firms Rejiggering Supply Chains Will See Long-Term Benefits 'Brands are seeking efficient ways to sell through existing inventory, while retailers require the agility to place orders closer to delivery, minimizing risk by reacting to trends and real-time product performance,' said Amanda McCormick Bacal, senior vice president of marketing at Joor. 'By focusing on available-to-sell inventory, this groundbreaking digital experience provides access to products before prices are impacted by upcoming tariffs, as well as a showcase for evergreen styles which have become increasingly vital to retailers' assortments.' The digital trade show, hosted on Joor Passport, features 145 brands—including Mother Denim, Juicy Couture and Farm Rio—all with ATS inventory. Participating players can showcase brand bestsellers, evergreen pieces and carryover styles to 'maximize visibility of current stock,' Joor said, 'and drive sales ahead of the upcoming tariff changes.' Retailers looking to address these evolving market needs quickly, meanwhile, can now source styles in stock and ready to ship rather than placing orders to be delivered six months later. Joor's exclusive transaction data revealed several 'seismic shifts' within the luxury wholesale fashion industry over the past five years. Retailers are increasingly placing orders on shorter lead times, the data found, and placing smaller initial orders to save more of the company's buying budget for in-season purchases. In fact, per the New York-based platform, the average time from a wholesale order being placed to the product shipping has fallen 66 percent—from a high of 253 days in 2019 to just 86 days in 2024. In addition, evergreen styles continue to signify the climbing importance of such core items' driving overall sales volumes—growing from 37 percent of gross merchandise value (GMV) on Joor in 2019 to 47 percent in 2024. 'The fact that nearly half of total transaction volume is now dedicated to evergreen products demonstrates brands continued focus on maximizing best sellers and retailers' continued desire to invest in proven commercial winners,' Joor said. Looming tariffs seriously influence the wholesale fashion market's need for speed as well. Joor's tariff survey from April confirmed that 85 percent of brands anticipate increasing prices because of global tariffs, creating an urgency for retailers to order and receive goods in advance of these price hikes. The Joor Ready-To-Ship Style passport show runs until August 18.
Forbes
33 minutes ago
- Forbes
Musk-Trump Feud Reignites As Billionaire Attacks Spending Bill Backers
The feud between President Donald Trump and his former ally, Elon Musk, was reignited once again on Tuesday after the world's richest person said he'll back primary challenges against GOP lawmakers voting for the president's signature spending bill, prompting Trump to retaliate by threatening to scrap government subsidies for Musk's firms. Elon Musk looks on during a news conference with US President Donald Trump in the Oval Office of the ... More White House in Washington. AFP via Getty Images Musk attacked the spending bill in a series of post on X on Monday night and early Tuesday morning, saying: 'Every member of Congress who campaigned on reducing government spending,' and backed the mega bill 'will lose their primary next year if it is the last thing I do on this Earth.' The billionaire then tweeted, 'If this insane spending bill passes, the America Party will be formed the next day,' as he bashed what he described as the 'Democrat-Republican uniparty.' Musk later said that anyone who votes for the legislation after campaigning 'on the PROMISE of REDUCING SPENDING' will see their face on a poster of Pinocchio with the caption 'LIAR' followed by the text 'Voted to increase America's Debt by $5,000,000,000,000.' The X owner reshared the results of an unscientific poll he conducted on the platform last month during his public blow-up with the president and wrote 'VOX POPULI VOX DEI 80% voted for a new party.' Earlier on Monday, Musk had attacked the GOP and the spending bill, tweeting: 'It is obvious with the insane spending of this bill, which increases the debt ceiling by a record FIVE TRILLION DOLLARS that we live in a one-party country – the PORKY PIG PARTY!!' This is a developing story.
Tom's Guide
38 minutes ago
- Tom's Guide
This is the one upgrade that will get me to switch my Pixel Watch 3 for a Pixel Watch 4
I've always had very mixed feelings about smartwatches, but finally caved and picked up the Google Pixel Watch 3 last year. While my feelings haven't completely turned around, I have managed to fill a few niches with the wearable — but there's one thing I'd like to change. If you remember the original Pixel Watch, which was released back in 2021, you'll be aware that it came with a wireless charging-like system similar to the Apple Watch 10 and Galaxy Watch 7. By the time the Pixel Watch 2 came around, though, that feature was gone. And having used the replacement charging system and logged the problems it seems to have, I wish the Pixel Watch 4 would bring back something similar to the old arrangement — even though I know it's not going to happen should the Pixel 4 show up as expected later this year alongside the Pixel 10 smartphone series. Rather than having a wireless charging system, both the Pixel Watch 2 and Watch 3 draw their power from a 4-pin connector. It's the same charging system as recent Fitbit watches, like the Fitbit Sense 2 and Versa 4 — to the point where the chargers are (just about) compatible with each other. But while Fitbit watches are now functionally dead, the charging connection is still very much alive. The problem is, it doesn't work nearly as well on my Pixel Watch 3 as it did on my Fitbit Versa 4. I never actually had an issue with getting power into that watch, but the Pixel Watch 3 doesn't seem to want to play by the same rules. I've lost count of the number of times I've put my watch down to charge, and it just sat there not taking in power. I've done everything from making sure the pins are perfectly aligned, that the connectors are all clean, and there will still be times when the watch essentially goes, "hmm, nah." I never had that issue with the Versa 4, and that wearable was considerably cheaper — not to mention less advanced. Aside from the fact the charging pins liked scratching the back of the watch, it always recharged when I needed it to. I don't know why that's the case, but it's incredibly frustrating — and I'd love to be able to slap my watch onto a charging puck haphazardly with the confidence that it won't just sit there doing nothing. Plus, it would be nice to use my the reverse wireless charging on my Pixel 9 Pro to juice up my watch. When you look at the reasons why Google scrapped wireless charging for Pixel Watch 2 and 3, the reasons make sense. The main benefits are that pin charging offers faster charging speeds, which is helpful when you need to recharge your watch every day. This charging system also produces significantly less heat. In fact the heat problem was so bad that Google had to put out an update to nerf the charging speed to keep the temperature down to the point where a 100% recharge took almost 2 hours to finish — which is not good. I had wondered whether thickness was another factor, since it always seems to be with smartphones, but that doesn't seem to be the case. The Pixel Watch and its successors are all 12.3mm thick; in fact, they all look pretty similar, though admittedly, the original Pixel Watch is a lot rounder at the bottom compared to its younger siblings. That said, removing the charging coils from the wearable could have made space for other things. The Pixel Watch 2 has sensors for EDA, skin temperature, irregular heart beat rhythm and an improved multi-point heart rate sensor. Not to mention, it offers a larger battery than its predecessor. It was never officially confirmed that these features required the charging coil space, but I'd bet money Google definitely put the extra real estate to good use once the charging pins were decided on. As problematic as the Pixel Watch's wireless charging was, I'd still like to see some kind of puck-charging system come back on Pixel Watch 4 — or on some future model if it's too late to do anything about this year's offering. Google will need to work out the kinks, and improve wireless charging speeds without turning the wearable into a miniature burn risk in the process. Or, you know, at least make the 4-pin charging more consistent than it currently is. It really should not be hit-and-miss the way it has been for me, because like any charger, it should just be able to work. Hopefully, that isn't just a pipe dream.
