
UN calls for probe into Libya mass graves
It expressed concerns about the discovery of dozens of bodies, some charred and buried and others in hospital refrigerators, in an area of Libya's capital controlled by an armed militia whose leader was killed last month.
UN High Commissioner for Human Rights Volker Türk said he was shocked by revelations that gross rights violations were uncovered at detention facilities in Tripoli run by the Stabilization Support Authority, or SSA, an armed group whose commander, Abdel-Ghani Al-Kikli, was killed in militia fighting in mid-May.
It was established to uphold the rule of law and falls under the Presidential Council that came to power in 2021 with the Government of National Unity of Abdul Hamid Dbeibah through a UN-backed process.
The rights office said it later received information on the excavation of 10 charred bodies at the SSA headquarters in the Abu Salim neighborhood and another 67 bodies discovered in refrigerators in the Abu Salim and Al-Khadra Hospitals.
It also cited reports of a burial site at the Tripoli Zoo that was run by the SSA.
The office said the identities of the bodies were not immediately clear. 'Our worst-held fears are being confirmed: Dozens of bodies have been discovered at these sites, along with the discovery of suspected instruments of torture and abuse, and potential evidence of extrajudicial killings,' Türk said in a statement.
Türk called on authorities to seal the area to preserve evidence and said there needed to be accountability for the killings. He said the UN should be granted access to the sites to document rights violations.
Libya, a major oil producer in the Mediterranean, has known little law and order since a 2011 NATO-backed uprising that toppled dictator Muammar Qaddafi and eventually divided the country between warring eastern and western factions.
The rights body said the discovery of dozens of bodies and suspected instruments of torture and abuse confirmed longstanding findings by the UN that human rights violations were committed at such sites.
'We call on the Libyan authorities to conduct independent, impartial and transparent investigations into these discoveries,' it said in a statement. It urged the authorities to preserve evidence and grant Libya's forensic teams, as well as the United Nations, full access to the sites.
Outright war fighting in Libya abated with a ceasefire in 2020. However, efforts to end the political crisis have failed, with major factions occasionally joining forces in armed clashes and competing for control over Libya's substantial energy resources.
Armed clashes erupted on Monday evening and gunfire echoed in the center and other parts of Tripoli following reports that the commander of one of its most powerful armed groups had been killed, three residents said by phone.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Leaders
5 hours ago
- Leaders
Israel Kills Dozens of Palestinians at Aid Site in Gaza
Israeli forces killed at least 36 Palestinians and injured others near an aid distribution site run by the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF) in Khan Younis, reported Reuters. The US-backed organization denied the incident, while the Israeli army said it only fired warning shots at suspects, amid growing controversary over aid distribution process in the war-torn enclave. Shooting Palestinians At dawn on Saturday, the Israeli troops opened gunfire at Palestinians heading to an aid distribution site in Khan Younis, killing at least 36 people, according to Gaza's Health Ministry and Nasser Hospital. The Israeli military said it fired warning shots at suspects moving near its forces, at a time when the distribution site was not active. It said it was investigating the incident. However, an eyewitness told Reuters that there were no warnings before the shooting. 'We thought they came out to organize us so we can get aid, suddenly (I) saw the jeeps coming from one side, and the tanks from the other and started shooting at us,' Gaza resident Mohamed al-Khalidi said. GHF Response The GHF denied any incidents or fatalities on Saturday, adding that it warned people not to head to its sites in the dark. 'We have repeatedly warned aid seekers not to travel to our sites overnight and early morning hours,' the GHF said. 'The reported (Israeli military) activity resulting in fatalities occurred hours before our sites opened and our understanding is most of the casualties occurred several kilometers away from the nearest GHF site,' it said in a statement. The GHF has sparked worldwide anger over its aid distribution mechanism that caused mounting death toll near distribution sites. The Israeli and US-backed organization works with private American contractors to get aid supplies into Gaza. Global Condemnation The GHF model bypasses the UN-led system as Israel claims that Hamas loots aid shipments, an accusation the Palestinian movement denies. Under the GHF operation system, Palestinian aid seekers are required to travel to distribution sites each week to get one package per family. However, the UN and other international organizations have criticized the GHF operation model, refusing to cooperate with the organization amid fears it aims to force the displacement of Palestinians and saying there is no evidence that Hamas steals aid. Moreover, the UN has called the GHF model 'unsafe' and a 'breach of humanitarian impartiality standards.' Earlier in July, Amnesty International accused Israel and the GHF of using starvation tactics as a weapon of war against Palestinians as part of the Israeli ongoing genocide in the Gaza Strip. It also said that Israel has turned aid seeking into a 'booby trap for desperate starved Palestinians' by preventing UN and other key humanitarian organizations from distributing certain aid items and by maintaining the GHF 'militarized aid scheme.' Rising Deaths Shooting incidents near GHF distribution sites have been on the rise in recent weeks. On July 15, 2025, the UN Rights Office said that since May 27, 2025, at least 875 people in Gaza while seeking aid; 674 of them near the GHF sites. The remaining 201 were killed while seeking aid on the routes of aid convoys or near aid convoys run by the UN or its partners. Furthermore, the UN agency for Palestinian refugees, UNRWA, voiced deep concerns over civilian deaths near aid sites amid the spread of deadly malnutrition among children. In the light of this, the UNRWA Director of Communications, Juliette Touma, said: 'Our teams on the ground – UNRWA teams and other United Nations teams – have spoken to survivors of these killings, these starving children included, who were shot at while on their way to pick up very little food.' Touma warned that babies are dying as a result of acute malnutrition caused by Israel's blockade on aid entry into Gaza. 'We've been banned from bringing any humanitarian assistance into Gaza for more than four months now,' she said, pointing to a 'significant increase' in child malnutrition since the Israeli blockade began on 2 March. The Israeli war on Gaza has killed more than 58,000 Palestinians and wounded over 138,000 since October 7, 2023, according to Gaza's Health Ministry. Short link : Post Views: 75


Arab News
10 hours ago
- Arab News
Rights activists welcome Pakistan Senate move to scrap death penalty for two crimes
KARACHI: Rights activists in Pakistan on Saturday welcomed Pakistan's Senate decision to abolish the death penalty for two criminal offenses— publicly stripping women and harboring hijackers— but stressed the need for stronger legislation and better enforcement to ensure justice for survivors and prevent violence. The reform amends Sections 354-A and 402-C of the Pakistan Penal Code and replaces capital punishment with life imprisonment for the two crimes. Lawmakers say the move is part of a broader effort to align Pakistan's criminal justice system with international human rights standards, particularly under the European Union's Generalized Scheme of Preferences Plus (GSP+), which grants preferential trade access to countries that uphold certain rights commitments. 'Publicly stripping women of their clothes is one of the most heinous crimes and must be met with the harshest punishment,' Mahnaz Rahman, woman's rights activist and former executive director of the Aurat Foundation, told Arab News. 'While we strongly advocate for severe punishments for such acts, we do not support the death penalty for any crime, including this one.' She said life imprisonment itself was an 'extremely severe' punishment, though she insisted the change must be accompanied by comprehensive and robust legislation to prevent this and all other forms of violence against women. 'Ultimately, it is the effective enforcement of laws and accountability that will deter such crimes and help ensure that women feel genuinely safe and protected in our society,' she added. Sarah Belal, Executive Director of Justice Project Pakistan (JPP), said the reform aligned Pakistan's criminal justice system more closely with the principles of fairness and the rule of law. 'The death penalty has never been enforced for this offense, but its mere presence has discouraged convictions and denied survivors meaningful redress,' she said. 'Harsh punishments may appear tough, but they often let perpetrators walk free.' 'Removing the death penalty for these offenses does not mean they are being decriminalized,' she added. 'It simply means we are pushing for stronger, more proportionate implementation of the law.' Senator Talal Chaudhry of the ruling Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz (PML-N) party who introduced the bill said the amendments had been thoroughly discussed and approved by a standing committee with cross-party input. 'Replacing the death penalty with life imprisonment under both sections is part of Pakistan's legal reforms,' he said. The bill must now be passed by the National Assembly before it can receive presidential assent and become law. Under existing law, Section 354-A allows for capital punishment or life imprisonment for anyone who assaults and strips a woman in public, while Section 402-C applies the same punishment to individuals who knowingly harbor hijackers. The new bill eliminates the death penalty option for both. However, some lawmakers have voiced concern over the move. Senator Samina Mumtaz Zehri of the Balochistan Awami Party warned that Pakistan's low conviction rates and weak enforcement mechanisms could make reduced punishments ineffective as a deterrent. 'This is not right,' she was quoted as saying by Dawn newspaper. 'This is not going to help the country or its people.' Chaudhry defended the move, pointing to the misuse of capital punishment laws enacted during the military regime of General Zia-ul-Haq. 'Life imprisonment is by no means a minor punishment,' he said, noting that the law had often been abused by police to settle personal vendettas. Federal Law Minister Azam Nazeer Tarar emphasized that the changes did not affect death sentences for more serious crimes like murder or rape. 'We are only removing the death penalty from offenses that do not constitute the 'most serious crimes,' a key requirement under the GSP+ agreement,' he said in response to a query by Senator Shibli Faraz. Pakistan has long faced international scrutiny over its broad application of the death penalty. At least 31 offenses are currently punishable by death under Pakistani law. While executions have not taken place since 2020, over 6,100 people remain on death row, according to the Justice Project Pakistan. Between 2015 and 2019, more than 500 people were executed following the end of a moratorium in 2014. Senator Quratulain Marri of the Pakistan People's Party, a coalition partner of the ruling PML-N, said her party opposed the death penalty on principle. 'There are numerous studies on how capital punishment is not an effective deterrent,' she told Arab News. 'While the need for reforms cannot be ruled out, we have to consider bringing changes that better society in the long run. The aim is to rid society of the crime and not just the criminal.'


Arab News
18 hours ago
- Arab News
Gaza's ‘tragic story' shows ‘unraveling of international law,' Pakistan's Ambassador to UN Asim Iftikhar Ahmad tells Arab News
Asim Iftikhar Ahmad, Pakistan's permanent representative to the UN, in an interview with Arab News. (AN photo) NEW YORK CITY: A long-standing advocate of the Palestinian cause, Pakistan is using its presidency of the UN Security Council to help refocus global attention on the crisis in Gaza and the wider Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Asim Iftikhar Ahmad, Pakistan's permanent representative to the UN, outlined his country's vision in a wide-ranging interview with Arab News as the South Asian country assumed the rotating presidency of the Security Council 'It's a tragic story. It is an unraveling of international law, international humanitarian law,' Ahmad said, decrying the humanitarian catastrophe in Gaza and the international community's failure to pressure Israel to put an end to it. Reiterating his country's position at the UN, he said: 'We want clear movement in the direction of Palestinian statehood, on the basis of the right to self-determination, on the basis of international legitimacy and UN Security Council resolutions.' He also highlighted the significance of the upcoming conference on implementing the two-state solution — to be co-chaired by Saudi Arabia and France from July 28 to 30 — calling it 'another golden opportunity for the international community to come together and to reaffirm that support for the Palestinian cause.' Pakistan's deputy prime minister and foreign minister are expected to attend, offering the country's full political and diplomatic backing. In preparation, Ahmad said Pakistan has actively participated in eight preparatory roundtables addressing the political, security, humanitarian and legal dimensions of the two-state solution. 'We have described how we are going to support many of those actions,' he said. Regarding coordination with Saudi Arabia and others involved in ceasefire negotiations, Ahmad noted that while Pakistan is 'not directly involved,' it remains in close contact with key stakeholders. 'We hope that this ceasefire should be announced sooner rather than later,' he said. Asked whether Pakistan would consider normalizing relations with Israel if a Palestinian state were recognized and the violence in Gaza ended, Ahmad was unequivocal. 'There are no indications, unfortunately, from the Israeli side on moving forward with recognition,' he said. 'What we are looking at this point of time is Palestinian statehood in the context of the two-state solution.' Another unresolved conflict concerns the disputed Kashmir region between India and Pakistan. In May, India launched Operation Sindoor, firing missiles at what it claimed were militant targets in Pakistan and Pakistan-administered Kashmir, in retaliation for a deadly April 22 attack in Pahalgam, Indian-administered Kashmir, that killed 26 civilians. India, which has accused Pakistan of supporting terrorism in Indian-administered Kashmir, said that Pakistan-based insurgents were behind the attack — claims that Islamabad denies. Pakistan responded to India's attacks with missile, drone and artillery strikes along the Line of Control and on military installations, in what it called Operation Bunyan-ul-Marsoos, sparking intense cross-border exchanges until a ceasefire was brokered on May 10. Ahmad linked these events to the broader unresolved status of the region. 'This recurring conflict was the result of Indian unprovoked aggression against Pakistan, which Pakistan had to respond to in accordance with the right to self-defense, in accordance with the UN Charter,' he said. He welcomed international mediation efforts and reiterated Pakistan's position. 'We want to have this dialog with India. We want to address the issues between us, and in particular the core issue of Jammu and Kashmir.' He restated the legal basis for Pakistan's claims. 'This position derives itself from the resolutions of the UN Security Council on Jammu and Kashmir,' which call for a plebiscite for the Kashmiri people. However, 'that plebiscite has not been held because India has refused to comply.' Ahmad argued that lasting peace in South Asia is unlikely without resolving this 'core issue.' Turning to the credibility of the Security Council itself, Ahmad was blunt in his critique. 'It's very clear; resolutions are there. The problem is about implementation,' he said, citing both Kashmir and Palestine as long-neglected issues. He referred to Article 25 of the UN Charter, which affirms that all Security Council resolutions are binding, whether under Chapter VI or Chapter VII. 'There should be a review, an assessment of how the Security Council has been able to implement many of its resolutions,' he said. He proposed that special envoys or representatives of the secretary-general could help advance implementation. 'More important than adopting those resolutions is to have them implemented,' he said. Ahmad spoke at length about the leadership role Pakistan envisioned at the Security Council — including its commitment to multilateralism and its strategic engagement across UN agencies. Beyond peace and security, Pakistan remains actively engaged in the UN's development, humanitarian and environmental work. 'Pakistan, being a developing country, has development challenges. We are particularly impacted by climate change,' said Ahmad, recalling the devastating floods that have repeatedly afflicted the country in recent years. He highlighted Pakistan's leadership in climate diplomacy, emergency response and poverty reduction through collaboration with specialized UN agencies. 'We are among the lead countries who are leading this international discourse on development, on climate change,' he said. According to Ahmad, Pakistan is active not only in New York, but also across other UN hubs — including Geneva, Rome and Nairobi — contributing to human rights, sustainable development and climate resilience. On issues from Palestine and Kashmir to Security Council reform, he said, Pakistan is pushing for action grounded in the UN Charter and international law. As Ahmad sees it, the July presidency is an opportunity 'to bring that focus back' to the principles on which the UN was founded. At the heart of this approach is a renewed emphasis on multilateralism — a value Ahmad calls 'the cornerstone of Pakistan's foreign policy.' In an increasingly divided world, he stressed that 'the attachment to the UN, the charter, international law, and this ability for the member states to work together through the UN' remains vital. Pakistan, he said, aims to advance peace and security through constructive cooperation with all member states, both inside and outside the council. Reflecting that goal, Pakistan's signature open debate next week will focus on 'how we can better use multilateralism and peaceful settlement of disputes to promote international peace and security.' The aim, he added, is to 'bring that discussion back to the council' and reaffirm the tools provided in the UN Charter — particularly Chapter VI on peaceful dispute resolution, Chapter VIII on regional arrangements, and the secretary-general's role in preventive diplomacy. 'We want to bring together and reaffirm the commitment of the Security Council to really utilize these tools,' Ahmad said. Although some expected Pakistan's signature event to spotlight national concerns, Ahmad clarified that the debate 'is not specific to any situation.' Rather, it is intended to promote 'a comprehensive approach to conflict prevention, preventive diplomacy,' and 'peacefully address disputes.' 'Pakistan does not believe that we are in the Security Council only to promote our own issues or agendas. Our agenda is broad, based on international law,' he said. Ahmad argued that such a holistic approach is essential to resolving many of the crises currently on the council's agenda — including Gaza and Kashmir.