logo
Saudi Arabia hikes oil prices to 4-month high amid China demand surge

Saudi Arabia hikes oil prices to 4-month high amid China demand surge

Time of India12-07-2025
The Kingdom raises crude prices for August, reflecting shifting domestic demand and global export strategy/Image: File
TL;DR: Saudi Arabia has raised its August Arab Light crude price to Asia by $2.20 per barrel, its highest in four months.
This move aligns with peak domestic energy consumption, increased exports to China, and a broader OPEC+ production reset.
Refiners in Asia and Europe are facing higher procurement costs amid changing demand patterns..
Long-term consequences include possible pricing pressure, strategic shifts in refinery sourcing, and accelerated energy diversification within Saudi Arabia.
A Price Hike With Global Consequences
In a move that has caught both traders and analysts off guard, Saudi Aramco raised the official selling price (OSP) of its Arab Light crude to Asia by $2.20 per barrel above the Oman/Dubai average for August deliveries. This represents the steepest premium since April and far exceeds the forecasted range of $0.50 to $0.80 per barrel.
Pricing for European buyers has also risen by $1.40 per barrel for Northwest Europe while other grades such as Arab Medium, Heavy, and Extra Light saw increases between $0.90 and $1.30.
This pricing decision comes amid a convergence of domestic and international pressures: a surge in local power demand, rising exports to China, and a coordinated OPEC+ move to unwind production cuts that were initially implemented to stabilise pandemic-era oil markets.
Why Is Saudi Arabia Raising Prices Now?
One of the most immediate drivers behind the price hike is Saudi Arabia's own seasonal energy needs. With air conditioning usage surging across the Kingdom during the intense summer heat, the country has ramped up its crude burn to fuel domestic power stations. Industry sources estimate that Saudi Arabia could be using up to 470,000 barrels per day of crude for electricity generation, especially as fuel oil has become costlier in global markets.
Simultaneously, demand from Asia, particularly China is rebounding strongly. In August, Saudi crude exports to China are expected to hit 1.65 million barrels per day, the highest level in over two years. Chinese refiners, particularly state-run Sinopec, have increased orders following maintenance shutdowns in the second quarter. This additional pull from China provides Riyadh with the leverage to set higher price points for its crude.
Beyond bilateral trade, the move comes at a time when OPEC+, the alliance of oil-producing nations led by Saudi Arabia and Russia, has decided to raise production by 548,000 barrels per day in August. This is the most significant step yet in a multi-month plan to restore roughly 2.2 million barrels per day of previously withheld output.
Absorbing the Shock: Can the Market Handle It?
Despite this increase in both price and supply, global oil markets have remained relatively stable.
Brent crude futures have hovered around $69–70 per barrel, signalling that demand driven by peak travel season and broader economic recovery is absorbing the additional barrels. Analysts at the International Energy Agency and Saxo Bank suggest that the market remains tight enough in the short term to handle incremental increases without major price collapses.
However, this balance could prove fragile. If OPEC+ continues to restore production through September and beyond, it could begin to weigh heavily on prices.
Several major investment banks, including Goldman Sachs, have forecasted that Brent could fall into the mid-$60s or even low $60s by the end of 2025 if global demand plateaus or weakens.
Implications for Refiners and Global Energy Strategy
The pricing decision has strategic implications for refiners in both Asia and Europe. Asian buyers, already operating on thin margins, may look for cost-effective alternatives or adjust refining configurations to accommodate lower-priced crude blends.
Some European buyers may explore diversifying away from Gulf supplies toward Atlantic basin producers like Nigeria or Brazil, especially if premiums remain elevated.
Saudi Arabia, however, appears willing to accept this trade-off. With spare production capacity estimated at over three million barrels per day, the Kingdom remains the only oil exporter with significant room to manoeuvre. By pricing aggressively, it can crowd out higher-cost competitors particularly in US shale and reassert its dominance in the global supply chain.
This aggressive pricing posture also ties into Saudi Arabia's long-term economic transformation plan, Vision 2030. Oil revenues remain the backbone of the country's public spending, and maximising returns from each barrel sold is a fiscal necessity, especially as the government continues to fund megaprojects like NEOM, The Line, and major tourism investments. The International Monetary Fund estimates that Saudi Arabia needs oil prices in the $75–90 range to balance its budget.
Looking Ahead: Opportunities and
Challenges
The long-term consequences of this pricing move will depend on how global markets evolve over the next six to twelve months. A few possibilities stand out:
First, if supply continues to rise but demand falters, prices could weaken significantly, putting pressure on both Saudi fiscal health and the broader OPEC+ alliance's unity. Second, US shale producers, many of whom have recently slowed drilling activity due to cost constraints, may see an opening to regain lost ground if prices stabilise above $70.
However, they remain highly price-sensitive and unlikely to flood the market as they did in previous years.
Third, Saudi Arabia's continued reliance on crude for domestic power generation underlines the need to accelerate its renewable energy goals. The Kingdom has already announced major investments in solar, wind, and nuclear energy to reduce crude burn and meet its climate targets. Successfully implementing these initiatives will allow it to export more oil in the long run and improve environmental sustainability.
Finally, rising global oil prices often trigger an acceleration in energy diversification efforts worldwide. For countries heavily reliant on imports, higher prices are a stark reminder of energy insecurity and could push them to fast-track their own transition away from fossil fuels.
Verdict:
Saudi Arabia's decision to sharply increase crude prices for August marks a pivotal moment in global oil diplomacy. It reflects not only short-term supply and demand dynamics but also a deeper recalibration of the Kingdom's energy and fiscal strategies. Whether this bold move results in sustained revenues or catalyzes new market disruptions will depend on a complex mix of refinery responses, global demand recovery, and policy shifts in energy-importing nations.
What is clear, however, is that Saudi Arabia is once again reshaping the rules of the game.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

U.S EU Trade deal: Who wins after tariff agreement - Donald Trump or Europe?
U.S EU Trade deal: Who wins after tariff agreement - Donald Trump or Europe?

Economic Times

time2 hours ago

  • Economic Times

U.S EU Trade deal: Who wins after tariff agreement - Donald Trump or Europe?

Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads FAQs U.S EU Trade deal agreement has finally been chalked. In the end, Europe found it lacked the leverage to pull Donald Trump 's America into a trade pact on its terms and so has signed up to a deal it can just about stomach - albeit one that is clearly skewed in the U.S.'s favour. As such, Sunday's agreement on a blanket 15 per cent tariff after a months-long stand-off is a reality check on the aspirations of the 27-country European Union to become an economic power able to stand up to the likes of the United States or has long portrayed itself as an export superpower and champion of rules-based commerce for the benefit both of its own soft power and the global economy as a whole. For sure, the new tariff that will now be applied is a lot more digestible than the 30% "reciprocal" tariff which Trump threatened to invoke in a few it should ensure Europe avoids recession, it will likely keep its economy in the doldrums: it sits somewhere between two tariff scenarios the European Central Bank last month forecast would mean 0.5-0.9 per cent economic growth this year compared to just over 1% in a trade tension-free this is nonetheless a landing point that would have been scarcely imaginable only months ago in the pre-Trump 2.0 era, when the EU along with much of the world could count on U.S. tariffs averaging out at around 1.5%.Even when Britain agreed a baseline tariff of 10% with the United States back in May, EU officials were adamant they could do better and - convinced the bloc had the economic heft to square up to Trump - pushed for a "zero-for-zero" tariff took a few weeks of fruitless talks with their U.S. counterparts for the Europeans to accept that 10% was the best they could get and a few weeks more to take the same 15% baseline which the United States agreed with Japan last week."The EU does not have more leverage than the U.S., and the Trump administration is not rushing things," said one senior official in a European capital who was being briefed on last week's negotiations as they closed in around the 15% official and others pointed to the pressure from Europe's export-oriented businesses to clinch a deal and so ease the levels of uncertainty starting to hit businesses from Finland's Nokia to Swedish steelmaker SSAB ."We were dealt a bad hand. This deal is the best possible play under the circumstances," said one EU diplomat. "Recent months have clearly shown how damaging uncertainty in global trade is for European businesses."That imbalance - or what the trade negotiators have been calling "asymmetry" - is manifest in the final only is it expected that the EU will now call off any retaliation and remain open to U.S. goods on existing terms, but it has also pledged $600 billion of investment in the United States. The time-frame for that remains undefined, as do other details of the accord for talks unfolded, it became clear that the EU came to the conclusion it had more to lose from all-out retaliatory measures it threatened totalled some 93 billion euros - less than half its U.S. goods trade surplus of nearly 200 billion a growing number of EU capitals were also ready to envisage wide-ranging anti-coercion measures that would have allowed the bloc to target the services trade in which the United States had a surplus of some $75 billion last even then, there was no clear majority for targeting the U.S. digital services which European citizens enjoy and for which there are scant homegrown alternatives - from Netflix to Uber to Microsoft cloud remains to be seen whether this will encourage European leaders to accelerate the economic reforms and diversification of trading allies to which they have long paid lip service but which have been held back by national the deal as a painful compromise that was an "existential threat" for many of its members, Germany's BGA wholesale and export association said it was time for Europe to reduce its reliance on its biggest trading partner."Let's look on the past months as a wake-up call," said BGA President Dirk Jandura. "Europe must now prepare itself strategically for the future - we need new trade deals with the biggest industrial powers of the world."A1. President of USA is Donald Trump.A2. US is levying 15 per cent tariffs on Europe.

Canada's passport is losing ground; here's why it matter
Canada's passport is losing ground; here's why it matter

Economic Times

time2 hours ago

  • Economic Times

Canada's passport is losing ground; here's why it matter

Synopsis Canada's passport strength has diminished, now ranking eighth globally, granting access to 184 destinations. This decline reflects a shifting global mobility landscape where traditional leaders like the U.S. and U.K. are also losing ground. Singapore leads with access to 193 destinations, highlighting increasing competition for travel freedom as Asia-Pacific sees significant growth in international travel. Agencies Canada's passport power weakens, slips to 8th in global ranking Canada's passport, once among the most powerful in the world, has slipped again in global rankings, according to the Henley Passport Index, which measures travel freedom across 199 latest data places Canada eighth, tied with Estonia and the United Arab Emirates. Canadian passport holders can now travel visa-free or with a visa-on-arrival to 184 destinations out of marks a drop from seventh place earlier this year, when the figure stood at 188 destinations, and a four-point decline over the past say the ranking change reflects a wider shift in global mobility. A statement from Henley & Partners, which compiles the index, noted that 'traditional mobility champions are losing ground in an increasingly multipolar world.' As countries in Asia, the Middle East, and parts of Africa open their doors and secure reciprocal agreements, many Western nations are introducing tighter entry requirements. The United States and the United Kingdom have also slipped in the rankings, to 10th and 6th, respectively, despite once topping the list in 2014 and 2015. Singapore remains at the top of the 2025 list, with access to 193 destinations. Japan and South Korea follow with 190. Several European countries, including France and Germany, dominate the next the bottom end, Afghanistan's passport grants visa-free access to just 25 destinations, underlining stark global inequality in mobility rights. The Canadian passport remains among the strongest globally, but its gradual decline underscores the need for sustained diplomatic engagement. With international travel demand rising by 5.8 percent in early 2025 and Asia-Pacific leading growth at 9.5 percent, competition for travel freedom is expected to intensify.

U.S EU Trade deal: Who wins after tariff agreement - Donald Trump or Europe?
U.S EU Trade deal: Who wins after tariff agreement - Donald Trump or Europe?

Time of India

time2 hours ago

  • Time of India

U.S EU Trade deal: Who wins after tariff agreement - Donald Trump or Europe?

U.S EU Trade deal agreement has finally been chalked. In the end, Europe found it lacked the leverage to pull Donald Trump 's America into a trade pact on its terms and so has signed up to a deal it can just about stomach - albeit one that is clearly skewed in the U.S.'s favour. As such, Sunday's agreement on a blanket 15 per cent tariff after a months-long stand-off is a reality check on the aspirations of the 27-country European Union to become an economic power able to stand up to the likes of the United States or China. U.S EU Trade Deal Face-saver for Europe? Explore courses from Top Institutes in Please select course: Select a Course Category Finance Technology others Data Analytics Data Science PGDM MCA healthcare MBA Public Policy Product Management Leadership Healthcare Project Management Others Digital Marketing Design Thinking CXO Operations Management Management Cybersecurity Data Science Artificial Intelligence Degree Skills you'll gain: Duration: 9 Months IIM Calcutta SEPO - IIMC CFO India Starts on undefined Get Details Skills you'll gain: Duration: 7 Months S P Jain Institute of Management and Research CERT-SPJIMR Fintech & Blockchain India Starts on undefined Get Details EU has long portrayed itself as an export superpower and champion of rules-based commerce for the benefit both of its own soft power and the global economy as a whole. For sure, the new tariff that will now be applied is a lot more digestible than the 30% "reciprocal" tariff which Trump threatened to invoke in a few days. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Nazlat Alsman: Unsold Sofas Prices May Surprise You (Prices May Surprise You) Sofas | Search Ads Search Now Undo While it should ensure Europe avoids recession, it will likely keep its economy in the doldrums: it sits somewhere between two tariff scenarios the European Central Bank last month forecast would mean 0.5-0.9 per cent economic growth this year compared to just over 1% in a trade tension-free environment. But this is nonetheless a landing point that would have been scarcely imaginable only months ago in the pre-Trump 2.0 era, when the EU along with much of the world could count on U.S. tariffs averaging out at around 1.5%. Live Events Even when Britain agreed a baseline tariff of 10% with the United States back in May, EU officials were adamant they could do better and - convinced the bloc had the economic heft to square up to Trump - pushed for a "zero-for-zero" tariff pact. It took a few weeks of fruitless talks with their U.S. counterparts for the Europeans to accept that 10% was the best they could get and a few weeks more to take the same 15% baseline which the United States agreed with Japan last week. "The EU does not have more leverage than the U.S., and the Trump administration is not rushing things," said one senior official in a European capital who was being briefed on last week's negotiations as they closed in around the 15% level. That official and others pointed to the pressure from Europe's export-oriented businesses to clinch a deal and so ease the levels of uncertainty starting to hit businesses from Finland's Nokia to Swedish steelmaker SSAB . "We were dealt a bad hand. This deal is the best possible play under the circumstances," said one EU diplomat. "Recent months have clearly shown how damaging uncertainty in global trade is for European businesses." Big Win for Donald Trump? That imbalance - or what the trade negotiators have been calling "asymmetry" - is manifest in the final deal. Not only is it expected that the EU will now call off any retaliation and remain open to U.S. goods on existing terms, but it has also pledged $600 billion of investment in the United States. The time-frame for that remains undefined, as do other details of the accord for now. As talks unfolded, it became clear that the EU came to the conclusion it had more to lose from all-out confrontation. The retaliatory measures it threatened totalled some 93 billion euros - less than half its U.S. goods trade surplus of nearly 200 billion euros. True, a growing number of EU capitals were also ready to envisage wide-ranging anti-coercion measures that would have allowed the bloc to target the services trade in which the United States had a surplus of some $75 billion last year. But even then, there was no clear majority for targeting the U.S. digital services which European citizens enjoy and for which there are scant homegrown alternatives - from Netflix to Uber to Microsoft cloud services. It remains to be seen whether this will encourage European leaders to accelerate the economic reforms and diversification of trading allies to which they have long paid lip service but which have been held back by national divisions. Describing the deal as a painful compromise that was an "existential threat" for many of its members, Germany's BGA wholesale and export association said it was time for Europe to reduce its reliance on its biggest trading partner. "Let's look on the past months as a wake-up call," said BGA President Dirk Jandura. "Europe must now prepare itself strategically for the future - we need new trade deals with the biggest industrial powers of the world." FAQs Q1. Who is President of USA? A1. President of USA is Donald Trump. Q2. How much tariffs USA is levying on Europe? A2. US is levying 15 per cent tariffs on Europe.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store