
Evotrux loads up online subscription seeking freight efficiency
Evotrux, the business he co-founded seven years ago, is making its presence known after years of operating in what Santos describes as 'stealth mode.'
'We're essentially launching Evotrux to the world,' he said. 'It's been behind closed doors to the world until now.'
Evotrux offers an on-demand freight marketplace that does away with phone calls, emails and spreadsheets. The name reflects the evolution of trucking Santos believes the company is bringing to the shipping industry.
The online platform connects shippers (businesses that need to transport goods) and carriers (trucking companies and freight brokers). The platform allows carriers to provide more shippers with real-time pricing on available shipments.
Shippers can compare and negotiate rates, review carrier profiles and then select their preferred option with the click of a button. From there, the shipper and carrier are connected through live chat and the shipper receives live tracking updates, including time-stamped pick-up and delivery statuses.
The platform also enables users to collaborate and analyze real-time market insights so they can maximize efficiencies and streamline overall operations.
Santos said while there are other digital solutions for shippers, most use a commission/transaction fee business model 'and they are almost never transparent.' Some services add a 20 per cent markup on the carrier price, he added.
Evotrux doesn't do that, Santos said. Customers pay a monthly subscription fee of $199 to access the network and whatever price they are quoted by the carrier is the actual price they end up paying. There are no hidden fees, markups or commissions.
Evotrux coined the term 'open shipping' to describe the platform.
'(It's) a fair, transparent marketplace where everyone competes on a level playing field,' said Santos, who works from his home in Ste. Anne, some 50 kilometres southeast of Winnipeg.
The 42-year-old has worked in logistics for 25 years. Prior to starting Evotrux, he spent seven years as a freight broker — the middleman between shippers and carriers.
He said he managed roughly 300 emails and 100 phone calls a day trying to get his job done. The idea for Evotrux came to him as he wondered if there might be a way to create better communication across a wider platform.
Santos founded the company with Ross Prentice and Norm Curtis. The company launched in 2018, but supply chain disruptions during the COVID-19 pandemic 'stopped us in our tracks,' Santos said.
He and his colleagues sensed they could improve on their product, so they spent more than 18 months rebuilding it. They quietly relaunched in 2022.
Logistics and shipping are areas businesses almost never look at when they're trying to optimize costs, Santos said. Now they can.
'Businesses don't need to look at logistics as a necessary evil,' he said. 'Evotrux helps them to unlock and uncover the opportunities.'
The company has a satisfied customer in Mike Friesen, president and CEO of Elmer's Manufacturing Ltd.
The farm equipment manufacturer is based around 100 kilometres south of Winnipeg in Altona and ships its products across North America. It has used Evotrux for around three years. Friesen said he likes the platform because it's an efficient way for the company to explore its options.
'We may know (Manitoba) carriers very well, but we may not know good local carriers in the U.S.,' he said. 'This provides us easier access to that.'
Evotrux has also saved Elmer's money, Friesen said: $95,000 in the first four months of 2025 alone.
'One of my sales managers … figures it increased his productivity by about 75 per cent, just because of the streamlined process that Evotrux offers,' Friesen added.
Evotrux is set to receive $250,000 from an as-yet unannounced Manitoba Innovates loan program. (Manitoba Innovates is the unification of Tech Manitoba and Manitoba Technology Accelerator.)
'They're a company that's been around for a long time (and) they're starting to see good traction,' said Paul Card, CEO of MTA. 'It's an innovative product we haven't seen anywhere else and Manitoba Innovates is in the business of trying to find innovative Manitoba solutions to local and international problems.'
According to Santos, 500 carriers and 15 shippers are subscribed to Evotrux.
The company employs five people and will add three staff members in the coming weeks, he added. Last year, its annual net revenue surpassed $120,000.
'(We're) hoping to grow that this year,' Santos said. 'This is our big breakout year. No one knew we existed before.'
aaron.epp@freepress.mb.ca
Aaron EppReporter
Aaron Epp reports on business for the Free Press. After freelancing for the paper for a decade, he joined the staff full-time in 2024. He was previously the associate editor at Canadian Mennonite. Read more about Aaron.
Our newsroom depends on a growing audience of readers to power our journalism. If you are not a paid reader, please consider becoming a subscriber.
Our newsroom depends on its audience of readers to power our journalism. Thank you for your support.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

4 hours ago
Could U.S. tariffs drive up drug prices? Manitoba bioscience group says it's complicated, but possible
Medicine manufacturers across Canada are on edge with the looming threat of catastrophic tariffs on pharmaceutical exports to the U.S., experts say. Earlier this month, U.S. President Donald Trump threatened to impose tariffs as high as 200 per cent on pharmaceuticals exported to the United States. Howard Lutnick, Trump's secretary of commerce, said details about the pharmaceutical tariffs would come at the end of July. The uncertainty this created is starting to reveal itself as stock prices of major pharmaceutical manufacturing companies with operations in Canada — companies like Emergent Biosolutions and Bausch Health — have declined in recent days. If a 200 per cent tariff were to be put into place then I think [pharmaceutical manufacturers] would have to potentially reconsider whether it makes sense to manufacture in Canada, says Shawn Bugden, dean of the school of pharmacy at Memorial University. So what could the impact be in Canada? Given the tariff uncertainty, it's intensely complicated, says Bugden. According to government data, the pharmaceutical industry in Canada represents two per cent (new window) of global market share, and the manufacturing portion of it alone consists of an average of 35,000 jobs since 2019. Enlarge image (new window) Andrea Ladouceur, president and chief executive officer of the Bioscience Association of Manitoba, describes the pharmaceutical industry as the cornerstone of the province's economy. Photo: CBC / Justin Fraser In Manitoba, medicine is one of the leading industries, accounting for between 30-35 per cent of the medicine manufactured in Canada, seven per cent of the province's GDP, and roughly 14,000 jobs, according to Andrea Ladouceur, president of the Bioscience Association of Manitoba. The pharmaceutical industry is the cornerstone of the Manitoba economy, said Ladouceur. If being in Canada becomes unaffordable for them, these companies are connected to the global market and moving out of Canada is not off the table. The danger of these companies leaving is multifaceted. Not only would there be the major economic impact of a shrinking key industry, but we'd also lose the security of having some of the drug supply manufactured here in Canada, according to Bugden. The reliance on international trade for essential goods like medicines has proved risky in the past. During the COVID-19 pandemic, drug shortages (new window) in Canada were not uncommon. If pharmaceutical manufacturers move operations out of the country, it will likely make Canada even more reliant on global markets than they already are: with 70 per cent of drugs imported from foreign countries, 16 per cent of which is imported from the U.S., accounting for nearly $9 billion, according to Bugden. However, Budgen's main concern is that a sizable tariff, like the 200 per cent figure touted by Trump, would undermine Canada's price control mechanisms like the Patented Medicine Prices Review Board and the pan-Canadian Pharmaceutical Alliance — which he views as major assets to Canadians. The Patented Medicine Prices Review Board — established in 1987 but amended in 2019 — is meant to (new window) ensure that the prices of patented medicines sold in Canada are not excessive. The board reviews the price of drugs and medicine and conducts hearings which may result in orders to reduce prices to a non-excessive level, according to guidelines listed on their website. Shawn Bugden, dean of the school of pharmacy at Memorial University, says if Canadian pharmaceutical companies are hurt by tariffs on imports to the U.S., it could have an impact on the supply of some medicines in Canada. Photo: Submitted by Shawn Bugden Bugden says that as an unintended consequence, implementing such a substantial tariff would likely raise the cost of manufacturing drugs and medicine globally, in turn applying pressure on the review board to break their own rules and allow for higher-priced drugs. The Americans have been transparent, they say they have the highest drug prices in the world, we want to lower them, but we're not going to lower them, which is what they should do and they have the ability to do, we're instead going to try and make everybody else pay higher prices so that it allows our prices to go down, said Bugden. As things stand, many pharmaceutical companies are waiting to see what will happen. CBC News has reached out to several pharmaceutical companies in Manitoba, but none have wanted to comment given the uncertainty of the situation they're facing. Ladouceur says they're fearful that tariffs may force them to increase their prices. At the end of the day, any increase in cost will be passed on to the consumer, says Ladouceur. And so for these companies it is a very hard spot because they know it may put them out of reach for the consumer, and having medicines are key to having a healthy life and sometimes save a life, so they are really concerned their products will become unaffordable for those that need them most. Trump has said that there would be a period — a year, or a year and a half after a tariff would be imposed for companies to get their act together. In light of that, Bugden doesn't think the end consumer will be paying the price for at least a year. I don't think consumers need to worry about the prices changing tomorrow, said Bugden. Keep calm and carry on, don't think you need to run to the drug store and fill up your prescriptions. I'm confident in the institutions we have in Canada to do the best job possible to maintain pricing and accessibility for Canadians, said Bugden.


Global News
7 hours ago
- Global News
U.S. job market data shows weaker than expected results amid the trade war
U.S. employers added just 73,000 jobs last month and Labor Department revisions showed that hiring was much weaker than previously reported in May and June. The unemployment rate ticked up to 4.2 per cent. The deterioration in the job market is taking place with companies paralyzed by uncertainty over President Donald Trump's erratic trade policies. The Labor Department reported Friday that revisions shaved a stunning 258,000 jobs off May and June payrolls. The stock market tumbled on the news. The American job market is deteriorating — ever so slowly. It's not showing up as widespread layoffs. The unemployment rate is still low. It's subtler than that: New college graduates are struggling to break into the job market. The unemployment rate for college graduates 22 to 27 years old, reached 5.8 per cent in March, the highest, excluding the pandemic, since 2012, and far above the nationwide unemployment rate. Story continues below advertisement Many Americans are staying in their jobs, unwilling to start the job hunt, because they believe this is as good as it gets, and there is growing evidence that they're right: Few industries are actually hiring aggressively. The current situation is a sharp reversal from the hiring boom of just three years ago when desperate employers were handing out signing bonuses and introducing perks such as Fridays off, fertility benefits and even pet insurance to recruit and keep workers. 2:21 Trump vs. Powell: POTUS, Fed chair agree state of U.S. economy is strong, but disagree on interest rates When the Labor Department was expected to show that companies, government agencies and nonprofits collectively added 115,000 jobs last month, according to a survey of forecasters by the data firm FactSet. Get daily National news Get the day's top news, political, economic, and current affairs headlines, delivered to your inbox once a day. Sign up for daily National newsletter Sign Up By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy That is not a bad number but its worse than last year, and even last month, when employers added 147,000 jobs. Employers added an average 130,000 jobs a month through June, down 23 per cent from last year's hiring and a whopping 68 per cent below the 2021-2023 average when the economy was bounding back from COVID-19 lockdowns. Story continues below advertisement Weighing on the job market are the lingering effects of higher interest rates that were used by the Federal Reserve to fight inflation; President Donald Trump's massive import taxes and the costs and uncertainty they are imposing on businesses; and an anticipated drop in foreign workers as the president's massive deportation plans move forward. 'The labor market is poised for a summer slowdown as businesses put hiring plans on hold but refrain from broad-based layoffs,' Gregory Daco, chief economist at EY-Parthenon wrote in a commentary this week. 'We see job growth slowing well below trend in the coming months.'' Still, most American workers enjoy an unusual level of job security. The unemployment rate is low at 4.1 per cent. The number of Americans applying for unemployment benefits — a proxy for layoffs — remains at healthy levels. But Adam Schickling, senior economist at Vanguard, cautions that 'a low unemployment rate and a muted pace of layoffs mask underlying weakness.'' In a commentary Tuesday, Schickling wrote that the health of the job market 'can be a matter of individual perspective…If you're a registered nurse, you may believe the job market's health to be excellent. The unemployment rate for experienced health care practitioners is currently below two per cent. If you're young and just entering the labor force or you're older and seeking to reenter it, prospects may seem bleak.'' Story continues below advertisement The rate of people quitting their jobs — a sign they're confident they can land something better — has fallen from the record heights of 2021 and 2022 and is now below where it stood before the pandemic. For one thing, hiring has become concentrated in a handful of industries. So far this year, for example, private U.S. employers have added 644,000 jobs. Of those, nearly 405,000 — or 63 per cent — were in just one of the Labor Department's industry categories: healthcare and social assistance, which spans everything from hospitals to daycare centers. As hiring has cooled over the past couple of years it's become harder for young people or those re-entering the workforce to find jobs, leading to longer job searches or spells of unemployment. The Labor Department said the number of discouraged workers, who believe no jobs are available for them, rose by 256,000 in June to 637,000. 'Historically, a decline in hiring has been accompanied by a swift rise in layoffs, a one-two punch that drives up the unemployment rate,' Schickling wrote in a commentary. 'Today's labor market is defying that pattern.'' One reason is that manufacturing companies, which tend to pull the trigger on layoffs quickly when economic conditions weaken, account for an ever-smaller share of American jobs. 'So there is simply less headcount to cut,'' he said. The bottom line: 'Firms are pulling back on hiring without shedding existing workers in significant numbers,'' Schickling said. 'The result is a labor market that is softening gradually, not collapsing.''


Vancouver Sun
10 hours ago
- Vancouver Sun
Ottawa's top HR official aims to reduce excess senior executives in public service: memo
OTTAWA — After 10 years of constant growth, the federal government now says there are too many senior executives in the public service, slowing productivity and creating workplace conflicts. In an internal memo Wednesday obtained by National Post, the federal Chief Human Resources Officer Jacqueline Bogden is clear: there are more assistant deputy ministers (421) in the bureaucracy than permanent positions at that level (355). Now, the top human resources official says her office will be cracking down on the overage, an exceptional move after years of substantial growth of the federal public service. Start your day with a roundup of B.C.-focused news and opinion. By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc. A welcome email is on its way. If you don't see it, please check your junk folder. The next issue of Sunrise will soon be in your inbox. Please try again Interested in more newsletters? Browse here. Bogden said just the assistant deputy minister (ADM) — the second highest ranking position in most departments — cadre ballooned by 50 per cent (or 140) since 2015. 'There is a need to take additional proactive measures to address the ADM overage situation and contain future growth of the ADM cadre,' Bogden wrote. An ADM's salary can range from $197,774 to $260,719 depending on their years of experience as well as their pay classification, according to the government's website . Bogden's memo says her office is implementing two new measures until the end of the year to address the overage. The first aims to reduce the number of ADMs by reviewing existing positions, particularly 'higher risk' situations where the senior executive is on a temporary assignment with no subsequent permanent position. The memo does not say if those positions will be demoted, eliminated or transformed into permanent positions to reduce the 'overage.' The second aims to 'contain' the growth of the ADM cadre by requiring all departments to get permission from her office before promoting a new person to the position. The internal announcement comes as Prime Minister Mark Carney's government is asking most departments and agencies to find spending cuts worth 15 per cent by 2029. It also comes after years of tremendous growth of the public service under Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, particularly during the COVID-19 pandemic beginning in 2020. Over his tenure, the public service grew by over 100,000, from 257,000 in 2015 to 358,000 this year , according to government data. Though Bogden's memo focuses on the ADM cadre, it also included a recent report by the Public Service Management Advisory Committee warning that there are too many executives overall in the public service. In fact, nearly half of all departments in the core public service are above the recommended average number of executives, according to the committee. 'New EX jobs at all levels are created, in many cases without a significant change in the organization's mandate. In essence, this can mean that the same pie is being sliced in smaller pieces,' reads the July 18 document titled 'Enabling a Robust Assistant Deputy Minister Cadre.' The boon, and now excess number, of senior executives has created significant risks for the public service, the committee warns, including poor performance and productivity issues. 'Dilution and duplication lead to unnecessary layers of decision making and unclear accountabilities. It slows down productivity and can create workplace conflicts,' reads the report. The excess of ADMs compared to permanent positions also means the number of senior executives ready to move to another job 'far exceeds' the number of expected vacancies to fill in 2025. That creates 'false expectations' for ADMs and 'impatience' among other lower-ranking executives hoping for a promotion, warns the report. Kevin Page, a former Parliamentary Budget Officer, said in an email that the review was useful and timely as the government embarks on a new spending review process. 'I hope one of the outputs of the review process will be a multi-year plan to manage the growth of the public service including the size of the executive group and a plan for military service people. The focus could be on productivity in the delivery of service,' said Page, now the President and CEO of the Institute of Fiscal Studies and Democracy. But the Parliamentary Budget Officer office said earlier this month that the federal government has missed its 'full-time equivalents' reduction targets four years in a row. 'For the fourth year in a row the government said: 'don't worry, next year we're going to reduce the number of full-time equivalents in the federal government' and they blew past it again,' Jason Jacques, the PBO's director general of economic and fiscal analysis, told the Ottawa Citizen . In an email to National Post, Page encouraged individual departments to publish data on executives yearly so that the public can keep the government accountable when monitoring growth in the federal bureaucracy. 'The lack of aggregation of numbers like that provided in the report on an annual basis does not allow the executive and Parliament to monitor the upward creep in the size of the public service including the growth of higher paid executives,' he told National Post. National Post cnardi@ Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark and sign up for our politics newsletter, First Reading, here .