"No Tariffs Or Sanctions Can Halt...": Russia's History Lesson On US Threats
Russia has accused the Donald Trump administration in the United States of pursuing a "neocolonial" policy against nations in Global South to maintain Washington's hegemony, and said no amount of tariffs and sanctions could change the "natural course of history." Russian Foreign Ministry spokesperson Maria Zakharova said that US was putting "politically motivated economic pressure" on nations who are choosing an independent course on the international stage, and expressed Moscow's willingness to boost cooperation with these countries to form a "truly multilateral" and equal world order.
Remarks from Moscow came days after US President Donald Trump unveiled sweeping new tariffs on dozens of countries.
Calling sanctions and restrictions a "regrettable reality" of today's historical stage that affects the entire world, Zakharova said that the US cannot come to terms with the "loss of hegemony in the emerging world order."
🎙 Russian MFA Spokeswoman Maria #Zakharova:
Washington is unable to accept the erosion of its dominance in an emerging multipolar international order.
❗️ No tariff wars or sanctions can halt the natural course of history. https://t.co/EU2NKETj7y pic.twitter.com/SYJtlpcaib
— MFA Russia 🇷🇺 (@mfa_russia) August 4, 2025
"Sanctions and restrictions have unfortunately become a defining feature of the current historical period, impacting countries across the globe. Unable to accept the erosion of its dominance in an emerging multipolar international order, Washington continues to pursue a neocolonial agenda, employing politically motivated economic pressure against those who choose an independent course on the international stage," she said.
Commenting on Trump's tariff policy against Russia's partners in the Global South, Zakharova called it a "direct encroachment" on the national sovereignty of nations and an "attempt to interfere in their internal affairs".
"We firmly believe that no tariff wars or sanctions can halt the natural course of history. We are supported by a vast number of partners, like-minded states, and allies, particularly among the countries of the Global South and, above all, within BRICS, who share this perspective," Zakharova said, adding that Russia stands ready to deepen cooperation and resist the "unlawful unilateral sanctions."
Zakharova was referring to the bloc originally comprising Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa, expanded in 2024 to include Egypt, Ethiopia, Iran, and the United Arab Emirates, with Indonesia joining in 2025.
She said that US policy is fraught with a slowdown in economic growth, damage to supply chains, and fragmentation of the global economy. "Contrary to the basic provisions in the area of free trade, which the Western countries themselves once promoted, there is politically motivated protectionism and voluntaristic build-up of tariff barriers," she added.
Trump's Tariffs On India
Donald Trump on Monday said it will "substantially raise" the tariff paid by India for buying "massive amounts of Russian Oil", stating that much of the oil purchased from Moscow is being sold in the open market "for big profits".
In a strong worded reply, India reminded Washington that when it began importing from Russia after the outbreak of the Ukraine conflict, the US "actively encouraged such imports". It also countered the stance of the European Union for singling out Indian refiners over their exports of crude.
The foreign ministry said that while India's imports are "a necessity compelled by the global market situation", the nations criticising it are themselves "indulging in trade with Russia" even when "such trade is not even a vital compulsion".
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
38 minutes ago
- Business Standard
Q1 results today: Adani Ports, Bharti Airtel, Lupin, 150 others on Aug 5
Q1 FY26 company results, August 5: Britannia, Alembic Pharmaceuticals, Aarti Surfactants, Berger Paints, Bharti Hexacom, and Exide are also to release their April-June quarter earnings reports today New Delhi Bharti Airtel, Adani Ports and Special Economic Zone, Lupin, Britannia Industries, Alembic Pharmaceuticals, Aarti Surfactants, and Berger Paints India are scheduled to announce their earnings report for the first quarter (Q1) of the financial year 2025-26 (FY26) on Tuesday. A host of other companies expected to declare their Q1 results today include Bharti Hexacom, CARE Ratings, Container Corporation of India, Exide Industries, Gland Pharma, Gujarat Gas, Jindal Saw, NCC, Prestige Estates Projects, Keystone Realtors, and Torrent Power. Bharti Airtel Q1 results preview Bharti Airtel is expected to post healthy earnings for the June quarter of FY26 (Q1FY26), driven by strong subscriber additions and a rise in average revenue per user (Arpu), according to analysts. While the telecom major's mobile wireless business is likely to report steady growth, the enterprise segment is projected to see a decline during the quarter. Analysts polled by Business Standard estimate Airtel's consolidated revenue to rise 25.2 per cent year-on-year (Y-o-Y) and 0.7 per cent quarter-on-quarter (Q-o-Q) to ₹48,224.9 crore. Earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortisation (Ebitda) is expected to jump nearly 39 per cent Y-o-Y and 1.4 per cent Q-o-Q to ₹27,380.8 crore, while Ebit is forecast to grow 63.8 per cent Y-o-Y and 2.3 per cent Q-o-Q to ₹15,017 crore. Market overview for August 5 Indian benchmark indices Sensex and Nifty are likely to open lower on Tuesday, amid rising uncertainty over trade tariffs. US President Donald Trump on Monday announced plans to substantially raise tariffs on Indian goods in response to New Delhi's Russian oil purchases. India called the move "unjustified" and said it would take necessary steps to safeguard its interests. GIFT Nifty futures were trading 38 points lower at 24,755, indicating a soft start. Meanwhile, investors will closely track the Reserve Bank of India's Monetary Policy Committee (MPC) meeting, scheduled from August 4 to 6. While some analysts expect a 25-basis-point rate cut, others believe the committee may revise its inflation forecast downward instead. Follow the latest market updates here: Stock Market LIVE Updates List of firms releasing Q1 FY26 results on August 5 Aarti Surfactants Ltd Abhijit Trading Company Ltd Allcargo Gati Ltd Adani Ports and Special Economic Zone Ltd Allied Digital Services Ltd Advait Energy Transitions Ltd Alphalogic Techsys Ltd Alstone Textiles (India) Ltd Andhra Paper Ltd Anjani Finance Ltd The Anup Engineering Ltd Alembic Pharmaceuticals Ltd Anand Rayons Ltd Artemis Medicare Services Ltd Aryaman Capital Markets Ltd Atal Realtech Ltd Automotive Axles Ltd Avalon Technologies Ltd Berger Paints India Ltd Bharti Airtel Ltd Bharti Hexacom Ltd Zinka Logistics Solutions Ltd BLS International Services Ltd Britannia Industries Ltd Cantabil Retail India Ltd CARE Ratings Ltd Carraro India Ltd Castrol India Ltd CCL Products (India) Ltd Centum Electronics Ltd Chemcon Speciality Chemicals Ltd Chartered Capital & Investment Ltd Chaman Lal Setia Exports Ltd-$ Container Corporation of India Ltd Crysdale Industries Ltd Dalmia Bharat Sugar and Industries Ltd Delton Cables Ltd Easy Fincorp Ltd EIH Ltd EKI Energy Services Ltd Elantas Beck India Ltd Ellenbarrie Industrial Gases Ltd Electronics Mart India Ltd Energy Development Company Ltd Enkei Wheels (India) Ltd EPL Ltd Eris Lifesciences Ltd Espire Hospitality Limited Eureka Industries Ltd Eveready Industries India Ltd Everest Organics Ltd Exide Industries Ltd Gujarat Fluorochemicals Ltd Gala Precision Engineering Ltd Geetanjali Credit and Capital Ltd Ginni Filaments Ltd Gland Pharma Ltd Gokaldas Exports Ltd Godawari Power and Ispat Ltd GSS Infotech Ltd GTN Textiles Ltd Gujarat Gas Ltd HT Media Ltd Indo Credit Capital Ltd Industrial & Prudential Investment Company Ltd Inventure Growth & Securities Ltd ISF Ltd Jindal Saw Ltd JSL Industries Ltd Kaizen Agro Infrabuild Ltd Kanani Industries Ltd Kanoria Chemicals & Industries Ltd Kartik Investments Trust Ltd Kaya Ltd Kanoria Energy & Infrastructure Ltd Kemp & Company Ltd K.P. Energy Ltd KPI Green Energy Ltd KZ Leasing & Finance Ltd Ladderup Finance Ltd Lexoraa Industries Ltd Lupin Ltd Machhar Industries Ltd Magadh Sugar & Energy Ltd Mangal Credit and Fincorp Ltd Max India Ltd Mayur Floorings Ltd Mazda Ltd Medi Caps Ltd-$ M.K. Exim (India) Ltd Motisons Jewellers Ltd MPIL Corporation Ltd MTAR Technologies Ltd Muthoot Capital Services Ltd NCC Ltd Nitin Spinners Ltd Noida Toll Bridge Company Ltd Orient Bell Ltd-$ Orient Paper & Industries Ltd Ovobel Foods Ltd Patel Integrated Logistics Ltd-$ Patspin India Ltd Vashu Bhagnani Industries Ltd Poona Dal & Oil Industries Ltd Prestige Estates Projects Ltd Radiant Cash Management Services Ltd Rajesh Exports Ltd Raj Rayon Industries Ltd-$ Raymond Realty Ltd Resonance Specialties Ltd Restile Ceramics Ltd Rich Universe Network Ltd Rishi Techtex Ltd Rane (Madras) Ltd Rossell India Ltd Rashi Peripherals Ltd RSWM Ltd Keystone Realtors Ltd Sandesh Ltd SBC Exports Ltd Sheetal Cool Products Ltd Sheela Foam Ltd Square Four Projects India Ltd Shree Rama Multi-Tech Ltd Shri Dinesh Mills Ltd Simplex Mills Company Ltd Simplex Papers Ltd Speciality Restaurants Ltd Starteck Finance Ltd Starteck Finance Ltd SW Investments Ltd Tainwala Chemicals and Plastics (India) Ltd Tega Industries Ltd Tirupati Sarjan Ltd Torrent Power Ltd Transpek Industry Ltd-$ Transrail Lighting Ltd Updater Services Ltd Ugar Sugar Works Ltd-$ Vaibhav Global Ltd Shri Vasuprada Plantations Ltd Veranda Learning Solutions Ltd Vardhman Holdings Ltd Viji Finance Ltd Vikas WSP Ltd Vivid Mercantile Ltd Kairosoft AI Solutions Ltd Welcure Drugs & Pharmaceuticals Ltd Woodsvilla Ltd WPIL Ltd Xtglobal Infotech Ltd Yatharth Hospital & Trauma Care Services Ltd Zeal Aqua Ltd
Mint
38 minutes ago
- Mint
Rupee at risk of lifetime low after Trump ups tariff threat on India
MUMBAI, August 5 (Reuters) -The Indian rupee may drop past 88 to the U.S. dollar to an all-time low on Tuesday after U.S. President Donald Trump threatened steeper tariffs on Indian goods, worsening fragile sentiment and stoking concerns of more foreign outflows. The 1-month non-deliverable forward indicated the rupee will open in the 88.00 to 88.04 range versus the U.S. dollar, down from 87.6550 on Monday. The rupee's previous record low was 87.95, touched in February. Trump again threatened to substantially raise tariffs on Indian goods, citing India's continued purchases and resale of Russian oil. India's foreign ministry responded, saying it will take all necessary steps to protect its national interests and economic security. "Whether these barrage of comments are mainly negotiating tactics against India to partly prod for changes in the Russia-Ukraine war remains to be seen," MUFG Bank said in a note. Trump had already imposed higher-than-expected 25% tariffs on Indian imports last week, while U.S. officials continue to highlight multiple hurdles that are delaying a trade deal with India. Sentiment on the rupee has been fragile due to the hefty tariffs on Indian goods. On Monday, the pressure intensified, with the rupee falling despite the dollar weakening broadly. On Monday, the rupee failed to hold on to an intraday recovery to near 87.20. "Today was already shaping up to be a difficult session (for the rupee), and Trump's latest tariff threat only amplified the pressure,' a senior trader at a private bank said. "I'd fully expect the Reserve Bank of India to step in — they won't want to let the rupee depreciate unchecked, especially in the face of U.S. rhetoric." He warned that overseas outflows from Indian equities may gather pace in response to rising trade tensions with the U.S. KEY INDICATORS:** One-month non-deliverable rupee forward at 88.14; onshore one-month forward premium at 12 paise ** Dollar index up at 98.82 ** Brent crude futures down 0.1% at $68.7 per barrel ** Ten-year U.S. note yield at 4.2% ** As per NSDL data, foreign investors sold a net $165.5mln worth of Indian shares on Aug. 1 ** NSDL data shows foreign investors bought a net $223.7mln worth of Indian bonds on Aug. 1 (Reporting by Nimesh Vora; Editing by Mrigank Dhaniwala)
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
38 minutes ago
- Business Standard
Trump says June jobs data 'rigged', Wall Street and economists disagree
The monthly jobs report is already closely-watched on Wall Street and in Washington but has taken on a new importance after President Donald Trump on Friday fired the official who oversees it. Trump claimed that June's employment figures were "RIGGED" to make him and other Republicans "look bad". Yet he provided no evidence and even the official Trump had appointed in his first term to oversee the report, William Beach, condemned the firing of Erika McEntarfer, the director of the Bureau of Labour Statistics appointed by former President Joe Biden. The firing followed Friday's jobs report that showed hiring was weak in July and had come to nearly a standstill in May and June, right after Trump rolled out sweeping tariffs. Economists and Wall Street investors have long considered the job figures reliable, with share prices and bond yields often reacting sharply when they are released. Yet Friday's revisions were unusually large -- the largest, outside of a recession, in five decades. And the surveys used to compile the report are facing challenges from declining response rates, particularly since COVID, as fewer companies complete the surveys. Nonetheless, that has not led most economists to doubt them. "The bottom line for me is, I would not take the low collection rate as any evidence that the numbers are less reliable," Omair Sharif, founder and chief economist at Inflation Insights, a consulting firm, said. Many academics, statisticians and economists have warned for some time that declining budgets were straining the government's ability to gather economic data. There were several government commissions studying ways to improve things like survey response rates, but the Trump administration disbanded them earlier this year. Heather Boushey, a top economic adviser in the Biden White House, noted that without Trump's firing of McEntarfer, there would be more focus on last week's data, which points to a slowing economy. "We are having this conversation about made-up issues to distract us from what the data is showing," Boushey said. "Revisions of this magnitude in a negative direction may indicate bad things to come for the labour market." Here are some things to know about the jobs report: Economists and Wall Street trust the data Most economists say that the Bureau of Labour Statistics is a nonpolitical agency staffed by people obsessed with getting the numbers right. The only political appointee is the commissioner, who does not see the data until it is finalised, two days before it is issued to the public. Erica Groshen, the BLS commissioner from 2013 to 2017, said she suggested different language in the report to "liven it up", but was shot down. She was told that if asked to describe a cup as half-empty or half-full, BLS says "it is an eight ounce cup with four ounces of liquid". The revised jobs data that has attracted Trump's ire is actually more in line with other figures than before the revision. For example, payroll processor ADP uses data from its millions of clients to calculate its own jobs report, and it showed a sharp hiring slowdown in May and June that is closer to the revised BLS data. Trump and his White House have a long track record of celebrating the jobs numbers -- when they are good. These are the figures Trump is attacking Trump has focussed on the revisions to the May and June data, which on Friday were revised lower, with job gains in May reduced to 19,000 from 144,000, and for June to just 14,000 from 147,000. Every month's jobs data is revised in the following two months. Trump also repeated a largely inaccurate attack from the campaign about an annual revision last August, which reduced total employment in the United States by 818,000, or about 0.5 per cent. The government also revises employment figures every year. Trump charged that the annual revision was released before the 2024 presidential election to "boost" Vice President Kamala Harris's "chances of Victory", yet it was two months before the election and widely reported at the time that the revision lowered hiring during the Biden-Harris administration and pointed to a weaker economy. Here's why the government revises the data The monthly revisions occur because many companies that respond to the government's surveys send their data in late, or correct the figures they have already submitted. The proportion of companies sending in their data later has risen in the past decade. Every year, the BLS does an additional revision based on actual job counts that are derived from state unemployment insurance records. Those figures cover 95 per cent of US businesses and are not derived from a survey but are not available in real time. These are the factors that cause revisions Figuring out how many new jobs have been added or lost each month is more complicated than it may sound. For example, if one person takes a second job, should you focus on the number of jobs, which has increased, or the number of employed people, which has not? (The government measures both: The unemployment rate is based on how many people either have or do not have jobs, while the number of jobs added or lost is counted separately). Each month, the government surveys about 121,000 businesses and government agencies at over 630,000 locations -- including multiple locations for the same business -- covering about one-third of all workers. Still, the government also has to make estimates: What if a company goes out of business? It likely will not fill out any forms showing the jobs lost. And what about new businesses? They can take a while to get on the government's radar. The BLS seeks to capture these trends by estimating their impact on employment. Those estimates can be wrong, of course, until they are fixed by the annual revisions. The revisions are often larger around turning points in the economy. For example, when the economy is growing, there may be more startups than the government expects, so revisions will be higher. If the economy is slowing or slipping into a recession, the revisions may be larger on the downside. Here's why the May and June revisions may have been so large Ernie Tedeschi, an economic adviser to the Biden administration, points to the current dynamics of the labour market: Both hiring and firing have sharply declined, and fewer Americans are quitting their jobs to take other work. As a result, most of the job gains or losses each month are probably occurring at new companies, or those going out of business. And those are the ones the government uses models to estimate, which can make them more volatile. Groshen also points out that since the pandemic, there has been a surge of new start-up companies, after many Americans lost their jobs or sought more independence. Yet they may not have created as many jobs as startups did pre-COVID, which throws off the government's models. Revisions seem to be getting bigger The revisions to May and June's job totals, which reduced hiring by a total of 258,000, were the largest -- outside recessions -- since 1967, according to economists at Goldman Sachs. Kevin Hassett, Trump's top economic adviser, went on NBC's "Meet the Press" on Sunday and said, "What we have seen over the last few years is massive revisions to the jobs numbers." Hassett blamed a sharp drop in response rates to the government's surveys during and after the pandemic: "When COVID happened, because response rates went down a lot, then revision rates skyrocketed." Yet calculations by Tedeschi show that while revisions spiked after the pandemic, they have since declined and are much smaller than in the 1960s and 1970s. Other concerns about the government's data Many economists and statisticians have sounded the alarm about things like declining response rates for years. A decade ago, about 60 per cent of companies surveyed by BLS responded. Now, only about 40 per cent do. The decline has been an international phenomenon, particularly since COVID. The United Kingdom has even suspended publication of an official unemployment rate because of falling responses. And earlier this year, the BLS said that it was cutting back on its collection of inflation data because of the Trump administration's hiring freeze, raising concerns about the robustness of price data just as economists are trying to gauge the impact of tariffs on inflation. US government statistical agencies have seen an inflation-adjusted 16-per cent drop in funding since 2009, according to a July report from the American Statistical Association. "We are at an inflection point," the report said. "To meet current and future challenges requires thoughtful, well-planned investment ... In contrast, what we have observed is uncoordinated and unplanned reductions with no visible plan for the future. (Only the headline and picture of this report may have been reworked by the Business Standard staff; the rest of the content is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)
