logo
Analysts warn DA-led no-confidence vote could topple Ramaphosa

Analysts warn DA-led no-confidence vote could topple Ramaphosa

IOL News5 hours ago

President Cyril Ramaphosa's future could hang by a balance if the Democratic Alliance (DA), party og GNU, continues with the motion of no-confidence against him.
Image: IOL Graphic
If the Democratic Alliance (DA) proceeds with a motion of no confidence against President Cyril Ramaphosa, it could mark the end of his presidency. That's according to political analysts.
Speaking with IOL News, Professor Bheki Mngomezulu said Ramaphosa previously survived parliamentary votes in the sixth administration because the African National Congress (ANC) held a majority in Parliament.
However, the party will no longer have the May 2024 national elections.
'Anything is possible with the DA, because they don't seem to know what they are doing,' Mngomezulu said.
'Both the ANC and the DA are suffering from an identity crisis. The ANC behaves as though it is still the sole governing party, while the DA continues acting as the official opposition. But the reality is that they are now part of a coalition government and should be pulling in the same direction.'
He said the DA often second-guesses and 'checkmates' the ANC, creating confusion about its intentions within the Government of National Unity (GNU).
Mngomezulu said two main reasons are preventing the DA from leaving the coalition - is the receipt of ministerial and deputy ministerial positions, and its desire to prevent the MK Party and the Economic Freedom Fighters (EFF) from joining the GNU.
His remarks come amid heightened tensions following Ramaphosa's dismissal of Deputy Trade and Industry Minister Andrew Whitfield, a senior DA member, over an unauthorised international trip.
The blue party responded by withdrawing from the National Dialogue process, which is a key platform for inter-party consultation.
But, the party has not ruled out tabling a motion of no confidence against Ramaphosa.
Speaking over the weekend at the OR Tambo regional conference in the Eastern Cape, ANC secretary-general Fikile Mbalula rubbished DA's threats.
'The DA can pack their things and leave, but on their way out, they will meet others coming in,' Mbalula said.
'Even if the DA walks away, the GNU will not collapse. Other parties are already knocking at the door to join. The GNU is powerful - it finishes you without you realising.'
Mbalula warned that any attempt to propose a motion of no confidence would result in the DA's expulsion from the GNU.
He confirmed that the ANC's National Working Committee (NWC) would meet Monday afternoon to discuss the matter.
Meanwhile, Mngomezulu said if the DA were to proceed with the motion, it would likely find support from smaller parties, including the MK Party, the EFF, and the African Transformation Movement (ATM).
'Even if ActionSA, which also has an identity crisis, were to vote against it, the rest could constitute the two-thirds majority needed, which would mean the end of Ramaphosa,' he said.
'But I don't think it will come to that, because the ANC and DA do discuss issues behind closed doors.'
He called on the ANC to address the DA's repeated challenges to its policies, including the Basic Education Laws Amendment (BELA) Bill, the Land Expropriation Bill, and its stances on foreign policy.
'They must also discuss the DA's threats to oppose all budget speeches by ministers they disagree with, and the possibility of invoking Section 89 of the Constitution,' Mngomezulu said.
'They must assess what the DA's exit would mean in terms of parliamentary numbers. That is critical.'
The ANC's NWC is also expected to address the fate of Higher Education Minister Nobuhle Nkabane, who is facing criticism over the controversial appointment of the Services Sector Education and Training Authority (SETA) board.
In addition, Independent political analyst Goodenough Mashego echoed Mngomezulu's remarks.
'If the DA were to bring a motion of no confidence against the president, it will definitely succeed,' Mashego said.
'It will succeed because it will have shifted the DA toward the MK and the EFF, because they need MK and EFF for the motion to succeed.'
However, he said the DA is unlikely to bring the motion unless it is certain it will pass.
'They wouldn't want to embarrass themselves by bringing a motion that's going to fail, thus spilling the end of their coalition with the ANC while they go out and they've got nothing to show for it,' he said.
Mashego said negotiating with the EFF and MK would be difficult, especially because it would require agreement on who would become president if Ramaphosa were removed.
'There is no scenario whereby the MK Party or EFF are going to allow the DA to appoint a president,' he said.
'If the DA also agrees with MK to appoint an MK president, there is no way an MK president will have the DA in Cabinet.'
Mashego expressed that the motion is unlikely to happen.
'They might talk about it as a bargaining tool, but they're not going to do it,' he said.
'The recent DA stance is for optics. No South African is looking forward to the national dialogue, so withdrawing from it doesn't change anything.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

The real test isn't the GNU — it's whether voters see through the elites
The real test isn't the GNU — it's whether voters see through the elites

Mail & Guardian

time2 hours ago

  • Mail & Guardian

The real test isn't the GNU — it's whether voters see through the elites

The public must not be deceived by politicians' use of democratic language to obscure anti-democratic actions. (Delwyn Verasamy/M&G) When President Cyril Ramaphosa But this moment is not about one person, one party or a fragile coalition. It reveals a big problem in our politics — leaders from different parties are working more to protect each other than serve the public, slowly damaging South Africa's democracy. Unless voters develop the political maturity to challenge this culture, the cycle of self-interest and manufactured outrage will persist. What played out between the ANC and the DA reveals more than a disagreement over executive conduct. It is another episode in a long-standing drama where displays of outrage mask deeper consensus among elites to preserve power. Today, South African voters are caught in a cycle of manufactured division, where dramatic performances of principle often hide narrow, short-term power plays. The DA claims Whitfield was fired for 'fighting corruption', specifically for exposing irregularities around the This is not new. The ANC has long protected its Likewise, More concerning is that this culture has not only persisted but become more entrenched under the government of national unity (GNU). The DA is hardly innocent. While the party frames Whitfield's dismissal as political punishment, it continues to benefit from its insider role in a government it often discredits. Its indignation feels opportunistic, especially given that it was silent during other troubling appointments and when coalition negotiations yielded power-sharing privileges. The point is not which party is worse. Both have become fluent in using democratic language to obscure anti-democratic habits. So, what are voters to make of all this? They should resist being drawn into a false binary, ANC vs DA, and instead start asking deeper questions. What are both parties really trying to protect? Who benefits from these political distractions? What does it cost South Africans when political theatre replaces meaningful reform? The South Africa needs a leadership change and a fundamental shift in civic expectations. It needs a public that demands transparency and interrogates motives, not just actions. Let's also not forget that, for centuries, In the end, the Whitfield affair is not just a test of the GNU. It's a test of us, the voters. If we fail to ask harder questions now, we risk being governed, not by public servants, but by elites brokering influence behind closed doors, while we pay the price. It's time for voters to stop watching from the sidelines and start holding every politician in every party truly accountable. Zimkhitha Manyana is an international relations lecturer at the University of the Witwatersrand and recently obtained his PhD in Political Science from the University of Johannesburg.

Rand holds steady despite ANC and DA squabbles
Rand holds steady despite ANC and DA squabbles

IOL News

time3 hours ago

  • IOL News

Rand holds steady despite ANC and DA squabbles

Despite the ongoing tensions between the ANC and the DA, which threaten to disrupt the Government of National Unity (GNU), the local currency remains unfazed as the DA's ultimatum to President Cyril Ramaphosa to dismiss ministers passes without action. Ramaphosa's removal from the office of the then Deputy Minister of Trade, Industry and Competition, Andrew Whitfield, towards the end of last week resulted in a war of words between the two largest parties in the GNU. DA leader John Steenhuisen last Thursday issued an ultimatum to Ramaphosa to get rid of three MPs in an effective 'or else' message. 'Within the next 48 hours, we will find out if the DA stands alone as the only party that can be trusted to govern responsibly and take South Africa forward,' he said. That Saturday deadline came and went without Ramaphosa acceding to his wishes. The rand has hardly moved. By lunchtime on Monday, it was trading at R17.77, more or less flat on the day. On a more historical level, it is trading at around a six-month low. Andre Cilliers, currency strategist at TreasuryONE, said: 'The DA's antics have had little effect on the rand'. In a note, he stated that the DA is so 'upset' that the party won't be taking part in Ramaphosa's new national discussion plan. This plan brings together prominent figures, including business leaders and the rugby captain, to discuss how to address the country's problems, but it will cost R740 million, explained Cilliers.

Zille says the ANC is acting arrogantly
Zille says the ANC is acting arrogantly

Eyewitness News

time3 hours ago

  • Eyewitness News

Zille says the ANC is acting arrogantly

CAPE TOWN - Democratic Alliance (DA) Federal Chairperson Helen Zille has dismissed criticism that the party is playing a game of chicken with the African National Congress (ANC) and is not serious about ever leaving the governing coalition. Speaking on 702 on Monday, Zille said her party is mindful of the consequences such a move would have on ordinary South Africans. Over the weekend the DA announced it would withdraw from the National Dialogue, which Zille claims would be 'useless' without the participation of her party and its supporters. The latest round of tensions has been sparked by President Cyril Ramaphosa firing DA MP Andrew Whitfield, as deputy minister for going on a DA trip without his permission. Zille said that the ANC is ignoring the statement of intent signed between coalition parties at every turn, undermining her party, failing to consult on matters - and not being called out for it. "For as long as they act arrogantly as if they are the only people running this government, then we will take a decision at every point, what the appropriate action is." But she said that her party has to be commensurate in its response to the problematic issues - and the impact on the economic well being of the country, should the DA opt out of the Government of National Unity (GNU). "So we have to decide, at what point is the ANC's behaviour is so egregious that we think it's worth taking the step that will have those consequences." Zille also accused the ANC of failing to consult on the structure of the National Dialogue and of unilaterally naming an eminent persons' panel without its knowledge.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store