logo
Bush, Obama -- and singer Bono -- fault Trump's gutting of USAID on agency's last day

Bush, Obama -- and singer Bono -- fault Trump's gutting of USAID on agency's last day

The Mainichia day ago
WASHINGTON (AP) -- Former Presidents Barack Obama and George W. Bush delivered rare open criticism of the Trump administration -- and singer Bono recited a poem -- in an emotional video farewell Monday with staffers of the U.S. Agency for International Development.
Obama called the Trump administration's dismantling of USAID "a colossal mistake."
Monday was the last day as an independent agency for the six-decade-old humanitarian and development organization, created by President John F. Kennedy as a peaceful way of promoting U.S. national security by boosting goodwill and prosperity abroad.
Secretary of State Marco Rubio has ordered USAID absorbed into the State Department on Tuesday.
The former presidents and Bono spoke with thousands in the USAID community in a videoconference, which was billed as a closed-press event to allow political leaders and others privacy for sometimes angry and often teary remarks. Parts of the video were shared with The Associated Press.
They expressed their appreciation for the thousands of USAID staffers who have lost their jobs and life's work. Their agency was one of the first and most fiercely targeted for government-cutting by President Donald Trump and his billionaire ally Elon Musk, with staffers abruptly locked out of systems and offices and terminated by mass emailing.
Trump claimed the agency was run by "radical left lunatics" and rife with "tremendous fraud." Musk called it "a criminal organization."
Obama, speaking in a recorded statement, offered assurances to the aid and development workers, some listening from overseas.
"Your work has mattered and will matter for generations to come," he told them.
Obama has largely kept a low public profile during Trump's second term and refrained from criticizing the monumental changes that Trump has made to U.S. programs and priorities at home and abroad.
"Gutting USAID is a travesty, and it's a tragedy. Because it's some of the most important work happening anywhere in the world," Obama said. He credited USAID with not only saving lives, but being a main factor in global economic growth that has turned some aid-receiving countries into U.S. markets and trade partners.
The former Democratic president predicted that "sooner or later, leaders on both sides of the aisle will realize how much you are needed."
Asked for comment, the State Department said it would be introducing the department's foreign assistance successor to USAID, to be called America First, this week.
"The new process will ensure there is proper oversight and that every tax dollar spent will help advance our national interests," the department said.
USAID oversaw programs around the world, providing water and life-saving food to millions uprooted by conflict in Sudan, Syria, Gaza and elsewhere, sponsoring the "Green Revolution" that revolutionized modern agriculture and curbed starvation and famine, preventing disease outbreaks, promoting democracy, and providing financing and development that allowed countries and people to climb out of poverty.
Bush, who also spoke in a recorded message, went straight to the cuts in a landmark AIDS and HIV program started by his Republican administration and credited with saving 25 million lives around the world.
Bipartisan blowback from Congress to cutting the popular President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief, known as PEPFAR, helped save significant funding for the program. But cuts and rule changes have reduced the number getting the life-saving care.
"You've showed the great strength of America through your work -- and that is your good heart,'' Bush told USAID staffers. "Is it in our national interests that 25 million people who would have died now live? I think it is, and so do you," he said.
Former Liberian President Ellen Johnson-Sirleaf, former Colombian President Juan Manual Santos and former U.S. Ambassador to the U.N. Linda Thomas-Greenfield also spoke to the staffers.
So did humanitarian workers, including one who spoke of the welcome appearance of USAID staffers with food when she was a frightened 8-year-old child in a camp for Liberian refugees. A World Food Program official vowed through sobs that the U.S. aid mission would be back someday.
Bono, a longtime humanitarian advocate in Africa and elsewhere, was announced as the "surprise guest," in shades and a cap.
He jokingly hailed the USAID staffers as "secret agents of international development" in acknowledgment of the down-low nature of Monday's unofficial gathering of the USAID community.
Bono spoke passionately as he recited a poem he had written to the agency and its gutting. He spoke of children dying of malnutrition, in a reference to people -- millions, experts have said -- who will die because of the U.S cuts to funding for health and other programs abroad.
"They called you crooks. When you were the best of us," Bono said.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Royal train will end 156 years of service as King Charles III seeks to economize
Royal train will end 156 years of service as King Charles III seeks to economize

The Mainichi

time29 minutes ago

  • The Mainichi

Royal train will end 156 years of service as King Charles III seeks to economize

LONDON (AP) -- The Royal Train will soon leave the station for the last time. King Charles III has accepted it's time to decommission the train, whose history dates back to Queen Victoria, because it costs too much to operate and would have needed a significant upgrade for more advanced rail systems, Buckingham Palace said Monday. "In moving forwards we must not be bound by the past,'' said James Chalmers, the palace official in charge of the king's financial affairs. "Just as so many parts of the royal household's work have modernized and adapted to reflect the world of today, so too the time has come to bid the fondest of farewells, as we seek to be disciplined and forward-looking in our allocation of funding.'' The train, actually a suite of nine railcars that can be hitched to commercial locomotives, will be decommissioned sometime before the current maintenance contract expires in 2027. That will bring to an end a tradition that dates back to 1869, when Queen Victoria commissioned a pair of special coaches to accommodate her travels. The decision was announced during the palace's annual briefing for reporters on the royal finances. The royal family will for the fourth consecutive year receive public funding of 86.3 million pounds ($118 million), including 34.5 million pounds to fund the remodeling of Buckingham Palace, in the 12 months through March 2026. This money comes from a mechanism known as the Sovereign Grant, which sets aside 12% of the net income from the Crown Estate to fund the official duties of the king and other members of the royal family. The Crown Estate is a portfolio of properties that are owned by the monarch during his reign. The properties are professionally managed and the king cannot dispose of the assets. The Crown Estate is one of the many relics of Britain's feudal past. King George III, who ruled during the American Revolution, surrendered management of the crown lands to Parliament in 1760 in return for a fixed payment from the Treasury. The royal finances remain a topic of public debate, with Charles pledging to slim down the monarchy and cut costs as he seeks to ensure the institution's survival. Buckingham Palace was quick to point out that while the Sovereign Grant has been unchanged for the past four years, inflation has eroded its value. If the grant had increased in line with inflation, it would have been about 106 million pounds this year, the palace said. The basic grant was supplemented with 21.5 million pounds ($29.5 million) of income generated by properties outside the Crown Estate. This income increased by 1.7 million pounds, driven by a record year for visitors to Buckingham Palace and special tours of the newly renovated East Wing. Craig Prescott, a constitutional law expert at Royal Holloway, University of London who focuses on the political role of the monarchy, said funding for the royals is relatively small when compared to the overall cost of the British state and it provides tangible benefits for the country. "It's something that puts Britain on the world stage in a way that few other things do,'' he said, noting that Queen Elizabeth II's funeral was the largest gathering of world leaders in history and the coronation was broadcast around the world. "It's one of those things that people think about when they think about Britain.'' Over the past year, Charles traveled to Australia and attended the Commonwealth Heads of Government Meeting in Samoa -- his first as the organization's head. The royals also took center stage at the 80th anniversaries of D-Day and V-E Day, which marked the end of World War II in Europe, and welcomed the leaders of Japan and Qatar as they made state visits to the U.K. Overall, the royals made 1,900 public appearances in the U.K. and overseas. Some 93,000 guests attended 828 events at the royal palaces.

Buying US Steel: Nippon Steel's Purchase Becomes Tariff Bargaining Chip

time41 minutes ago

Buying US Steel: Nippon Steel's Purchase Becomes Tariff Bargaining Chip

Nippon Steel has successfully acquired US Steel following a year and a half of negotiations. While the path ahead of it still appears rocky, it has achieved a foothold in the promising US market, and hopes are high that it will lead to success for the new owner—even as the Japanese government hopes it will produce welcome results in broader tariff negotiations. No Choice but to Swallow the 'Golden Share' Nippon Steel's acquisition of US Steel followed a long, rocky road due to resistance from the US government under President Joe Biden and the United Steelworkers union. The end of the Biden administration, however, did give negotiators in Japan a glimmer of hope due to incoming President Donald Trump's desire to be seen as a deal maker and his willingness to change tack to achieve such deals. Therefore, the eventual consummation of the agreement under the Trump administration should not be too surprising. Despite acquiring full ownership of US Steel, Nippon Steel's control of the company will differ from other cases of 'wholly owned' subsidiaries. This is due to the signing of a 'national security agreement' with the Trump administration that granted the White House a noneconomic 'golden share' and effective veto power over decisions at shareholders' meetings affecting America's national and strategic interests. The United States itself has traditionally been opposed to the use of golden shares as they undermine shareholders' rights, but in this case accepting these provisions, among others, was essential for Nippon Steel to secure US government approval. In response to concerns about the NSA's provisions, Nippon Steel Chairman Hashimoto Eiji emphasized that the company would retain 'sufficient managerial freedom' and that management would not 'be constrained in pursuing anything we aim to.' Given the possibility that the presence of the golden share provision could affect share prices, Hashimoto had little choice but to make this assertion to ensure the deal made its way through his company's general shareholders meeting. Hashimoto Eiji, chairman and CEO of Nippon Steel, at a press conference on June 19, 2025, following the completion of the acquisition of US Steel. (© Jiji) Nevertheless, without knowing the full details of the agreement and its provisions, it is difficult to evaluate the full extent that the US government can intervene in the management of US Steel and the risks associated with such intervention. Certainly, Nippon Steel management's freedom of action is restricted insofar as it must invest $11 billion of capital in the United States by 2028. We also know that Nippon Steel cannot downsize US Steel, close American factories, or scale down their operations without permission. As US Secretary of Commerce Howard Lutnick noted on social media, there is much more to the deal than the general details currently available to the public. Between purchase costs and promised capital investments, Nippon Steel will dedicate approximately ¥3.5 trillion (around $25 billion) to the acquisition of US Steel, raising questions over whether it can fully recover this investment through business operations. As a top-tier management team, Nippon Steel's executives must have carefully calculated the return on investment and conducted detailed analysis of growth potential based on conditions in the American market, US Steel's customer base, and its competition. It must have judged that the long-term opportunities in both the automotive and shipbuilding industries justified the outlays. Key Points of the Deal US Steel to become a wholly owned subsidiary of Nippon Steel Purchase price of ¥2 trillion ($14.1 billion) Completion of national security agreement with US government Noneconomic 'golden share' with veto rights granted to US government Promised future capital investment of ¥1.5 trillion ($11 billion) Compiled by based on various media reports. Nippon Steel persisted in its acquisition of US Steel despite the barriers placed in its way as it saw few other opportunities for growth on this side of the Pacific. Japan's own domestic market has peaked, and the company has been completely excluded from the Chinese market. On the other hand, production in the United States is relatively protected from cheap foreign steel by high tariffs (50%), making it an attractive market for corporate investment. From a management perspective, pursuing this deal was entirely rational. Even if US Steel fails to grow as anticipated, evaluating the outcome requires us to consider Nippon Steel's prospects should the deal not have been made. The nature of high-level business decision-making is the evaluation of the relative risks and opportunity costs of any given action. Addressing a US Lack of Access to Quality Steel Nippon Steel's acquisition of US Steel is likely to contribute to the revival of US production of steel and to downstream industries like automobiles and shipbuilding. The decreased competitiveness and quality of American steel is one factor in the long-term decline of both industries. The lack of high-quality premium steel sheets for automobiles and thick steel plates for shipbuilding at reasonable prices created a critical bottleneck that undermined domestic American industries dependent on steel. Therefore, Nippon Steel's promise of capital investment and the introduction of technology and engineering expertise into American industry could both improve product quality and enable production expansion in the United States. No matter how loudly President Trump insists on the revival of American manufacturing in automobile and shipbuilding industries, without sufficient quality and volume of domestically sourced steel, his ambitions would have remained ultimately unrealizable. Nippon Steel's acquisition is therefore also a significant development for the United States and President Trump's policies. The acquisition and likely contribution to the revival of American manufacturing are an essential part of the big picture surrounding ongoing US-Japan trade negotiations. From Nippon Steel's perspective, it must have been irritating to have the acquisition negotiations linked to US-Japan tariff negotiations. Indeed, the Ministry of Economy, Trade, and Industry actively sought to avoid this linkage. Nevertheless, the completion of the deal should give the Japanese side more confidence and a clear message. However, even if the Japanese side presents a grand vision of how Nippon Steel will revitalize the American steel industry and downstream manufacturing, it would be naive to expect the recent agreement to immediately lead to success in tariff negotiations. Commerce Secretary Lutnick is known as a hardliner, and talks are taking place in an environment where the US administrative apparatus has lost considerable numbers of staff and operational capacity. Both of these are factors making it more difficult for the Japanese government to communicate its point of view. We should for the time being expect no sudden changes in the tariff negotiations being led by Minister of Economic Revitalization Akazawa Ryōsei. Tokyo will need to keep working to gain the understanding of the Trump administration and its political appointees. An Evaporating Possibility of a General Agreement While Akazawa's American counterpart is nominally Secretary of the Treasury Scott Bessent, it appears that Lutnick is the point man for the United States in tariff negotiations with Japan. During the fifth round of negotiations in early June, Akazawa met with Lutnick for two hours on the first day, and then the next day he met Bessent for 45 minutes, followed by Lutnick again for a further two hours. This indicates that the issue of automobile tariffs was the focus of intense discussion. Both Lutnick and Bessent look only to President Trump and are constantly mindful about his reaction. In mid-June, Akazawa appeared to have hopes for a general US-Japan agreement on tariffs ahead of the G7 summit in Canada. His comments at the time indicated that he had received a positive response from Lutnick about this possibility. However, Trump's response seems to have been quite different. In fact, Lutnick eventually did not accompany Trump to the G7 summit. High-stakes negotiations like this are never straightforward. Negotiations at the ministerial level are likely to accelerate in the future. Japan must stay on message and emphasize its contribution to American manufacturing, employment, and productivity through its investments in the domestic steel industry and, in turn, the American automotive industry. Ideally, Japan's contribution will be reflected in the reduction of tariffs on automobiles on Japanese makers, which appears to currently be the main battleground. The key message will be that Japan is partnering with the United States to help revive America's own manufacturing industry. (Originally published in Japanese on June 26, 2025, based on an interview by Mochida Jōji of Banner photo: Nippon Steel Corporation headquarters. © AFP/Jiji.)

Trump Says Israel Has Agreed on Terms for a 60-Day Ceasefire in Gaza and Urges Hamas to Accept Deal
Trump Says Israel Has Agreed on Terms for a 60-Day Ceasefire in Gaza and Urges Hamas to Accept Deal

Yomiuri Shimbun

timean hour ago

  • Yomiuri Shimbun

Trump Says Israel Has Agreed on Terms for a 60-Day Ceasefire in Gaza and Urges Hamas to Accept Deal

WASHINGTON (AP) — President Donald Trump said Tuesday that Israel has agreed on terms for a 60-day ceasefire in Gaza and warned Hamas to accept the deal before conditions worsen. Trump announced the development as he prepares to host Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu for talks at the White House on Monday. The U.S. leader has been increasing pressure on the Israeli government and Hamas to broker a ceasefire and hostage agreement and bring about an end to the war in Gaza. 'My Representatives had a long and productive meeting with the Israelis today on Gaza. Israel has agreed to the necessary conditions to finalize the 60 Day CEASEFIRE, during which time we will work with all parties to end the War,' Trump wrote, saying the Qataris and Egyptians would deliver the final proposal. 'I hope, for the good of the Middle East, that Hamas takes this Deal, because it will not get better — IT WILL ONLY GET WORSE,' he said. Trump's promise that it was his best and final offer may find a skeptical audience with Hamas. Even before the expiration of the war's longest ceasefire in March, Trump has repeatedly issued dramatic ultimatums to pressure Hamas to agree to longer pauses in the fighting that would see the release of more hostages and a return of more aid to Gaza's civilian populace. Still, Trump views the current moment as a potential turning point in the brutal conflict that has left more than 56,000 dead in the Palestinian territory. The Gaza Health Ministry does not differentiate between civilians and combatants in its death count. Hamas is still capable of landing fatal blows to Israeli forces. But U.S. officials believe that the group's been significantly diminished as its centralized command and control capabilities have deteriorated over the course of the nearly 21-month conflict. Meanwhile, Hamas' chief backer Iran was badly battered last month by 12 days of strikes by Israel and the United States on Tehran's key nuclear facilities.. Israeli Minister for Strategic Affairs Ron Dermer was in Washington on Tuesday for talks with senior administration officials to discuss a potential Gaza ceasefire, Iran and other matters. Dermer was expected to meet with Vice President JD Vance, Secretary of State Marco Rubio and special envoy Steve Witkoff. Earlier Tuesday, Trump repeated his hope for forging an Israel-Hamas ceasefire deal next week. Asked if it's time to put pressure on Netanyahu to get a ceasefire deal done, Trump said the Israeli prime minister was ready to come to an agreement. 'He wants to,' Trump said of Netanyahu in an exchange with reporters while visiting a new immigration detention facility in Florida. 'I think we'll have a deal next week.' Talks between Israel and Hamas have repeatedly faltered over a major sticking point — whether the war should end as part of any ceasefire agreement. About 50 hostages remain captive in Gaza, with less than half believed to be alive. Hamas says it is willing to free all the hostages in exchange for a full withdrawal of Israeli troops and an end to the war in Gaza. Israel rejects that offer, saying it will agree to end the war if Hamas surrenders, disarms and goes into exile, something that the group refuses. The announcement by Trump came as over 150 international charities and humanitarian groups called Tuesday for disbanding a controversial Israeli- and U.S.-backed system to distribute aid in Gaza because of chaos and deadly violence against Palestinians seeking food at its sites. The joint statement by groups including Oxfam, Save the Children and Amnesty International followed the killings of at least 10 Palestinians who were seeking desperately needed food, witnesses and health officials said. Meanwhile, Israeli airstrikes killed at least 37 in southern Gaza's Khan Younis, according to Nasser Hospital. 'Tents, tents they are hitting with two missiles?' asked Um Seif Abu Leda, whose son was killed in the strikes. Mourners threw flowers on the body bags. Before Trump's announcement, Israel's defense minister, Israel Katz, had warned that his country would respond forcefully to the firing of a missile the military said originated from Yemen. Sirens sounded across parts of Israel, alerting residents to the attack and the launch of two projectiles from Gaza. All were intercepted by Israeli defense systems. The missile launch marked the first attack by the Iran-backed Houthi rebels since the end of the 12-day war initiated by Israel with Iran. Katz said Yemen could face the same fate as Tehran. Nasruddin Amer, deputy head of the Houthi media office, vowed on social media that Yemen will not 'stop its support for Gaza … unless the aggression stops and the siege on Gaza is lifted.' Speaking to his Cabinet, Netanyahu did not elaborate on plans for his visit to Washington next week, except to say he will discuss a trade deal. Iran is also expected to be a main topic of discussion in Washington after Trump brokered a ceasefire between it and Israel.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store