Biden's White House doctor declines to answer questions in House deposition
'Earlier today, Dr. Kevin O'Connor asserted the physician-patient privilege, as well as his right under the Fifth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, in declining to answer questions from the staff of the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform regarding his service as Physician to the President during the Biden Administration,' the statement from O'Connor's legal counsel said.
'On the advice of his legal counsel, Dr. O'Connor refused to answer questions that invaded the well-established legal privilege that protects confidential matters between physicians and their patients. His assertion of his right under the Fifth Amendment to decline to answer questions, also on the advice of his lawyers, was made necessary by the unique circumstances of this deposition,' the statement said.
Later in the day, the Oversight Committee released a video of the deposition, showing O'Conner identifying himself for the record, then going on to answer every question by invoking the Fifth Amendment or physician-patient privilege. He provided the same answer to both substantive questions and questions about whether he understood the proceedings.
Oversight Committee Chair James Comer (R-Ky.) subpoenaed the doctor last month to compel his interview as part of the panel's investigation into Biden's mental acuity while in office and whether the 46th president was aware of documents signed with his 'autopen' signature.
Comer tore into O'Conner over his refusal to answer questions.
'It's clear there was a conspiracy to cover up President Biden's cognitive decline after Dr. Kevin O'Connor, Biden's physician and family business associate, refused to answer any questions and chose to hide behind the Fifth Amendment. The American people demand transparency, but Dr. O'Connor would rather conceal the truth,' Comer said in a statement. 'Dr. O'Connor took the Fifth when asked if he was told to lie about President Biden's health and whether he was fit to be President of the United States. Congress must assess legislative solutions to prevent such a coverup from happening again. We will continue to interview more Biden White House aides to get the answers Americans deserve.'
According to a written draft of a statement delivered inside the deposition room, O'Connor's lawyer, David Schertler, said the committee indicated that 'it does not intend to honor one of the most well-known privileges in our law — the physician patient privilege …. Revealing confidential patient information would violate the most fundamental ethical duty of a physician, could result in revocation of Dr. O'Connor's medical license, and would subject Dr. O'Connor to potential civil liability.'
Schertler also noted President Trump has directed the Department of Justice to conduct an investigation into Biden's mental acuity while in office, arguing the Oversight panel should pause its investigation until any criminal investigation concluded.
And Schertler said O'Connor's decision to assert his Fifth Amendment privilege 'does not imply that Dr. O'Connor has committed any crime.'
Asked about doctor-patient confidentiality before heading into the interview, Comer told reporters: 'I don't believe that he can hide behind doctor-patient confidentiality, because this is the president of the United States, and people expect the White House physician to be truthful and transparent about the president of the United States' health.'
Rep. Robert Garcia (D-Calif.), the ranking member of the committee, slammed the GOP investigation in a statement.
'The only person's health that Republicans care about is Joe Biden's – even as 17 million Americans lose access to affordable health care thanks to their big budget betrayal,' Garcia said. 'Oversight Republicans could be working to lower costs for American families and conducting oversight of President Trump's corruption, but instead are obsessed with the past. Democrats will continue to look forward and build a more effective and efficient government for the American people.'
The doctor's lawyers over the weekend had requested postponement of the interview, citing concern O'Connor would not be able to protect doctor-patient privilege during the testimony, and asserting the committee had declined to rule out any limitations to the scope of the deposition.
The statement from O'Connor's legal counsel referenced President Trump relying on his Fifth Amendment rights when refusing to testify in a deposition before the New York state attorney general in 2022, saying: 'Anyone in my position not taking the Fifth Amendment would be a fool — an absolute fool.'
NewsNation contributed.
Updated at 6:36 p.m. EDT
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
7 minutes ago
- Yahoo
These tick species can be found in New York this summer. How to prevent tick-borne illness
While some may equate tick exposure to deep woods and hiking, that is no longer the case. New York residents can be exposed "absolutely anywhere," said Cornell Community IPM Extension Support Specialist Joellen Lampman. "The risk of getting a tick-borne disease is increasing as the years go by," Lampman said. "But, we can absolutely protect ourselves from tick bites if we take the proper precautions." With that in mind, here's what you need to know about ticks as you spend time outdoors this summer, including precautions, various tick species, and what to do if you find one attached to your body. There are various tick species throughout the state — black-legged ticks, American dog ticks, Lone Star ticks, Gulf Coast ticks and Asian longhorned ticks, according to the Cornell College of Agriculture and Life Sciences Lampman said Gulf Coast ticks and Asian longhorned ticks are more commonly found in the southeastern region of the state, while the other three species are found all throughout New York. Black-legged ticks, also known as deer ticks, are most commonly found in shady, humid environments like the forest. American dog ticks survive in warm, dry areas like lawns. Lone Star ticks can be found in various habitats. That's why it is important to take the necessary precautions against tick exposure even if residents are not doing any deep-wooded hiking, Lampman said. "Be prepared to encounter ticks," Lampman said, adding that there is no "where" or "when" a person will be completely safe from them. At this time of year, black-legged ticks would have normally died off, but Lampman said with the recent weather patterns of cooler, more humid weather, these ticks are likely still around and active. Along with that potential threat, American dog ticks will remain very active throughout the summer months. More: Looking for the best views? Here are hiking, biking trails worth the drive in NY Lampman recommends the following precautions be taken when preparing to spend time outdoors: Wear long clothing to minimize skin exposure. Wear repellent on exposed skin. Treat your clothing with permethrin insecticide before spending time outdoors. Shower immediately after returning inside and conduct a tick check while in the shower. While ticks can attach to any part of the body, they are more likely to attach to warm, dark, and moist places. Lampman noted most people are not aware of exactly how small ticks are, which is why attached ticks often go unnoticed, as ticks are normally only the size of a poppy seed. Another way to prevent getting tick-borne diseases is to protect your pets from ticks as well. Lampman said that people with dogs are twice as likely to get Lyme disease as those without, so she recommends working with your veterinarian to ensure your pets are protected. While "crawling ticks" are not a cause for concern, Lampman said, ticks attached to your skin are. If you do find one, she recommends using a pair of pointy tweezers to carefully grab the part of the tick where the mouth enters the skin. It is important that you do not pull from the body of the tick, as that causes the tick stress and to salivate increasingly. Their saliva could introduce your body to even more harmful pathogens. While some may think sending the tick in to be tested is the next step, Lampman warns against this, as the test results could take too long and it is important that you get treated for any diseases as soon as possible. Finding a tick on your body is not always cause for a doctor's visit, but Lampman recommends using your own judgment and having conversations with your health care provider to determine next steps. Resources such as or visiting your local Cornell Cooperative Extension office can also be helpful in determining the tick species. For more information on tick-borne diseases, tick species and preventative measures, visit This article originally appeared on Binghamton Press & Sun-Bulletin: These tick species are present in New York. How to minimize risk
USA Today
10 minutes ago
- USA Today
English only: Trump clamping down on offering federal services in other languages
Some federal court rulings have found that failing to provide certain services in other languages can be discriminatory. The Trump administration is clamping down on other languages as it formally begins implementing the president's order making English the country's sole official language. Many government agencies have long provided services and documents in other languages, reflecting the United States' longtime reputation as a nation of immigrants. But President Donald Trump upon retaking the White House declared English the nation's official language. Previously, the country had no official language, although English was the guidance issued by Attorney General Pam Bondi on July 14, federal agencies must begin reviewing any "unnecessary multilingual offerings" they currently offer and consider ending them. Trump said making English the official language will improve national unity and encourage immigrants to assimilate, a sentiment echoed by Bondi in her memo. "By prioritizing English as the official language, we strengthen national unity and operational efficiency while providing agencies with practical tools to balance this mandate with mission-critical responsibilities," Bondi wrote to the entire federal government. Bondi said she was suspending the federal government's Limited English Proficiency website service, which historically advised agencies on how to best assist people who don't speak English well. The website also lists multiple instances in which federal officials have secured legally binding agreements with state and local governments to provide options for people who don't speak English. Bondi's memo does not require other agencies to stop providing services in other languages, but orders them to determine "which of their programs, grants, and policies might serve the public at large better if operated exclusively in English." The administration said that within 180 days it will publish a listing of services that will still be offered in other languages. Federal services currently provided in languages other than English include: voting information, emergency warnings and weather forecasts, court proceedings and IRS forms. People seeking to become U.S. citizens are also allowed to skip the English-language portion of the citizenship test or bring an interpreter, under certain circumstances. Some federal court rulings have found that failing to provide certain services in other languages can be discriminatory, but Bondi in her new order said some departments were providing far more than the legally required translations. The federal Civil Rights Act prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, or national origin, but Trump officials argue previous administrations incorrectly applied the law. "A shared language binds Americans together, transcending different backgrounds to create a common foundation for public discourse, government operations, and civic life, while leaving ample room for the vibrant linguistic diversity that thrives in private and community spheres," Bondi added. "This initiative is not merely a return to tradition but a forward-looking strategy to enhance social and economic integration, offering all residents the opportunity to learn and embrace English as a means of achieving the American dream." A 2024 survey by the Pew Research Center found that 51% of Americans said it was "extremely or very important" for the U.S. to make English its official language. The survey found that nearly 75% of Republicans or Republican-leaning Americans supported making English the official language, compared to just 32% of Democrats or Democrat-leaning voters. The Linguistic Society of America, which opposed making English the official national language, noted that Congress repeatedly over centuries declined to pass proposals making the designation, and pointed out that several states in the 1780s had to translate the proposed Constitution into German and Dutch before ratification because so many people didn't speak English. The Kentucky-based LSA, founded in 1924 to promote the scientific study of langauge, said trying to create national unity through language is ineffective. More than 80% of the world's countries are officially bi- or multilingual, the LSA said. "Furthermore, there is research documenting how imposing a common language can actually generate intense resistance, rather than creating a 'unified and cohesive' society," the LSA said in a position paper. "The intertwined nature of language and race creates a linguistic hierarchy in which the languages and linguistic repertoires of non-White speakers are considered deficient. The imposition of this kind of linguistic hierarchy can only be divisive."
Business Insider
11 minutes ago
- Business Insider
Trump's plan to dismantle the Department of Education is back on, the Supreme Court says. Here's what that means.
President Donald Trump's plans to dismantle the Department of Education can officially be revived. On Monday, the Supreme Court said that Trump's administration can move forward with its plan to terminate over 1,300 of the Department of Education's employees. Prior to the terminations, the department had 4,133 workers on staff. After the department announced in March that it planned to slash half of its workforce, a federal judge in May blocked those plans from moving forward indefinitely. The Supreme Court's Monday ruling temporarily suspends that federal judge's block while the legal process plays out. The three liberal judges dissented. "Today, the Supreme Court again confirmed the obvious: the President of the United States, as the head of the Executive Branch, has the ultimate authority to make decisions about staffing levels, administrative organization, and day-to-day operations of federal agencies," Linda McMahon, Trump's education secretary, said in a statement. "While today's ruling is a significant win for students and families, it is a shame that the highest court in the land had to step in to allow President Trump to advance the reforms Americans elected him to deliver using the authorities granted to him by the U.S. Constitution," she continued. Justice Sonia Sotomayor wrote in her dissent that the decision expedites "lawlessness" in the executive branch. "The majority is either willfully blind to the implications of its ruling or naive, but either way the threat to our Constitution's separation of powers is grave," Sotomayor said. Here's what this ruling means for the future of the Department of Education. What dismantling ED would mean for student-loan borrowers and schools McMahon has repeatedly acknowledged that, despite Trump's order to eliminate the department, closing a federal agency cannot be done without approval from Congress. The federal judge who blocked the department's reduction efforts in May wrote in his ruling that there isn't any evidence to suggest the administration's intent to work with Congress. "Not only is there no evidence that Defendants are pursuing a 'legislative goal' or otherwise working with Congress to reach a resolution, but there is also no evidence that the RIF has actually made the Department more efficient," the ruling said, referring to worker firings, officially called reduction-in-force. "Rather, the record is replete with evidence of the opposite." The department primarily facilitates federal funding and research and manages a trillion-dollar student-loan portfolio. Cuts to department staff would make managing those programs more difficult, education analysts previously said, and many programs relying on grants and student aid would likely see more extensive delays and paperwork processing backlogs. While Trump suggested in March that he wanted to transfer student loans to another federal agency, it's unclear how quickly the administration is working to make that happen, if at all. Trump also cut $900 million in research contracts in February, and education experts previously told Business Insider that the cuts are putting future data collection — including the ability to track kids' progress in science and reading — at risk. Sheria Smith, president of the American Federation of Government Employees local chapter representing Department of Education workers, said in a statement that the ruling "is playing with the futures of millions of Americans, and after just four months, the consequences are already evident across our education system." "It's deeply disappointing that the Supreme Court is upholding this extreme, anti-democratic agenda, despite this administration's clear obstruction of civil rights and its misalignment with the Constitution," Smith said. In her statement, McMahon said that workforce reductions will now proceed "to promote efficiency and accountability and to ensure resources are directed where they matter most — to students, parents, and teachers."
