logo
10 years of marriage equality — and what's next

10 years of marriage equality — and what's next

Politico7 hours ago

Ten years ago this week, the Supreme Court ruled in Obergefell v. Hodges that the Constitution guaranteed gay people in all 50 states the right to marry. The White House lit up in Pride rainbow colors that night to celebrate the victory. After years of fierce and ugly debate, it seemed as though America could finally move on. And Obergefell, whose husband had died of ALS before their case reached the court, could finally begin to move on from his grief.
But that's not how the following decade played out. Anti-LGBTQ+ politics has mounted a comeback in the GOP. Republican support for marriage equality has dropped to just 41 percent. And Obergefell has struggled to process his loss — and to keep certain promises he made to his late husband on his deathbed.
'The trajectory of his life and the trajectory of American politics would twist, turn, double back on themselves, like tree branches searching for light,' writes Dylon Jones in this week's Friday Read, an intimate profile of the man who brought marriage equality to America.
How can he move forward at a time when he sees American politics moving backward?
Read the story.
'Justice Jackson would do well to heed her own admonition: 'Everyone, from the President on down, is bound by law.' That goes for judges too.'
Can you guess who said this about Supreme Court Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson? Scroll to the bottom for the answer.**
Yep, We Asked Bernie About It … Underdog Zohran Mamdani's stunning victory in the Democratic primary for New York mayor has kicked off a debate over what it represents about the state of the party — and where it goes from here. Holly Otterbein caught up with Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.), a fellow democratic socialist who endorsed Mamdani in the race, to get his thoughts about what this means for the Democrats. 'I think they have a lesson to learn,' he said of the party establishment. 'Whether or not they will, I have my doubts.'
Still reeling from the bucket of major decisions the Supreme Court just dumped? The lawyers at happy hour won't let you hear the end of it. Better drop these talking points into conversation so no one tries to cross-examine you. (From Associate Editor Dylon Jones)
— Read Kyle Cheney so you can talk about how this shifts legal strategies like you passed the bar. 'The Court made it harder to block federal government policies, but not impossible,' you might say. 'They left open several avenues, one of which is class action lawsuits — and an organization representing immigrants has already refiled as a class action case.'
— Point out the potential loss within the victory in the fight against HIV: 'The Court says it's perfectly constitutional for the U.S. Preventative Services Task Force to require insurers to cover drugs that prevent HIV. But the reason they say it's constitutional is that the Health and Human Services secretary has the power to sack the task force and appoint new members. RFK Jr., who has raised questions about whether HIV is the cause of AIDS (to state the obvious, it is), ain't exactly a comfort to public health advocates.'
— One for your book group: 'Everyone, there's something of such great national importance that it has been recorded in Supreme Court opinion, and I think we should take part: Let's do a line-by-line analysis of Uncle Bobby's Wedding.'
How Mamdani Would Change America … Mamdani's upset win isn't just a signal that change could be coming to New York politics — it's a sign that American politics writ large could shift, especially for cities and the Democrats that govern them. We reached out to current and former mayors, as well as politicos with a deep understanding of city politics, just how a Mayor Mamdani might shift the future of urban governance and the party itself. They disagreed about whether this could represent a broader surge of democratic socialism. But one thing they all seemed to agree on? 'People across America are voting for change.'
'Ohio's Anthony Fauci' Runs for Governor … During the Covid pandemic, demonstrators — some of them armed and carrying signs with antisemitic symbols — gathered outside the home of the state's health director, a Democrat named Amy Acton who'd been appointed by Republican Gov. Mike DeWine. Her family was harassed, and she said she faced political pressure to sign health orders she opposed, so she resigned. But now, Liz Skalka reports, Acton is using that experience in a way no other health director who found their job politicized by the pandemic has before: to attempt a political comeback. Acton is running to succeed DeWine as governor, and her background in the health department is a major part of her pitch. 'I saw under the hood during Covid,' she tells voters. 'I saw how fragile our democracy is.'
Could Iran's Exiled Prodigal Prince Take Over? … For nearly 50 years, Reza Pahlavi, the son of Iran's last shah, has been criticizing the Islamist autocracy from exile, mostly in the United States. He says that if the regime falls — a possibility Trump has raised on social media — he should be the one to remake the country into 'a free and democratic Iran.' Many in the Iranian diaspora agree — but others see him, after decades away, as too distant from the on-the-ground reality. Daniel Block, a senior editor at Foreign Policy, explores what his prodigal return would mean.
From the drafting table of editorial cartoonist Matt Wuerker.
**Who Dissed? answer: It was Supreme Court Justice Amy Coney Barrett, in her majority opinion curtailing the ability of lower courts to issue nationwide injunctions against the White House.
politicoweekend@politico.com
POLITICO Weekend will be off next week for July Fourth. Enjoy the holiday!

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump loses latest bid to get Central Park Five defamation lawsuit tossed
Trump loses latest bid to get Central Park Five defamation lawsuit tossed

CNBC

time20 minutes ago

  • CNBC

Trump loses latest bid to get Central Park Five defamation lawsuit tossed

A federal judge on Friday dealt another blow to President Donald Trump's efforts to throw out a defamation lawsuit against him filed by plaintiffs formerly known as the Central Park Five. U.S. District Judge Wendy Beetlestone said that Pennsylvania's Anti-SLAPP law, designed to protect defendants from lawsuits targeting protected speech, does not apply in federal court, rejecting Trump's motion to dismiss the case. "The only issue before the Court is whether Plaintiffs' claims for defamation, false light, and intentional infliction of emotional distress ("IIED") can survive given Pennsylvania's Uniform Public Expression Protection Act, otherwise known as its Anti-Strategic Lawsuits Against Public Participation Statute," Beetlestone wrote in a 13-page filing. "Pennsylvania's Anti-SLAPP Statute (a state law) does not apply here, in federal court," she wrote in the filing, adding: "Accordingly, Defendant's Motion shall be denied." Five men who as teenagers were wrongfully convicted in the so-called Central Park Five jogger rape case sued Trump in October, accusing the then-Republican presidential nominee of defaming them. They cited a number of statements Trump made during his Sept. 10 presidential debate against former Vice President Kamala Harris, accusing him of falsely stating that the men killed somebody and pled guilty to the crime. "These statements are demonstrably false," they wrote in their filing against Trump. The five men — Yusef Salaam, Raymond Santana, Kevin Richardson, Antron McCray and Korey Wise — spent years in prison for the rape and assault of a white female jogger, a crime they were later exonerated of and did not commit. Trump has tried to dismiss the defamation lawsuit against him, but has not been successful. Judge Beetlestone in April also threw out Trump's motion to dismiss the case against him in a different filing.

Weekend Law: Final SCOTUS Decisions & Dogs Are Family
Weekend Law: Final SCOTUS Decisions & Dogs Are Family

Bloomberg

time25 minutes ago

  • Bloomberg

Weekend Law: Final SCOTUS Decisions & Dogs Are Family

Constitutional law expert David Super, a professor at Georgetown Law, discusses the Supreme Court limiting judge's use of nationwide injunctions. First Amendment law expert Caroline Mala Corbin, discusses the Supreme Court bolstering the rights of religious parents. Christopher Berry, the Executive Director of the Nonhuman Rights Project, discusses a New York judge ruling that dogs are part of the family. June Grasso hosts.

Louisiana hospitals warn Mike Johnson of 'devastation' from megabill
Louisiana hospitals warn Mike Johnson of 'devastation' from megabill

Politico

time34 minutes ago

  • Politico

Louisiana hospitals warn Mike Johnson of 'devastation' from megabill

Senate Republicans released updated megabill text late Friday that would make sharp cuts to the Inflation Reduction Act's solar and wind tax credits after a late-stage push by President Donald Trump to crack down further on the incentives. The text would require solar and wind generation projects seeking to qualify for the law's clean electricity production and investment tax credits to be placed in service by the end of 2027 — significantly more restrictive than an earlier proposal by the Senate Finance Committee that tied eligibility to when a project begins construction. The changes came after Trump urged Senate Majority Leader John Thune to crack down on the wind and solar credits and align the measure more closely with reconciliation text, H.R.1, that passed the House, as POLITICO reported earlier on Friday. The changes are likely to put some moderate GOP senators, who have backed a slower schedule for sunsetting those incentives, in a tough position. They'll be forced to choose between rejecting Trump's agenda or allowing the gutting of tax credits that could lead to canceled projects and job losses in their states — something renewable energy advocates are also warning about. 'We are literally going to have not enough electricity because Trump is killing solar. It's that serious,' Sen. Brian Schatz (D-Hawaii) responded on X early Saturday. 'We need a bunch of new power on the grid, and nothing is as available as solar. Everything else takes a while. Meantime, expect shortages and high prices. Stupid.' The revised text would retain the investment and production tax credits for baseload sources, such as nuclear, geothermal, hydropower or energy storage, as proposed in the Finance Committee's earlier proposal. But it would make other significant changes, including extending a tax credit for clean hydrogen production until 2028. The panel's earlier proposal would have eliminated the credit after this year. And despite vocal lobbying by the solar industry, the proposal would maintain an abrupt cut to the tax incentive supporting residential solar power. The committee's earlier proposal would have eliminated that credit six months after the enactment of the bill; now the updated draft proposes repealing it at the end of this year. It would also deny certain wind and solar leasing arrangements from accessing the climate law's clean electricity investment and production tax credits, but, in a notable change, removed earlier language specifically disallowing rooftop solar. And it would move up the timeline for certain rules barring foreign entities of concern from accessing those credits. The bill would move up the termination date for electric vehicle tax credits to Sept. 30, compared to six months after enactment in the earlier Finance text. The credit for EV chargers would extend through June 2026. The new text also provides a bonus incentive for advanced nuclear facilities built in communities with high levels of employment in the nuclear industry. And the bill makes metallurgical coal eligible for the advanced manufacturing production tax credit through 2029. Sam Ricketts, co-founder of S2 Strategies, a clean energy policy consulting group, said the new draft is going to 'screw' ratepayers, kill jobs and undermine U.S. economic competitiveness. 'All just to give fossil fuel executives more profits,' he said. 'Or to own the libs. Insanity.' Josh Siegel contributed to this report.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store