Western arms makers are setting up in Ukraine. Kyiv gets firepower, NATO gets lessons in war.
A Ukrainian industry body called it a "win-win."
Ukraine gets more weapons, and Western companies learn from local experience.
Western arms makers aren't just sending weapons to Ukraine these days; they're moving in. As Russia's war drags on, NATO defense companies are opening offices, setting up new production lines, and working closely with Ukrainian partners inside the country at war.
For Ukraine, the payoff is that it gets faster, more customized firepower. For the West, it's access to something money can't usually buy: real-time lessons in modern warfare.
Ukraine's defense industry is offering hard-earned insights, and NATO countries are able to bring those secrets home before they need to use them themselves.
Talking with Business Insider, representatives of Ukraine's defense industry described Western defense companies working in Ukraine as a "win-win" because it helps them learn from the war and Ukraine's industry while also aiding Ukraine's fight against Russia's invasion.
And Many European leaders have acknowledged that their own domestic industries have much that they can learn from Ukraine's booming defense sector.
Ihor Fedirko, the CEO of the Ukrainian Council of Defense Industry, an industry body that represents over 100 Ukrainian defense companies, said Western companies that open offices and produce in Ukraine gain experience "for our type of work." The war is a fast-moving conflict where new tech and innovations are substantially changing how wars are fought, with new developments in drone technology being among the most noticeable.
Western companies in Ukraine
Among the growing number of Western defense companies that have opened up facilities in Ukraine are the German drone and aerial intelligence company Quantum Systems, which said last month that it will double its production capacity in Ukraine, and KNDS, a French-German defense group opening a subsidiary there.
British multinational arms and aerospace company BAE Systems has also set up in Ukraine, and Norwegian defense company Nammo signed an agreement to work with a Ukrainian defense firm. German arms manufacturer Rheinmetall has plans for multiple factories in Ukraine, including an ammunition production plant to make the Lynx infantry fighting vehicle.
Even Western companies without production facilities in Ukraine are testing their products there, working with local companies and soldiers and adapting in real time.
Kuldar Väärsi, the CEO of Estonian defense company Milrem Robotics, which makes military robotic systems like the THeMIS and has some in Ukraine, told BI his company works directly with Ukrainian industry to keep its systems relevant as well as "to work collaboratively to get the lessons learned from the war in Ukraine and help to improve the European defense equipment."
He said that Europe needs to learn from Ukraine's industry, "what works, what doesn't work, what needs to be shifted."
And then domestic operations like Brave1, a Ukrainian government-run defense technology and innovation platform, are creating opportunities for foreign companies to test their combat tech on the battlefield in Ukraine.
Luke Pollard, the UK's armed forces minister, said in May that "if you are a drone company and you do not have your kit on the front line in Ukraine, you might as well give up."
These developments bring a lot of warfighting technology to Ukraine, which needs both innovative solutions and firepower mass to hold its own against Russia.
What the West can learn
Troels Lund Poulsen, NATO ally Denmark's defense minister, told BI in February: "I think we have a lot to learn from Ukraine." He explained that he wants Danish defense companies to learn from Ukrainian ones so that they can "get some of the lessons learned from the defense companies in Ukraine back to Danish defense companies."
He said that by helping Ukraine, "some of the lessons learned will come back to Denmark, and that's a win-win, in fact, both for Ukrainian defense companies and also for Denmark."
Some of those lessons are coming back to Denmark through the new way it is getting weapons for Ukraine, Poulsen said. Known as the Danish model because it was pioneered by Denmark, the model sees countries buying weaponry for Ukraine directly from Ukrainian companies, which means weapons get to Ukraine faster and cheaper, without adding to the production backlog that defense companies all over Europe are seeing.
Denmark's new connection with Ukraine's defense industry means that lessons from those companies can get back to Danish ones, Poulsen said. He said one of the key lessons Denmark needs to adopt is "the way to produce fast."
The West is bracing for a serious conflict, such as a war between Russia and NATO or a fight between the US and China, and defense budgets are soaring. The war in Ukraine is offering insights into modern warfare, specifically what weapons, tactics, and training are needed for the future fight.
A key realization from this war is that in a major war, there is a need to produce weapons and equipment quickly. Denmark's prime minister, Mette Frederiksen, said in February that it's a problem "if a country at war can produce faster than the rest of us."
"I'm not saying we are at wartime," she said, "but we cannot say we are at peacetime anymore. So, we need to change our mindset."
Fedirko said that speed is something other European companies can learn from Ukrainian ones: "We can say that what our defense complex is rich with is the ability to scale up manufacturing. That's what we are very good at. So we have a very brief period between R&D."
He said Ukrainian companies are also "very swift in terms of testing and finding out any shortcomings and then refining them, addressing them, and then getting ready a new product."
He added that Ukraine has shown how fast it can create and scale up new types of weaponry, like drones.
Fredriko, NATO defense leaders, and warfare experts have all previously warned that Russia's invasion shows that the West needs to get a larger number of cheaper weapons that it can make quickly, rather than just focusing on a smaller number of advanced pieces of equipment. There has to be a balance between cheap mass and exquisite firepower, they say.
Ammunition is also key. NATO's secretary general warned this month that Russia makes as much ammunition in three months as NATO does in a year. In the war in Ukraine, ammunition has at times been a decisive factor in battles.
Working in Ukraine, Western companies get greater insight and clarity into the demands of large-scale modern wars. Russia has been getting these lessons firsthand. This is proving an opportunity for the West to catch up.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Chicago Tribune
10 minutes ago
- Chicago Tribune
President Donald Trump orders US nuclear subs repositioned over statements from ex-Russian leader Medvedev
WASHINGTON — In a warning to Russia, President Donald Trump said Friday he's ordering the repositioning of two U.S. nuclear submarines 'based on the highly provocative statements' of the country's former president, Dmitry Medvedev, who has raised the prospect of war online. Trump posted on his social media site that, based on the 'highly provocative statements' from Medvedev, he had 'ordered two Nuclear Submarines to be positioned in the appropriate regions, just in case these foolish and inflammatory statements are more than just that.' The president added, 'Words are very important, and can often lead to unintended consequences, I hope this will not be one of those instances.' It wasn't clear what impact Trump's order would have on U.S. nuclear subs, which are routinely on patrol in the world's hotspots, but it comes at a delicate moment in the Trump administration's relations with Moscow. Trump has said that special envoy Steve Witkoff is heading to Russia to push Moscow to agree to a ceasefire in its war with Ukraine and has threatened new economic sanctions if progress is not made. He cut his 50-day deadline for action to 10 days, with that window set to expire next week. The post about the sub repositioning came after Trump, in the wee hours of Thursday morning, had posted that Medvedev was a 'failed former President of Russia' and warned him to 'watch his words.' Medvedev responded hours later by writing, 'Russia is right on everything and will continue to go its own way.' And that back-and-forth started earlier this week when Medvedev wrote, 'Trump's playing the ultimatum game with Russia: 50 days or 10' and added, 'He should remember 2 things: 1. Russia isn't Israel or even Iran. 2. Each new ultimatum is a threat and a step towards war. Not between Russia and Ukraine, but with his own country.' Asked as he was leaving the White House on Friday evening for a weekend at his estate in New Jersey about where he was repositioning the subs, Trump didn't offer any specifics. 'We had to do that. We just have to be careful,' he said. 'A threat was made, and we didn't think it was appropriate, so I have to be very careful.' Trump also said, 'I do that on the basis of safety for our people' and 'we're gonna protect our people.' He later added of Medvedev, 'He was talking about nuclear.' 'When you talk about nuclear, we have to be prepared,' Trump said. 'And we're totally prepared.' Medvedev was Russia's president from 2008 to 2012, while Vladimir Putin was barred from seeking a third consecutive term, and then stepped aside to let him run again. Now deputy chairman of Russia's National Security Council, which Putin chairs, Medvedev has been known for his provocative and inflammatory statements since the start of the war in 2022. That's a U-turn from his presidency, when he was seen as liberal and progressive. Medvedev has frequently wielded nuclear threats and lobbed insults at Western leaders on social media. Some observers have argued that with his extravagant rhetoric, Medvedev is seeking to score political points with Putin and Russian military hawks. One such example before the latest spat with Trump came on July 15, after Trump announced plans to supply Ukraine with more weapons via its NATO allies and threatened additional tariffs against Moscow. Medvedev posted then, 'Trump issued a theatrical ultimatum to the Kremlin. The world shuddered, expecting the consequences. Belligerent Europe was disappointed. Russia didn't care.'

Business Insider
40 minutes ago
- Business Insider
Lina Kahn is taking a victory lap over the Figma IPO
Former FTC chair Lina Khan celebrated Figma's blockbuster IPO in an X post on Friday. Khan nodded to Adobe's planned Figma acquisition that fell apart in 2023 under regulatory pressure. Khan drew criticism in Silicon Valley for her antitrust enforcement in Big Tech. The former FTC chair celebrated Figma's stellar IPO in an X post on Friday, nodding at the larger movement, including her own efforts, to block major tech mergers. "A great reminder that letting startups grow into independently successful businesses, rather than be bought up by existing giants, can generate enormous value," Khan, who led the FTC from 2021 to 2025, said. "A win for employees, investors, innovation, and the public." Figma went public on Thursday, valued at $19.3 billion, and closed at 250% above its asking price, valuing the design company at nearly $68 billion and delivering a windfall to investors. The IPO came less than two years after rival Adobe dropped its planned acquisition of Figma. The Adobe-Figma merger, valued at $20 billion, was called off in December 2023 after facing regulatory pressure from European and US officials. It was part of a larger crackdown on antitrust enforcement that was pushed by Khan, who drew the ire of Silicon Valley thanks to her aggressive stance on antitrust issues, especially in Big Tech. "Figma is a massive success, but it's because of the company's innovative growth and not due to the FTC and Kahn," Dan Ives, a tech analyst at Wedbush Securities, said on Friday. Louis Lehot, a Silicon Valley-based partner at Foley & Lardner who advises on M&A and venture capital financing, said that while the blockbuster IPO was a great outcome for the company and investors, "there's a hint of schadenfreude in celebrating independent success while dismissing the potential upside of the Adobe-Figma merger." "The Adobe-Figma merger was a missed opportunity to pair complementary strengths and unlock broader value. Independent scaling and strategic acquisition aren't mutually exclusive—each can serve innovation and the public, depending on the context," he added.

Business Insider
40 minutes ago
- Business Insider
Lina Kahn is taking a victory lap over the Figma IPO
The former FTC chair celebrated Figma's stellar IPO in an X post on Friday, nodding at the larger movement, including her own efforts, to block major tech mergers. "A great reminder that letting startups grow into independently successful businesses, rather than be bought up by existing giants, can generate enormous value," Khan, who led the FTC from 2021 to 2025, said. "A win for employees, investors, innovation, and the public." Figma went public on Thursday, valued at $19.3 billion, and closed at 250% above its asking price, valuing the design company at nearly $68 billion and delivering a windfall to investors. The IPO came less than two years after rival Adobe dropped its planned acquisition of Figma. The Adobe-Figma merger, valued at $20 billion, was called off in December 2023 after facing regulatory pressure from European and US officials. It was part of a larger crackdown on antitrust enforcement that was pushed by Khan, who drew the ire of Silicon Valley thanks to her aggressive stance on antitrust issues, especially in Big Tech. "Figma is a massive success, but it's because of the company's innovative growth and not due to the FTC and Kahn," Dan Ives, a tech analyst at Wedbush Securities, said on Friday. Louis Lehot, a Silicon Valley-based partner at Foley & Lardner who advises on M&A and venture capital financing, said that while the blockbuster IPO was a great outcome for the company and investors, "there's a hint of schadenfreude in celebrating independent success while dismissing the potential upside of the Adobe-Figma merger." "The Adobe-Figma merger was a missed opportunity to pair complementary strengths and unlock broader value. Independent scaling and strategic acquisition aren't mutually exclusive—each can serve innovation and the public, depending on the context," he added.