Rachakonda traffic police crush modified motorcycle silencers
The move is in line with the National Clean Air Programme (NCAP) and the Mission LiFE Campaign, both aiming to counter the growing menace of urban pollution and promote sustainable practices. Commissioner G. Sudheer Babu said that the racket around modified silencers not only breaches traffic norms but also aggravates noise and air pollution, posing a serious risk to public health.
'These modifications are more than just a fashion statement for thrill-seeking bikers,' the officer said, adding that they are a threat to every pedestrian and commuter caught off-guard by the roar of an unregulated engine or the blast of a pressure horn.
The Commissioner cited multiple studies linking long-term exposure to traffic noise with cardiovascular diseases, particularly among adults and the elderly. Excessive noise is also known to cause respiratory issues, high blood pressure, sleep disturbances, memory problems, and psychological stress.
Under Section 190(2) of the Motor Vehicles (MV) Act, bikers caught using modified silencers or pressure horns that exceed 80 decibels face penalties of up to ₹10,000 and imprisonment of up to six months. Workshops and dealers have also been put on notice, with those found fitting illegal silencers may face similar legal action.
Citizens are encouraged to report violators and cooperate with the campaign for cleaner air and safer roads.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
News18
2 hours ago
- News18
SC Cancels Bail Of Woman Superintendent Accused Of Sexual Exploitation Of Patna Protection Home Inmates
The top court has said that the gravity of the allegations and procedural lapses in the bail process warranted intervention under Article 136 of the Constitution The Supreme Court on July 21 set aside a Patna High Court order granting bail to Vandana Gupta, a former superintendent of a protection home in Bihar's Patna, accused of sexually exploiting women inmates, many of whom belonged to Scheduled Caste/Scheduled Tribe communities. A bench comprising Justices Vikram Nath and Sandeep Mehta held that the nature of the allegations and the surrounding circumstances made it imperative to cancel the bail and direct the accused to surrender within four weeks. The bench observed that the allegations against the accused were grave and, if established, reflected a gross misuse of public office. It was alleged that during her tenure as superintendent of the Uttar Raksha Grih in Gaighat, Patna, Gupta administered intoxicating substances to female inmates, subjected them to sexual exploitation and mental torture, and orchestrated their trafficking to influential individuals under the pretext of protection. The court held that the release of the accused on bail could seriously undermine the trial process by posing a threat to key witnesses. It said that the conduct attributed to the accused was not only a betrayal of the institutional trust placed in her but also a possible obstruction to justice, especially considering her reinstatement to a similar position in another protection home following her release. The court was also critical of the procedural irregularity committed by the High Court in granting bail without compliance with Section 15A(3) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989. This provision mandates that notice be issued to the victim before deciding a bail application in cases involving offences under the SC/ST Act. The bench held that the appellant-victim had not been made a party in the High Court proceedings, thereby denying her the right to be heard. Referring to the precedent laid down in Shabeen Ahmad v State of Uttar Pradesh & Anr (2025), the Supreme Court reiterated that cryptic bail orders, especially in serious matters involving abuse of power and violation of fundamental rights, cannot be allowed to stand. The bench stated that granting bail without assigning proper reasons in such cases not only offends judicial discipline but also has the potential to affect public confidence in the administration of justice. The bench emphasised that while cancellation of bail is not to be exercised routinely, it is justified where the nature of allegations shakes the conscience of the court and the liberty of the accused poses a threat to the integrity of the trial. The court observed that the nature of offences, coupled with the accused's reinstatement, indicated her influence within the administrative structure, raising concerns about witness tampering and fair trial. The FIR in the case was registered in 2022 following the intervention of the Patna High Court, which had taken suo motu cognisance based on a media report highlighting the ordeal of the inmates. The investigation was also monitored by the High Court. The appellant-victim contended that the accused deliberately used her official position to exploit women inmates and facilitated their abuse by powerful outsiders. According to statements recorded under Section 164 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, several women disclosed being sent out of the institution for non-consensual sexual acts and, in case of resistance, were drugged and assaulted within the premises. Further allegations pointed to unidentified men gaining access to the home and exploiting the inmates in collusion with the staff. After securing bail, Gupta was reportedly given charge of another protection home, a decision which the court noted demonstrated administrative complicity. While the State supported the victim's plea, the standing counsel was unable to justify the government's action in reinstating the accused despite pending charges of serious misconduct and criminal offences. In defence, Gupta's counsel argued that she had spent nearly 500 days in custody since her arrest on August 27, 2022, and that a detailed evaluation of evidence at the bail stage could prejudice the pending trial. The court, however, dismissed these arguments, holding that the gravity of the allegations and the procedural flaws in the HC's order required urgent correction. Accordingly, the Supreme Court exercised its extraordinary jurisdiction under Article 136 of the Constitution to quash the High Court's bail order dated January 18, 2024. It also directed that adequate protection and support be extended to all victims involved in the case by the trial court and local administration. Get breaking news, in-depth analysis, and expert perspectives on everything from politics to crime and society. Stay informed with the latest India news only on News18. Download the News18 App to stay updated! tags : patna high court sexual exploitation supreme court view comments First Published: Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
RERA slaps 4.5L fine on infra firm for fraud in plot sale
Cleared: dk Hyderabad: Telangana Real Estate Regulatory Authority (TGRERA) has imposed a penalty of 4.5 lakh on Roy All Diamond Infra Developers for misrepresentation and unauthorised marketing of a residential plot. The authority found that the firm collected 9 lakh from complainant Madikonda Mallesh without any legal ownership or authorisation over the property in question. Mallesh, a 40-year-old govt employee from Mallapur, filed the complaint after discovering that the plot he agreed to purchase in the venture 'Kaasvi E-City' did not belong to the respondent. According to the complaint, Nayak introduced himself as a partner in Roy All Diamond Infra Developers and claimed to be the absolute owner of Plot No. 43, measuring 150 square yards in Ferozguda village, Ibrahimpatnam mandal. He demanded a sale consideration of 36 lakh and received 9 lakh as advance through multiple payments in March 2024. You Can Also Check: Hyderabad AQI | Weather in Hyderabad | Bank Holidays in Hyderabad | Public Holidays in Hyderabad Nayak executed a sale agreement on June 7, 2024, with a clause requiring the balance payment of 27 lakh within 40 days. However, the respondent became untraceable after signing the agreement. Upon verifying the property's Encumbrance Certificate, the complainant discovered that the land actually belonged to another real estate developer. Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Hidden Cause Found: Dementia And Memory Loss Linked To This Habit Memory and Health Click Here Undo by Taboola by Taboola Furthermore, RERA registration number cited in the respondent's brochure was found to be false. TGRERA Orders Refund with Interest and Seeks Probe into Project Promoters TGRERA, in its findings, observed that the respondent had no legal title or authority over the land and that his conduct constituted a violation of Sections 11(4)(a) and 12 of the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016. In addition to the penalty under Section 61, the authority directed the respondent to refund the 9 lakh received from the complainant with 11% annual interest, calculated from the date of each payment until the amount is realised. The refund has to be completed within 30 days from the date of the order. Noting "unauthorised and deceptive conduct," the authority also instructed Telangana RERA secretary to initiate an inquiry and issue a show cause notice to the registered promoters of Kaasvi E-City. The notice seeks a written explanation on whether Nayak was ever authorised to market or collect payments for the project, and requires submission of all related agreements and correspondence. The order was issued under Sections 37 and 38 of the RERA Act, empowering the authority to take such enforcement actions. The authority has made it clear that any further non-compliance with the refund or penalty payment timelines would invite additional consequences under the Act.
Time of India
3 hours ago
- Time of India
2 women held for attempting to smuggle heroin into Faridkot jail
Bathinda: Two women, the mother and wife of an inmate lodged in Faridkot jail, have been arrested for allegedly attempting to smuggle heroin concealed in clothes meant for the prisoner. The accused, identified as Charanjit Kaur and Veerpal Kaur, residents of Bilaspur village in Moga, had arrived at the jail to meet Harpreet Singh, who is currently incarcerated and was scheduled to appear in a court case in Moga. After depositing the clothes and leaving the premises, the garments were scanned by prison staff, who discovered 35 grams of heroin hidden within them. The suspicious material was seized under the supervision of assistant superintendent of jail Karamjit Singh Bhullar, and the matter was promptly reported to the authorities. A case under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (NDPS) Act was registered against both women, who have since been taken into custody. Investigations are under way. Cops Recover Heroin, Cash In a separate incident, Faridkot Police recovered 1 kg of heroin and Rs 50,000 in cash from a Creta car. The seizure occurred during a late-night nakabandi conducted by sub-inspector Charanjit Singh and a police team from the CIA staff. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like $30K Goes a Long Way in This Clementi Condo squarerooms Read More Undo The car, approaching from the Mudki side, was signalled to stop. The driver and another occupant attempted to flee under the cover of darkness but were apprehended by the police. The arrested individuals were identified as Bittu Singh and Nishan Singh, both residents of Ferozepur district. Faridkot DSP Tarlochan Singh, a gazetted officer, was called to the scene, and the car was searched in his presence. The police recovered the heroin and cash, and a case under the NDPS Act was registered against the duo.
