A Russian peasant defeated Napoleon before the war even began
It is the story of how a simple Russian peasant stood his ground and made Napoleon realize, even before the war had truly begun, that defeat was inevitable. After Napoleon Bonaparte had secured his control over much of Europe, he set his sights on invading Russia. As he marched through European cities and villages along the way, crowds would gather and people would come out of their homes to watch his grand procession and massive army.
As he approached the outskirts of Russian territory, Napoleon noticed something unusual - a bent-over peasant, sickle in hand, tirelessly harvesting his crops, undistracted and unbothered. The man worked with steady focus, showing no interest whatsoever in Napoleon's procession. Napoleon turned to his guards and commanders and said, 'Do you see that lowly Russian peasant? He doesn't even glance at my procession, while the women of Europe rush out of their bedrooms just to catch a glimpse of me passing by their homes.'
Napoleon halted his procession and ordered that the peasant be brought before him. The man was brought in with his hands tied. Napoleon asked, 'Why didn't you stop harvesting to watch my procession?' The peasant replied calmly, 'What business do I have with your procession? My land is more important to me.' The emperor pressed further, 'Don't you know who I am?' The peasant answered without hesitation, 'I don't care who you are. It is enough to know that you are a contemptible invader, and too mean to occupy my country.' Napoleon said to the peasant, 'You must carry my name with you always, so that you will never forget me.' He then ordered his soldiers to tattoo his name on the peasant's forearm. A soldier heated an iron rod and branded the name 'Napoleon' into the man's skin, a mark intended to be permanent.
In an act of defiance, the Russian peasant raised his sickle and struck his forearm to remove the branded area. He threw his arm aside and said firmly, 'Take your name with you. I refuse to bear the name of someone vile like you who came to invade my land.' Napoleon turned to his officers and said his famous words, 'This is where defeat begins.' And indeed, history records that Russia would defeat him. Regarding the attitude of that Russian peasant, what was the reaction of those groups and individuals who aided the occupier in entering their homeland? History teaches us that defeat is inevitable when people choose loyalty to invaders over their own nation.
---
The most precious thing in the world. Nothing in this world is more precious than a blessing that cannot be bought or replaced, which is the blessing of health and peace of mind. Many bodies are surrounded by wealth, but they are burdened by pain on the inside. Many hearts dwell in palaces but have never tasted true comfort. Health is the real treasure, and peace of mind is the silent wealth unseen by others but deeply felt in the heart, making life truly flourish. Concealment is nothing but a cloak of mercy that hides our flaws from the eyes of others and protects us from irreversible harm. O God, grant us concealment that remains unseen, health that never weakens, and peace of mind that never fades. O God, spare us from pain in our bodies, anxiety in our souls, and sorrow that dims the light of our hearts. O God, the treasures of this world can never replace health, and abundant wealth cannot restore lost serenity. O God, bless us with a share of every good and protect us from all evil.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Kuwait Times
21 hours ago
- Kuwait Times
Meta to ban political ads in EU due to bloc's ‘unworkable' rules
BRUSSELS: Meta on Friday said it will be forced to ban political advertising on its platforms in the European Union from October because of rules the Facebook and Instagram owner called 'unworkable'. The EU has a bolstered legal armory to rein in Big Tech, against which Meta has hit out - with the support of US President Donald Trump's administration. Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg has been highly critical of European rules, accusing Brussels in January of 'censorship' while this week the US State Department denounced the EU's 'Orwellian' regulation of social media. Against this uneasy backdrop, and with EU-US trade tensions sky-high, Meta announced that political, electoral and social issue advertising will no longer be allowed from October in the bloc because of 'unworkable requirements' under new rules. 'This is a difficult decision - one we've taken in response to the EU's incoming Transparency and Targeting of Political Advertising (TTPA) regulation,' it said. 'Unfortunately, the TTPA introduces significant, additional obligations to our processes and systems that create an untenable level of complexity and legal uncertainty for advertisers and platforms operating in the EU,' Meta added. The tech giant stressed that its European users would still be able to post and debate about politics. The EU says its political advertising rules seek to increase transparency in online advertising after Facebook's Cambridge Analytica scandal, which came to light in 2018. Cambridge Analytica was a consulting firm that was found to have improperly accessed personal data from millions of Facebook users for targeted political advertising, particularly during the 2016 US election and Brexit referendum. The change is set to impact Meta's flagship platforms Facebook and Instagram, as well as WhatsApp - which is largely ad-free but announced in June it would be introducing new advertising features in some parts of the app. Meta said it was 'not the only company to have been forced into this position'. Google last year announced it would also prevent political advertising in the EU from October 2025 because of the 'significant new operational challenges and legal uncertainties'. Meta and Brussels have locked horns on a series of issues - most recently over the firm's 'pay or consent' system regarding user data. The EU slapped a 200-million-euro ($235-million) fine in April after concluding Meta violated rules on the use of personal data on Facebook and Instagram. Zuckerberg has previously equated EU fines against the company to tariffs. Facebook and Instagram also face investigations under the EU's mammoth content moderation law known as the Digital Services Act (DSA). Meta's announcement comes as US officials ramp up their attacks on the DSA. The State Department took aim at the DSA on Tuesday as it accused European countries of convicting thousands of people 'for the crime of criticizing their own governments,' without elaborating on the allegation. And the judiciary committee of the US House of Representatives on Friday described the EU law as a 'foreign censorship threat' that forces 'platforms to change content moderation policies that apply in the United States'. 'On paper, the DSA is bad. In practice, it is even worse,' the Republican-majority committee said in an interim report. Staunch Trump ally Jim Jordan, committee chair, will meet the EU's digital chief, Henna Virkkunen, in Brussels on Monday. Jordan will be joined by other US Congress members in a bipartisan delegation, EU digital spokesman Thomas Regnier said. The European Commission rejected the censorship claims. 'Freedom of expression is a fundamental right in the EU. And it is at the heart of our legislation, including the DSA,' Regnier said.- AFP
Kuwait Times
2 days ago
- Kuwait Times
Iran holds ‘frank' nuclear talks with European powers
Meeting in Istanbul the first since Zionists attack on Iran ISTANBUL: Iranian diplomats said they held 'frank and detailed' nuclear talks on Friday with counterparts from Germany, Britain and France, who have threatened to trigger sanctions if Tehran fails to agree a deal on uranium enrichment and cooperation with UN inspectors. The meeting in Istanbul was the first since Zionists launched an attack on Iran last month targeting key nuclear and military sites, sparking a 12-day war and leading Tehran to pull away from working with the UN watchdog. The European diplomats were seen leaving the Iranian consulate shortly before 1100 GMT after spending several hours inside. Zionist offensive - which killed top commanders, nuclear scientists and hundreds of others and in which residential areas and military sites were struck - also derailed US-Iran nuclear talks that began in April. Since then, the European powers, known as the E3, have threatened to trigger a so-called 'snapback mechanism' under a moribund 2015 nuclear deal that would reinstate UN sanctions on Iran by the end of August. The sanctions trigger expires in October, and Tehran has warned of consequences should the E3 opt to activate it. Iran's Deputy Foreign Minister Kazem Gharibabadi, who attended the talks alongside senior Iranian diplomat Majid Takht-Ravanchi, wrote on X that he had used the meeting to criticize the European stance on the 12-day conflict with Zionists. He said the snapback mechanism had also been discussed, adding: 'It was agreed that consultations on this matter will continue.' Takht-Ravanchi told state news agency IRNA the Iranian side had demanded 'punitive sanctions' be lifted 'as soon as possible'. Before the talks, a European source said the three countries were preparing to trigger the mechanism 'in the absence of a negotiated solution'. The source urged Iran to make 'clear gestures' on uranium enrichment and resuming cooperation with the UN nuclear watchdog. Gharibabadi warned earlier in the week that triggering sanctions - which would deepen Iran's international isolation and place further pressure on its already strained economy - would be 'completely illegal'. He accused European powers of 'halting their commitments' under the 2015 deal, which the United States unilaterally withdrew from in 2018 during President Donald Trump's first term. 'We have warned them of the risks, but we are still seeking common ground to manage the situation,' said Gharibabadi. Iranian diplomats have previously warned that Tehran could withdraw from the global nuclear non-proliferation treaty if sanctions were reimposed. Zionist Foreign Minister Gideon Saar has urged European powers to trigger the mechanism. Zionist June 13 attack on Iran came two days before Tehran and Washington were scheduled to meet for a sixth round of nuclear negotiations. On June 22, the US joined Zionist offensive by striking Iranian nuclear facilities at Fordo, Isfahan, and Natanz. Before the war, the US and Iran were divided over uranium enrichment - with Tehran describing it as a 'non-negotiable' right, while Washington called it a 'red line'. The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) says Iran is enriching uranium to 60 percent purity - far above the 3.67 percent cap under the 2015 deal and close to weapons-grade levels. Tehran has said it is open to discussing the rate and level of enrichment, but not the right to enrich uranium. A year after the US withdrew from the nuclear deal, Iran began rolling back its commitments, which had placed restrictions on its nuclear activities in exchange for sanctions relief. Zionist entity and Western powers accuse Iran of pursuing nuclear weapons, a charge Tehran has repeatedly denied. Iran insists it will not abandon its nuclear program, with Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi describing the position as 'unshakable'. Though he claimed enrichment had come to a halt because of 'serious and severe' damage to nuclear sites caused by US and Zionist airstrikes, the full extent of the damage sustained in the US bombing remains unclear. Trump claimed at the time the sites had been 'completely destroyed', but US media reports based on Pentagon assessments cast doubt on the scale of destruction. Since the 12-day war, Iran has suspended cooperation with the IAEA, accusing it of bias and failing to condemn the attacks. Inspectors have since left the country but a technical team is expected to return in the coming weeks after Iran said future cooperation would take a 'new form'. Zionist entity has warned it may resume strikes if Iran rebuilds facilities or moves toward weapons capability. Iran has pledged a 'harsh response' to any future attacks. — AFP
Kuwait Times
2 days ago
- Kuwait Times
Russia says seized two villages in central Ukraine
LVIV: Relatives and local residents react as they kneel before the hearses carrying the coffins of twelve Ukrainian servicemen and prisoners of war (POWs), who died being held in Russian captivity, during a funeral ceremony in Lviv, western Ukraine. – AFP MOSCOW: Russia on Saturday said it had wrested two villages in Ukraine, including one in the central Dnipropetrovsk region, marking a fresh advance into an area largely spared seizures of land since Moscow launched its offensive in 2022. Overnight strikes by both sides meanwhile claimed six lives—four in central Ukraine and two in western Russia, according to officials in both countries. The Russian army said its forces had 'liberated the settlement of Maliyevka' in Dnipropetrovsk weeks after it seized the first village in the region—not one of the Ukrainian territories annexed by Russia. In a separate message on Saturday, Moscow said it had 'liberated the settlement of Zeleny Gai' in Donetsk region on the border with Dnipropetrovsk, adding that it was an important stronghold used by Ukraine to protect the area. Further north in Kharkiv, a Russian strike destroyed a large boiler room that will be impossible to repair before winter, while in Sumy, another strike hit a regional administration building, local authorities said. Supported by swarms of drones, Russia gains new settlements almost daily, but they are normally reduced to rubble and emptied of inhabitants after months of fighting. The summer offensive comes despite a call from the United States to cease violence and peace talks in Istanbul, which so far have yielded no breakthroughs. Further Russian advances could harm Ukraine's economy and energy supplies as Dnipropetrovsk and Donetsk, which has been occupied since 2014, are part of Ukraine's mining heartland, particularly for coal that powers the electricity grid. Ukrainian authorities have already been ordering civilians with children to flee a front line that is creeping closer. Deeper Russian advances could mean more attacks on one of Ukraine's largest cities, Dnipro, though Russian troops are around 200 kilometers (120 miles) away. Dnipropetrovsk is not one of the five Ukrainian regions—Donetsk, Kherson, Lugansk, Zaporizhzhia and Crimea—that Moscow has publicly claimed as Russian territory. Meanwhile, a gas explosion at an apartment building in western Russia on Friday killed six people, with rescuers searching for four still missing, according to the authorities. More than 30 flats were destroyed in the blast in the city of Saratov, which occurred towards noon local time, said regional governor Roman Busargin. He announced a day of mourning. 'The number of deaths in Saratov has reached 6 people,' the Russian emergencies ministry said on Telegram. A man who spent more than six hours trapped under the rubble later succumbed to his wounds after being unearthed by rescuers, the ministry added. Sixteen people were wounded in the blast and search operations were ongoing late on Friday to find four missing persons, according to authorities cited by the TASS news agency. The Russian investigative committee said it had opened a probe into whether safety rules had been respected. Deadly gas accidents are relatively common in Russia, in part due to leaky Soviet-era infrastructure and a lax attitude to health and safety. – AFP
