logo
Musk vows to unseat lawmakers who support Trump's one big beautiful bill

Musk vows to unseat lawmakers who support Trump's one big beautiful bill

The Guardian11 hours ago

Elon Musk has vowed to unseat lawmakers who support Donald Trump's sweeping budget bill, which he has criticized because it would increase the country's deficit by $3.3tn.
'Every member of Congress who campaigned on reducing government spending and then immediately voted for the biggest debt increase in history should hang their head in shame! And they will lose their primary next year if it is the last thing I do on this Earth,' he wrote on his social media platform, X.
A few hours later he added that if 'insane spending bill passes, the America Party will be formed the next day'.
With these threats, lobbed at lawmakers over social media, the tech billionaire has launched himself back into a rift with the US president he helped prop up. Since taking leave from his so-called 'department of government efficiency', or Doge, Musk has sharply criticized Trump's budget bill, which he has said will undermine his work at Doge by increasing spending.
Musk had been relatively quiet about the bill after his dramatic fallout with Trump, but reentered the debate this weekend.
On Monday, he said lawmakers who had campaigned on cutting spending but backed the bill 'should hang their heads in shame! And they will lose their primary next year if it is the last thing I do on this Earth,' Musk said.
The Tesla and SpaceX CEO called again for a new political party, saying the bill's massive spending indicated 'that we live in a one-party country – the PORKY PIG PARTY!!'
'Time for a new political party that actually cares about the people,' he wrote.
After contributing $277m to Trump's political campaign, Musk became a vital part of the US president's orbit and his administration. Doge, which oversaw abrupt and chaotic cuts to various government programs, claimed it saved $190bn. But the effort may also have cost taxpayers $135bn, according to an analysis by the Partnership for Public Service (PSP), a nonpartisan non-profit that focuses on the federal workforce.
Both Musk and Trump were aligned in cutting social safety net programs, environmental and health initiatives and global aid programs. But Musk has railed against the president's signature proposal, which he is calling his 'big, beautiful bill'.
The Senate's version of the bill would add nearly $3.3tn to the deficit over the next decade, according to a congressional budget office estimate, whereas the House-approved bill would add $2.4tn to the deficit over the next decade.
Musk has expressed disdain for both versions.
In addition to criticizing the bill's spending provisions, he has bemoaned its slashing of subsidies for electric vehicles, saying that the bill 'gives handouts to industries of the past while severely damaging industries of the future'.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Fed independence is already dead: Trump will get his monetary bailout
Fed independence is already dead: Trump will get his monetary bailout

Telegraph

time8 minutes ago

  • Telegraph

Fed independence is already dead: Trump will get his monetary bailout

Central banks have no God-given right to independence. Nothing in the US constitution authorises the US Federal Reserve to act as a shadow government, and nor should it have such powers under any theory of accountable democracy. One can admire the gentlemanly altruism of Fed chairman Jay Powell, and one can deplore the motives and methods of Donald Trump, while also conceding that Trump is accidentally right on the perils of overmighty technocrats. The Fed has slipped its leash. It is not alone in that. Central bankers have been calling the shots across the advanced democracies over the last 30 years, elevating this priesthood to the status of Nietzschean rock stars. Sir Paul Tucker argues in his exposé, Unelected Power: The Quest For Legitimacy in Central Banking, that they have become the 'third great pillar of unelected power', akin to the judiciary but without the constraints. The Bank of England veteran says the fraternity has strayed a very long way into 'quasi-fiscal' intervention, picking winners and losers in what amounts to a revolution in the system of government. There is a case for zero rates and quantitative easing in a crisis, but these policies were pursued for too long and have led to a vast transfer of wealth from wage workers to the owners of capital. The central banks unwittingly became agents of extreme inequality. Trump has purged the top echelons of the US military, the CIA, the NSA, the FBI, the justice department and every agency that stands in his way. It would be out of character if he spared the Fed. His war of words against Jay Powell is in full flight: 'Low IQ ... a very stupid person, actually … terrible … a major loser … Mr too late ... a total and complete moron.' Needless to say, Trump's determination to get his hands on the machinery of interest rates and bond purchases is an admission that his 'big, beautiful bill' is pushing the limits of US debt sustainability. The Congressional Budget Office (CBO) says the draft will add $3.3 trillion (£2.4 trillion) to deficits by 2034, mostly from rolling over the Trump 1.0 tax cuts that were never affordable in the first place. The US is in a runaway debt compound trap. The budget deficit is 6.7pc of GDP at full employment. The next recession will push it into double digits. Interest costs were 1.6pc of GDP in 2018, during those halcyon days of free global money. They are 3.2pc this year and rising fast. 'The federal budget has become highly sensitive to interest rate dynamics,' said James Knightley from ING. The US is also about to breach the Niall Ferguson rule: that great powers go into terminal decline once interest costs exceed military spending as a share of GDP. Net public debt was 54pc of GDP at the turn of the century. It is now 121pc, rising by two points a year even in good times, and heading for 140pc in short order.

Starbucks under fresh pressure as China's biggest coffee chain opens first US locations with $2 drinks
Starbucks under fresh pressure as China's biggest coffee chain opens first US locations with $2 drinks

Daily Mail​

time32 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

Starbucks under fresh pressure as China's biggest coffee chain opens first US locations with $2 drinks

A Starbucks competitor has opened its first location in the US. Luckin Coffee, known for its no-frills menu and ultra-low prices, has already given Starbucks a run for its money in its home country of China. It has now opened its first two American shops this week — both near the campus of New York University. The Big Apple's newest coffee shop opened on Monday. The chain celebrated Monday's opening with free tote bags with for the first 100 guests and $.99 drinks for early customers. In China, the no-frills coffee chain has consistently pulled in young shoppers, with aggressive TikTok campaigns and low prices. Luckin's strategy is clear: keep it simple and cheap. Lattes, matchas, and cold brews go for as little as $2 to $3 — significantly less than Starbucks. It also has a small assortment of pastries. Diners can order some fruit-forward refresher drinks, too. In China, the brand has leaned into aggressive TikTok marketing and a grab-and-go model that caters to students and professionals on the run. The chain has a history of undercutting Starbuck's value. A standard cup of Starbucks coffee will typically cost New Yorkers around $6 to $7. In China, Starbucks drinks are typically 30 percent more expensive than Luckin's. Luckin has used its simple, easily-scaled restaurants with bargain basement prices to become one of China's biggest restaurant chains. By 2019, the brand had overtaken Starbucks as the largest coffee chain in China. It currently operates 22,000 stores in the country, triple the size of the Seattle-based brewer's Chinese locations. Meanwhile, Starbucks' forray into the Chinese market is appearing to lose steam. The company is fighting off rumors that it was exploring a sale of all its Chinese store locations. The New York openings also come as Starbucks attempts to mount a sales ressurgence back in the US. Last year, Starbucks posted declining growth, prompting a wave of changes in the company's restaurants and in the C-suite. The coffee chain slashed products from its menus, changed its perks programs, and pilfered Chipotle's CEO to become the coffee chain's top boss. The chain has reintroduced ceramic mugs, slashed some of its complicated menu items, and changed its rewards program to become more competitive 'People love Starbucks, but I've heard from some customers that we've drifted from our core,' Brian Niccol, the new CEO, said during a 2024 earnings call. 'As a result, some are visiting less often, and I think today's results tell that same story.' In April, the company reported a two percent increase in net sales. But Niccol said the company is still facing headwinds from higher costs and decreasing consumer strength. Meanwhile, Starbucks might not be the only coffee chain in the Chinese coffee-makers sights. Luckin's new stores could also lure coffee drinkers away from Dunkin ($2.15 to $3.50 average coffee price) and Tim Hortons ($3 average price). If it expands westward, the Chinese coffee chain could set its sights on Dutch Bros ($5.25 average price).

Swiss privacy tech firm Proton sues Apple in US over app store rules
Swiss privacy tech firm Proton sues Apple in US over app store rules

Reuters

time36 minutes ago

  • Reuters

Swiss privacy tech firm Proton sues Apple in US over app store rules

June 30 (Reuters) - Swiss privacy software company Proton on Monday sued Apple (AAPL.O), opens new tab in U.S. federal court, accusing the technology giant of maintaining an illegal stranglehold on iPhone app distribution and charging excessive commissions to app developers. Proton, which provides the secure email service Proton Mail, filed the proposed class action, opens new tab in the federal court in Oakland, California, on behalf of app developers. The lawsuit said Apple was violating antitrust law by forcing developers to use its payment processing services and imposing a 30% commission on most transactions. A related class action was filed, opens new tab in May against Apple by the Korean Publishers Association and several other plaintiffs. Proton said it was building on that lawsuit, and was focused on winning a court order that would force Apple to allow competing app stores and payment processors on its iOS platform. In a statement, Proton said it sued Apple 'to set an important precedent that free people, not monopolies, will dictate the future of the internet.' Apple did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Founded in 2014, Proton offers secure consumer-facing apps for email, calendars and other areas. The company now has more than 100 million user accounts, according to its lawsuit. Proton's lawsuit estimated there were millions of potential class members. Apple faces other antitrust lawsuits, including one filed by the U.S. Justice Department accusing the company of monopolizing the smartphone market. Apple has denied the claims and asked a judge to dismiss the case. The case is Proton AG v. Apple, U.S. District Court, Northern District of California, No. 4:25-cv-05450. For plaintiff: Sam Stake of Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan and Michael Eisenkraft of Cohen Milstein Sellers & Toll For defendant: No appearance yet Read more: Apple must face consumer lawsuit over iCloud storage, US judge rules Apple loses bid to pause app store reform order in Epic Games case Google hit with US lawsuit by Korean publishers, app developer

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store