There was a deal to fix this Alabama community's raw sewage crisis. Trump tore it up over DEI
They used to barbecue on the back porch looking out at the woods on their land until a couple of years back when the contaminated wastewater seeping out from a leaky old pipe got simply unbearable. Willie, 71, ripped out the sinking porch as branches began falling off a towering old hickory tree which is now completely dead and at risk of toppling.
'We have water and electricity now, it's just the waste, the raw fluids on the ground. But the little money that me and my wife get is just to take care of our bills, we can't afford no septic system,' said Willie, a retired janitor with a weak heart and mobility issues. 'This might be the richest country in the world, but we're the little people.'
Related: 'A dog cemetery would not be treated like this': the fight to preserve Black burial grounds in the US
Here in Alabama's Lowndes county, a majority-Black county with high levels of poverty and a deep civil rights history, an estimated 60% to 80% of households in rural parts do not have a functioning sanitation system. Authorities have known about the raw sewage crisis for decades, which to some extent affects all 67 counties in Alabama.
In 2025, in the richest, most powerful country in the world, many people are still forced to depend on PVC pipes to funnel parasite-infested wastewater from the bathroom and kitchen into hand-dug trenches, fields or wooded areas metres from where they sleep, play and grow vegetables.
It's unclear when or whether the Perryman family will ever get to experience life without the stench of raw sewage after a landmark 2023 civil rights settlement mandating the state to resolve the crisis was terminated by the Trump administration, dismissing it as an 'illegal' diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) agreement. As a result, the state is no longer required to resolve this sanitation crisis – or conduct public health campaigns. It could also restart enforcing sanitation laws that threaten residents without a functioning sewage system with fines and jail time – which the justice department settlement strictly forbade.
The decision is part of Donald Trump's broader assault on all programs, policies and research that seek to tackle systemic and structural inequalities in American life by claiming that they are discriminatory, 'woke' and wasteful.
Ripping up the Lowndes county legal settlement puts the onus back on Alabama lawmakers to remedy the sewage crisis, but it's unclear whether this longstanding public health crisis will be a priority without a federal mandate or funds.
'The money's been taken away so that means we've got to wait another one year, two years … We keep hoping for some help, but we're not getting any younger,' said Thelma Perryman, 74, a retired farmhand who has never lived in a house with a functioning sanitation system.
Charlie King, chair of the Lowndes county commission, said he had been left speechless by the cruelty of the decision: 'Losing the funding will have a devastating effect on the people of the county, who are struggling and don't have no ways to help themselves. This administration is just not concerned about the poor people, whether they are white or Black, poor people, period. They don't have a heart for them.'
Lowndes county is a sprawling, mostly rural area between Selma and Montgomery, where almost three-quarters of the 9,000 or so inhabitants are Black and nearly a third live below the poverty line.
The county is part of what's known as the Alabama Black belt – named for the dark, fertile soil prized for producing cotton during the enslavement and Jim Crow eras, which became synonymous with the brutal trade and treatment of African people by European settler plantation owners.
The scale of the injustices perpetrated was in part why by the mid-1960s Lowndes county had become a major organising hub for the civil rights movement. Stokely Carmichael led the Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee (Sncc) in organising voter-registration drives and political education classes, later launching the Lowndes County Freedom Organization, the independent Black political party that first adopted the Black Panther as its logo.
The county earned the grim nickname Bloody Lowndes due to the violent white backlash against the students and other Black organisers pushing the US to live up to its promised ideals of equity, rights, liberty, opportunity and democracy for all.
Residents here have struggled with raw sewage and other wastewater problems for generations due to a mix of structural poverty, the waterlogged clay soil that was ideal for growing cotton but makes standard septic tank systems ineffective, and environmental racism by state authorities.
Six decades after Martin Luther King Jr led voting rights marchers through Lowndes county en route from Selma to Montgomery, many of the residents living without basic sanitation are descendants of enslaved cotton pickers – and also have connections to the civil rights struggle.
Nationwide, 20% to 25% of households are not connected to a public sewer, and instead depend on individual septic systems to treat and disperse toilet, bath and other waste water. Private underground septic systems are mostly found in rural areas where municipal systems are unaffordable or impractical, with particularly high concentrations in New England and the deep south. In many places, the climate crisis is adding pressure to septic systems of all kinds due to sea level rise, salt intrusion and increasingly intense rainfall.
There has been progress in Lowndes county, but those in the rural unincorporated areas are lagging way behind, despite initiatives by non-profits with federal, state and private funding that have been difficult to track. Hundreds of homes still have either no sanitation system to deal with human waste or a failing septic system that is easily overwhelmed by rain and even toilet paper, pushing raw sewage back into the sink or bathtub.
Alabama began prosecuting poor, mostly Black residents for noncompliance with sanitation regulations more than two decades ago, even though most families had built their homes before the standards came into force – while others had ended up with unsuitable systems through earlier government programs. At least one woman is known to have been jailed, while many others were cited, fined or mired in court struggles.
Despite mounting evidence of a serious public health crisis and criticism from the UN, it took a civil rights lawsuit brought by a local environmental justice group in 2017 to finally force authorities to do the right thing.
A landmark settlement in 2023 during the Biden administration mandated the state government to stop criminalizing residents unable to afford septic systems and instead work on remedying the indignity.
The settlement was reached after an 18-month justice department investigation found that the Alabama department of public health (ADPH) had systematically failed to tackle the raw sewage – a public health crisis exposing mostly Black, but also low-income white, families, to health hazards such as hookworm, a gastrointestinal parasite most commonly found in parts of sub-Saharan Africa and south-east Asia. Instead, authorities threatened residents with fines, jail time and losing their homes.
It was a historic civil rights victory for environmental justice, and a signal that the Biden administration was willing to take at least some steps to tackle some of the US's deep-seated structural inequalities that have led to people of color, Native Americans and low-income communities being disproportionately exposed to a multitude of environmental harms including raw sewage, lead-contaminated water and toxic air.
In August 2023, the ADPH received $5m from the American Rescue Plan Act (Arpa), Biden's Covid-19 stimulus package, to address sewage problems across the so-called Black belt. Of this, $1.5m was allocated by the state to Lowndes county.
Since then, hundreds of low-income households, including the Perryman family, have finally made it on to a waitlist for a custom-made septic system that would be paid for entirely or partly by federal funds, depending on their economic circumstances. The couple is considered a priority case due to the critical state of seepage, as well as their age and ailing health.
After years of setbacks, the Lowndes County Unincorporated Wastewater Program (LCUWP), a non-profit created by the county commissioners to oversee the assessment and rollout of septic systems, began the task of building trust in a community that has been badly and repeatedly let down.
In April, Trump's justice department tore up the settlement, claiming it violated the president's Ending Radical and Wasteful Government DEI Programs and Preferencing executive order, which bans federal agencies from pursuing programs or initiatives related to DEI including those dealing with environmental justice.
'Trump says he wants to make America great again, but it was never great for Black people, for the minorities. It's a sad reflection of past times that people in this day and age are still fighting for such basic rights,' said Stephanie Wallace, a community outreach worker with the Center for Rural Enterprise and Environmental Justice (Creej), which launched the civil rights lawsuit that led to the historic settlement. 'Raw sewage on the ground is not DEI.'
The justice department declined to comment.
The Lowndes county decision is part of Trump's broader assault on civil rights and anti-poverty and anti-racism efforts championed by some of his predecessors.
Trump's 2026 budget, signed into law last week, will also have devastating impact on the Black belt communities, where 28% rely on Medicaid, compared with 23% statewide. Hunger rates are also likely to rise given that one in four Alabamians receive Snap benefits, which Trump's new budget also slashes. The state will have to come up with an additional $120m – a 30% increase – to continue providing food assistance for more than 700,000 people, half of whom are children.
Trump won Alabama with 65% of the votes in 2024, but 68% of Lowndes county voted for Kamala Harris.
Alabama's Black belt counties are among the poorest in the US, and in Lowndes county the median income is just $35,000 a year – 57% below the national average, according to the US census. Installing a new septic system is beyond the means of most of those who desperately need one.
The heavy, nonabsorbent clay soil synonymous with the region makes it extremely difficult to install and operate conventional septic tanks, which cost between $10,000 and $15,000, instead requiring custom-engineered systems that can be as expensive as $50,000.
So far, the LCUWP has installed only three septic systems due to the complex soil, poor housing conditions and bureaucratic obstacles – including a cumbersome funding mechanism that requires the non-profit to secure bank credit to pay for everything upfront, and then submit receipts to the state for reimbursement from the Arpa fund. Another 20 are ready to be fitted over the summer.
Clara Hope*, who asked to remain anonymous, is a 68-year-old retired factory worker and widow who lives on a quiet, picturesque country road in the house that she and her husband built 40 years ago, back when they used an outhouse and hauled water.
No matter how hard they worked, the couple could never afford to install a septic system and raise their children, so instead a straight pipe discharges into a cordoned-off field out back of the bungalow, which is lush and green thanks to the seeping sewage fertilizing it.
Hope, who has bronchitis, diabetes and mobility issues, keeps her home clean and tidy but there is a distinct odour – which she can no longer smell on account of being what she calls 'nose blind' after a lifetime of living with raw sewage. But Hope is among the lucky ones who will benefit from the remaining Arpa funds. Her first-ever septic system, which cost $40,000 to engineer, is almost ready to be installed.
'I just felt everything was defeated when Trump canceled the program, like it was going to fall through again and I would be without a septic tank probably until I died. I do feel sorry for those who won't get one but I'm just so happy that finally I'm gonna be able to get mine so the place will be cleaner, and the scent will go,' said Hope.
The remaining Arpa funds will cover another 40 to 50 new septic systems, but there are now almost 150 households on the tier-one priority list who have been deemed poor enough by the ADPH to qualify for a fully funded system – with hundreds more who need help but would be asked to pay a share.
In February, the ADPH allocated another $1.5m to Lowndes county, which came from the state budget and which groups such as the LCUWP can bid for, but this is still not enough.
'There's a lot of mistrust among the community that has grown from past betrayals, and we know there are still people with needs who have not yet applied for septic systems. I personally felt disappointed and discouraged by the decision to cancel the settlement, as we have to let people down again,' said Carmelita Arnold, who runs the LCUWP and whose role now includes chasing other potential funding so the project doesn't collapse.
Arnold is worried that the state could lose interest, now that the federal government no longer cares. 'We had more support when the DoJ was backing it. And now that they're not, it's like almost going back to what it was before,' she said.
According to an ADPH spokesperson, 'the termination of the DoJ agreement has not changed any of the ADPH work in Lowndes county'. The department does not know how many households in Alabama are currently without a reliable septic system.
Yet, in April, following the termination of the justice department settlement, a spokesperson said that under state law the installation of sanitation systems was outside the agency's authority or responsibility, but it would continue the work 'until appropriated funding expires'. After that, the ADPH will only provide support and technical assistance to 'other organizations that may choose to engage in this work'.
It's unclear whether the ADPH will restart enforcement of sanitation laws that could result in criminal charges, fines, jail time and potential property loss for poor residents.
About 30 miles (50km) south-east from Hope is an idyllic cul-de-sac where four generations of the McPherson family live on 33 acres (13 hectares) in five homes with no septic tanks – or garbage collection.
Rattlesnakes, horseflies, mosquitoes and all sorts of other biting insects live in the prairie and surrounding woods where the sewage empties out. But the worst thing, according to Christopher McPherson, 54, is when the straight pipe gets backed up and they have to locate the blockage and flush it out: 'If you don't watch yourself, everything will shoot down with force and get all over you. If that happens, I take the water hose, some soap and bleach, and just make sure it don't get in your mouth.'
Related: Amid attacks on DEI, a US nonprofit offers reparations, education and healing: 'We're looking to fill the gap'
It's a beautiful spot, peaceful and sparkling green, but there's an unpleasant whiff that intensifies as the piercing sun heats the raw sewage seeping out of the pipe.
According to McPherson, who runs his own small handyman business, the family has been trying to secure help for at least 30 years, but something always goes wrong: the money runs out, or the project disappears. Three of the five homes were recently assessed and approved by the LCUWP, but there are many people in similar dire straits ahead of them – and Trump killing the settlement could mean a long wait until new donors come on board.
'It's wild to me that people don't think about the poverty side of America, because a lot of people here can barely make ends meet; some are living in tents out in the woods, begging for money so they can eat,' said McPherson. 'We have our own home, so I think we got it pretty good, but sewage is a basic thing everybody needs. Trump says he's trying to make America great again, but he's just making it hard for us. He's not really doing anything to help regular people.'
In a region where setbacks and resistance are the norm, Elis Bandy, 79, a lifelong Lowndes county resident and the LCUWP's in-house septic system expert, is disappointed but not surprised by the latest blow.
'Trump is going to be a dictator, that's always been his goal, so this ain't nothing surprising to me,' said Bandy, a Methodist pastor. 'But as Dr King said, we still gotta fight for our rights because it's being violated every day.' *Name has been changed
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Verge
17 minutes ago
- The Verge
X could face liability for failing to stop CSAM.
Posted Aug 1, 2025 at 7:09 PM UTC X could face liability for failing to stop CSAM. It's a relatively narrow legal defeat, though. The Ninth Circuit Appeals Court ruled that X — Twitter, at the time of the lawsuit — isn't protected by Section 230 for failing to report known child sexual abuse material to authorities, nor for designing a bad system to let users flag it. (It hasn't been held liable for either; that will be argued later.) But the court found Section 230 blocked claims that it 'amplified' CSAM by failing to scrub offending hashtags, and it said the controversial FOSTA exception didn't come into play. Follow topics and authors from this story to see more like this in your personalized homepage feed and to receive email updates. Adi Robertson Posts from this author will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. See All by Adi Robertson Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. See All Policy Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. See All Speech Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. See All Tech Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. See All Twitter - X


Washington Post
an hour ago
- Washington Post
Avoiding screens makes me truly creative
Ryan Zickgraf wrote about life 40 years after Neil Postman's 'Amusing Ourselves to Death' in his July 18 op-ed, 'The scroll never stops. Will we?' Post Opinions asked readers: How do you feel about your relationship to screens? These are some of their responses. I have abstained from most forms of screens. I have no social media accounts. For information about the state of the world, I rely on trusted old-fashioned newspapers and state-funded television. I use email where necessary and Google to find answers for things I need to find. I still write longhand letters. I am a realist painter, which is a job I came to after being an illustrator in the analog age. I sensed with the onset of digital technology in just about all aspects of daily life that under the glitz of all those new possibilities something fundamental was taken away: deep, personal involvement in what one was doing. When everyone uses similar software, the results run the danger of becoming interchangeable. Personalities die for the sake of quick, easy results. I saw that coming in the 1990s, and, instinctively, I wanted none of it. I live a mainly analog life because I realized that to make something truly creative, you have to do the hard yards and try things out in the real world. You need to take risks of failure without recourse to a reset button. Only then can one truly assess the value of decisions and research the given options in the light of the real risks and promises available. It keeps my skills honed and my assessment capabilities as good as they can be. Sticking to my old-fashioned ways of looking at the world helps me avoid, as much as I can, information overload. I get the information I need by using the available technology wisely. If I search the internet for some information, it is always on the basis of factual, matter-at-hand, topical interest. I don't see myself as king of my own bubble, but in service to the project I am engaged in — a painting, a renovation project, etc. I believe in the value of handicraft skills. I believe that nothing surpasses the joy of having completed something by your own skills and wits — occasional help from technology is permissible, but not as a first choice. Oliver Rennert, Cologne, Germany Story continues below advertisement Advertisement As a late adopter of first a cellphone (it flipped) and then a smartphone (that is smarter than me), I've always questioned what this technology is doing to us. I admit I've scrolled a trending feed on my cell only a few times; after all, with so much doom in the world, why scroll it? I'm also skeptical of the supposed benefits of social media; from my friends' experiences, I came to call it antisocial media. I've read tweets and posts cited in media stories, and it seems like all this tech just offers us a means to view the narcissistic, arrogant, ignorance of the loudest voices. There's no nuance, just a righteous, ill-informed, politicized certainty that's poisoned our national discourse. If this is progress, I can hardly wait for artificial intelligence, whose starry-eyed tech bro developers are promising us limitless benefits. Besides, if I spent any significant time on screens, I wouldn't be reading The Post — in print, thank you very much. Take it from my cold, dead, ink-stained hands. Jessica Xavier, Silver Spring I hate having to use my cellphone for everything: Having to scan QR codes to access a menu or open my phone to get grocery store discounts unnecessarily complicates daily tasks. Luckily, my father gave our TV away when I was in third grade because he did not want us to be influenced by advertising. Instead, we read books and played outdoors. It makes me crazy when people I am with keep checking their cellphones. They seem disengaged, distracted and not interested in being with others. Now with artificial intelligence, even searching the internet has become mundane. Mary Kent, Papaaloa, Hawaii I have been avoiding screens increasingly for about 15 months. I use no social media on my phone. I have not watched television since March 2024. My news consumption has been limited since February due to a difficult move to a new environment followed by eye surgery. I have also been focusing on personal human contact through phone calls, texts, occasional emails and face-to-face visits. I miss some news but was reading too much of it anyway. I am delighted to be without television. I am reading more books, going to the gym, going on walks and greeting other pedestrians in my neighborhood. It's a great neighborhood, and there are a lot of us. Peggy Naumann, Lake Oswego, Oregon Story continues below advertisement Advertisement I'm 70 years old. I'm fine with my old laptop, but when it finally dies, I'll be looking forward to a lot of long walks. When my carrier told me my flip phone wasn't going to handle 5G, I bought an Android because I have an adult child. It never leaves the house. We have painted ourselves into a corner with technology. Leo Muzzy, Eugene, Oregon I have been working to change my technology habits as I am overwhelmed with organizational emails, most of them asking for money. I have recently moved from a very rural setting to a retirement community filled with exercise classes, music of all kinds, theater, discussion and craft groups. It's a real community with little time for media. It's interesting how people here are giving up TV, computers and cellphones. Elizabeth A. Trought, Laconia, New Hampshire I find that deleting the Instagram and Facebook apps from my phone really keeps me off social media for the most part. I can still log in via a web browser, but it's much clunkier, so I log out more often. Scrolling endlessly on these platforms wears on my self identity, motivation and confidence and is just such a time suck. I would rather practice my instrument, listen to music or watch a movie than be bombarded with attention-seeking clickbait, self-promotion, product advertising or content generated by artificial intelligence. Part of why it's so hard to quit entirely is that I learn things from those quick social media videos. They make me feel like I'm being a little productive, but it's never just a small dose of content. Social media really sucks away your day, week, month, year, life. It was definitely a wake-up call reading the article about Neil Postman's book 'Amusing Ourselves to Death.' I have peers who never downloaded social media apps to begin with, but they lost touch with pop culture and I don't want to completely check out. It's a great way to let people know about my upcoming music performances, but, rather than constantly bombarding people, I prefer to drop in and out like a social media ninja. Caitlin Schneiderman, Centreville Story continues below advertisement Advertisement As a 78-year-old man, I really appreciated Ryan Zickgraf's op-ed regarding his hope for younger peoples' rejection of the overly entertained lives most of us lead these days. I grew up in a Democratic family, and our next-door neighbors were staunch Republicans. Both families got along very well, perhaps because politics seemed then, at this distance, so much less a matter of personal identification and implied self worth than politics seems now. At any rate, I suppose we will see how resilient reason, critical thinking, and thoughtfulness are in the long run. But for now, three cheers for the 'Luddites,' long may they wave. Jerald Angell, Springfield Like anything, the 'screen' is what one makes of it. I've found social media is a good way to network with like-minded people — and to discuss current events and political dysfunction in the United States. As for TV, I don't get sucked under by what semioticist Umberto Eco dubbed 'hyperreality.' After reading for a few hours, writing, examining and growing, I might relax by watching either a suspenseful foreign miniseries or comfort TV such as 'Star Trek: Voyager.' I think TV becomes dangerous if viewers are prone to believe they're watching reality. Gordon Hilgers, Dallas Story continues below advertisement Advertisement I see my devices as tools to give me the information I'm looking for. I read The Post in a digital subscription on my iPad, and typically use my computer only if necessary. My cellphone is a necessity and burden, just something else to carry around. If there were still public telephones, I would probably rely on those. I grew up in an age that didn't have a lot of devices and I marvel at the mindlessness to which some watch, scroll and stream information and entertainment. I abhor social media platforms that seem to encourage vulgarity and banality. I believe in individual thinking and critical consideration, as well as personal choice; not following the crowd. Marilyn Leggett, Niceville, Florida Mitch Daniels recently wrote about visiting an unearthed time capsule. Post Opinions wants to know: What would you add to a time capsule to represent America today?


CBS News
an hour ago
- CBS News
Maryland residents sue Perdue AgriBusiness over alleged PFAS contamination
Two Salisbury residents are suing Perdue AgriBusiness, alleging the Maryland agribusiness giant improperly discharged wastewater containing toxic chemicals onto land and into nearby streams. Filed in Maryland's federal district court, the lawsuit claims Perdue dumped wastewater containing PFAS, or per-and polyfluoroalkyl substances, into the ground and waterways near its Salisbury facility. PFAS are commonly referred to as "forever chemicals" because they can persist in the environment and human body for thousands of years. According to the complaint, Perdue treats wastewater on-site and disposes of it by spraying it on nearby fields, discharging it into Peggy Branch, a small stream originating at the facility, or storing it in an on-site lagoon. The plaintiffs allege that this practice has led to high concentrations of PFAS in the local groundwater. The lawsuit states that private wells near Peggy Branch contained PFOS, a type of PFAS, at levels exceeding 100 parts per trillion. The plaintiffs argue that Perdue's practices violate the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, a federal law that regulates the management of hazardous waste. The Maryland Department of the Environment (MDE) discovered elevated PFAS levels at the Salisbury site during statewide testing in 2023, according to the lawsuit. Despite this, the plaintiffs say Perdue did not notify nearby residents until nearly a year later, in the fall of 2024. "Even after Perdue's groundwater showed PFAS levels up to 343 times the drinking water standard and PFOS levels up to 20 times higher than the existing health advisory level in December 2023, Perdue waited almost a year before starting to advise neighboring homeowners," the complaint reads. But Perdue says that it took steps to remedy the high PFAS levels before the lawsuit was filed. In response, Perdue issued a statement denying wrongdoing and emphasizing its cooperation with state regulators. "Perdue AgriBusiness has worked closely and openly with the Maryland Department of the Environment—the only agency empowered to oversee remediation and assess impacts," the company said. "From the moment we received the 'responsible person' letter, we immediately began notifying residents about bottled water and testing—well before BMF filed suit on Oct. 11, 2024." Perdue said it had already taken significant steps by the time the lawsuit was filed, including testing well water for 673 properties, installing PFAS treatment systems at 90% of impacted sites, providing bottled water, removing potential PFAS sources from its Zion Church Road facility, and continuing outreach to unresponsive homeowners. The plaintiffs are asking the court to stop Perdue from continuing the alleged discharges and to require the company to pay for cleanup and preventative measures. They are also seeking civil penalties and reimbursement for legal fees, stating that Perdue's actions pose an ongoing risk to public health and the environment.