
Keir Starmer was quick to condemn Kneecap, but strangely silent on Moygashel
burning of effigies
of people in a boat atop a bonfire in Moygashel in Co Tyrone last week is an especially grotesque brand of racism.
Stormont's First Minister
Michelle O'Neill
referred to 'openly racist displays that are sickening and deplorable' and called for political leadership. Where is that leadership? And how can it effectively tackle these annual expressions of unhinged hate?
Where is the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland,
Hilary Benn
, on this?
Keir Starmer
found the time to speak about an
Irish band playing Glastonbury
, making interventions that exerted huge political pressure on the festival. Why did he not have anything to say about the premeditated, explicit and threatening racism on display in Moygashel last week?
In June Starmer condemned the
racist violence in Ballymena
. In May Starmer made his Enoch Powell-esque 'island of strangers' speech. Note the singular 'island'. Starmer is especially well-placed to speak on the North given that he was a human rights adviser to the Northern Ireland Policing Board, yet he said nothing.
READ MORE
Yvette Cooper declared Palestine Action a 'proscribed' group, turning a bunch of people protesting against genocide into 'terrorists' in the eyes of the law (and rhetoric) overnight. Expressing support for Palestine Action is now illegal in the UK – a ludicrous, dangerous situation that frames those desiring peace and an end to war crimes and mass murder as the enemy. There was not a peep from her on Moygashel either. Kemi Badenoch accused the BBC of 'rewarding extremism' by broadcasting Kneecap's Glastonbury set. On Moygashel's spectacle of actual extremism, however, she has been silent.
Those who have called it out for what it is
deserve credit. They include John McDowell, the Church of Ireland Archbishop of Armagh and Primate of All Ireland. He described it as 'racist, threatening and offensive. It certainly has nothing whatsoever to do with Christianity or with Protestant culture and is in fact inhuman and deeply sub-Christian'.
Sinn Féin's Colm Gildernew labelled it a 'clear incitement to hatred'.
UUP leader Mike Nesbitt described it as 'sickening, deplorable and entirely out of step with what is supposed to be a cultural celebration'.
Amnesty International's Patrick Corrigan called it a 'vile, dehumanising act that fuels hatred and racism'.
Claire Hanna, the leader of the SDLP, called it 'disgusting' and 'a deeply dehumanising provocation'.
On Friday, Taoiseach
Micheál Martin
said he 'was dismayed' by the display. 'Archbishop McDowell made a strong comment on it and he's right – it's racist, threatening, and offensive and it's unChristian and lacking in any appreciation of human dignity.'
[
'Clear incitement to hatred': Calls for removal of migrant effigies in boat placed on loyalist bonfire
Opens in new window
]
The PSNI eventually said they were investigating the 'material placed upon a bonfire' as a 'hate incident'. The PSNI did not dismantle
another bonfire in Belfast
when a city council committee voted that such action should be taken, and asked the PSNI to assist contractors in doing so. The request to have it removed was rooted in concerns that the electricity supply to Belfast City Hospital and Royal Victoria Hospital was at risk due to the proximity of that bonfire to a substation, and because there is asbestos at the bonfire site.
The decision to let it burn regardless was driven by the potential for violence. The decision is understandable in operational terms – had the PSNI set about dismantling it, riots were inevitable, and everyone knows that threat of violence ultimately emanates from the UDA and the UVF. Northern Ireland's Environment Minister and Alliance Party MLA Andrew Muir also told the BBC that 'the removal of asbestos is very complex and delicate. It requires the site to be completely vacated.' He asked people 'not to light this bonfire if they could.'
Year in, year out, the burning of effigies, hate slogans and flags is accepted. Were it not, effective action would be taken to end it. The reluctance to interfere – by politicians and police – is unacceptable when there are lives at risk, both from direct racist violence and the incitement of it.
This is a tired cycle, the playing out of a pathetic desire for negative attention. Perhaps there is even a subconscious – or a tacit – understanding that the Britain those making such effigies are loyal to barely thinks about them. This reality may be so painful that it produces a desire to burn something. Anything. Anyone. Boats, mannequins, effigies, flags.
I take no issue with bonfires as spectacle and
community events
celebrating culture. In a pluralist society, expressions of identity, community, and the rituals and traditions that accompany them are important. But there is something rotten about leveraging what is supposed to be an expression of long-standing culture and tradition for contemporary expressions of racist hate, with phraseology borrowed from the likes of Nigel Farage (a man who once got paid a few quid to say 'up the Ra' during his pathetic hustle selling personalised video clip messages via Cameo).
It's a pity the imagery of this bonfire did not make the front pages the world over. Maybe then, the blind eye could open to confront a spectacle of festering racism and red hot hate.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Irish Examiner
3 hours ago
- Irish Examiner
Mother of Air India crash victim ‘heartbroken' after remains wrongly identified
The mother of a British Air India crash victim has said her family is 'heartbroken' after receiving news the remains of her son were wrongly identified, The Sunday Times reported. The London-bound Boeing 787 Dreamliner crashed into a medical college shortly after taking off from Ahmedabad Airport on June 12, killing 241 people on board. Some 169 Indian passengers and 52 British nationals were killed. Among the British victims were Fiongal Greenlaw-Meek, 39, and his husband Jamie, 45, who had been returning to Britain after celebrating their wedding anniversary in India. Mr Greenlaw-Meek's mother, Amanda Donaghey, told The Sunday Times she flew to India after the crash in order to find her son's remains, providing a DNA sample at Ahmedabad's Civil Hospital to assist the identification process. Following a match on June 20 last year, she returned to Britain with Mr Greenlaw-Meek's coffin. But on July 5, as Mr Greenlaw-Meek and his husband's families prepared to bury the married couple together, police told Ms Donaghey that DNA tests carried out in the UK showed Mr Greenlaw-Meek's remains were not in the coffin. 'We don't know what poor person is in that casket,' she told The Sunday Times. 'I had my doubts but to be told that was heartbreaking. 'This is an appalling thing to have happened,' she added. 'And we would now like the British government to do everything in its power to find out, and bring Fiongal home.' It was revealed last week the coffin of another repatriated British victim, 71-year-old Shobhana Patel, contained remains of multiple people, The Sunday Times reported. Mrs Patel was killed alongside her husband Ashok, 74, as they returned to the UK from a Hindu religious trip. Their son Miten Patel told The Sunday Times: 'There may have been a mistake done. 'But for religious reasons we need to make sure my mother is my mother and not somebody else's remains. 'Knowing 100% that it is my mum is very important to us.' Shobhana and Ashok Patel were laid to rest last week, The Sunday Times said. Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer (right) with the Prime Minister of India, Narendra Modi (Kin Cheung/PA) International aviation lawyer James Healey-Pratt, whose firm Keystone Law is representing families of victims of the Air India crash, has told Times Radio the identification issues have raised concerns over the total number of victims whose identities may have been misattributed. 'We know that 12 caskets were repatriated from India to the UK,' he said. 'Of those 12, two had been mishandled, misidentified. 'And so if you extrapolate that sample, you're looking at 40 mishandled remains out of 240. 'So that's a very large number, but we simply don't know. 'And to date, the Indian authorities have not been transparent or helpful about that, which is why there was pressure put on by the families to the FCO and the Prime Minister's office. 'And this was actually mentioned in the meeting at Chequers between Keir Starmer and Prime Minister Modi on Thursday. 'So the families are waiting to hear, first thing next week, about what actions are really being done in India to provide some degree of assurance.' It is understood no blame is being put on any UK agency for the blunders, Mr Healy-Pratt previously told the PA news agency. The only surviving passenger on the plane was Vishwash Kumar Ramesh, who previously told The Sun it was a 'miracle' he was alive but felt 'terrible' he could not save his brother Ajay. A preliminary report into the incident from India's Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau found both of the plane's fuel switches moved to the 'cut-off' position 'immediately' after take-off, stopping fuel supply to the engine. It has sparked questions over whether the crash was deliberate. Read More India orders airlines to inspect certain Boeing models after Air India crash

The Journal
6 hours ago
- The Journal
Scottish party to force Palestine recognition vote as UK government faces pressure on Gaza
THE SCOTTISH NATIONAL Party (SNP) is threatening to bring the fight over Palestinian statehood to Parliament in the UK, aiming to corner Prime Minister Keir Starmer on the issue. Stephen Flynn, the SNP leader, said he would table a 'Palestine Recognition Bill' in the Commons when UK parliament returns from recess unless the Prime Minister changes his position. It comes after 221 MPs – the majority Labour, along with Conservatives, Liberal Democrats, SNP, Greens, Plaid Cymru, SDLP and Independents – signed a letter calling on the Government to take the step. Starmer has faced mounting pressure after French President Emmanuel Macron announced France would formally recognise Palestine at the UN General Assembly in September, amid global anger at starvation in Gaza. The SNP said it would table the Bill to coincide with the gathering of world leaders, and Flynn said the Government could not 'stand idly by in the face of what is happening'. The UK Prime Minister has committed to recognising Palestinian statehood, but said it must be part of a peace process in the Middle East. Advertisement 'Unless Keir Starmer stops blocking UK recognition of Palestine, the SNP will introduce a Palestine Recognition Bill when Parliament returns in September and force a vote if necessary,' Flynn said. Stephen Flynn said the Government could not 'stand idly by'. PA PA He added: 'Keir Starmer must stop defending the indefensible, finally find a backbone and demand that Israel ends its war now.' Close attention will be paid to how any potential vote plays out, after the Uk parliament descended into chaos last February when the SNP used one of its Opposition Day Debates to press for an immediate ceasefire in Gaza. Labour, then the official opposition, responded by tabling an amendment to the motion with different wording, and the then-Tory government put forward a separate one calling for an 'immediate humanitarian pause'. Commons Speaker Sir Lindsay Hoyle came under fire at the time for breaking with convention to select both the Labour and Government, which he said was to give MPs the 'widest range' of options to consider. The SNP said they were being denied an opportunity to have a vote on their motion, which was originally meant to be the focus of the debate, and the Speaker later apologised.


Irish Times
8 hours ago
- Irish Times
‘Cautiously optimistic': Trump officials hopeful of US-EU trade deal
Donald Trump will meet the president of the European Commission Ursula von der Leyen as work gets under way on a five-day visit to Scotland. The US president flew into the country on Friday night and was then s een playing golf at his Trump Turnberry resort the following day. However, on Sunday, he will meet von der Leyen for talks on the trading relationship between Europe and the US. The talks come ahead of discussions with prime minister Keir Starmer on Monday, which are also expected to focus on trade issues. The UK and the US struck a trade deal recently, with discussions between the two men expected to focus on this, with reports suggesting Starmer will be looking for the US to cut the tariffs for British steel. The start of discussions show the US president getting down to business on what is a private, five-day visit to Scotland. On Saturday, he was spotted playing a round at the Turnberry course, which he purchased in 2014. A massive security operation was in place as he drove his own buggy. Even before he took to the course, police officers and military personnel could be seen searching the area around the resort, which has had a metal fence erected around it as part of heightened security measures. Police snipers are positioned on the roof of the Trump Turnberry hotel during US president Donald Trump's visit in Turnberry, Scotland. Photograph: Getty Images No protesters were seen while he was playing on Saturday, but hundreds of people gathered in both Edinburgh and Aberdeen for demonstrations against his visit, organised by the Stop Trump Coalition. Police Scotland said that no arrests were made but a 50-year-old woman was given a recorded police warning in Edinburgh. Trump has said there was a 50-50 chance that the US and the 27-member European Union could reach a framework trade pact, adding that Brussels wanted to 'make a deal very badly.' The EU faces US tariffs on more than 70 per cent of its exports, with 50 per cent on steel and aluminium, 25 per cent on cars and car parts and a 10 per cent levy on most other EU goods. Trump has said he would hike the rate to 30 per cent on August 1st, a level EU officials said would wipe out whole chunks of transatlantic commerce. Further tariffs on copper and pharmaceuticals are looming. A 15 per cent tariff on most EU goods would be seen by many in Europe as a poor outcome compared to the initial European ambition of a zero-for-zero tariff deal on all industrial goods. But it would be better than 30 per cent and it would remove uncertainty about business conditions that has already hit profits of European companies. For Trump a deal with the EU would be the biggest trade agreement, surpassing the $550 billion accord reached with Japan earlier this week. Trump, who is seeking to reorder the global economy and reduce decades-old US trade deficits, has so far reeled in agreements with Britain, Japan, Indonesia and Vietnam, although his administration has failed to deliver on a promise of '90 deals in 90 days.' The EU deal would be a huge prize, given that the US and EU are each other's largest trading partners by far and account for a third of global trade. While close, a deal still requires some final negotiations. US trade representative Jamieson Greer and commerce secretary Howard Lutnick departed Washington for Scotland on Saturday for talks with EU trade commissioner Maros Sefcovic, who is also travelling to Scotland, before the Trump-von der Leyen meeting. 'We're cautiously optimistic that there will be a deal reached,' said a Trump administration official, who spoke on the condition of anonymity. 'But it's not over till it's over.' In case there is no deal and the US imposes 30 per cent tariffs from August 1st, the EU prepared countertariffs on 93 billion euros ($109 billion) of US goods. EU diplomats have said a possible deal would likely include a broad 15 per cent tariff on EU goods imported into the US, mirroring the US-Japan deal, along with a 50 per cent tariff on European steel and aluminium. Trump told reporters there was 'not a lot' of wiggle room on the 50 per cent tariffs that the US has on steel and aluminium imports, adding, 'because if I do it for one, I have to do it for all.' It remains unclear if Washington would exempt EU imports from other sectoral tariffs on automobiles, pharmaceuticals and other goods that have already been announced or are pending although EU officials are hopeful the 15 per cent baseline tariff would apply also to cars and pharmaceuticals. After spending some time at his South Ayrshire resort, Trump will head to Aberdeenshire, where he is expected to open a second course at his Trump International golf resort in Balmedie. During his time in the north east, Trump is also due to meet Scottish first minister John Swinney. Speaking ahead of the talks, Swinney said it was his responsibility to 'raise global and humanitarian issues of significant importance, including the unimaginable suffering we are witnessing in Gaza' with the president. Saying he wanted to 'ensure Scotland's voice is heard at the highest levels of government across the world' Swinney added: 'That is exactly what I will do when I meet with president Trump during his time in Scotland.' Mr Swinney announced that he met Ms von der Leyen on Saturday evening in Glasgow and discussed the wars in Ukraine and Gaza. Mr Swinney said: 'I was pleased to welcome the president of the European Commission, Ursula von der Leyen, to Scotland. 'During our meeting, I outlined Scotland's continued support for the European Union's leadership in demanding free and safe humanitarian aid in Gaza, alongside efforts to bring an end to the unbearable suffering unfolding. 'I also took the opportunity to reiterate Scotland's steadfast commitment to Ukraine and the country's commitment to work with European partners on key issues, including energy.' - Reuters and PA