Amid India-Pak rift, Senator Palwasha Zai Khan makes shocking remark on Ayodhya's Ram Mandir, sparks backlash

Economic Times

01-05-2025

Tensions between India and Pakistan escalate after Pakistani Senator Palwasha Mohammad Zai Khan's provocative remarks in parliament. Her speech, invoking religious and militaristic rhetoric, includes threats to India and praises for Khalistani separatist Gurpatwant Singh Pannu. The speech has gone viral amid the aftermath of the Pahalgam terror attack. With both countries on edge, the international community urges restraint as the risk of further conflict grows.
Tired of too many ads?
Remove Ads
The provocative speech
Nationalist and militaristic rhetoric
Tired of too many ads?
Remove Ads
Calls for military preparedness
The escalating India-Pakistan tensions
A recent speech by Pakistani Senator Palwasha Mohammad Zai Khan has added fuel to the already simmering tensions between India and Pakistan . Her remarks, delivered on April 29 in Pakistan's Upper House, have sparked widespread outrage, both diplomatically and on social media. The speech, which contained threats and religious rhetoric, has raised concerns about the future of bilateral relations between the two nuclear-armed nations.Senator Khan, a member of the Pakistan Peoples Party (PPP), addressed Pakistan's Senate with a fiery tone. During her speech, she controversially declared, 'The first brick of the new Babri mosque in Ayodhya will be laid by Pakistan Army soldiers, and the first azaan will be given by Army Chief Asim Munir himself.' These remarks referred to the Babri mosque, which was demolished in 1992, and were framed as part of a broader vision for a 'Muslim government' in the Indian subcontinent, one that would be led by Pakistan.Her words echoed calls for religious and militaristic unity, stating, 'There is no doubt, this enmity is not with Pakistan or Pakistanis; this is enmity against Muslims and against Islam.' The senator's speech further intensified when she warned India of dire consequences, saying, 'If any hand reaches toward us, then the symbol of their power, the Red Fort of Delhi, will witness a bloodshed that its walls have never seen, and its ramparts will testify to it for centuries to come.'Khan's speech took on a highly militaristic tone, asserting that Pakistanis were not weak, remarking, 'We are not wearing bangles.' She cited the late Venezuelan President Hugo Chávez, saying, 'We have guns, we have arms, we have trees—and if the enemy tries anything, we will hang their corpses from our trees.'Despite her strong language, Khan clarified that she did not have any quarrel with Indian citizens, stating, 'We have no enmity with the people of India.' This was part of her attempt to distinguish the actions of the Pakistani state from the people of India, although the threatening tone of her speech seemed to contradict this assertion.Khan also attempted to stir religious divisions within the Indian armed forces, claiming, 'The Sikh army will not attack Pakistan because it's the land of Guru Nanak for them.' She went on to express admiration for Khalistani separatist leader Gurpatwant Singh Pannu, praising him for his anti-India stance.Concluding her speech, Khan issued a call to arms, declaring, 'Our army is not just six or seven lakh soldiers, we have 250 million people who, when the time comes, will stand shoulder to shoulder with our armed forces and become soldiers themselves, God willing.' Her statement further highlighted the nationalist sentiment she was rallying behind, presenting Pakistan's population as ready to defend the nation should the need arise.The video of the speech has since gone viral on social media platforms, drawing sharp reactions. In particular, her remarks were made public just days after the deadly Pahalgam terror attack in Jammu and Kashmir, which left 26 civilians dead. The attack has already heightened tensions between the two nations, with Pakistan being accused of supporting cross-border terrorism.Relations between India and Pakistan have been fraught with tension for decades, but recent events have brought the two countries to the brink. The Pahalgam attack, coupled with Pakistan's ongoing ceasefire violations along the Line of Control (LoC), has escalated tensions further. India has responded with several retaliatory measures, including suspending the Indus Waters Treaty and reducing the staff at the Pakistan High Commission.In response, Pakistan has made several threats, including the closure of its airspace to Indian flights and the potential withdrawal from key agreements such as the Shimla Agreement. With the nuclear threat looming, both nations have been locked in a delicate and dangerous standoff.The international community has expressed concern about the rhetoric and actions of both nations. The United Nations has called for restraint, urging both India and Pakistan to engage in diplomatic dialogue rather than resorting to military threats. As tensions continue to rise, the world watches closely, fearing that any misstep could lead to catastrophic consequences for the region.Palwasha Mohammad Zai Khan's speech has added fuel to the fire of an already volatile relationship between India and Pakistan. As both nations continue to exchange threats, the risk of further violence looms large. With deep-rooted political, religious, and historical factors at play, the path to peace seems more elusive than ever. Whether diplomacy can prevail over military threats remains to be seen, but the stakes are high for both countries and the wider region.