Edinburgh school catchment and moving Gaelic unit under review at council debate
Our community members are treated to special offers, promotions and adverts from us and our partners. You can check out at any time. More info
Plans for the future of Gaelic education in Edinburgh are to be discussed this week.
The Education, Children and Families committee will meet on Thursday as the number of applications for places at the city's only Gaelic primary school doubles in a year, and plans for a standalone secondary school stalled.
Gaelic education for secondary school pupils is currently available at James Gillespie's High School - which is also seeing a rise in the number of pupils enrolled.
A number of options, including exploring a catchment change, introduction of timetabling efficiencies, internal reconfiguration of existing accommodation or, if possible, additional accommodation, have all been highlighted in the meeting agenda.
Plans to offer an annex unit at Liberton High School were previously ruled out and it was decided there was no budget in the capital programme to deliver a Gaelic Medium Education (GME) secondary school.
Parents previously criticised plans for the provision at the new Liberton High School due to its location from the primary school and a more central site being required. Councillors agreed and a statutory consultation was paused.
The main report states: "Engagement with the GME community on all aspects of GME education has continued through the Edinburgh Gaelic Collaborative Forum and in line with the specific action on demand for GME in the Gaelic Language Plan.
"However, in relation to the provision of new GME primary and secondary schools, there remains no fundamental change to the update provided in 2022. Monitoring of the primary and secondary school rolls continues, and demand is currently able to be accommodated in existing provision or by introducing the rising rolls options highlighted above.
"There remains no specific capital budget allocated to the provision of GME infrastructure and therefore no detailed project work can progress. The situation with potential site availability for a new GME secondary school remains as has been reported to Committee in 2022.
"Following the request by Committee on 3 September 2024 to report the potential of the Police Headquarters at Fettes as a site, direct communication with the Scottish Government and Police Scotland has reconfirmed this site would not be available to the Council for the provision of a GME secondary school."
In terms of next steps, the monitoring of school rolls for GME and recruitment of school staff will continue and the council will engage with the Scottish Government, the Gaelic community in Edinburgh and other stakeholders to consider the best way forward.
Councillor Steve Burgess, Greens education spokesperson, said: "Greens strongly support the growth of Gaelic in the Capital, so we very much welcome any positive steps towards developing a robust strategy around the expansion of Gaelic Medium Education, which has now been stalled for years.
"But the challenge is how to grow Gaelic with only one primary school, that looks to be bursting at the seams, and no dedicated high school for Gaelic, whereas Glasgow has several Gaelic primary schools and a high school.
"The council needs to be working proactively with the Gaelic community in Edinburgh to rapidly produce a meaningful way forward for the growth of Gaelic in the Capital, and I would then hope and expect that the SNP Scottish Government would support this as they promised to in their last Holyrood election manifesto."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Sun
6 hours ago
- The Sun
Universal Credit households warned claims at RISK over ‘mis-sold' savings accounts
SAVERS are being warned that opening a certain type of savings account could affect their eligibility for Universal Credit. When you apply for the key benefit, the Government will take into account how much you have in savings. 1 One of the factors taken into account is whether you have savings in a Lifetime ISA (LISA). A committee of MPs has just completed a review into Lifetime ISAs - and concluded the accounts may have been improperly sold to people who could be eligible for Universal Credit. The Lifetime ISA lets you save up to £4,000 a year either towards a first home or for retirement. The Government adds a 25% bonus of up to £1,000 a year on top of everything you save annually. Under the current system, any savings held in a LISA can affect your eligibility for Universal Credit or Housing Benefit. That's despite this not being the case for other personal or workplace pension schemes. The report said: "If the Government is unwilling to equalise the treatment of the Lifetime ISA with other Government -subsidised retirement savings products in universal credit assessments, Lifetime ISA products must include warnings that the Lifetime ISA is an inferior product for anyone who might one day be in receipt of Universal Credit. "Such warnings would guard against savers being sold products that are not in their best financial interests, which might well constitute mis-selling." The committee said the inclusion of the Lifetime ISA in the eligibility assessment for these benefits is "inconsistent" with other retirement products and "nonsensical". It comes as Chancellor Rachel Reeves is expected to reform ISA savings. Disability benefit explained - what you can claim ISAs are accounts that let you save away up to £20,000 every tax year without paying any tax on your interest or earnings. However the Government is hoping to push more savers towards investments rather than cash savings. What is a Lifetime ISA? FIRST-time buyers saving into a LISA can stash up to £4,000 into this account each year tax-free. The government will add a 25% bonus to your savings, up to a maximum of £1,000 per year. For example, if you save £4,000, you'll get a £1,000 bonus. The amount you pay in is linked to your annual ISA allowance (£20,000 for 2023/24) – for example, if you pay £1,000 into your LISA, you can still pay £19,000 into other ISA products. Any bonus you earn doesn't count towards your ISA allowance. You can open a Lifetime ISA with any bank, building society or investment manager that offers the product. You can only open a LISA if you're aged 18–39. You can hold multiple Lifetime ISAs, although you can only pay into one each tax year. You can also transfer your Lifetime ISA to another provider, for example, to get a better interest rate. If you want to use a Lifetime ISA to buy a home, there are a few restrictions you need to keep in mind: Only first-time buyers can use Lifetime ISAs to buy a home, which means you can't own, or have owned, a home in the UK or anywhere in the world. You'll need to be buying a home for no more than £450,000. You must be buying a home you plan to live in – the scheme isn't for buying a home you want to rent out, or a holiday home. If you don't use it to buy your first home, you can continue paying into a LISA until you're 50. You can then make full or partial withdrawal from your LISA, without paying a fee, when you turn 60. Savers might be making 'poorer decisions' The review also found that Lifetime ISAs could be contributing to people making poorer financial decisions. Many use the accounts to boost their deposit savings for their first home. But experts have argued that restrictions placed on LISA customers have led to thousands missing out. You can only use a LISA to purchase a home worth up to £450,000, which in many parts of the country is feasible but in the South East and London this is increasingly pricing people out. The £450,000 limit has not changed since the LISA was first introduced in 2017. On top of this, people withdrawing money from a LISA for any reason other than retirement or buying a first home face a 25% withdrawal charge. At face value this looks like just losing the bonus offered by the Government, but in reality you end up losing 6.25% of your own savings too. In the 2023-24 financial year, 99,650 people were charged the penalty. That's nearly double the number of people who used their LISA to buy a home (56,900). The Treasury Committee, which released the report, said this was a possible indication the LISA is not working as intended. The report said: "Many people have lost a portion of their savings due to a lack of understanding of the withdrawal charge or because of unforeseen changes in their circumstances, such as buying a first home at a price greater than the cap. "However, the case for reducing the charge must be balanced against the impact on Government spending. "The Lifetime ISA must include a deterrent to discourage savers from withdrawing funds from long-term saving." The Office for Budget Responsibility predicts spending on bonuses paid to account holders will cost the Treasury around £3billion over the five years to 2029-30. Treasury Committee chairwoman Dame Meg Hillier said: "The committee is firmly behind the objectives of the Lifetime ISA, which are to help those who need it onto the property ladder and to help people save for retirement from an early age. "The question is whether the Lifetime Isa is the best way to spend billions of pounds over several years to achieve those goals. "We know that the Government is looking at ISA reform imminently, which means this is the perfect time to assess if this is the best way to help the people who need it." Brian Byrnes, head of personal finance at Lifetime ISA provider Moneybox, said the accounts have "proven particularly valuable for first-time buyers on lower to middle incomes, with 80% of Moneybox Lisa savers earning £40,000 or less". "We firmly believe that by future-proofing the house price cap and amending the withdrawal penalty, the LISA would continue to serve as a highly effective product, helping young people build and embed positive saving behaviours early in life, get more people onto the property ladder, and prepare for a more secure retirement," he said.
The Independent
7 hours ago
- The Independent
Savers should be warned about potential pitfalls of Lifetime Isas, MPs say
The complexity of Lifetime Isas could increase the risk of savers making poor financial decisions and the products may need to carry warnings for some people, according to a committee of MPs. The savings accounts enable people to save for their first home or their retirement in one pot. But the Treasury Committee said the dual-purpose design of the Lifetime Isa, or Lisa, may be diverting people away from more suitable products. MPs found that the objectives to help people save for both the short and long term make it more likely that people will choose unsuitable investment strategies. Lisas held in cash may suit those saving for a first home, but may not achieve the best outcome for those using accounts as a retirement savings product, as they are unable to invest in higher-risk but potentially higher-return products such as bonds and equities, the committee said. It also described current rules penalising benefit claimants as 'nonsensical'. Under the current system, any savings held in a Lisa can affect eligibility for universal credit or housing benefit, despite this not being the case for other personal or workplace pension schemes, the committee said. The report said: 'The Government provides higher levels of contribution through tax relief to many other pension products that are not included in the universal credit eligibility assessment, such as workplace pensions and Sipps (self-invested personal pensions). Treating one retirement product differently from others in that regard is nonsensical.' The report added: 'If the Government is unwilling to equalise the treatment of the Lifetime Isa with other Government-subsidised retirement savings products in universal credit assessments, Lifetime Isa products must include warnings that the Lifetime Isa is an inferior product for anyone who might one day be in receipt of universal credit. 'Such warnings would guard against savers being sold products that are not in their best financial interests, which might well constitute mis-selling.' Savers can put in up to £4,000 into a Lisa each year, until they reach 50. They must make their first payment into their Lisa before the age of 40. The Government will add a 25 per cent bonus to Lisa savings, up to a maximum of £1,000 per year. People can withdraw money from their Lisa if they are buying their first home, aged 60 or over or terminally ill with less than 12 months to live. People withdrawing money from a Lisa for any other reason face a 25 per cent withdrawal charge, and can end up with less money than they put in. The report said: 'The withdrawal charge of 25 per cent is applied to unauthorised withdrawals, causing Lisa holders to lose the Government bonuses that they have received, plus 6.25% of their own contributions. 'Several witnesses described that loss of 6.25% as a 'withdrawal penalty'.' There are also restrictions on when Lisas can be used to buy a first home, including that the property must cost £450,000 or less. The report said: 'Many people have lost a portion of their savings due to a lack of understanding of the withdrawal charge or because of unforeseen changes in their circumstances, such as buying a first home at a price greater than the cap. 'However, the case for reducing the charge must be balanced against the impact on Government spending. The Lifetime Isa must include a deterrent to discourage savers from withdrawing funds from long-term saving.' It also added: 'Before considering any increase in the house price cap, the Government must analyse whether the Lifetime Isa is the most effective way in which to spend taxpayers' money to support first-time buyers.' The committee noted that in the 2023-24 financial year, nearly double the number of people made an unauthorised withdrawal (99,650) compared to the number of people who used their Lisa to buy a home (56,900). This should be considered a possible indication that the product is not working as intended, the committee said. At the end of the tax year 2023–24, around 1.3 million Lisa accounts were open, the report said. The Office for Budget Responsibility predicts spending on bonuses paid to account holders will cost the Treasury around £3 billion over the five years to 2029-30 – and the committee questioned whether this product is the best use of public money given the current financial strain. MPs also raised concerns that the product may not be well enough targeted towards those in need of financial support and could be subsidising the cost of a first home for wealthier people. It said the data on this issue remains unclear. The report also highlighted the benefits of certain elements of the Lisa, including being an option for the self-employed to save for retirement. Treasury Committee chairwoman Dame Meg Hillier said: 'The committee is firmly behind the objectives of the Lifetime Isa, which are to help those who need it onto the property ladder and to help people save for retirement from an early age. The question is whether the Lifetime Isa is the best way to spend billions of pounds over several years to achieve those goals. 'We know that the Government is looking at Isa reform imminently, which means this is the perfect time to assess if this is the best way to help the people who need it. 'We are still awaiting further data that may shed some light on who exactly the product is helping. What we already know, though, is that the Lifetime Isa needs to be reformed before it can genuinely be described as a market-leading savings product for both prospective home buyers and those who want to start saving for their retirement at a young age.' Brian Byrnes, head of personal finance at Lifetime Isa provider Moneybox said: 'The report marks a further opportunity to engage with policymakers and continue the conversations needed to ensure the Lisa continues to offer the best level of support to those that need it most.' He added: 'While it is right that the Government ensures the Lisa provides value for money as part of its review of the product, it is our view that it absolutely does… 'The Lisa has proven particularly valuable for first-time buyers on lower to middle incomes, with 80 per cent of Moneybox Lisa savers earning £40,000 or less.' He continued: 'We firmly believe that by future-proofing the house price cap and amending the withdrawal penalty, the Lisa would continue to serve as a highly effective product, helping young people build and embed positive saving behaviours early in life, get more people onto the property ladder, and prepare for a more secure retirement.'
The National
7 hours ago
- The National
West of Orkney windfarm gets green light with 125 turbines approved
Scottish ministers granted offshore consent following a recommendation from the Marine Directorate Licensing Operations Team, allowing the £8 billion, two-gigawatt offshore wind project to move forward. A partnership between Corio Generation, TotalEnergies, and the Renewables Infrastructure Development Group, the wind farm will be located around 30km west of Orkney Mainland and 25km north of the Sutherland coast. It will feature up to 125 fixed-foundation turbines. READ MORE: Wind, words, and willpower: Inside a pivotal week on Skye's energy future ScotWind, managed by Crown Estate Scotland, grants developers the rights to seabed sites to build large-scale offshore wind farms. Project director Stuart Macauley welcomed the decision, stating: 'We'd like to thank the Scottish Government, their officials, and all stakeholders and suppliers who have worked with us so proactively to make this happen.' He also highlighted the need for greater clarity on regulatory issues such as transmission charges, electricity market reform, and the future of Contracts for Difference (CfD) auction rules. 'Like many projects in Scotland and the UK, we and our investors are focused on working with government to achieve the certainty required on key regulatory areas such as transmission charging, electricity market reform and the rules for future CfD auction rounds. 'Gaining clarity on these points will be crucial for investors to fully understand the economic case for progressing into construction and operation. 'The UK Government has set out ambitious decarbonisation goals for 2030 and beyond, and our pioneering wind farm, backed by major international investors, can deliver jobs, inward investment and make a significant contribution to the energy transition in Scotland.' Highland Council had already approved the project's onshore planning application in June 2024. This covers underground cabling and infrastructure needed to connect the wind farm to the national grid in Caithness. In March, the council also confirmed it would not object to the offshore plans submitted to Scottish ministers. The developers have launched several local initiatives, including: A £1m research and development programme led by EMEC in Orkney A £900,000 education initiative with the University of Highlands and Islands A £125k Fit 4 Renewables programme run by ORE Catapult The offshore application included requests under the Electricity Act 1989 and the Marine (Scotland) Act 2010, alongside two and a half years of environmental and technical assessments. The West of Orkney Windfarm is expected to play a key role in meeting the UK Government's 2030 net-zero targets.
