Education experts hail DF Malan ruling as victory for school
Education experts are celebrating the Supreme Court of Appeal's landmark ruling in the DF Malan High School case, describing it as a decisive victory that strengthens school governing bodies' authority to shed apartheid-era symbols and transform their institutional identities.
The judgment, passed down on 4 June, which dismissed an appeal seeking to prevent the school from changing its name to DF Akademie, has been praised by education specialists as a precedent-setting decision that empowers school communities while establishing clear guidelines for institutional transformation.
'The judgement strengthens the school governing bodies to have the autonomy they need to make decisions about renaming schools, as long as they follow a fair and consultative process. This ruling sets a precedent for other schools,' said education expert Hendricks Makatena.
Rautenbach & Others v The Governing Body of die Hoërskool DF Malan & Another (073/2024) [2025] ZASCA 78 (4 June 2025)
Today the Supreme Court of Appeal (the SCA) handed down judgment, dismissing an appeal against an order granted in the Western Cape Division of the High Court. pic.twitter.com/E8nuqkVuBT — Supreme Court of Appeal ZA (@SCA_ZA) June 4, 2025
Experts see broader implications for school governance
Professor Brahm Fleisch, another education expert, emphasised the judgment's significance in reinforcing democratic school governance at a time when there are concerns about legislative changes undermining governing body roles.
'I think that in many respects, it's an important judgement because it says that communities have a very significant say in shaping their own institutions, the values and the vision of the institution,' Fleisch said.
'I think this judgment essentially reminds us that South Africa continues to have a very significant piece of legislation which grants real decision-making power to school governing bodies,' he added.
Makatena noted that the Supreme Court's interpretation reveals greater autonomy than previously understood.
'SCA's interpretation of the Schools Act's provisions on governance suggests that school governing bodies have more autonomy than previously thought. The court's ruling that the governing body has the implied power to change the school's name empowers schools to take ownership of their decisions.'
ALSO READ: Hoërskool DF Malan wants a new, more inclusive name
Fleisch highlighted how the court's reliance on constitutional principles strengthened the foundation of the judgment.
The expert emphasised that the decision aligns with constitutional values of human dignity, equality, and freedom, making it consistent with the principle of 'an open and democratic society based on human dignity, equality, and freedom'.
Process creates template for future cases
Education specialists see the ruling as establishing a clear roadmap for other schools considering similar transformations.
Fleisch explained that 'the judgement officially created a process and logic of reasoning should this issue occur in any other school… basically what the judgement does is it provides the rationale, and the overall logic that would need to be followed if another school wanted to change its name.'
Makatena predicted the judgment will influence how institutions approach change: 'The judgement may influence schools to approach renaming or revising symbols with caution, ensuring that they engage in comprehensive consultation processes and consider the impact on their communities. Schools may prioritise contextual understanding and stakeholder engagement when making decisions about their names and symbols.'
ALSO READ: 'Using k-word is illegal': Northern Cape teacher fired for racist outburst loses reinstatement battle
External facilitation model endorsed
The experts praised the use of independent facilitation in the DF Malan case, with Makatena noting that 'usually, external facilitators bring knowledge and skills to manage complex decision-making processes.'
He added that 'bringing in an external facilitator particularly facilitated that trusted by all parties is often away which potential disagreement can get resolved amicably.'
This approach, overseen by experienced mediator Di Jan Frederick Marais, included group discussions focused on the school's identity and core values, leading to the May 2021 decision that the original name conflicted with the school's Christian ethos and inclusivity policy.
Procedural fairness standards clarified
Addressing concerns about consultation processes, Makatena emphasised that 'the court's finding confirms that schools should prioritise transparency and fairness when making decisions that affect their communities.'
The Supreme Court found that minimum requirements under the Promotion of Administrative Justice Act were met through detailed stakeholder invitations, unbiased facilitation, and broad community engagement.
The court's acceptance of the 'saturation point' approach, where consultation ended when no new perspectives emerged, provides guidance for future processes while ensuring comprehensive community input.
Message to educational institutions
Education experts believe the ruling sends a powerful message about institutional reflection and transformation.
'This judgement sends a message to schools and educators about the importance of reflecting on their institutional identities and values,' Makatena observed.
Fleisch described the name change as representing a careful balance between preservation and modernisation: 'The decision about the school name is an attempt on the part of the school governing body to preserve the legacy of the school and the memory and the communities reputation of school.
'The school was trying very hard to find a mechanism of preserving the community and belief and commitment to the school, but also to modernise the school name in a way that addresses some of the most egregious parts of the historical name of the school.'
ALSO READ: Education department clears the air on school calendar 'changes'
Impact on decolonisation discourse
The experts see the judgment as contributing positively to broader educational transformation efforts.
'The judgement contributes positively to the discourse about decolonisation,' Makatena concluded, while Fleisch noted that the decision reinforces the importance of schools being 'mindful of the context and changing context within school.'
DF Malan school case background
The Supreme Court of Appeal dismissed an appeal by four parents who challenged the school governing body's authority to rename DF Malan High School, which had borne the name of the apartheid architect since its establishment in 1954.
The court found that governing bodies possess implied power under the South African Schools Act to rename schools, and that the consultative process met all procedural requirements.
The ruling, delivered with costs including expenses for two counsel, establishes that school communities have the democratic authority to transform their institutional identities while following fair and comprehensive consultation processes.
READ NEXT: Department scrambles to fix curriculum chaos at Gauteng school after delayed start
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
SowetanLIVE
2 days ago
- SowetanLIVE
State's corruption case against Mabuyakhulu and others in failed jazz festival project back on the table
A bid by the state to appeal against the discharge of ANC heavyweight Mike Mabuyakhulu and others charged with corruption in relation to the failed 2012 R28.5m North Sea Jazz Festival project is back on the table. The Supreme Court of Appeal (SCA) ordered the decision of KwaZulu-Natal high court judge Mahendra Chetty, dismissing the state's application for special leave to appeal, be referred to the SCA for reconsideration, and oral argument, including on the merits, if requested by the court. Mabuyakhulu — the ANC's provincial task team co-ordinator — and 15 others, including former economic development department head Desmond Golding, event organisers Ceaser Mkhize, Mabheleni Ntuli, Basil Ninela and his wife Brenda, Nothando Zungu, Ntokozo Ndlovu and Njabulo Mkhize — faced fraud, money-laundering and corruption charges relating to the festival. The state alleged the service providers were irregularly paid and the politicians received kickbacks. In May 2023, Chetty, in an application at the end of the state's case, effectively acquitted the accused without them having to put up a defence. This, he said, was because there was not a shred of evidence against them. In a 100-page ruling, which took three hours to read, Chetty went through each charge against each accused, noting the paucity of evidence against them, that in some instances the allegations were a 'stretch too far', and that a 'sniff of suspicion' was not enough in a criminal trial. In terms of law, the state can only seek to appeal against what it considers to be a misdirection by the trial court on questions of law, not questions of fact. In considering the application for leave to appeal to the SCA Chetty had ruled even if his judgment revealed he might have been mistaken in his assessment of the evidence the state could not appeal against this. He was not convinced there were reasonable prospects the SCA would find he had committed a mistake in law and it would lead to the accused in the matter being convicted. Mabuyakhulu, who was economic development and tourism MEC at the time, was charged with taking a bribe of R300,000 in return for the award of the contract to what became a joint venture. Chetty's ruling came after their lawyers applied for their discharge, in terms of section 174 of the Criminal Procedure Act, without having to put up a defence. This is done at the discretion of the judge at the close of the state's case in circumstances where the state has failed to prove its case and cannot secure a conviction without the accused having to testify and possibly incriminate themselves. On Friday, Natasha Ramkisson-Kara, KwaZulu-Natal NPA spokesperson said: 'The NPA welcomes the opportunity to argue its case before the SCA that the honourable judge Mahendra Chetty erred in law in discharging the accused, that there are reasonable prospects of success on appeal, and that there are compelling reasons for the appeal to be heard by the SCA. Prosecutors will continue to vigorously challenge any decision considered to be wrong in law using available legal remedies.' TimesLIVE
TimesLIVE
2 days ago
- TimesLIVE
State's corruption case against Mabuyakhulu and others in failed jazz festival project back on the table
A bid by the state to appeal against the discharge of ANC heavyweight Mike Mabuyakhulu and others charged with corruption in relation to the failed 2012 R28.5m North Sea Jazz Festival project is back on the table. The Supreme Court of Appeal (SCA) ordered the decision of KwaZulu-Natal high court judge Mahendra Chetty, dismissing the state's application for special leave to appeal, be referred to the SCA for reconsideration, and oral argument, including on the merits, if requested by the court. Mabuyakhulu — the ANC's provincial task team co-ordinator — and 15 others, including former economic development department head Desmond Golding, event organisers Ceaser Mkhize, Mabheleni Ntuli, Basil Ninela and his wife Brenda, Nothando Zungu, Ntokozo Ndlovu and Njabulo Mkhize — faced fraud, money-laundering and corruption charges relating to the festival. The state alleged the service providers were irregularly paid and the politicians received kickbacks. In May 2023, Chetty, in an application at the end of the state's case, effectively acquitted the accused without them having to put up a defence. This, he said, was because there was not a shred of evidence against them. In a 100-page ruling, which took three hours to read, Chetty went through each charge against each accused, noting the paucity of evidence against them, that in some instances the allegations were a 'stretch too far', and that a 'sniff of suspicion' was not enough in a criminal trial. In terms of law, the state can only seek to appeal against what it considers to be a misdirection by the trial court on questions of law, not questions of fact. In considering the application for leave to appeal to the SCA Chetty had ruled even if his judgment revealed he might have been mistaken in his assessment of the evidence the state could not appeal against this. He was not convinced there were reasonable prospects the SCA would find he had committed a mistake in law and it would lead to the accused in the matter being convicted. Mabuyakhulu, who was economic development and tourism MEC at the time, was charged with taking a bribe of R300,000 in return for the award of the contract to what became a joint venture. Chetty's ruling came after their lawyers applied for their discharge, in terms of section 174 of the Criminal Procedure Act, without having to put up a defence. This is done at the discretion of the judge at the close of the state's case in circumstances where the state has failed to prove its case and cannot secure a conviction without the accused having to testify and possibly incriminate themselves. On Friday, Natasha Ramkisson-Kara, KwaZulu-Natal NPA spokesperson said: 'The NPA welcomes the opportunity to argue its case before the SCA that the honourable judge Mahendra Chetty erred in law in discharging the accused, that there are reasonable prospects of success on appeal, and that there are compelling reasons for the appeal to be heard by the SCA. Prosecutors will continue to vigorously challenge any decision considered to be wrong in law using available legal remedies.'
The South African
3 days ago
- The South African
The Judicial Service Commission announces candidate shortlist
On 25 July 2025, the Judicial Service Commission announced the candidates that have been shortlisted for vacancies across various courts in South Africa. They will interview the selected candidates between 6 to 17 October 2025. The Constitutional Court, Supreme Court of Appeal, Land Court, Labour Court and multiple divisions of the High Court currently have open positions. 'The Constitutional Court advertised two vacancies. Six candidates have applied but only five of them are eligible to be shortlisted,' said the office of the JSC. According to the JSC, because they only had five qualifying candidates, the commission decided to re-advertise the positions. 'The advert was published on 18 July 2025, with a closing date of 6 August 2025,' they said. The commission further explained that the new applications will be narrowed down and will be sent as recommendations to the president. Despite the extension, the Constitutional Court applicants will also be interviewed in October. According to the JSC, the following candidates have been shortlisted to be interviewed in October for openings in the Supreme Court of Appeal: Judge Thandi Victoria Norman Judge Bashier Vally Judge Leonie Windell Judge Gerald Hercules Bloem Judge Busisiwe Shareen Masipa Judge Pitso Ephraim Molitsoane Although there are three vacancies open at the Johannesburg Labour Court, only one candidate, Suzanna Harvey, has made the cut. Nevertheless, law bodies and members of the public who wish to comment on the shortlisted candidates have been urged by the JSC to write to the commission's Secretariat. Let us know by leaving a comment below, or send a WhatsApp to 060 011 021 1 Subscribe to The South African website's newsletters and follow us on WhatsApp, Facebook, X and Bluesky for the latest news.
