Report highlights scope of homelessness across Colorado
The big picture: The Colorado Homeless Management Information System's inaugural report offers a broad look at a persistent issue most often associated with urban areas.
The report stresses the need for collaboration across agencies to help curb homelessness.
Why it matters: Homelessness is growing across the state — not just in Denver.
A recent study from the Common Sense Institute suggests it spiked 90% statewide between 2020 and 2024, while a federal report noted families with children experiencing homelessness rose by 134% last year.
State of play: Among those seeking assistance, nearly one-third were considered chronically homeless and 6% were veterans, per the COHMIS report.
Most of the people who sought housing and services were single adults (82%) followed by families (9%) and youth (8%).
More than half of the individuals experiencing homelessness have a disabling condition, which the report cited as one factor making it more difficult to maintain housing.
Between the lines: Native American, Black, multiracial and Native Hawaiian and Pacific Islander people experiencing homelessness are overrepresented in the COHMIS data.
People of color represented 55% of those seeking services last year statewide
Context: Among the four regional agencies that issued the report is the Metro Denver Homeless Initiative (MDHI), which served the highest number of people in the state, per the report.
The three other agencies collectively cover the rest of Colorado, tracking and coordinating services.
The intrigue: Supportive housing, which provides low-income housing with additional services like health care, is listed as one solution with a proven track record.
Lack of access to health care and supportive services can contribute to long-term and persistent homelessness.
The report also highlights the Built for Zero movement, which brings together housing groups, doctors and government and has led to a 7% drop in veteran homelessness.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
San Francisco Chronicle
a day ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Asian and Pacific Islander teens face higher prediabetes risk, study finds
Asian and Pacific Islander adolescents who are overweight or obese are twice as likely to have prediabetes compared to their white counterparts, according to new research from Kaiser Permanente. Twenty-seven percent of Asian youths had prediabetes compared to 12% of white youths, according to the study, which was published this week in Diabetes Care. All youths in the study were overweight or obese. And there were significant differences in prediabetes rates among Asian subgroups: Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander youth were at highest risk (32%), followed by South Asian (31%), Filipino (28%), Chinese (26%) and Vietnamese (18%), the study found. The analysis is one of the first to break down prediabetes rates in Asian subgroups rather than grouping all Asians together as a single monolith, which many medical research studies typically do. The findings are important because they reinforce that some people are more likely to develop prediabetes — a condition where one's blood sugar level is higher than normal, but not high enough to be considered diabetes — than their peers, and should perhaps get tested more frequently or earlier to prevent it. 'We need to think about certain populations as being at higher risk, and maybe they need to be screened for prediabetes at a lower threshold,' said study co-author Dr. Louise Greenspan, a pediatric endocrinologist at Kaiser Permanente San Francisco Medical Center. 'We lump all adolescents into one category, and we'd love to be able to personalize things a little more.' Screenings also give doctors a chance to educate patients and their families about diabetes and talk to them about lifestyle factors that can help their health, she said. There is no standard recommendation for when adolescents should start getting screened for diabetes. The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force, the group of medical experts that issues recommendations for what age people should start getting screened for breast cancer and other diseases, does not have a recommendation on diabetes screenings for youths. The American Diabetes Association recommends screening for high-risk ethnic groups who are overweight. Kaiser screens all adolescents who are overweight, regardless of race or ethnicity. It's not clear why Asian youths are more likely than white youths to develop prediabetes, or why some subgroups of Asian youths are more prone than other subgroups. Some potential explanations could be differences in genetics, cultural factors and social determinants of health like income level and neighborhood — or a combination of all those things. 'We know genetics contribute to the risk of developing prediabetes and type 2 diabetes, but the environment that someone grows up in can push them over the edge,' Greenspan said. 'If they're living in a neighborhood where they don't have access to safe places to exercise, or their school doesn't have adequate physical education, or they live in a food desert … those all lead to less activity and more food intake than someone who lives in an environment where it's safe to ride their bike to meet friends in the park and come home to meals parents are able to resource that are plant-based.' The study included about 38,000 Kaiser Permanente Northern California members between ages 10 and 17 who were overweight (85th to 95th percentile BMI for their age) or obese (96th percentile or higher BMI for their age) at a pediatric visit between 2012 and 2019, and had a hemoglobin A1c test within a year of that visit. A1c measures one's average blood sugar level over the last three months. An A1c level between 5.7% and 6.4% is considered prediabetic. The findings add to an already established body of research showing that Asian adults are at a higher risk of developing type 2 diabetes at a lower BMI than white adults. It's not entirely clear why, but some researchers have posited it may be because Asians tend to store more fat around abdominal organs, known as visceral fat, which may lead to heightened insulin resistance. This led to the American Diabetes Association in 2015 recommending that Asian adults get screened for diabetes at a BMI of 23 rather than a BMI of 25, which is the standard screening threshold for all adults.
Black America Web
3 days ago
- Black America Web
‘No One Should Have to Go Through This': Venus Williams On Fibroids & Fighting To Be Heard
Source: WWD / Getty Venus Williams has always been a powerhouse on the court. But her latest win isn't about titles – it's about telling the truth and reclaiming her health. In a recent exclusive interview with the TODAY Show , Venus Williams' fibroid journey takes center stage. While the world watched her dominate in tennis, the seven-time Grand Slam winner battled with the condition for years. On July 3, Venus revealed that for most of her life, doctors dismissed her extreme period pain, nausea, and anemia. She knew she had fibroids, but nobody explained how deeply they were affecting her health and performance. 'I was outraged that I didn't know this was possible,' she said. 'No one should have to go through this.' She described suffering in silence. The champ layered clothes to hide bleeding, often threw up from cramps, and laid on locker room floors during tournaments. But she kept playing. 'I did not wave the white flag. It is not a thing for me,' she said. Venus Williams' fibroids experience is all too familiar for Black women. Fibroids disproportionately impact us, and too often, our pain is minimized or ignored. Her story mirrors a larger issue where even world-class athletes are left unheard. Venus shared that some health care professionals said her condition was 'natural birth control.' Another doctor brushed off her symptoms as 'part of aging.' What finally prompted her to seek care was a social media post that read, 'You don't have to live like this.' That moment of recognition led her to NYU Langone's Center for Fibroid Care, where she was diagnosed correctly and underwent a successful myomectomy. Despite years of misdiagnosis and medical gaslighting, Venus is using her voice now to speak directly to women who may be suffering in silence. 'Hopefully, someone will see this interview and say, 'I can get help. I don't have to live this way,'' she said. Venus may be known for her backhands and forehands, but this time, it's her honesty that's hitting the hardest. Read the full interview at SEE ALSO 'No One Should Have to Go Through This': Venus Williams On Fibroids & Fighting To Be Heard was originally published on
Black America Web
3 days ago
- Black America Web
Trump Administration Cuts Funding For Black Infant Health Research, Labeling It A DEI Initiative
Source: Cultura Creative / Getty It would surprise absolutely no one that infant mortality rates in America are disproportionately high among Black babies, or that Black and Latino babies are more vulnerable than their white counterparts to serious, life-threatening illnesses such as upper respiratory infection (URI). Of course, anyone who has been paying attention to our current political climate would be equally unsurprised to find that, under the Trump administration, medical research that seeks to understand why Black children suffer these health issues so often is under attack, because the results of that research might hurt white people's feelings. In other words, Black babies might have to die in order to placate white fragility. According to The Cincinnati Herald, a federally funded study exploring why Black babies in Detroit are disproportionately born prematurely has been abruptly terminated by the National Institutes of Health (NIH), apparently, because the study focused on the effects of stress associated with racism and poverty, and how that stress might alter gene function and contribute to adverse birth outcomes — or as the Trump administration defines it, DEI. From the Herald: In termination letters sent to researchers, the NIH claimed the project relied on 'artificial and non-scientific categories' linked to DEI and asserted it did not 'enhance health or advance science.' Researchers behind the project strongly contest that explanation, calling the decision politically motivated. The cancellation aligns with a broader initiative by the Trump administration to dismantle DEI initiatives across the federal government, including within health and science agencies. Numerous projects focused on minority and LGBTQ health have been defunded under the same rationale. So, a bunch of so-called medical authorities from the same administration that gave the position of a Secretary of Health and Human Services to RFK Jr. — who thinks Black people don't need vaccines as much as white people because we have super negro immune systems — have canceled funding for this research, because, in their non-medical opinions, any research tied to racial disparities is 'non-scientific.' Actual medical experts, of course, say differently. 'Health-related social needs are health care,' said Dr. Alex Peahl, an OB-GYN at the University of Michigan and co-director of the Partnering for the Future Clinic. 'And if we want to improve the health of pregnant people and their families, we have to care for every part of their lives, not just the clinical pieces.' Peahl noted that access to prenatal care is inseparable from issues like lack of transportation, food insecurity and other external stressors that disproportionately affect Black people. 'It is really hard to come to your prenatal visit if you don't have a car, or to take a medication if you don't have food on the table,' she explained. And it would be nice if the administration of President Donald Trump cared about any of that, but it does not. Source: MEHMET ESER / Getty In April, Trump signed an executive order that essentially made housing discrimination easier by requiring federal agencies, including the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) and the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB), to stop using 'disparate impact' data to identify discriminatory policies and practices that disproportionately harm certain groups. Days before signing that order, Trump signed a similar order discouraging school administrators from using 'disparate impact' data to address racial disparities in disciplinary actions taken against students. In other words: Trump decided researchers can't use data involving racial disparities to study potential racial discrimination because, in his mind and that of his ilk, anything that addresses systemic racism against anyone but white people is a diversity, equity and inclusion effort. Hell, also in April, the Trump administration ended a wastewater settlement for a mostly Black Alabama town, erroneously calling it 'environmental justice as viewed through a distorting, DEI lens' because the case addressed environmental racism. So, a whole town full of Black people has to continue living with well-documented wastewater sanitation issues all because a White House full of white nationalists is far more invested in silencing calls for racial justice than it is in correcting racial injustice (again, except for fictional racial injustice against white people). Anyway, according to the Herald, the research team in Detroit, which is currently scrambling to secure private funding so it can continue its work, has 30 days to appeal the NIH decision. Last month, a federal judge ruled that the agency's funding cuts to minority health research were illegal and an example of 'government racial discrimination' like nothing the judge had ever seen. Unfortunately, that ruling could also be appealed by the Trump administration. The very idea of correcting systemic racism in America makes white conservatives deeply resentful, and Black health continues to suffer because of it. Sad. SEE ALSO: Op-Ed: We Should All Be More Concerned That Trump Keeps Threatening To Deport US Citizens Trump's DOJ Investigates University Of California Over Effort To Recruit Racially Diverse Faculty SEE ALSO Trump Administration Cuts Funding For Black Infant Health Research, Labeling It A DEI Initiative was originally published on
