logo
Nova Scotia to do own study of 3 areas with uranium deposits without drilling or digging

Nova Scotia to do own study of 3 areas with uranium deposits without drilling or digging

CBC6 days ago

Nova Scotia will move ahead with its own geological study of three areas with known uranium deposits, despite an apparent lack of interest from the mining industry in exploring those lands.
A spokesperson for the Department of Natural Resources told CBC News the province won't grant any mineral exploration licences for the areas, which were part of a recent request for proposals.
"Our research won't be intrusive and it won't involve any digging or drilling," spokesperson Adele Poirier said in an email.
"We have some existing core samples that we'll examine, along with any existing historical records."
Most of Nova Scotia has been available for uranium exploration since the Houston government lifted a ban earlier this year, but the province has been more particular about surveying three areas identified for heightened uranium potential: Millet Brook, East Dalhousie and Louisville.
Natural Resources Minister Tory Rushton has said the province wants to be able to select experienced companies to do the exploration there.
An open call to mineral exploration companies this spring did not yield any applications. Nevertheless, the province is keeping ropes up around those areas, and turning its attention to department-led research.
'Reconnaissance' work a smart approach: prof
Poirier said this work will take place "while we consider other next steps." The research is to start in Millet Brook in Hants County, the largest of the three areas at 2,300 hectares.
Erin Adlakha, an associate professor and chair of geology at Saint Mary's University, said it's a smart move. She said modern techniques are more precise than what would have been used four decades ago before a uranium moratorium came into effect. She said the province's research could paint a clearer picture of what's in the ground.
Adlakha said the work described by the province is different from exploration, and more akin to "reconnaissance" work that could facilitate later exploration.
"Packaging and marketing that material to exploration companies would be really helpful," she said.
Call for proposals was poorly timed
Adlakha said she thinks the lack of interest in the request for proposals was a case of bad timing. She said the deadline — just four weeks from the date it was announced — was too tight for companies to make decisions about human resources and capital investments.
She said companies probably already had plans for summer exploration work.
"The exploration season in Canada, of course, is restricted to when there's no snow on the ground," she said. "You spend the winter planning for these exploration activities."
NDP Leader Claudia Chender said the lack of interest shows that the government didn't engage adequately with the industry before putting out the call.
"What we saw in response to the RFP is evidence of what happens when you move ahead with a sloppy surprise agenda," she said Monday at a news conference.
Chender was speaking to reporters to launch a series of town halls that she and other NDP MLAs will host throughout the summer to "engage with Nova Scotians about their priorities."
Chender said the tour is a response to the direction the Houston government has taken since its second term began last fall. She pointed to the push for greater resource extraction, which began this year and was not part of the PC campaign platform.
Persistent public opposition
The Houston government's push for uranium exploration, in particular, has been fraught, with Mi'kmaw groups, municipalities and individuals calling for things to slow down or halt completely.
Buddy Hebb said generations of his family have owned more than 160 hectares of land adjacent to the Millet Brook area since the 1800s, and he's strongly opposed to any work in pursuit of uranium development.
"I think they should drop it. Our province is too small for this kind of thing," Hebb said in an interview. "There's hundreds of people living around here. It's a beautiful area. It's going to contaminate it."
Mining proponents say uranium has among the safest mining practices in Canada, with stringent environmental regulations enforced by the Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission. But those protections are not enough to convince Hebb and other uranium opponents.
'Leave it in the ground'
Hebb said last week his MLA, Melissa Sheehy-Richard, called to talk to him about the importance of uranium exploration. He said he felt she was implying that the province wanted access to his land, including a road that leads to the Millet Brook site.
"She was trying to convince me the whole time that this is in our best interest to see how much uranium is in there, and that they would have their own geologists come… just come and check it out," he said.
"I more or less told her then that they wouldn't be going back across [my land]," said Hebb.
"I don't want anything to do with this. I leave it in the ground."
The office of Premier Tim Houston said in a statement there was "a high level misunderstanding" between Sheehy-Richard and Hebb, and the province did not ask for access to Hebb's land for any purpose.
"I understand that emotions are high," the premier's statement said, adding a reassurance that uranium development will only proceed safely.
"Like I said a few weeks ago when asked if it was the end of the line for uranium, I said we're not going to open uranium mines unless it is an industry-led project and, at this time, industry has not expressed any interest."

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Accessibility minister's comments about ASL interpreter a 'knife right in the back' for deaf graduate
Accessibility minister's comments about ASL interpreter a 'knife right in the back' for deaf graduate

CBC

time20 minutes ago

  • CBC

Accessibility minister's comments about ASL interpreter a 'knife right in the back' for deaf graduate

Social Sharing A woman who was excited to celebrate with her family at a graduation event for Indigenous women on Thursday says it's hard to look at her college certificate after the experience was tainted by comments Manitoba's accessibility minister made about sharing the stage with a sign-language interpreter. Deborah Owczar, who is deaf, said the ASL interpreter was removed from the stage after Minister Nahanni Fontaine's speech, depriving her and her daughter access to participation during the first annual Mino'Ayaawag Ikwewag Celebration of Indigenous Women Graduates held in downtown Winnipeg on Thursday. She said she was looking forward to getting dressed up with her daughter and celebrating with other Indigenous high school, college and university grads. Owczar had just earned a child and youth care certificate through a partnership between Ndinawe and Red River College Polytechnic. "I feel like my certificate is completely ruined. I got it from this event, now when I look at it, it's associated with these negative memories, not with my accomplishment. I look at my certificate and I think about what was said," Owczar told CBC News through an ASL interpreter on Sunday. "I felt like my accomplishment was not as worthy as the others," she said. In a video taken by APTN news, Fontaine is seen telling a person off camera that she was "thrown off" by the interpreter sharing the stage with her, saying the interpreter shouldn't have been on the stage because she was blocking Fontaine's view of the audience. Nahanni Fontaine complains about ASL interpreter sharing her stage 5 hours ago Duration 0:32 In video captured by APTN, Manitoba's minister responsible for accessibility asks "why the F are you on the stage?" in reference to the sign language interpreter who had shared the stage with her while she delivered a speech to Indigenous graduates. The other person referred to the interpreter's translation as "frantic hand movements." "Yeah, I'm like, 'F--k, why did I have her on the stage?' Jesus! I'm like, 'you need to leave,'" the minister is heard saying into a hot mic in the APTN video. On Friday, Fontaine issued an apology, saying her comments were an expression of frustration over her "poor planning ensuring clear sight lines for all graduates." "I also sincerely apologize to the Deaf community and to all Manitobans for my comments," Fontaine said, adding she apologized directly to the interpreter who shared the stage with her. Owczar said when she saw the video of Fontaine's comments the day after the event, it "was just like a knife right in the back, adding salt to the wound," and the apology doesn't do enough to help heal that wound. "Any sense of inspiration or joy that I had from this event was completely lost," she said. Owczar's daughter Stephanie Jebb, who is also deaf, said she was shocked by the minister's comments, adding Fontaine's facial expressions throughout the video communicated an "obvious lack of respect." "She used such harsh, foul language. It was extreme," Jebb said. "It really just tainted the entire experience." "When you disrespect the interpreter, you disrespect the Deaf community," Owczar said. Owczar said she saw Fontaine go up to the interpreter after her speech, pointing to an area off of the stage. The interpreter was not on stage for the remaining speeches, Owczar said. Having an interpreter on stage next to the speaker helps make the event fully accessible for members of the Deaf community, Owczar and Jebb said. Owczar said it's important to see both at the same time because the interpreter provides access to the language while the speaker offers emotion and context, such as hand gestures and facial expressions, through their presentation. "That's the way that I can really have a full understanding of what's going on … to be able to see both at the same time, not one or the other," she said. According to the Canadian Hearing Society, interpreters should sit or stand next to the speaker and across from the person accessing ASL interpretation. This allows the individual to clearly see both the interpreter and the speaker. Jebb said the interpreter was moved in front of their table, forcing them to choose whether to understand the speech or watch the speaker on stage. "You can't see what's happening on stage and also understand what's being said," she said. "This is our culture and our language. Having the interpreter there next to the speaker so we can see both, that's the way that we can fully participate in what's happening," Owczar said. Both Jebb and Owczar said they are sadly used to being denied access to ASL interpreters at events. They said interpreters — if they are provided at all — are often asked to move out of the way, which limits an ASL speaker's access. Still, it was shocking to see the same conduct from Fontaine on Thursday. "She's the minister of accessibility and yet my right to access was denied," Owczar said, adding that Fontaine's comments make her question how the minister feels about accessibility behind closed doors. However, Owczar said she hopes Fontaine learns from her mistakes and commits to educating herself further, whether she keeps the accessibility role or not. "I would love to have her as part of a healing circle with the Deaf community …" Owczar said. "I would love to have her involved in the Deaf community and learning more about us and our language." "The minister of accessibility needs to know these things," Jebb said. Before Thursday's event, the pair were already excited to attend next year's graduation ceremony for Indigenous women, where Jebb had planned to celebrate earning her bachelor's degree from the University of Winnipeg in 2026. Now they're not sure if they'll go back. "It's hard to imagine watching her on stage again," Owczar said. CBC News reached out to the province for comment on Sunday. However, Fontaine posted a second apology to her Instagram account late Sunday afternoon. "Over the past few days, I've heard clearly from Deaf Manitobans and community members of the harm my comments caused. Once again, I remain deeply sorry," she wrote, adding she will ensure all events are accessible to everyone.

Canadian Prime Minister Carney says trade talks with US resume after Canada rescinded tech tax
Canadian Prime Minister Carney says trade talks with US resume after Canada rescinded tech tax

Globe and Mail

timean hour ago

  • Globe and Mail

Canadian Prime Minister Carney says trade talks with US resume after Canada rescinded tech tax

TORONTO (AP) — Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney said late Sunday trade talks with U.S. have resumed after Canada rescinded its plan to tax U.S. technology firms. U.S. President Donald Trump said Friday that was suspending trade talks with Canada over its plans to continue with its tax on technology firms, which he called 'a direct and blatant attack on our country.' The Canadian government says 'in anticipation' of a trade deal 'Canada would rescind' the Digital Serves Tax. The tax was set to go into effect Monday. Carney's office said Carney and Trump have agreed to resume negotiations. 'Today's announcement will support a resumption of negotiations toward the July 21, 2025, timeline set out at this month's G7 Leaders' Summit in Kananaskis,' Carney said in a statement. Carney visited Trump in May at the White House, where he was polite but firm. Trump traveled to Canada for the G7 summit in Alberta, where Carney said that Canada and the U.S. had set a 30-day deadline for trade talks. Trump, in a post on his social media network last Friday, said Canada had informed the U.S. that it was sticking to its plan to impose the digital services tax, which applies to Canadian and foreign businesses that engage with online users in Canada. The digital services tax was due to hit companies including Amazon, Google, Meta, Uber and Airbnb with a 3% levy on revenue from Canadian users. It would have applied retroactively, leaving U.S. companies with a $2 billion U.S. bill due at the end of the month. Trump's announcement Friday was the latest swerve in the trade war he's launched since taking office for a second term in January. Progress with Canada has been a roller coaster, starting with the U.S. president poking at the nation's northern neighbor and repeatedly suggesting it would be absorbed as a U.S. state.

Federal government rescinds digital services tax to advance trade talks with U.S.
Federal government rescinds digital services tax to advance trade talks with U.S.

Globe and Mail

timean hour ago

  • Globe and Mail

Federal government rescinds digital services tax to advance trade talks with U.S.

The Canadian government says it's decided to rescind a digital services tax that led U.S. President Donald Trump to break off negotiations aimed at ending a damaging trade war between the United States and Canada. In a late Sunday announcement, Prime Minister Mark Carney's government said talks with the Trump administration would resume now that Canada has repealed the levy that applied to U.S. tech giants such as Amazon, Google parent Alphabet, Meta, Uber and Airbnb. Mr. Trump on Friday had announced the United States was 'terminating all discussions on trade with Canada' in response to the digital sales tax. First payments under the levy were due June 30 and the initial bill faced by big U.S. companies was expected to exceed US$2-billion. 'Prime Minister Carney and President Trump have agreed that parties will resume negotiations with a view towards agreeing on a deal by July 21, 2025,' the Canadian government said in a statement Sunday. The digital sales tax would have imposed a 3-per-cent levy on Canadian revenue from digital services exceeding $20-million that is earned by companies with at least $1.1-billion in global revenue. This includes revenue from search engines, social-media platforms and online marketplaces. With files from Canadian Press

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store