
What is the ‘RICO charge' Diddy faces?
Combs was charged with one count of racketeering conspiracy, two counts of sex trafficking and two counts of transportation to engage in prostitution. Jurors were able to reach a verdict in the other charges but explained to a judge that there were some who were 'unpersuadable on both sides' when it came to racketeering.
The jurors are expected back Wednesday to continue further deliberations, in hopes of reaching a verdict on that charge.
The Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Law, or RICO, was passed in 1970. It allows prosecutors to issue criminal charges against multiple people or groups who commit related crimes over time for financial profit.
RICO was originally aimed at the Mafia, but prosecutors have used it to attack many forms of organized crime including street gangs, cartels, corrupt police departments and even politicians.
To violate the law, a person must engage in a pattern of racketeering activity connected to an enterprise. There are 35 offenses defined by the law as constituting racketeering, including gambling, murder, kidnapping, arson, drug dealing and bribery. To charge under RICO, at least two predicate crimes within 10 years must have been committed through the enterprise.
An 'enterprise' is defined as including any individual, partnership, corporation, association or other legal entity, and any union or group of individuals associated with the criminal activity. The criminal RICO statute provides for prison terms of 20 years and financial penalties.
Combs has pleaded not guilty to all charges against him.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
21 minutes ago
- Yahoo
What's next for 'Diddy' after his guilty verdict? Sean Combs awaits sentencing date, faces maximum prison time of 20 years
Sean 'Diddy' Combs was denied bail by a federal judge late Wednesday, after he was acquitted by a jury of sex trafficking and racketeering but convicted of transporting prostitutes to participate in drug-fueled sex marathons, and will remain in jail as he awaits sentencing. The ruling capped a roller coaster day in federal court for the 55-year-old hip-hop mogul, who hours earlier pumped his fist and fell to his knees after the mixed verdict was read. Combs could have been sentenced to life in prison had he been convicted of racketeering or sex trafficking. He now faces a maximum of 20 years in prison, though he could receive significantly less. After more than 12 hours of deliberations across three days, the jury of eight men and four women reached a verdict, finding Combs guilty on two counts of transportation to engage in prostitution under the federal Mann Act but not guilty of sex trafficking by force, fraud or coercion and racketeering conspiracy — charges that each carried maximum sentences of life in prison. Count 1: Racketeering conspiracy — NOT GUILTY Count 2: Sex trafficking by force, fraud or coercion regarding Victim 1 (Cassie Ventura) — NOT GUILTY Count 3: Transportation to engage in prostitution regarding Victim 1 (Cassie Ventura) and commercial sex workers — GUILTY Count 4: Sex trafficking by force, fraud or coercion regarding Victim 2 ("Jane") — NOT GUILTY Count 5: Transportation to engage in prostitution regarding Victim 2 ("Jane") and commercial sex workers — GUILTY The defense team asked Judge Arun Subramanian to immediately release Combs, who has been held without bail at the Metropolitan Detention Center in Brooklyn, N.Y., since his arrest last September. His lawyers proposed that he be released on $1 million bond, turn over his passport and submit to drug testing. "He needs and wants to be with — and remain with — his family," Combs's lawyers wrote in a letter to the judge. Federal prosecutors urged the judge to deny the defense's request, arguing that Combs is a 'danger' to society and should remain incarcerated while he awaits sentencing. "Over the course of seven weeks, the jury heard evidence of the defendant's violence, interstate transportation of numerous individuals for prostitution, drug use and distribution, and attempts to escape law enforcement detection," read their letter to the judge. "This conduct spanned two decades." Subramanian rejected the request from Combs's attorneys that he be released until sentencing, citing, in part, their admission that he had a history of violent behavior over the course of the trial. "At trial, the defense conceded the defendant's violence in his personal relationships," Subramanian said, adding that the defense had failed to prove that Combs poses "no danger to any person." Subramanian added that Combs's duties as a father and son did not rise to the level that's necessary to allow an exception under the law, which mandates detention in most cases. Combs faces a maximum of 20 years in prison. He was convicted of two prostitution-related offenses that each carry maximum sentences of up to 10 years. His lawyers said that under federal sentencing guidelines, he would likely face about two years in prison, including the time he has already spent in jail. Prosecutors, citing Combs's history of violence and other factors, said the guidelines call for a sentence of at least four to five years. The final decision will be up to the judge. Judge Subramanian set a tentative sentencing date of Oct. 3 but will consider the defense's request for it to be sooner at a virtual hearing next week. 'We are not nearly done fighting,' Marc Agnifilo, Combs's lead defense attorney, told reporters at a press conference outside the courthouse. 'We're not going to stop until he walks out of prison a free man to his family.' 'I'll see you when I get out,' Combs told family members in the courtroom after being denied bail. 'We're going to get through this.'
Yahoo
31 minutes ago
- Yahoo
What is the Mann Act? Here's what to know about the law used to convict Sean 'Diddy' Combs
Sean 'Diddy' Combs was convicted Wednesday of prostitution-related offenses under the federal Mann Act, an anti-sex trafficking law with a century-old history. Though he was acquitted of more serious charges, Combs was still convicted of flying people around the country, including his girlfriends and male sex workers, to engage in paid sexual encounters. Over the years, the law has been applied to prominent convictions, including R&B superstar R. Kelly, British socialite Ghislaine Maxwell, musician Chuck Berry and more than a century ago, boxer Jack Johnson. Its broad wording and a subsequent Supreme Court interpretation once allowed prosecutors to bring cases against interracial couples, and eventually many others in consensual relationships, according to Cornell Law School's Legal Information Institute. The law was amended in the 1980s and today it is primarily used for prosecuting interstate prostitution crimes or people accused of taking underage children across state lines for sexual purposes. Here's what to know about the law. Why is it called the Mann Act? In 1910, Congress passed the bill, which was named after Republican U.S. Rep. James Robert Mann of Illinois. It's also known as the 'White-Slave Traffic Act' of 1910. How does it apply to Combs' case? Combs was convicted of counts involving two former girlfriends: the R&B singer Cassie and a woman who testified under the pseudonym Jane. Both women said at trial that Combs had pressured them into degrading sex marathons with strangers, who were paid for the sexual performances. Jane said she was once beaten by Combs for declining to participate. Cassie said that when she tried to walk out of one such event, Combs beat her and dragged her down a hotel hallway. Combs was acquitted of sex trafficking and racketeering charges but convicted of transporting people to engage in prostitution. What's the history behind it? The 1910 law originally prohibited the interstate or foreign commerce transport of 'any woman or girl for the purpose of prostitution or debauchery, or for any other immoral purpose.' It followed a 1907 congressionally appointed commission to look into the issue of immigrant sex workers, with the view that a girl would only enter prostitution if drugged or held captive, according to Cornell's Legal Information Institute. The law was used to secure a conviction against Jack Johnson, who became the first Black boxer to win a world heavyweight title in 1910. Johnson was convicted in 1913 by an all-white jury for traveling with his white girlfriend, who worked as a sex worker, in violation of the Mann Act. (President Donald Trump posthumously pardoned Johnson in 2018, saying Johnson had served 10 months in prison 'for what many view as a racially motivated injustice.') How has the law changed since 1910? In a 1917 Supreme Court case, the justices ruled that 'illicit fornication,' even when consensual, amounted to an "immoral purpose,' according to Cornell's Legal Information Institute. A 1986 update made the law gender-neutral and effectively ended the act's role in trying to legislate morality by changing 'debauchery' and 'immoral purpose' to 'any sexual activity for which any person can be charged with a criminal offense.' The act received additional amendments in 1978 and 1994 to address issues of sexual exploitation of children. Nevertheless, Combs ' legal team made a motion last February to dismiss a Mann Act charge, writing that the law 'has a long and troubling history as a statute with racist origins." Prosecutors said there was nothing racist about pursuing charges under the act. Most of Combs' accusers are people of color.
Yahoo
32 minutes ago
- Yahoo
What's next for 'Diddy' after his guilty verdict? Sean Combs awaits sentencing date, faces maximum jail time of 20 years
Sean 'Diddy' Combs was denied bail by a federal judge late Wednesday after he was acquitted by a jury of sex trafficking and racketeering but convicted of transporting prostitutes to participate in drug-fueled sex marathons, and will remain in jail as he awaits sentencing. The ruling capped a rollercoaster day in federal court for the 55-year-old hip-hop mogul, who hours earlier pumped his fist and fell to his knees after the mixed verdict was read. Combs could have been sentenced to life in prison had he been convicted of racketeering or sex trafficking. He now faces a maximum of 20 years in prison, though he could receive significantly less. After more than 12 hours of deliberations across three days, the jury of eight men and four women reached a verdict, finding Combs guilty on two counts of transportation to engage in prostitution under the federal Mann Act, but not guilty of sex trafficking by force, fraud or coercion, and racketeering conspiracy — charges that each carried maximum sentences of life in prison. Count 1: Racketeering conspiracy — NOT GUILTY Count 2: Sex trafficking by force, fraud or coercion regarding Victim 1 (Cassie Ventura) — NOT GUILTY Count 3: Transportation to engage in prostitution regarding Victim 1 (Cassie Ventura) and commercial sex workers — GUILTY Count 4: Sex trafficking by force, fraud or coercion regarding Victim 2 ("Jane") — NOT GUILTY Count 5: Transportation to engage in prostitution regarding Victim 2 ("Jane") and commercial sex workers — GUILTY The defense team asked Judge Arun Subramanian to immediately release Combs, who has been held without bail at the Metropolitan Detention Center in Brooklyn since his arrest last September. His lawyers proposed that he be released on $1 million bond, turn over his passport and submit to drug testing. "He needs and wants to be with — and remain with — his family," Combs's lawyers wrote in a letter to the judge. Federal prosecutors urged the judge to deny the defense's request, arguing that Combs is a 'danger' to society and should remain incarcerated while he awaits sentencing. "Over the course of seven weeks, the jury heard evidence of the defendant's violence, interstate transportation of numerous individuals for prostitution, drug use and distribution, and attempts to escape law enforcement detection," read their letter to the judge. "This conduct spanned two decades." Subramanian rejected the request from Combs's attorneys that he be released until sentencing, citing, in part, their admission that he had a history of violent behavior over the course of the trial. "At trial, the defense conceded the defendant's violence in his personal relationships," Subramanian said, adding that the defense had failed to prove that Combs poses "no danger to any person." Subramanian added that Combs's duties as a father and son did not rise to the level that's necessary to allow an exception under the law, which mandates detention in most cases. Combs faces a maximum of 20 years in prison. He was convicted of two prostitution-related offenses that each carry maximum sentences of up to 10 years. His lawyers said that under federal sentencing guidelines, he would likely face about two years in prison, including the time he's already spent in jail. Prosecutors, citing Combs's history of violence and other factors, said the guidelines call for a sentence of at least four to five years. The final decision will be up to the judge. Judge Subramanian set a tentative sentencing date of Oct. 3, but will consider the defense's request for it to be sooner at a virtual hearing next week. 'We are not nearly done fighting,' Marc Agnifilo, Combs's lead defense attorney, told reporters at a press conference outside the courthouse. 'We're not going to stop until he walks out of prison a free man to his family.' 'I'll see you when I get out,' Combs told family members in the courtroom after being denied bail. 'We're going to get through this.'