
Letters: What a marvellous achievement for the New Zealand Youth Choir
Bootcamps
It is interesting to learn that Oranga Tamariki is not going to release information regarding future offending after attending bootcamps. But most people aren't stupid and the obvious conclusion to draw is that the reoffending rate must be high to the point of embarrassment.
But what to do? Well, if you reoffend, then it's back to a stricter camp, such that offenders eventually just won't want to have to go back. But it also begs the question as to just how much education as to the rights and wrongs of life are these people getting, and it's also fair to say they probably have, in most cases, been let down by dysfunctional families.
So, at least try and fix that part of what is a complex equation, but in the end, make sure that there are consequences.
Paul Beck, West Harbour
Concert radio
In the past, the concert programme offered a rich and varied journey through the wonderful world of music. These days, it feels more repetitive and lacks the spark it once had. Music has the power to slow the pace of life and soothe the troubled mind – a gift worth sharing in all its depth.
Perhaps a gentle spoken introduction could guide listeners through themes like Percy Grainger, European folk and gypsy traditions, South American and Japanese music, early American tunes, solo instruments like the cello or clarinet, and the voices of great tenors – just a few of the many possibilities that could inspire and uplift.
Brian Cross, Kerikeri.
Literacy and numeracy
I wonder how much of the shocking decline in literacy and numeracy exam results can be attributed to the changes in the way teachers are trained?
A century ago, when my mother entered the Auckland Teacher Training College, actual entry was preceded by a year in the classroom as a 'pupil teacher'. This had two major benefits. Firstly, the teacher involved had an assistant who, as they were there for a year, could become very helpful. Secondly, the trainees had the opportunity to find out if they were actually suited to teaching. This eliminated many unsuitable ones before money and time were wasted on them.
Today, however, teacher training has become far more academic. The Auckland College of Education was actually absorbed into Auckland University early this century. Our literacy standards used to be among the best in the world, but you cannot handle young children as though they are 'adult students' and expect them to absorb the basics at the essential - almost subconscious - level.
Jeanette Grant, Mt Eden.
War in Gaza
The militant group Hamas is running the Gaza Strip where the war is still going on. In your letters to the editor, (Anne Priestley, June 17) writes that leaders should say 'stop' and take action. Israel is blamed for all the damage that is done to the people and their country.
We never hear what Hamas' part in the war is. They are hiding in schools and hospitals for their own safety and so offer up their own people in this war and Israel is blamed for that but if Hamas would love their own, they would never hide in those places.
I certainly do not agree with all that Israel is doing but we have a saying: where two fight, two are guilty. Never in the media do we hear what Hamas is doing to their own, only Israel's actions. A 'stop' should be asked equally of Israel and Hamas.
D Hoekstra, Henderson.
Coalition Government
Is there no end to the dreadful decisions this coalition Government is making? Brooke van Velden, stating that to cast out more than 500,000 books from the National Library will be 'beneficial' to the taxpayer, trimming about $1m in storage costs.
The Bible, Quran, Shakespeare, Virginia Woolf, and Charles Dickens are still relevant today, as Romeo and Juliet being performed in Auckland this week attests.
This Government has no compunction to change any and everything as they see fit, usually ignoring specialists in their field, such as doctors, nurses, teachers, scientists. The mind boggles.
As Oscar Wilde said, 'A cynic is a man who knows the price of everything and the value of nothing.'
Sharon Marks, Te Aroha.
Ratepayer money
It seems a bit rich for the Government to castigate local councils for wasting our rates money, when it's clear that most of their meagre income is spent on basic public facilities.
Meanwhile, we have so much funding of questionable initiatives by central government, squandering public money. 'Rejecting official advice' and relying on anecdotal evidence to make policy is unacceptable and yet seems to be how this Government operates. There are so many examples: Huge spending on failed experiments in punishment, such as bootcamps and Three Strikes, and building mega prisons - this money would be better spent on prevention and rehabilitation.
Instead of fixing public health, millions are funnelled into expensive private health companies, exacerbating the desperate shortages in the public hospitals. In education, pouring money into publicly funded private Charter schools, where the numbers who have taken up the scheme are tiny, resulting in massively more funding per student compared with the public system. To top it all, we have the expensive Doge-inspired Ministry of (de)Regulation, where government is employing large numbers of bureaucrats to look for other bureaucrats who might be wasting public money doing unnecessary work. We seem to be living in cloud cuckoo land!
Vivien Fergusson, Mt Eden.
A quick word
The proposed container park at Te Puna, in the Western Bay of Plenty is crazy. The stretch of road between there and the port is some of the most congested in the country. Other industrial areas nearer the port would be more appropriate; increasing truck traffic on this part of SH2 would only exacerbate a huge traffic problem.
Neville Cameron, Coromandel.
I read in the Herald (July 17) that the National Library will remove religious books and books by William Shakespeare, Virginia Woolf and Charles Dickens to save $1 million. According to the article, the books will all be shredded and recycled. Has the National Library thought to offer these books, at no charge, to appropriate organisations for their use? Surely this would be a better solution than shredding.
Janet Boyle, Orewa.
Dress it up how they will, this looks to me like cultural vandalism. Perhaps we should call it vanVeldenism.
They used to do this sort of thing in China, during the Proletarian Cultural Revolution. It makes New Zealand look like the last refuge of dimwits, with a government that cannot understand anything except how to give more tax cuts to the rich.
This is the government that wants the next generation to learn how to read, but is apparently sending the works of Virginia Woolf to the shredder rather than to school libraries.
Arch Thomson, Mt Wellington.
Commerce Commission chair John Small has jumped the gun. The existence of ride-sharing companies is still up in the air due to the non-payment of taxes with this business model. Exploiting both the drivers and the taxman. I will expect him to resign as his credibility is lost.
Ian Gaskin, Tuai.
I'm not surprised open-plan classrooms have not worked. Learning needs to be focused, and teachers need to be able to monitor their students and ensure all are catered to. Open plan was way too new age, some might consider a bit woke even. As long as students get tailored education that maximised their potential, everyone wins.
John Ford, Taradale.
Our petrol is shipped 8500km from Singapore and costs $2.20 per litre and our milk only travels 200km and costs $3.40 per litre. Something is wrong here.
Richard Murray, Henderson.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

1News
14 hours ago
- 1News
US intelligence director attacks Trump's foes over Russia probe
As the national intelligence director, Tulsi Gabbard is responsible for guarding America's secrets and discovering threats from overseas. But when she made a surprise appearance in the White House briefing room on Thursday, her targets were President Donald Trump's political enemies. Escalating her attempts to undermine the long-settled conclusion that Russia tried to help Trump beat Hillary Clinton for the presidency nearly a decade ago, she unspooled what she called unshakable proof that then-President Barack Obama and his advisers plotted nothing short of a coup. 'They conspired to subvert the will of the American people,' she said, claiming they fabricated evidence to taint Trump's victory. Little of what she said was new, and much of it was baseless. Gabbard said her investigation into the former Democratic administration was designed to stop the weaponisation of national security institutions, but it spurred more questions about her own independence atop a spying system intended to provide unvarnished intelligence. Gabbard, a former Democratic congresswoman from Hawaii who ran for president herself before joining Trump's idiosyncratic political ecosystem, seemed prepared to use her presentation to burnish her own standing. She was trailed by her cinematographer husband, who held a video camera to capture the moment. ADVERTISEMENT And Trump, who had previously expressed public doubts about Gabbard's analysis of Iran's nuclear programme, appeared satisfied. He posted a video of her remarks, pinning them at the top of his social media feed. It was a display that cemented Gabbard's role as one of Trump's chief agents of retribution, delivering official recognition of Trump's grievances about the Russia investigation that shadowed his first term. The focus on a years-old scandal also served Trump's attempts to shift attention from the Jeffrey Epstein case and questions about the president's own association with an abuser of underage girls. Gabbard touts her latest release During her White House remarks, Gabbard said she has referred the documents to the Justice Department to consider for a possible criminal investigation. Hours later, the department announced the creation of a "strike force" to investigate the findings. Obama's postpresidential office declined to comment on Thursday but issued a rare response a day earlier. "These bizarre allegations are ridiculous and a weak attempt at distraction," said Patrick Rodenbush, an Obama spokesman. The White House rejected questions about the timing of Gabbard's revelations and whether they were designed to curry favour with Trump or distract attention from the administration's handling of files relating to Epstein. Still, Trump was quick to reward Gabbard's loyalty this week, calling her "the hottest person in the room". ADVERTISEMENT On Thursday, she released a report by the Republican staff of the House Intelligence Committee produced during the first Trump administration. It did not dispute that Russia interfered in the 2016 election, but cites what it said were trade craft failings in the assessment reached by the intelligence community that Russian President Vladimir Putin influenced the election because he intended for Trump to win. Gabbard went beyond some conclusions of the report in describing its findings from the White House podium. She, along with the report, also seized on the fact that a dossier including uncorroborated tips and salacious gossip about Trump's ties to Russia was referenced in a classified version annex of an intelligence community assessment released in 2017 that detailed Russia's interference. The dossier was not the basis for the FBI's decision to open an investigation in July 2016 into potential coordination between the Trump campaign and Russia, but Trump supporters have seized on the unverified innuendo in the document to try to undercut the broader probe. Timing of Gabbard's intel reports prompts questions Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard, speaks with reporters in the James Brady Press Briefing Room at the White House (Source: Associated Press) Gabbard said she didn't know why the documents weren't released during Trump's first administration. Her office did not respond to questions about the timing of the release. Responding to a question from a reporter about Gabbard's motivations, White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt accused journalists of looking for a story where there wasn't one. ADVERTISEMENT "The only people who are suggesting that she would release evidence to boost her standing are the people in this room," Leavitt said. Trump, however, has said he wants the media, and the public, to focus on Gabbard's report and not his ties to Epstein. "We caught Hillary Clinton. We caught Barack Hussein Obama ... you ought take a look at that and stop talking about nonsense," Trump said Wednesday. CIA Director John Ratcliffe served briefly as director of national intelligence during Trump's first term but did not release any of the information declassified by Gabbard. The CIA declined to comment on Gabbard's remarks. Trump and Gabbard's evolving relationship Gabbard told Congress in April that Iran wasn't actively seeking a nuclear weapon, and Trump dismissed her assessment just before US strikes on Iran. "I don't care what she said," Trump said in June on Air Force One when asked about Gabbard's testimony. ADVERTISEMENT Gabbard recently shared her findings about the Russia investigation in an Oval Office meeting with Trump, according to two administration officials who requested anonymity to discuss a private conversation. Afterwards, one of the officials said, Trump expressed satisfaction that Gabbard's findings aligned with his own beliefs. Other recent releases on the Russia investigation Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard walks to the podium to speak with reporters in the James Brady Press Briefing Room at the White House (Source: Associated Press) On Saturday, Gabbard's office released a report that downplayed the extent of Russian interference in the 2016 election by highlighting Obama administration emails showing officials had concluded before and after the presidential race that Moscow had not hacked state election systems to manipulate votes in Trump's favour. But Obama's Democratic administration never suggested otherwise, even as it exposed other means by which Russia interfered in the election, including through a massive hack-and-leak operation of Democratic emails by intelligence operatives working with WikiLeaks, as well as a covert influence campaign aimed at swaying public opinion and sowing discord through fake social media posts. Earlier this month, Ratcliffe released a report criticising aspects of the intelligence community assessment and suggesting the process had been rushed. The report did not address multiple investigations since then, including a report from the Republican-led Senate Intelligence Committee in 2020 that reached the same conclusion about Russia's influence and motives. Democrats call for Gabbard's resignation ADVERTISEMENT Lawmakers from both parties have long stressed the need for an independent intelligence service. Democrats said Gabbard's reports show she has placed partisanship and loyalty to Trump over her duty, and some have called for her resignation. "It seems as though the Trump administration is willing to declassify anything and everything except the Epstein files," Senator Mark Warner of Virginia, the ranking Democrat on the Senate Intelligence Committee, said in a statement Thursday. Warner predicted Gabbard's actions could prompt US allies to share less information for fear it would be politicised or recklessly declassified. But Gabbard enjoys strong support among Republicans. Representative Rick Crawford, chairman of the House Intelligence Committee, said she and Ratcliffe were working to put the intelligence community "on the path to regaining the trust of the American people". Representative Jim Himes, the top Democrat on the House Intelligence panel, said Gabbard hasn't offered any reason to ignore the many earlier investigations into Russia's efforts. "The Director is free to disagree with the Intelligence Community Assessment's conclusion that Putin favoured Donald Trump, but her view stands in stark contrast to the verdict rendered by multiple credible investigations," Himes said in a statement. "Including the bipartisan report released by the Senate Intelligence Committee."


Otago Daily Times
18 hours ago
- Otago Daily Times
French president sues podcaster over wife claim
French President Emmanuel Macron and his wife Brigitte filed a defamation lawsuit in the United States against right-wing influencer and podcaster Candace Owens, centred on her claim that France's first lady is male. The Macrons said in a complaint filed in Delaware Superior Court that Owens has waged a lie-filled "campaign of global humiliation" to promote her podcast and expand her "frenzied" fan base. These lies included that Brigitte Macron, 72, was born under the name Jean-Michel Trogneux, the actual name of her older brother, the Macrons said. "Owens has dissected their appearance, their marriage, their friends, their family, and their personal history - twisting it all into a grotesque narrative designed to inflame and degrade," the complaint said. "The result," the complaint added, "is relentless bullying on a worldwide scale." In her podcast on Wednesday, Owens said, "This lawsuit is littered with factual inaccuracies," and part of an "obvious and desperate public relations strategy" to smear her character. Owens also said she did not know a lawsuit was coming, though lawyers for both sides had been communicating since January this year. A spokesperson for Owens called the lawsuit itself an effort to bully her, after Brigitte Macron rejected Owens' repeated requests for an interview. "This is a foreign government attacking the First Amendment rights of an American independent journalist," the spokesperson said. In a joint statement released by their lawyers, the Macrons said they sued after Owens rejected three demands that she retract defamatory statements. "Ms Owens's campaign of defamation was plainly designed to harass and cause pain to us and our families and to garner attention and notoriety," the Macrons said. "We gave her every opportunity to back away from these claims, but she refused." HIGH LEGAL STANDARD Wednesday's lawsuit is a rare case of a world leader suing for defamation. US President Donald Trump has also turned to the courts, including in a $US10 billion ($NZ16.5 billion) lawsuit accusing The Wall Street Journal of defaming him by claiming he created a lewd birthday greeting for disgraced late financier Jeffrey Epstein in 2003. The Journal said it would defend against that case and had full confidence in its reporting. In December, meanwhile, Trump reached a $US15 million settlement with Walt Disney-owned ABC over an inaccurate claim that a jury found him liable for rape, rather than sexual assault, in a civil lawsuit. To prevail in US defamation cases, public figures must show defendants engaged in "actual malice," a tough legal standard requiring proof the defendants knew what they published was false or had reckless disregard for its truth. Owens has more than 6.9 million followers on X and more than 4.5 million YouTube subscribers. TUCKER CARLSON, JOE ROGAN The Macrons' lawsuit focuses on the eight-part podcast "Becoming Brigitte," which has more than 2.3 million views on YouTube, and X posts linked to it. According to the Macrons, the series spread "verifiably false and devastating lies," including that Brigitte Macron stole another person's identity and transitioned to female, and that the Macrons are blood relatives committing incest. The complaint discusses circumstances under which the Macrons met, when the now 47-year-old president was a high school student and Brigitte was a teacher. It said their relationship "remained within the bounds of the law." According to the complaint, baseless speculation about Brigitte Macron's gender began surfacing in 2021, and the topic has been discussed on popular podcasts hosted by Tucker Carlson and Joe Rogan, who have many conservative followers. In September, Brigitte won a lawsuit in a French court against two women, including a self-described medium, who contributed to spreading rumours about her gender. An appeals court overturned that decision this month, and Brigitte Macron has appealed to France's highest court.


Scoop
2 days ago
- Scoop
Deportation Actions Against US Legal Permanent Residents Affiliated With Haitian FTO Viv Ansanm
July 21, 2025 I am pleased to announce the latest U.S. actions against individuals whose presence and activities in our country have potentially serious adverse foreign policy consequences for the United States. Specifically, the Department of State has determined that certain individuals with U.S. lawful permanent resident status have supported and collaborated with Haitian gang leaders connected to Viv Ansanm, a Haitian Foreign Terrorist Organization (FTO). Viv Ansanm is a driver of the violence and criminality in Haiti contributing to the island's instability. The United States will not allow individuals to enjoy the benefits of legal status in our country while they are facilitating the actions of violent organisations or supporting criminal terrorist organisations. With this determination, the Department of Homeland Security can pursue the removal of these individuals under section 237(a)(4)(C) of the Immigration and Nationality Act. These new actions demonstrate the Trump Administration's firm commitment to protecting the American people, advancing our national security interests, and promoting regional security and stability.