
HC upholds ITAT order granting 80G approval to Raipur-based society
The court ruled that since the society already had a valid registration under Section 12AA—which confirms its charitable status—the Income Tax Department could not deny 80G approval by questioning its activities. The court dismissed the department's appeal, stating that the ITAT followed legal precedent and committed no error in granting the relief.
The High Court ruled that the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) was correct in directing that a society should be granted approval under Section 80G of the Income Tax Act, 1961, as long as its registration under Section 12AA of the Act is in existence.
The court dismissed an appeal filed by the Income Tax Department, stating that no illegality or irregularity was committed by the ITAT in setting aside an order from the Commissioner of Income Tax (CIT).
Section 80G of the Income Tax Act, 1961 provides tax deductions to individuals and companies who donate to charitable institutions and funds in India, while Section 12AA of the Income Tax Act, 1961 deals with the registration of trusts and other charitable or religious institutions to avail tax exemptions on their income.
The case involves a society that applied for approval under Section 80G of the Act on 28 Feb 2014. The CIT, Raipur, rejected the application on 25 Aug 2014, finding that the society was engaged in commercial activities and could not be considered a charitable organisation. The CIT noted that the society was running institutes on commercial lines, took large bank loans for infrastructure, and rented out its buildings for commercial purposes.
The society filed an appeal with the ITAT, Raipur Bench, which allowed the appeal on 15 Jan 2019. The ITAT set aside the CIT's order and directed that the society be granted approval under Section 80G.
The Income Tax Department, challenging the ITAT's decision, argued that the tribunal failed to appreciate that the society was providing vocational education for a fee, which it said did not qualify as "education" under Section 2(15) of the Act.
The department contended that the society's work was commercial and not charitable.
Counsels for the society, Sumesh Bajaj and Rishabh Bajaj, supported the ITAT's order. They argued that benefits under Section 80G of the Act cannot be denied if registration under Section 12AA is valid and has not been cancelled. They stated that the society's registration was renewed until Assessment Year 2026-27. The counsel cited judgments from the Supreme Court and the High Courts of Gujarat and Punjab and Haryana to support their arguments.
After hearing both sides and reviewing the orders, Chief Justice Ramesh Sinha and Justice Bibhu Datta Guru ruled in favour of the society. The court noted that the ITAT's decision was based on a precedent from the Gujarat High Court, which held that once registration under Section 12AA of the Act is granted, the benefits cannot be denied.
The court observed that the department had not presented any material to show that the decision relied upon by the ITAT was set aside by a higher judicial forum.
It held that the ITAT had not committed any illegality or irregularity.
The High Court answered the substantial question of law in favour of the respondent and against the appellant. It upheld the ITAT's decision, ruling that as long as the registration under Section 12AA of the Act is in existence, the Income Tax Department cannot make a further enquiry into the genuineness of the society's activities and whether they are charitable. The appeal filed by the Income Tax Department was dismissed.
Get the latest lifestyle updates on Times of India, along with
Friendship Day wishes
,
messages
and
quotes
!
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


India.com
3 minutes ago
- India.com
ITR Filing 2025: Do Students And Unemployed Need To File Income Tax Returns in 2025?
New Delhi: Income Tax Return (ITR) filing in India depends mainly on your annual income and age. For individuals under 60 years old, it is generally required to file an ITR if your income exceeds Rs 2.5 lakh under the old tax regime or Rs 3 lakh under the new tax regime. However, unemployed individuals and students are not obligated to file if their income stays below these limits. Even when not mandatory, filing an ITR is advisable for several reasons. It creates a government-backed digital record of your income, which can be useful when applying for loans, credit cards, jobs, or visas. Filing returns also allows you to claim refunds if excess tax has been deducted or paid in advance. Moreover, important financial transactions, such as deposits over Rs 50 lakh in a savings account, require ITR proof to comply with tax scrutiny. Additionally, filing returns is essential if you want to carry forward capital losses, such as short-term capital losses, which can be offset against future gains for up to eight assessment years, reducing your tax burden in subsequent years. For the assessment year 2025-26, the last date to file an ITR without penalty has been extended to September 15, 2025. If you miss this, you can still file a belated return until December 31, 2025, but a nominal penalty applies—Rs 5,000 if your income exceeds Rs 5 lakh, and Rs 1,000 if it is lower. The Income Tax Department offers various ITR forms depending on your income sources, like ITR-1 and ITR-2, and form ITR-3 for those earning from business or professions along with other income such as salary or capital gains. Filing your ITR is also beneficial for building a clean financial record, which is important for obtaining personal loans, credit cards, and traveling internationally. For students, maintaining a good tax record can ease admission processes in top global institutions, help secure education loans, and qualify for scholarships. The filing process is straightforward, requiring basic documents such as PAN, Aadhaar card, and bank statements.


News18
12 minutes ago
- News18
Wife Can Summon Bank Officials to Uncover Husband's Real Income, Rules Delhi High Court
Last Updated: Noting that husbands often hide their actual earnings to evade maintenance obligations, the court set aside the family court order The Delhi High Court has held that a wife can summon witnesses, including bank officials, to establish her husband's actual financial status. In a detailed 11-page verdict, Justice Ravinder Dudeja allowed the wife's plea under Section 311 of the CrPC and overturned the family court's earlier decision that had rejected her request. 'Matrimonial litigation, particularly where financial dependency and concealment are alleged, demands a sensitive and pragmatic approach," the judge added. The judge said the documents and witnesses sought by the petitioner are not collateral or irrelevant but directly impact the determination of maintenance, which is a matter concerning her subsistence. 'The family court ought to have adopted a more purposive interpretation of its enabling powers under Section 311 CrPC., instead of taking a hyper-technical view," the court said. Noting that husbands often hide their actual earnings to evade maintenance obligations, the court added, 'It is not uncommon that when there are matrimonial differences between the husband and wife, many times husbands tend to suppress their real income and resort to transferring their assets to avoid payment of legitimate dues to their wives." The petitioner wife and respondent husband got married on February 16, 2012. The wife had alleged that after her marriage, she was subjected to domestic violence by the husband and his family to fulfill dowry demands. It was also alleged that the respondent and his family had locked the matrimonial home and deserted the wife without returning her stree dhan, jewellery, or cash. The wife had sought to authenticate the Shakti Nagar property document to expose the husband's income. It was alleged that the husband transferred sale proceeds from his Noida property to his mother to conceal assets. It was also claimed that the husband had deliberately concealed his assets, including his appointment as CFO in 2014 and ownership of multiple properties, in an attempt to avoid disclosing his true financial capacity. On the other hand, the respondent husband argued that the plea seeking to call witnesses was not relevant to the petitioner's case. The husband further contended that the wife had approached the court with unclean hands and cited several instances of delay tactics employed by her during the proceedings. He alleged that the wife filed numerous applications with the intent to derail the maintenance petition. Taking note of the submissions, the judge said the family court erred in dismissing the petitioner's application under Section 311 CrPC. 'Section 311 CrPC grants wide discretion to the court to summon, recall or re-examine witnesses at any stage of the proceedings. The objective is to ensure that the truth emerges and justice is served. However, at the same time, such power must be exercised with caution, fairness and judicial prudence so that it does not become an instrument of delay or abuse," the court added. 'According to the petitioner, on 05.08.2013, from the sale proceeds of the Noida flat, respondent diverted an amount of Rs. 5.25 lakhs to the Axis bank account of his mother. On the same date, huge cash was also deposited in the bank accounts of the family members of the respondent in their various bank accounts," the court noted. The high court added that the petitioner wants to demonstrate through such records that the respondent deliberately diverted the sale proceeds of the Noida flat in the name of family members to escape his liability to pay due maintenance. By seeking to summon the bank statements of his family members, the court noted, the petitioner intended to establish a clear trail of fund diversion from the Noida sale, ultimately leading to the purchase of the Shakti Nagar property in the husband's name. The court said denying the petitioner an opportunity to prove the same would frustrate the objective of maintenance proceedings. Accordingly, the HC set aside the family court order and directed it to permit the petitioner wife to summon the witnesses concerned with the relevant record. Get breaking news, in-depth analysis, and expert perspectives on everything from politics to crime and society. Stay informed with the latest India news only on News18. Download the News18 App to stay updated! tags : delhi high court divorce family court view comments Location : New Delhi, India, India First Published: Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.


News18
27 minutes ago
- News18
'AGCO, TAFE Reach Settlement After Close Collaboration With Sudarshan Venu': AGCO CEO
Last Updated: 'This outcome was made possible with close collaboration with Sudarshan Venu, son of TAFE's chairman and MD,' says AGCO CEO Eric P Hansotia during Q2 2025 earnings call. AGCO Corporation Chairman and CEO Eric P Hansotia has acknowledged the key role played by TVS Motor Company Chairman Sudarshan Venu in reaching a comprehensive resolution with Chennai-based tractor manufacturer TAFE (Tractors and Farm Equipment Limited), bringing an end to a long-running dispute over shareholding and brand rights. Speaking during AGCO's Q2 2024 earnings call, Hansotia confirmed that the US-based agriculture machinery giant had finalised an agreement with TAFE, under which AGCO will exit its 20.7 per cent shareholding in TAFE for a consideration of $260 million. The move makes TAFE a fully owned subsidiary of the Chennai-based Amalgamations Group, a diversified industrial conglomerate. 'Turning to a couple of AGCO-specific items, we recently announced the resolution with TAFE on all outstanding commercial, governance and shareholding matters. This outcome was made possible with close collaboration with Sudarshan Venu, son of TAFE's chairman and managing director," Hansotia said during the Q2 2025 earnings call on July 31, 2025. The company follows January-December fiscal year. The agreement also grants TAFE sole and exclusive ownership of the Massey Ferguson brand in India, Nepal, and Bhutan. As per a statement released by TAFE in July, the settlement includes full rights, title, and interest in the Massey Ferguson brand and associated trademarks, along with all goodwill linked to them. This marks the end of a long-standing partnership between the two agricultural equipment giants, which had begun to show signs of strain in late 2024. The dispute came to a head in September when AGCO announced it was terminating its agreements with TAFE, including the licensing of the Massey Ferguson brand. TAFE responded by filing a contempt petition, alleging that AGCO's actions violated earlier court directives and were executed without proper legal notice. The resolution now paves the way for both companies to pursue independent strategies in the Indian subcontinent, one of the world's largest tractor markets. For TAFE, the settlement secures full control over one of its flagship brands in key geographies and allows it to move forward with brand and product development without external restrictions. For AGCO, the divestment aligns with its global portfolio strategy and eliminates governance complexities stemming from minority shareholding in a former joint venture. The agreement is also being viewed as a reflection of Sudarshan Venu's growing influence in resolving high-stakes corporate matters. While he currently leads TVS Motor, a separate entity from TAFE, his involvement in the settlement underscores the close familial and corporate ties within the broader business group and highlights his role in facilitating constructive dialogue between the parties. With the dispute now resolved, both companies are expected to focus on growth and innovation in a rapidly evolving global agri-machinery market. view comments Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.