Taiwan's forces are training to ride the subway into war if China invades
Footage of the drill, part of the island's annual Han Kuang war games, was published by the Military News Agency. The outlet is run by Taiwan's Ministry of National Defense.
Similarly, the US military also conducts combat training in tunnels and subway systems to prepare for urban warfare in megacities.
However, the Taiwanese defense ministry's news branch wrote that its soldiers weren't just learning to fight on the subway, but also to "use underground facilities to transfer troops."
Several clips showed dozens of heavily armed soldiers riding the subway, taking escalators, and leaving via ticket gantries before taking position away from the station.
The training exercise involved soldiers of Taiwan's military police and Third Army Command, who toted anti-armor rockets and practiced tactical movement in subway cars and stations.
Some soldiers were filmed driving forklifts to load ammunition and other gear onto service trains of the subway lines.
Taiwan's national news agency, Central News Agency, reported that the exercise ran between the Shandao Temple Station and Longshan Temple Station. The stations are three stops apart, and the route goes through Taipei Main Station, a major interchange.
Greater Taipei's urban core, home to roughly 6.5 million people, is serviced by six main subway lines and a few extensions.
Han Kuang, run for over 40 years, is focused on countering a Chinese invasion and also trains Taiwan's troops for contingencies if Beijing successfully lands its forces on the island.
This year's exercise is Taiwan's largest in scale so far, running for 10 days and featuring a heavier emphasis on drills with civil forces and civilians to test the entire island's war readiness.
Taiwanese troops on Saturday also deployed the American High Mobility Artillery Rocket Systems, which Taipei received last year, for the first time in the Han Kuang drills.
All of this comes as Taipei's current government, known for resisting Beijing, grows increasingly concerned about emerging hostilities with mainland China. Chinese leader Xi Jinping has pledged to reunify the island under Beijing's control, and said his country would never renounce its right to use force to reach that goal.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
8 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Number of Canadians with favourable view of U.S. has fallen, poll suggests
WASHINGTON — Amid months of tariffs and taunts from U.S. President Donald Trump, a new poll suggests the percentage of Canadians who have a favourable view of the United States has fallen and is now on par with the number who think positively about China. The survey by the Pew Research Center suggests one-third of Canadians — 34 per cent — now have a favourable view of the United States. It marks a 20 percentage point decrease from last year. The same percentage of Canadians had favourable views of China — a 13 point increase. "For the last few years … many people have preferred the U.S. to China by a sizable margin,' said Laura Silver, associate director of global attitudes research at the Washington-based research centre. Now, she said, "there's no daylight between the two." Pew polled people in 25 countries and the survey found positive views of China increased in more than half the nations. There was also an increase in people who viewed Chinese President Xi Jinping favourably. "This is the first real tick up that we've seen that we would describe as an increase across the board," Silver said. Trump returned to the White House with an agenda to realign global trade and upend geopolitics by targeting friend and foe alike. Critics of Trump's tactics have said the ongoing instability will push countries to form closer ties with China. Canada was an early target with Trump repeatedly calling former prime minister Justin Trudeau "governor" and insisting Canada should become a U.S. state. The president hit Canada and Mexico with duties he linked to fentanyl trafficking in March, only to walk back the tariffs for goods that comply with the Canada-U.S.-Mexico Agreement on trade a few days later. Trump took his trade war to the world in April with so-called "reciprocal" tariffs but paused the devastating duties a few hours later saying it would give time for countries to make a deal with America. He kept in place a 10 per cent tariff for most countries. China was hit by the hardest duties, prompting a brief but escalated tariff standoff between the world's two largest economies. The U.S. president has been sending out letters to nations suggesting they will be hit with high duty rates if no deal is made by Aug. 1. Trump did go ahead with specific tariffs targeting steel, aluminum and automobile imports, with copper duties also set to come into place on Aug. 1. Pew, a non-partisan think tank, surveyed 28,333 adults across 24 countries – not including the United States – from Jan. 8 to April 26 by phone, online and in person. The centre also surveyed 3,605 Americans from March 24 to March 30 by phone, online and in person. The poll reports 26 per cent of all people surveyed said they had confidence in the Chinese president, while 22 per cent said the same for Trump. "That reflects both a rising view of Xi and a quite dramatically negative view of Trump," Silver said. The changing views were especially stark in Mexico, where 45 per cent of people said it's more important for their country to have strong economic ties with China than with the U.S. — up from 37 per cent in 2019 and 15 per cent in 2015. Canada's relationship with China was roiled during the first Trump administration when in 2018 Canadians Michael Spavor and Michael Kovrig were taken into custody in China. It followed the arrest of Huawei's chief financial officer Meng Wanzhou in British Columbia at the request of the United States. Silver said the 2025 polling is the first time there hasn't been a wide gap in how Canadians view the world's two largest economies since the relationship with China took a "nosedive." The Pew Research Center survey found the share of Canadians who said the U.S. was more important for economic ties had dropped to 67 per cent from 87 per cent in 2019. "Now, while it's still a majority, it's down more than 20 percentage points with a corresponding rise in the share who prefer China," Silver said. This report by The Canadian Press was first published July 15, 2025. Kelly Geraldine Malone, The Canadian Press Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
21 minutes ago
Japan calls China's military activity its biggest strategic challenge
TOKYO -- Japan cautioned against China's rapid acceleration of military activity stretching from its southwestern coasts to the Pacific, describing the moves in a new defense report Tuesday as the biggest strategic challenge. China's growing military cooperation with Russia also poses serious security concerns to Japan, along with increasing tension around Taiwan and threats coming from North Korea, the Defense Ministry said in the annual report submitted to the Cabinet. 'The international society is in a new crisis era as it faces the biggest challenges since the end of World War II,' the report said, citing significant changes to the global power balance while raising concerns about an escalation of the China-U.S. rivalry. The security threats are concentrated in the Indo-Pacific, where Japan is located, and could get worse in the future, the report said. China's Foreign Ministry spokesperson Lin Jian criticized the white paper, saying it "adopts a wrongful perception of China, unjustifiably interferes in China's internal affairs, and plays up the so-called China threat.' Beijing has lodged protests with Japan, Lin said, defending China's military activities as 'legitimate and reasonable.' He urged Japan to reflect on its wartime past and 'stop hyping tension in the region and China-related issues as a pretext to justify its military buildup.' Japan has strengthened its military forces on southwestern islands in recent years and was preparing to deploy long-distance cruise missiles, as it worries about a conflict in Taiwan, which China claims as its territory to be annexed by force if necessary. The presence of Chinese warships in the Pacific has steadily increased and the frequency of their passage off southwestern Japan has tripled in the past three years, including in waters between Taiwan and the neighboring Japanese island of Yonaguni, the report said. It comes days after Japan demanded China stop flying its fighter jets unusually close to Japanese intelligence-gathering aircraft, which it said was happening repeatedly and could cause a collision. Beijing in turn accused Japan of flying near Chinese airspace for spying purposes. China's increasing dispatch of aircraft carriers in the Pacific underscores the country's attempt to advance its sea power in distant waters, the report said. The Defense Ministry also noted two cases last year in which a Chinese warplane briefly violated Japanese airspace off islands near Nagasaki, and an aircraft carrier's entry into a zone just outside of Japan's territorial waters southwest of the Nansei island chain, which stretches from the southern coast of Kyushu to Taiwan. North Korea poses 'an increasingly serious and imminent threat,' the report said, noting the North's development of missiles capable of carrying nuclear warheads and solid-fuel intercontinental ballistic missiles that can reach the U.S. mainland.
Time Magazine
21 minutes ago
- Time Magazine
Chinese Universities Rise in the Ranks as Senate Democrats Accuse Trump of ‘Ceding Global Leadership to China'
President Donald Trump's attacks on higher education have hurt colleges across the country, but they may also weaken the U.S.' ability to compete with its geopolitical rival China, some lawmakers say. The Trump Administration's protectionist actions, from issuing sweeping global tariffs to the shuttering of USAID, are 'ceding global leadership to China,' Democrats on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee said in a report released on Monday. Commissioned by ranking member of the committee Sen. Jeanne Shaheen (D-NH), the report comes after House Republicans proposed an appropriations bill that includes further cuts to foreign aid. [time-brightcove not-tgx='true'] The report was also published amid the backdrop of China stepping up its diplomatic efforts, opening itself up to more tourists, and advancing the global reputation of its universities. China has long sought to court the world's top talent by increasing government investment into higher education, boosting funding for science and technological research, and recruiting faculty from overseas. Chinese universities have risen steadily in global rankings, with 15 schools in mainland China and Hong Kong listed among the top 100 universities on the 2025-2026 Best Global Universities Rankings, compiled by U.S. News and World Report. Tsinghua University in Beijing ranked the highest of the Chinese universities on the USNWR list, moving up two spots from last year to place at 11th (tied with Imperial College London). Peking University and Zhejiang University also rose in the rankings to 25th, up from 31st, and 45th, up from 51st, respectively. That's a sharp jump from seven years ago, when just two Chinese universities were in the top 100: Tsinghua University at 50th and Peking University at 68th. While U.S. universities still dominate the top ten, the ranking suggests that Chinese universities are becoming more attractive to global talent at a time when the Trump Administration's targeting of U.S. colleges threatens to hurt American competitiveness. 'As America retreats from global leadership under the Trump Administration, China is well-positioned and eager to exploit this moment of American disengagement,' said Democrats on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee. The report also warned that Trump's crackdowns on higher education 'have laid the groundwork for a brain drain.' 'At a time when China is articulating its vision for a future that leaves America behind, the Administration's abdication of global leadership is dangerous and will impose real costs on the American people,' Sen. Shaheen said. Trump's pressure campaign on U.S. universities has ranged from slashing billions of dollars in research funding to restricting international students. Trump has especially targeted elite schools in the U.S., such as Harvard University, which still occupies USNWR's number one spot. Asian universities are already trying to make the most of the possible 'brain drain' from the U.S., with several courting Harvard transfers. Read More: How Trump's Crackdown on International Students Could Escalate Trade Tensions With China This year's rankings don't yet reflect the direct effects of Trump's policies, but experts have said that Trump's campaign is likely to accelerate the growing global popularity of Asian, especially Chinese, universities, while discouraging international students from going to the U.S. 'There is a slow, long-term strengthening of the position of the global power of universities in China,' says Simon Marginson, a professor of higher education at Oxford University. 'And the turmoil in U.S. higher education will hasten that trend. The present Administration has created a space for international rivals to fill.' Chinese enrollment at U.S. universities has declined over the years Chinese students and researchers had already started to turn away from the U.S. before Trump returned to the White House for a second term. Chinese students were the largest proportion of international students in the U.S. in the 2019-20 academic year, with more than 370,000 of them. That number had shrunk more than 25% by the 2023-2024 academic year, with India overtaking China for the number of nationals studying in the U.S. Nearly 20,000 ethnic Chinese scientists left the U.S. for other countries, including China, between 2010 and 2021, according to a study by researchers at Princeton, Harvard, and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. That trend accelerated in 2018 during Trump's first term, when his Administration introduced the 'China Initiative,' which investigated scientists affiliated with China on the basis of national security concerns and resulted in charges against more than two dozen academics. Critics accused the program of racial profiling and fearmongering, and said it created a 'chilling effect' within the scientific community that curtailed research and innovation. A 2021 MIT analysis found that a majority of the cases the Department of Justice opened against Chinese and Asian American researchers were not related to economic espionage or intellectual property theft. (The Biden Administration ended the China Initiative in February 2022.) The Trump Administration also targeted Chinese students through a restrictive visa policy beginning in 2020. Proclamation 10043 prohibited the entry or issuance of visas to Chinese students enrolled in U.S. graduate programs with ties to Chinese 'military-civil' universities, resulting in the cancellations of more than 1,000 student visas. A 2021 letter signed by over 40 associations, including the Association of American Universities and the American Council of Education, expressed concern about 'reports of this proclamation being applied very broadly.' Biden resumed regular visa services in China in May 2021, but left the proclamation in place, with reports of Chinese students being denied visas on that basis occurring up to at least 2023. Several U.S. universities have also ended their academic partnerships with Chinese universities in the past year. The University of California, Berkeley, cut ties with the Tsinghua-Berkeley Shenzhen Institute in February after the Trump Administration opened an investigation into undisclosed funding from the Chinese government. The University of Michigan abruptly ended a two-decade partnership with Shanghai Jiao Tong University in January on the basis of national security concerns. In September, the Georgia Institute of Technology ended its partnership with the Georgia Tech Shenzhen Institute for the same reason. In the meantime, thousands of Chinese researchers have returned to China, according to the aforementioned study, and higher education experts predict that Chinese applicants to the U.S. may begin looking elsewhere, including within China itself. Chinese universities' ability to attract homegrown talent has been a key strength, Senthil Nathan, managing director and co-founder of higher education consultancy Edu Alliance, told United Arab Emirates state-owned outlet the National last year. 'These Chinese universities are selecting the best Chinese students. That's a huge difference. They are not following the western blueprint,' Nathan said. 'They are not attracting the best and the brightest from the world, but from within their country because they have enough resources.' Read More: What to Know About New Social Media Screening Rules for Student Visas A hostile environment for some international students in the U.S. The Trump Administration in recent months has clamped down on international students in the U.S. In May, Trump introduced heightened screenings for student visa applicants, including requiring applicants to have 'public' social media profiles, while the Administration that month said it would begin 'aggressively' revoking Chinese student visas. Earlier this year, Trump also began targeting foreign-born students for deportation and threatened to bar international students from enrolling at Harvard—moves widely seen as attempts to compel U.S. universities to comply with his demands on academic curricula and campus activism. Trump has also threatened Harvard with budget cuts and federal contract cancellations as part of that pressure campaign. 'For a long time, the U.S. has been considered a top destination by international students, and at the same time, U.S. higher education has benefited much from international students especially regarding financial stability and research,' Lili Yang, an associate professor specializing in higher education at the University of Hong Kong, told TIME in May. The U.S. has cultivated a 'reputation as a place for free expression.' But Trump's policies have 'damaged' that reputation, she said. 'Without brilliant international students, U.S. research and technology may gradually face a shortage of human resources and lose its globally leading position.' While China has been trying to boost its soft power, in no small part through academic exchange, Trump's higher education policies demonstrate that 'the Administration no longer relates to the world in terms of soft power in education and science,' Marginson told TIME in May. Madi Biedermann, a spokesperson for the Department of Education, told USA Today that the Administration's actions will help 'faculty and graduate students to focus their attention on advancing science' by targeting antisemitism on campus. Quelling pro-Palestinian speech has been positioned as a driving force behind Trump's pressure campaign. However, many of the students whose visas were initially revoked (before Trump reversed course) did not participate in any pro-Palestinian activism and some of Trump's demands are broadly related to diversity, equity, and inclusivity (DEI) related programs. 'American universities that are committed to their academic mission, protect students on campus, and follow all federal laws will have no problem accessing generous taxpayer support for their programs,' Biedermann added. China is investing in research as Trump slashes funding The growth of Chinese universities' global reputation has been in large part due to significant government investment into higher education, especially scientific research and development. China has steadily increased its spending in that sector over the last five years, and it has seen dividends in its output. Between 2018 and 2020, China published nearly a quarter of the world's scientific papers, surpassing the U.S., and it has since worked to maintain this pace. Duncan Ross, the chief data officer at Times Higher Education which also compiles an annual global rankings list, told the National last year that the Chinese government has targeted investment at the national, regional, and city levels. 'It's not that U.S. universities have got worse in any way. They are improving,' he said, but universities in Asia 'are just improving more quickly.' At the same time, Trump has ordered billions of dollars in federal research grants to be cut, which would gut research on cancer, HIV, sickle cell disease, and more. An analysis published on July 9 by the American Association for the Advancement of Science found that Trump's cuts put a third of basic scientific research programs at risk, while the National Institutes of Health could have its budget cut by 40%. Even if international students were willing to take the risks of studying in the U.S. under a tremulous immigration policy, experts say a decline in research could knock U.S. universities off their global perch. It could even push American talent to look overseas. A March poll by British scientific journal Nature found that 75% of U.S. scientists are considering leaving the country. 'China is already trying to seize the moment and recruit some of the brightest talent,' Sen. Patty Murray (D-Washington) said at a congressional hearing in April. 'Bright young people, who want to do medical research here, are suddenly worried. Why start that PhD if their funding is going to get yanked away? Why study new vaccines if RFK Jr. [Secretary of Health and Human Services] is going to meddle in their work? Why come to the U.S. for promising research if Trump might just try to deport them for jaywalking?' Phil Baty, the chief global affairs officer at Times Higher Education, told the National last year that the steady rise of Chinese universities in global rankings suggest 'tectonic shifts in higher education from the West to the East, with real excellence demonstrated in East Asia and South-East Asia in particular, and well beyond.' 'The U.S. needs to remind others, and itself, that it's constantly competing for its position in the global talent marketplace. We can't be complacent if we want to maintain our dominance in innovation and tech even as other nations fight to take the lead,' Lex Zhao, a managing partner at immigrant-founded venture capital firm One Way Ventures, told TIME in May. Trump's policies, he adds, are 'driving foreign talent away from our institutions and into the arms of more welcoming nations—even those hostile to us—when we should be doing the exact opposite.'
