It's Time to ‘Pump the Brakes,' Says Analyst on Tesla Stock (TSLA)
Tesla (TSLA) is one of the most popular stocks among both Wall Street and retail investors, and understandably so, as the stock has generated phenomenal returns over the years, yielding a total return of 1,854% over the past decade.
Confident Investing Starts Here:
Easily unpack a company's performance with TipRanks' new KPI Data for smart investment decisions
Receive undervalued, market resilient stocks right to your inbox with TipRanks' Smart Value Newsletter
It has also captured the public's imagination with its forays into exciting fields like robotics and self-driving cars, as evidenced by this week's Robotaxi launch, which caused shares to surge 8% on Monday but have since pared gains to now trade ~2% lower.
Despite this rally driven by Robotaxi enthusiasm, the stock is down nearly 30% from its 52-week high, which may lead some investors to look for the opportunity to 'buy-the-dip' on this popular name. However, the stock hardly appears to be a bargain at this point in time and may decline further.
TSLA's Extreme Valuation Raises Eyebrows
While Tesla (TSLA) is an intriguing self-driving stock, and the limited Robotaxi launch is generating considerable investor excitement, the stock is incredibly expensive from a valuation perspective.
Shares of Tesla trade at an astronomical valuation of 169x 2025 earnings estimates. It's hard to understate how frothy this valuation is, but to put it into perspective, it's over eight times as expensive as the S&P 500 (SPX), which trades for 21x forward earnings estimates (and keep in mind that this is in and of itself a historically above-average valuation for the index).
You can make the case that Tesla should be worth more than the 'average' company in the S&P 500, as the company and the rest of the Magnificent Seven stocks are some of the most dominant and innovative companies in the world. But not only is Tesla more expensive than the average stock in the S&P 500, it's also considerably more expensive than all of its magnificent seven peers, as TipRanks data shows.
For comparison, Microsoft (MSFT) trades at 36x 2025 earnings estimates, while Amazon (AMZN) and Nvidia (NVDA), which have long been derided by many value investors for their lofty valuations, trade at similar valuations of 34x forward estimates for 2025 and 2026, respectively. Meta Platforms (META) and Apple (AAPL) both trade for roughly 27x 2025 estimates. Alphabet (GOOGL) is currently the cheapest stock in the Magnificent Seven, trading for just 18x 2025 estimates.
TSLA is Priced for More Than Perfection
When a stock is trading at such elevated valuation levels, it's often said to be 'priced for perfection.' But in this case, it's difficult to argue that everything is unfolding perfectly—significant risks remain. Elon Musk is widely regarded as a visionary CEO and brilliant engineer, but his tendency to court controversy is unparalleled, and it's increasingly cutting across political lines.
While alienating one side of the political spectrum might be manageable—potentially offset by support from the other—Musk has managed to provoke backlash from both the left and the right in a relatively short period of time. His public support for Donald Trump during the presidential election alienated many on the left, while his subsequent high-profile dispute with Trump has also drawn criticism from the right.
Although the details have been widely reported, the broader concern is that this bipartisan controversy could ultimately affect consumer sentiment and impact sales. When you pair this with the stock's lofty valuation, the potential downside risk becomes more pronounced.
If Robotaxis are Overhyped, TSLA Could be in Trouble
Let's take a closer look at Tesla's Robotaxi initiative, which has been driving the stock's momentum this week following a high-profile launch event in Austin. While the event generated significant media buzz, the substance of the launch was more modest.
According to Reuters, only a small number of Teslas—each with a human safety monitor in the front seat—provided rides within a tightly geofenced area of Austin. Importantly, this was a private, invite-only event aimed at investors, influencers, and brand enthusiasts, rather than a public rollout. Many attendees posted their ride experiences on social media, adding to the event's visibility.
That said, the launch was limited in both scale and scope. Even within this controlled environment, there were reported issues. The Verge noted an incident in which a Model Y briefly drove the wrong way down a street, while Tesla critic Ed Niedermeyer highlighted another case where a vehicle abruptly braked in traffic in response to a stationary object outside its path. These and similar reports have already prompted regulatory attention, with the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration reaching out to Tesla shortly after the event.
It's also worth noting that Tesla is not alone in the autonomous vehicle space, and some competitors appear to be significantly further along. Alphabet's (GOOGL) Waymo, for instance, is already operating at scale, providing over 250,000 rides per week across cities like Los Angeles, San Francisco, and Phoenix. Having recently surpassed the 10-million ride mark, Waymo is quietly leading in real-world deployment, despite receiving far less media attention than Tesla. In this context, while Tesla's ambitions are noteworthy, its current progress in the Robotaxi space still lags behind established players.
Is Tesla a Buy, Sell, or Hold?
Turning to Wall Street, TSLA carries a Hold consensus rating based on 14 Buys, 12 Holds, and nine Sell ratings assigned in the past three months. The average TSLA stock price target of $291.31 implies 10.5% downside potential over the coming year.
Sky-High Valuation Leaves Little Room for Error in Tesla's Stock
While shares of Tesla have regained momentum based on robotaxi excitement, it's likely a good time to pump the brakes on this enthusiasm. The limited nature of the launch, strong competition already in place (and further ahead of Tesla), and the regulatory attention the company is already facing illustrate the challenges ahead.
Robotaxis aside, Musk has demonstrated a remarkable ability to make enemies on both sides of the U.S. political divide, which has already led to a consumer backlash and could further harm sales.
Despite these developments, the stock remains priced for perfection, trading at a sky-high price-to-earnings multiple—approximately 8.5x higher than the S&P 500 average—and at a premium well above any of its peers in the so-called 'Magnificent Seven.' The average analyst price target implies a potential 10% downside, and the consensus Hold rating underscores the elevated risk associated with the current valuation.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
USA Today
18 minutes ago
- USA Today
Stocks usually rise by 10% a year. Those days may be over.
Americans are wise to invest in the stock market, we are told, because stocks have yielded historical gains of about 10% a year. But not, perhaps, this year. Many analysts predict that the S&P 500 index will end 2025 essentially flat, or with only meager gains. In one June 25 roundup, Yahoo Finance charts several strategists with year-end projections that put the benchmark S&P index between 5,600 and 6,100. Those figures fall below, or only slightly above, where the S&P started the year, around 5,900. Some forecasts range higher, and forecasters have been growing more bullish about American stocks in 2025. But anyone who predicts double-digit returns this year risks being branded an outlier. If big investment firms expect the stock market to finish 2025 more or less where it started, how should armchair investors react? Is the investment landscape shifting beneath our feet? First, let's explore the reasoning behind those gloomy forecasts. Stocks opened high in 2025. Maybe too high. The stock market opened strong in 2025. The broad S&P index sat near its all-time high, following two years of conspicuous growth. That growth spurt, alone, was enough to seed caution in forecasters. A surging S&P means stock prices are relatively high. Some stocks are overpriced. Bargains are fewer. The index may not have that much room to grow. 'I believe that, given the strong returns over the past two years, some lower returns are expected,' said Eric Teal, chief investment officer at Comerica Bank. Comerica's own projections call for the S&P 500 to end the year at 6,400, a number toward the high end of forecasts. Wall Street prognosticators have been bearish on stocks in 2025 because of one overarching theme: uncertainty. 'It's all the volatile actors in our current economy,' said Catherine Valega, a certified financial planner near Boston. 'It's like you don't know from one day to the next: Do we have tariffs? Do we not have tariffs?' It's hard to predict how President Trump's import taxes will affect prices, and thus, inflation. The trade war, coupled with Trump's immigration crackdown, could slow economic growth. Recession fears are heightened. The Federal Reserve may or may not ease interest rates in response. 'We're assuming that we sidestep a recession, that interest rate cuts are on the horizon, but not immediate,' Teal said, reflecting a common view on Wall Street. 'And so, there is an element of cautious optimism that I think is in the market, but a high degree of uncertainty and macro policy unknowns that will keep markets contained.' Stock forecasters don't want to be wrong There's another big reason, analysts say, why year-end forecasts for the S&P 500 are trending low: Forecasters tend to err on the conservative side. 'The analysts have historically kind of underestimated S&P 500 returns,' said Kristy Akullian, head of iShares investment strategy, Americas, at BlackRock. 'People don't want to stick their necks out with a bold prediction and be wrong.' That impulse, she said, also explains why stock forecasts tend to bunch together. No one wants to stand out. 'It's hard being an outlier,' said David Meier, a senior analyst at Motley Fool. Meier cites yet another reason why stock forecasters tend to aim low: 'Being negative, let's call it bearish, tends to get more clicks,' he said. Readers gravitate to distressing news about stocks. So, stocks are having an off year. What can I do? Now, let's move on to the practical question: If the S&P 500 might not gain much ground in 2025, what should ordinary investors do about it? The easy answer, of course, is to do nothing. Stock market projections for next month, or next year, shouldn't matter much to an investor who is in for the long haul, advisers say. And that advice applies to just about everyone: If you aren't in for the long haul, experts advise, stocks might not be for you. 'If you need funds soon, don't have it invested,' said Randy Bruns, a certified financial planner in Naperville, Illinois. 'If you don't need the funds for 15 years, stop looking at the volatility.' Market downturns tend to be brief. Recessions are shorter than they seem. Anyone who is saving for retirement, or for other long-term goals, can generally ride them out. 'If you have the luxury of being a long-term investor, be one,' Akullian said. There is, however, a longer and more nuanced answer to the question of how to respond to those conservative projections for stocks in 2025. A gloomy forecast for 2025 -- and for 2035 It involves this complicating factor: Stock market forecasts are also surprisingly conservative for 2035. Vanguard, the investment firm, predicts the U.S. stock market as a whole will rise by an underwhelming 3.8% to 5.8% a year over the next 10 years. 'Growth' stocks, the likes of Nvidia and Amazon, are projected to rise by only 2.5% to 4.5%: not much faster than inflation. Those forecasts are based on the idea that many U.S. stocks are overpriced, in essence, and trading above their real value. In Vanguard's analysis, everyday investors who want the gaudy returns they have come to expect from American growth stocks would do well to look elsewhere: Global stocks. Small-cap American stocks, in companies with a lower market value. 'Value' stocks, trading below their intrinsic worth. 'I would say it's time to have a more balanced allocation,' said Teal of Comerica. Bruns, the financial planner, suggests average investors should 'diversify across all the broad asset classes that should comprise a textbook portfolio.' That doesn't mean you should sell all of your Alphabet stocks, experts say. But the time might be right to scrutinize your portfolio. Does it include foreign stocks? Small-cap stocks? Bonds? If not, then you might consider rebalancing your portfolio to make it more diverse. 'The easiest way to do that, if you are a 401(k) contributor, is to change your future allocations,' Valega said. That way, you don't have to tinker with your current investments. Not sure how to rebalance? 'Reach out to your adviser,' Valega said. 'That's what we're there for.'
Yahoo
30 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Billionaire Dan Loeb Sold Third Point's Entire Stake in Tesla in Favor of a High-Yield Dividend Stock That's Doubled in Under 2 Years
Form 13Fs offer investors a quarterly snapshot of which stocks Wall Street's top money managers have been buying and selling. Though Tesla may have enjoyed a brief "Trump bump," a number of operating concerns have emerged. Meanwhile, billionaire Dan Loeb has piled into a slow-but-steadily-growing dividend stock whose shares have doubled since hitting their low in July 2023. These 10 stocks could mint the next wave of millionaires › Nothing is more valuable on Wall Street than data. The only problem for investors is that keeping atop the latest data releases is a daunting task that can allow something of importance to slip through the cracks. For example, what can arguably be described as the most important data dump of the second quarter occurred on May 15. But because it was at the start of earnings season and packaged so closely to important economic data releases from the federal government, investors might have overlooked the May 15 filing deadline for Form 13Fs with the Securities and Exchange Commission. A 13F is a required filing no later than 45 calendar days following the end to a quarter by institutional investors with at least $100 million in assets under management (AUM). It provides a concise snapshot of which stocks Wall Street's prominent money managers purchased and sold in the latest quarter. Even though 13Fs are far from perfect -- since they're filed up to 45 calendar days following the end to a quarter, they may present a stale snapshot for an active hedge fund -- they offer key insights as to which stocks and trends have piqued the interest of Wall Street's most-successful asset managers. While Warren Buffett is the stock market's most famous billionaire investor, he's not the only fund manager known for their phenomenal returns or key insights. Third Point's billionaire chief Dan Loeb is another asset manager with a keen eye for value that investors usually keep close tabs on. During the March-ended quarter, Loeb was a decisive seller of four "Magnificent Seven" stocks, perhaps none of which stands out more than Tesla (NASDAQ: TSLA). Meanwhile, the value-focused Loeb piled into a brand-name, high-yield dividend stock that's managed to double in value in less than two years. To preface this discussion, Dan Loeb operates a relatively active fund that ended the March quarter with more than $6.5 billion in AUM spread across 45 positions. Loeb's average hold time among these 45 positions is just 4.5 quarters, or roughly 13.5 months. In short, he's demonstrated a willingness to lock in gains when presented with a decisive move higher in a security. Between the third quarter of 2024, which is when Third Point first acquired shares of electric-vehicle (EV) maker Tesla, and the first quarter of 2025, which is when all 500,000 shares of Tesla were sold, this position, at one point, more than doubled in value. Loeb had ample incentive to lock in his fund's short-term gains. Based on the timing of Loeb's initial investment and selling activity, it's possible his fund's stake in Tesla was based on the expectation of the company benefiting from a Donald Trump victory in November. Tesla CEO Elon Musk was touted as having a role in the Trump administration -- he went on to be a special employee for the Department of Government Efficiency, or DOGE -- which was expected to be a positive for his company's long-term growth ambitions. But with this story having been played out, a number of red flags associated with Tesla's operations may have encouraged billionaire Dan Loeb to head for the hills. One of the more glaring issues with Tesla has been the company's declining vehicle margin. Though higher energy and storage revenue has helped to somewhat offset EV demand weakness, more than a half-dozen sweeping price cuts on Tesla's fleet of EVs from growing competition has sapped its vehicle margin. To add fuel to the fire, Tesla's Cybertruck looks to be a flop. Despite Musk previously claiming that his company had over 1 million reservations for Cybertruck, a recall announced in March of Cybertrucks manufactured from Nov. 13, 2023 to Feb. 27, 2025 showed this recall covered just shy of 46,100 vehicles. That's a far cry from "demand being off the charts," as Musk once touted. This speaks to the broader issue of Musk's innovations (usually) failing to materialize. While Musk has overseen the launch of a handful of new EVs and diversified Tesla into an energy generation and storage provider, his Level 5 autonomy claims by "next year" have fallen flat for 11 consecutive years. Furthermore, the initial robotaxi launch in Austin, TX, is limited to just 10 vehicles and geofenced to a small coverage area. If Musk's unfulfilled promises were backed out of Tesla's valuation, its share price, and astronomical forward price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio of almost 120, would plummet. However, Third Point's billionaire chief was also a buyer of select stocks during the March-ended quarter. Though nearly a dozen new positions were opened, arguably none stands out more than the 3,775,000 shares purchased of high-octane dividend stock AT&T (NYSE: T). Two years ago, investors seemingly wanted nothing to do with AT&T and large telecom companies. In July 2023, a report from The Wall Street Journal alleged that AT&T and other U.S. telecom companies had a network of legacy cables wrapped in toxic lead. The WSJ intimated that cleanup costs and health liabilities could be sizable for legacy telecom companies. Ultimately, AT&T and its peers refuted the findings of the report. Even if there is some form of future liability for America's legacy telecom providers, it's something that would almost certainly be determined in the U.S. court system, which is notoriously slow. What was viewed as a serious threat to AT&T in July 2023 quickly passed as short-term white noise. AT&T's shares have since doubled in value from their July 2023 lows. Although AT&T's best growth days are long gone, there are still catalysts working in the company's favor. For example, AT&T upgrading and steadily expanding the reach of its 5G network has resulted in ongoing postpaid phone additions and mobility sales growth that typically ranges in the low-to-mid single digits. Since access to a smartphone and the internet has effectively evolved into a basic necessity, AT&T is enjoying historically low postpaid phone churn rates that are below 1%. Additionally, there's been a resurgence in broadband signups since the rollout of 5G. AT&T has added at least 200,000 net customers to its broadband service for 21 consecutive quarters (more than five straight years) and is nearing 30 million cumulative consumer and business AT&T Fiber subscribers. Even with broadband no longer being the growth story it was when the century began, it's still a phenomenal source of operating cash flow and can be used as a tool to encourage high-margin service bundling. Perhaps best of all, AT&T has dramatically improved its financial flexibility since spinning out its content division, WarnerMedia, in 2022. This spinoff, which saw WarnerMedia merge with Discovery to create Warner Bros. Discovery, led to the assumption of certain debt lots by this new media entity. Whereas net debt for AT&T stood at $169 billion on March 31, 2022, it's fallen to $119.1 billion precisely three years later. Lastly, AT&T is dishing out a nearly 4% annual yield and sports a reasonable forward P/E ratio of 12.7 amid a historically pricey stock market. Ever feel like you missed the boat in buying the most successful stocks? Then you'll want to hear this. On rare occasions, our expert team of analysts issues a 'Double Down' stock recommendation for companies that they think are about to pop. If you're worried you've already missed your chance to invest, now is the best time to buy before it's too late. And the numbers speak for themselves: Nvidia: if you invested $1,000 when we doubled down in 2009, you'd have $400,193!* Apple: if you invested $1,000 when we doubled down in 2008, you'd have $38,264!* Netflix: if you invested $1,000 when we doubled down in 2004, you'd have $687,731!* Right now, we're issuing 'Double Down' alerts for three incredible companies, available when you join , and there may not be another chance like this anytime soon.*Stock Advisor returns as of June 23, 2025 Sean Williams has positions in AT&T and Warner Bros. Discovery. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Tesla and Warner Bros. Discovery. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. Billionaire Dan Loeb Sold Third Point's Entire Stake in Tesla in Favor of a High-Yield Dividend Stock That's Doubled in Under 2 Years was originally published by The Motley Fool Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
30 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Jefferies Trims SentinelOne (S) Price Target, Maintains Buy Rating
SentinelOne, Inc. (NYSE:S) is one of . Jefferies analyst Joseph Gallo has lowered the firm's price target on SentinelOne, Inc. (NYSE:S) to $23 from $25, while maintaining a Buy rating on the shares. The adjustment reflects a broader reduction in price targets across Jefferies' U.S. software coverage, prompted by recent multiple compression and early signs of softening macroeconomic conditions affecting deal-making in the technology sector. Gallo pointed out that these factors could lead to what he describes as another 'mullet' year for software companies, characterized by a challenging first half followed by a stronger second half. Despite this outlook, Jefferies has not yet lowered its earnings estimates for SentinelOne, choosing instead to await further data from upcoming first-quarter checks. The analyst also noted that SentinelOne's recent guidance assumed no significant improvement in market conditions, underscoring the cautious tone from management. As uncertainty continues, many investors appear to be holding back, adopting a wait-and-see approach to gauge how the evolving environment will affect technology spending and deal activity. While the cautious stance has led to a tempered near-term outlook, Jefferies remains positive on SentinelOne's longer-term prospects, keeping a Buy rating on the stock. While we acknowledge the potential of S to grow, our conviction lies in the belief that some AI stocks hold greater promise for delivering higher returns and have limited downside risk. If you are looking for an AI stock that is more promising than S and that has 100x upside potential, check out our report about this cheapest AI NEXT: 10 Best Small Cap Tech Stocks With Biggest Upside Potential and . Disclosure: None.
