The New Sustainability Playbook: 10 Questions For Business Leaders
The negative impacts of the Trump administration's tariffs are already taking effect and are projected to be even more consequential. Prices are projected to rise. At the same time, output and employment will be reduced, resulting in a net negative impact on the U.S. economy. In this context, every business with a global supply chain is facing an existential crisis: reduce investments in sustainability to save money in the short term, or stay the course and preserve long-term value? As cost rise from higher tariffs, business leaders need to understand the consequences of reducing investments in sustainability.
Cutting costs will jeopardize business relationships with global supply chain partners that require compliance with sustainability standards including GRI, ISSB, and SASB. Downsizing investments in sustainability will also alienate employees, consumers, and communities who reward businesses that reduce environmental impact, enhance social equity, and improve long-term resilience.
Every business leader will need to decide whether to maintain investments in sustainability that come with a cost but also deliver immense value. This new playbook will help leaders make the best choices for their companies.
Short-term cost savings can lead to long-term vulnerability. Cutting back on emissions reductions, renewable energy, or supply chain resilience might lower costs now. But it also raises the risk of climate impacts, harm to reputation, and fines from regulations. PG&E's failure to upgrade grid infrastructure to prevent wildfires resulted in the company facing an estimated $30 billion liability for damages from the two years of wildfires, according to the New York Times.
Many multinational clients and procurement partners now mandate sustainability metrics. Preferred supplier lists may remove companies that fail to align with frameworks like GRI, ISSB, or SASB may be removed from preferred supplier lists. This is especially true in sectors such as apparel, electronics, automotive, and food. If you are part of a global value chain, slashing ESG investments could mean losing business. Walmart requires key suppliers to report emissions and energy use. Suppliers that don't comply may be delisted.
Employees want to work for companies with purpose, consumers reward brands that do good, and communities are more supportive of responsible corporations. Scaling back ESG efforts to offset tariff-related costs could result in lower morale, higher turnover, customer churn, and social license to operate issues—intangibles that can rapidly transform into significant concerns. Patagonia's sustained customer loyalty and employee retention are closely linked to its genuine ESG commitments.
Institutional investors are placing greater emphasis on sustainability as a proxy for governance and future-readiness. While some shareholder segments may support short-term margin improvements, others—like pension funds and ESG-focused funds—may divest from companies seen as backtracking on sustainability. Before you cut ESG budgets, consider how it might change your investor profile. BlackRock has flagged companies with weak ESG disclosures as riskier and redirected capital toward ESG-aligned portfolios, according to ESG Today.
Sustainability efforts can benefit your company in the long run. You will save energy with efficient operations. Proactive compliance will cut regulatory costs. Plus, responsible sourcing will help your brand stand out. These investments may not appear on this quarter's balance sheet, but they build competitive advantage over time. What will you lose if you abandon what you've already built? Unilever's Sustainable Living Brands grew 69% faster than the rest of its portfolio, demonstrating tangible ROI.
The green transition is not a trend—it's an economic transformation. Companies in many fields are investing in sustainable innovation. They focus on electric fleets, biodegradable packaging, zero-waste operations, and inclusive hiring practices. If your rivals are pushing hard while you pull back, your market relevance could drop significantly. Ørsted shifted from relying on fossil fuels to becoming a top player in offshore wind. They moved faster than European energy giants who took longer to adapt.
Before making cuts, get insights from boards, investors, employees, NGOs, and community leaders. They likely have strong views on your sustainability goals. Often, stakeholders will advocate for re-prioritizing—not abandoning—ESG commitments. Transparency can protect your brand and build credibility, even in times of retrenchment. Interface, the carpet maker, teamed up with NGOs, suppliers, and customers for its sustainability plan. This likely helped maintain its brand trust during tough times.
The Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) and state-led green grants offer billions to companies investing in sustainability. Cutting ESG funding now could mean missing out on tax credits, rebates, and partnerships that offset costs and de-risk long-term investments. Have you explored every opportunity to turn sustainability into a net gain? First Solar secured over $700 million in federal tax credits from the Inflation Reduction Act for U.S. manufacturing.
Sustainability and profitability should co-exist. ESG investments boost efficiency, cut waste, and make resource use better. They also reveal new business models. Leaders who see sustainability as central to performance, not just an extra, are most likely to succeed. IKEA's focus on circular practices and renewable energy cuts waste and saves money worldwide.
Will people remember you as the company that pivoted toward the future—or as the one that retreated when pressure mounted? Leadership is not just about getting through this quarter. It's about creating a story that builds confidence, pride, and progress. The choices you make today will shape your company's legacy. This is especially true during times of climate change and economic uncertainty. Microsoft's pledge is to become carbon negative by 2030. This makes it a leader for the future, even in tough economic times.
Tariffs and inflationary pressure are forcing difficult decisions. But cutting sustainability investments will likely be a costly mistake. Business leaders need a new approach. This should balance short-term costs with long-term stakeholder value, regulatory risks, and market expectations.
Sustainability is not a corporate responsibility—it's a strategic advantage. In the current environment, reducing investments in this area may seem like a sensible decision, but it can ultimately lead to weakened supply chain relationships, investor skepticism, employee disengagement, and lost consumer trust.
The strongest and most resilient and respected companies will maintain their investments in sustainability, even when times are tough. The most resilient and respected companies in the coming decade will be those that continue to lead—not retreat—on sustainability. As tariffs increase and economic strain grows, follow this playbook to make smart choices for your company.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
a few seconds ago
Trump administration considers releasing transcripts of DOJ interview with Ghislaine Maxwell
The Trump administration is considering publicly releasing the transcripts from Ghislaine Maxwell's interview with the Justice Department last month, multiple sources familiar with the internal discussions told ABC News. Maxwell's meetings with Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche took place for nine hours over two days. There is also an audio recording of the interview, the sources said, but it's not clear whether the administration plans to release the audio to accompany any public release of the transcript. The public release of the transcripts could come as soon as this week, the sources said. Maxwell, an associate of the late sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, was convicted of sex trafficking and other charges and sentenced to 20 years in prison in 2022, which she was serving at a federal prison in Tallahassee, Florida, until her recent move to a federal prison camp in Texas. She is appealing her conviction to the U.S. Supreme Court. Following his first day of meetings with Maxwell, Blanche tweeted that "The Department of Justice will share additional information about what we learned at the appropriate time." Maxwell's attorney David Markus, following both days of meetings, said Maxwell was asked about "one hundred different people," and said "she didn't hold anything back." Markus, however, declined to be specific about who Maxwell was asked about or whether she provided information about others who committed crimes against victims. Thus far, the administration has not revealed any details from what Maxwell said. CNN first reported the administration was considering releasing the transcripts. In an interview with Newsmax last week when asked when Americans could hear about the contents of the meeting, Trump said: "I don't know, because I haven't spoken about it, but he's a very talented guy, Todd Blanche, and a very straight shooter, and I think he probably wanted to know, you know, just to get a feeling of it, because we'd like to release everything, but we don't want people to get hurt that shouldn't be hurt. And I would assume that was why he was there. I want to release everything. I just don't want people to get hurt."
Associated Press
a few seconds ago
- Associated Press
Trump narrows Fed chair candidates to four, excluding Treasury Secretary Bessent
WASHINGTON (AP) — President Donald Trump said Tuesday that he's whittled down his list of potential Federal Reserve chair candidates to four as he considers a successor to Jerome Powell — a choice that could reset the path of the U.S. economy. Asked on CNBC's 'Squawk Box' for a future replacement to Powell, Trump named Kevin Hassett, director of the National Economic Council, and Kevin Warsh, a former member of the Federal Reserve Board of Governors. 'I think Kevin and Kevin, both Kevins, are very good,' Trump said during an interview on CNBC's 'Squawk Box.' He said two other people were also under consideration, but Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent is not among them. 'I love Scott, but he wants to stay where he is,' Trump said. He did not name his other two top candidates but used the opportunity to disparage Powell, whom he has dubbed 'too late' in cutting interest rates. The news that Trump plans to make a decision on the Fed chair 'soon' comes as the Republican president has been highly critical of current Powell, whose term ends in May 2026. Trump recently floated having the Fed's board of governors take full control of the U.S. central bank from Powell, whom he has relentlessly pressured to cut short-term interest rates in ways that raise questions about whether the Fed can remain free from White House politicking. Trump has openly mused about whether to remove Powell before his tenure as chair ends, but he's held off on dismissing the Fed chair after a recent Supreme Court ruling suggested he could only do so for cause rather than out of policy disagreements. The president has put pressure on Powell by claiming he mismanaged the Fed's $2.5 billion renovation project, but he's also said that he's 'highly unlikely' to fire Powell. One of the Fed's governors, Adriana Kugler, made a surprise announcement last Friday that she would be stepping away from her role. That created an opening for Trump, who called her departure 'a pleasant surprise,' to name a new Fed governor. Trump told CNBC it's 'a possibility' that his pick to replace Kugler could also be his choice to replace Powell. Here's what to know about the two known candidates: Kevin Hassett Hassett, director of the White House National Economic Council, has been supportive of the president's agenda — from his advocacy for income tax cuts and tariffs to his support of the recent firing of BLS Commissioner Erika McEntarfer. Hassett served in the first Trump administration as chairman of the Council of Economic Advisers. He has a doctoral degree in economics from the University of Pennsylvania and worked at the right-leaning American Enterprise Institute before joining the Trump White House in 2017. As part of Hassett's farewell announcement in 2019, Trump called him a 'true friend' who did a 'great job.' Hassett became a fellow at the Hoover Institution, which is located at Stanford University. He later returned to the administration to help deal with the pandemic. On CNBC on Monday, Hassett said 'all over the U.S. government, there have been people who have been resisting Trump everywhere they can.' Kevin Warsh A former Fed governor who stepped down in 2011, Warsh is currently a fellow at the Hoover Institution. He has been supportive of cutting interest rates, a key goal of Trump's. 'The president's right to be frustrated with Jay Powell and the Federal Reserve,' Warsh said on Fox News' 'Sunday Morning Futures' last month. Warsh has been increasingly critical of Powell's Federal Reserve and in July, on CNBC, called for sweeping changes on how the Fed conducts business as well as a new Treasury-Fed accord 'like we did in 1951, after another period where we built up our nation's debt and we were stuck with a central bank that was working at cross purposes with the Treasury.' He said the Fed's 'hesitancy to cut rates, I think, is actually quite a mark against them.' 'The specter of the miss they made on inflation' after the pandemic, he said, 'it has stuck with them. So one of the reasons why the president, I think, is right to be pushing the Fed publicly is we need regime change in the conduct of policy.' 'He's very highly thought of,' Trump said in June when asked directly about Warsh. ___ Associated Press writers Josh Boak and Christopher Rugaber in Washington contributed to this report.
Forbes
a few seconds ago
- Forbes
Was This Summer's Healthy Job Market A Mirage?
This is a published version of Forbes' Careers Newsletter. Click here to subscribe and get it in your inbox every Tuesday. After two months of seemingly healthy growth in the job market, the American workforce grew slower than expected in July. Only 73,000 nonfarm jobs were created last month, a dismal showing compared to the 115,000 analysts expected, while unemployment rose slightly to 4.2%. But that's not all: The Labor Department and the Bureau of Labor Statistics—the government bodies charged with producing the monthly jobs report—revised their estimates for May and June employment down by 258,000 jobs in total. And it's not just a lack of new jobs hurting the U.S. labor market. Job cuts this year have already surpassed all of 2024, according to career services firm Challenger, Gray & Christmas. Private and public employers have eliminated 806,000 jobs in the first six months of the year, largely driven by DOGE cuts to federal agencies and grants, concerns about President Donald Trump's tariffs and yes, AI. The disappointing labor report sent waves through Wall Street and the White House. Trump went as far as firing BLS commissioner Erika McEntarfer, a Biden-era appointee, in a move that has been criticized by many, including former Trump-era BLS chief William Beach. So what does all of this mean for those still looking for a new job? It's important to recognize the industries that are still adding jobs, like health care and social assistance. But for those working outside those fields, senior contributor Caroline Castrillon recommends seeking out contract work while you broaden your skills and network for full-time opportunities. Happy reading, and hope you have a lovely week! WORK SMARTER Practical insights and advice from Forbes staff and contributors to help you succeed in your job, accelerate your career and lead smarter. AI hiring tools can overlook top talent—here's how hiring managers can make sure they're still finding the best candidates. ChatGPT is coming for Excel. What does this mean for your job? Heads up, introverts: This is how AI can help you stand out to your boss. DEEP DIVE: Should You Scrub Your Social Media Before Beginning Your Job Hunt? Between the Trump Administration declaring private accounts a red flag for foreign student visas and prospective employers using AI to seek out fake applicants, the old rules are becoming obsolete. Forbes' Fiona Riley and I spoke to university counselors, employment lawyers and startup founders to figure out what job seekers should do. For years, the advice to graduates and job seekers when it came to their social media presence was straightforward: Delete your personal accounts or at least make them private, and work on building a professional LinkedIn network. But following that advice today could hurt your job prospects. The State Department now requires international students to make their accounts public to allow a review of their 'entire online presence.' Not only is content or activity that is 'hostile' to the U.S. government or culture worthy of a red flag, but even the absence of social media accounts could be held up against a visa applicant, as it could be viewed as a possible effort to evade scrutiny of their true views. 'You're damned if you do post, damned if you don't,' one international student who requested anonymity because she fears undermining her own immigration status tells Forbes. U.S.-born students and job seekers have reason to worry, too, as a lack of a social media presence can also hurt during verification processes. Employers are increasingly dealing with an influx of fake candidates, aided by the rise of AI. The technology is now so advanced that a novice AI user can create a fake applicant profile—social media pages and all—in just 70 minutes. So it makes sense that many employers are turning to pre-screening tools that use publicly available information to verify an applicant's authenticity. So is the new advice to post or not to post? To scrub your page or to leave it as is? It's a tough balancing act, especially when your online professional presence—like your LinkedIn profile—and personal brand can be more important than your résumé. Read the full piece for more tips here. TOUCH BASE News from the world of work. Boeing defense workers are on strike for the first time since 1996 after the union rejected the company's latest contract offer. The 3,200 unionized employees walked out of Boeing's factories in St. Louis and St. Charles, Missouri and Mascoutah, Illinois, where they assemble crucial missile systems and aircrafts, including the F-15 and F/A-18. Behind athletes' multimillion dollar paydays are the agents negotiating player contracts, brand partnerships and additional deals—all for a hefty cut. Topping Forbes' ranking of the Most Powerful Sports Agents in North America for 2025 is Scott Boras, who negotiated Juan Soto's contract with the New York Mets. Boras is set to earn $244 million in player commissions on nearly $5 billion in active player contracts. Meta has reached a new high in its bid to recruit top talent for its AI lab. According to Wired, one offer to an employee at Thinking Machines Lab, the startup founded by former OpenAI CEO Mira Murati, included a billion-dollar compensation package spread over a multi-year plan. Meta, however, has denied the staggering number. A new AP poll found that fewer Americans perceive racial discrimination against Asian and Black Americans than in 2021. The poll also found that more Americans are skeptical of DEI policies and programs, which have been targeted by the Trump Administration. NUMBER TO NOTE 154,000 VIDEO Venture Capitalist's Advice To Young Workers: Slow Down QUIZ As President Trump considers a replacement for Fed Chair Jerome Powell, whose term is not up until May 2026, which current cabinet member is no longer on the shortlist? A. Vice President JD Vance B. Secretary of Commerce Howard Lutnick C. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent D. Secretary of Transportation Sean Duffy Check if you got it right here.
