Florida signs $245 million in contracts for 'Alligator Alcatraz.' Here's a look by the numbers
The amount — to be fronted by Florida taxpayers — is in line with the $450 million a year officials have estimated the facility will cost.
It's also a reminder of the public funding that DeSantis' Republican administration is spending to help carry out President Donald Trump 's mass deportation agenda.
Human rights advocates, faith leaders and environmentalists have condemned the detention center. So has Mark Morgan, a former acting director of Immigration and Customs Enforcement during Trump's first term. Morgan wrote an opinion piece published by Fox News criticizing the facility as 'built for headlines' and 'ripe for failure, mismanagement and corruption.'
Here's a look by the numbers.
More than $245 million allocated so far
A state database of government contracts shows that since Florida officials announced plans for the facility on June 19, the Executive Office of the Governor has awarded at least two dozen contracts totaling more than $245 million in taxpayer funds to build and manage the facility. It rose in a matter of days from a county-owned airstrip surrounded by swampland about 45 miles (72 kilometers) west of downtown Miami.
All the contracts were awarded under an executive order declaring an illegal immigration emergency the governor first enacted in 2023 and which he has renewed since then. The order grants the state sweeping authority to suspend 'any statute, rule or order' seen as slowing the response to the emergency, including requirements to competitively bid public contracts.
State officials say at least some of the cost will be covered by the Federal Emergency Management Agency, which is best known for responding to hurricanes and other natural disasters. But in court documents filed earlier this month, attorneys for the Department of Homeland Security stated that the federal government had yet to reimburse Florida for any of the costs. The department made clear that 'Florida is constructing and operating the facility using state funds on state lands under state emergency authority.'
The largest contract totals $78.5 million
The single largest state contract related to the facility is a $78.5 million deal with Critical Response Strategies, a Jacksonville-based consulting firm. The responsibilities covered include hiring a warden, camp managers, corrections officers and IT workers.
Other major contractor include Longview Solutions Group, which is being paid $25.6 million for site preparation, civil engineering, road construction and fence installation. Doodie Calls, a St. Petersburg-based supplier of portable toilets and shower trailers, was awarded a $22 million contract.
The firm Gothams landed a $21.1 million contract to provide IT services, access badges and wristbands for detainees, while SLSCO LTD and Garner Environmental Services were both awarded $19.7 million deals to build out the site and handle ongoing maintenance.
Corrections officers to be paid up to $11,600 a month
One of the contracts shared with The Associated Press shows Critical Response Strategies was set hire a warden for the temporary facility at $125 an hour and potentially spend more than $400,000 in overtime pay. It's not clear how long staffers can expect to work at the facility.
Corrections officers at the facility can expect to earn up to $11,600 a month, plus overtime, according to a job posting for the company on LinkedIn. The starting pay for Florida's rank-and-file corrections officers is $22 an hour or about $3,800 a month at the state's brick-and-mortar prisons, which have been so persistently understaffed that DeSantis deployed members of the Florida National Guard to work at them for more than two years.
Zero publicly available contract documents
As journalists and watchdogs have raised questions about the contracts and companies behind them, documents detailing deliverables and line-item spending have disappeared from the state's website. They've been replaced with one-page invoices that show little more than the names of the companies, how much they're charging, the dates on which each deal was signed and an address for where to send the bill.
Some multimillion dollar contracts were awarded to political donors who have given to campaigns supporting DeSantis and other Republicans.
The governor's office directed questions about the contracts to the Florida Division of Emergency Management, the state agency in charge of building the detention center. Spokesperson Stephanie Hartman said the contracts were removed because they included 'proprietary information that shouldn't have been uploaded.'
The department did not answer questions about whether the full contracts would be released.
___
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
14 minutes ago
- The Independent
FBI redacted Trump's name from Epstein files before deciding ‘no basis' to release them, report claims
Donald Trump's administration has repeatedly hailed itself as the 'most transparent' in American history. But the president's name was reportedly redacted from documents surrounding the investigation into sex offender Jeffrey Epstein as the administration prepared for their potential public release. Investigators blacked out Trump's name, and the names of other high-profile figures, claiming that the information constituted an 'unwarranted invasion of privacy,' according to Bloomberg. Attorney General Pam Bondi told the president that his name was in the files in May, The Wall Street Journal previously reported. Ultimately, in July, the Department of Justice and the FBI declined to release any additional documents. Public scrutiny of Trump's connections to Epstein and the financier's crimes and circumstances of his death have only intensified in the wake of that memo. In February, the White House handed over binders of largely publicly-available Epstein-related documents to several far-right influencers in an apparent effort to prove that the administration was listening to demands for more information on Epstein and his death. At the time, Bondi labeled the release of those documents a 'first phase' and told Fox News that more materials — including a so-called 'client list' of high-profile figures allegedly implicated in Epstein's sexual abuse of girls and women — were 'sitting on my desk right now to review.' In July, the Trump administration reversed course, finding 'no basis to revisit the disclosure of those materials' despite demands from MAGA supporters and allies for a full accounting of Epstein's death and alleged ties to a wider child trafficking conspiracy implicating powerful figures. The DOJ determined that 'no further disclosure would be appropriate or warranted.' Before releasing the binders, Bondi wrote to FBI director Kash Patel demanding to know why the agency failed to provide her with documents she requested. She then 'pressured' the FBI to deploy hundreds of employees to support staff that work on Freedom of Information Act requests to dig for records, according to a letter from Senator Dick Durbin on July 18. In March, nearly 1,000 agents were pulled from field offices for 24-hours shifts to comb through thousands of documents, including grand jury testimony, case files, and investigative notes from the FBI, according to the senator's office. They were instructed to 'flag' any records in which Trump was mentioned, according to Durbin. FBI personnel identified 'numerous references to Trump' in the documents, according to Bloomberg, citing people familiar with the matter. The names of dozens of other public figures also appeared, the outlet reported. In preparation for their potential public release, the documents were reviewed by a team of FOIA officers who applied redactions, blacking out Trump's name and the names of other high-profile people, Bloomberg reported. FOIA officers redacted the president's name arguing that he was a private citizen when federal law enforcement launched an investigation into Epstein nearly 20 years ago. Investigators reportedly relied on a FOIA exemption that limits the release of information considered 'a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy', and another that protects the release of personal information in law enforcement records, that 'could reasonably be expected to constitute an unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.' A person's appearance in the documents does not necessarily indicate wrongdoing. Bondi reportedly made Trump aware that his name appeared in the files in May. The FBI and Justice Department issued the joint statement declaring there was 'no basis' to release any other files connected to the case on July 6. On the campaign trail, Trump had promised to release FBI files related to Epstein, who died by suicide in his jail cell on August 10, 2019 while awaiting trial on sex trafficking charges. But the president, whose friendship with Epstein spanned more than a decade, has insisted that the public and press should move on from questions about the case. Epstein's death during Trump's first administration has fueled ongoing conspiracy theories of a government-wide cover up to protect powerful public figures who exploited and abused young girls. Last year, Bondi told Fox News that people named within the so-called Epstein files 'have no legal basis' to conceal their names, 'unless they're a child, a victim, or a cooperating defendant.' In January, Patel promised during his Senate confirmation hearing that 'the American public knows the full weight of what happened.' Trump, who has denied any connections to Epstein's abuses, filed a $10 billion defamation lawsuit against The Wall Street Journal, its publishers and right-wing media mogul Rupert Murdoch over an article that reported he sent a 'bawdy' birthday card message to Epstein for his 50th birthday in 2003. Meanwhile, Trump's former criminal defense attorney Todd Blanche — who is now Bondi's top deputy at the Justice Department — recently performed a two-day jailhouse interview with Epstein's accomplice Ghislaine Maxwell. Maxwell was found guilty of sex trafficking and other offenses in connection with Epstein in 2021. She is serving a 20-year sentence for what prosecutors labeled a 20-year scheme to recruit, groom and abuse young girls. On August 11, Maxwell is scheduled to sit for a deposition sought by the Republican-led House Oversight Committee. In a letter to the committee, her attorneys have asked for some immunity protections — and made another appeal to Trump for clemency.
The Independent
14 minutes ago
- The Independent
Bill comes due: Student loan borrowers are set to see spike in prices as Trump provision begins
Millions of student loan borrowers enrolled in a payment plan the Trump administration has called 'illegal' will see their bills go up starting Friday as interest accrual resumes. The nearly eight million student loan borrowers who rely on the Saving on a Valuable Education (SAVE) Plan — a repayment plan rolled out under former President Joe Biden — will start seeing interest accrue on their loans as of August 1. The repayment plan was among the generous to date, and many borrowers' monthly payments dropped by as much as half, CNBC reports. When announcing the change, the department said it 'lacks the authority to put borrowers into a zero percent interest rate status,' according to a July statement. The Biden administration rolled out the plan in 2023, but it has since faced Republican-led challenges. A court blocked parts of the plan last year, placing SAVE borrowers on a no-interest forbearance plan in the meantime. Education Secretary Linda McMahon shared a video on X on Friday explaining that the 'Trump administration will not allow the American taxpayer to take on debts that are not their own.' 'If you are a borrower enrolled in the illegal SAVE plan, please visit to learn about affordable repayment options,' she said. Now, borrowers are reacting to the change. Shelly Cornwell, a 55-year-old from Illinois, told The Wall Street Journal she has been in 'limbo' for the past year after signing up for a SAVE plan. She wasn't making payments because her loans were in forbearance, so she signed up for a different plan to make progress toward forgiveness. Now, she's worried her payments will go up and hopes she doesn't have to take on another part-time job. Jessica Ochoa, a 31-year-old from California, told the Journal that her life became more affordable after going on a SAVE plan. 'I realized, 'Oh, wow, my loans are much more manageable and affordable. I can have a kid, I can buy a house,'' Ochoa told the outlet. 'So then I did those things.' On social media, users have also shared posts reacting to the decision. 'Completely forgot interest will start accruing on my student loans tomorrow,' one user wrote. — erica (@hotfvzz) July 31, 2025 Experts say borrowers are likely better off finding new plans, CNBC reports. One of the best options at the moment is the Income-Based Repayment Plan, which caps borrowers' monthly payments according to their income, the outlet reports. Borrowers could also opt for the Repayment Assistance Plan, which will launch next year. These options are among the few income-driven plans that will be available to borrowers after Trump's sweeping tax and spending legislation phased out many similar plans, CNBC reports.
The Independent
14 minutes ago
- The Independent
Despite their public fallout, Musk continued donating millions of dollars to Trump
Elon Musk funnelled $15 million to Republican-affiliated political action committees (PACs), despite an ongoing bitter feud with Donald Trump. The contributions, made on 27 June 2025, included $5 million each to MAGA Inc., the Senate Leadership Fund, and the Congressional Leadership Fund. Musk's donations followed a period of public animosity with Donald Trump, during which he criticised a bill and made a controversial comment about the Epstein files, later apologising. Despite making these significant donations, Musk continued to threaten Republicans who voted for the bill, stating they would lose their primary elections. Musk has also proposed establishing a new 'America Party' and previously intervened in the Wisconsin supreme court race by donating to voters.
