Two-time defending champ Carlos Alcaraz needs five sets escape first round of Wimbledon
It wasn't supposed to be that tough.
'Didn't expect to play five sets against him,' Fognini said. 'I had my chance.'
Advertisement
Consider, to begin with, that the No. 2-seeded Alcaraz is 22, already a five-time Grand Slam champion, including his latest at the French Open three weeks ago, and is currently on a career-best 19-match winning streak.
Consider, too, that Fognini has never been past the third round at the All England Club in 15 appearances and reached the quarterfinals at any major tournament just once — the 2011 French Open. He entered Monday ranked 138th and 0-6 this year.
What. A. Match. 🤩
Carlos Alcaraz wins an epic duel in the sun against Fabio Fognini, 7-5, 6-7(5), 7-5, 2-6, 6-1
— Wimbledon (@Wimbledon)
Oh, and then there's this: Only twice has the reigning men's champion at Wimbledon been beaten in the first round the following year, Lleyton Hewitt in 2003 and Manuel Santana in 1967.
There were times Monday when Alcaraz appeared to be something less than his best, far from the form he displayed during
Advertisement
Alcaraz double-faulted nine times. He faced a hard-to-believe 21 break points. He made more unforced errors, 62, than winners, 52.
He chalked some of that up to jitters.
'It doesn't matter the winning streak that I have right now, that I've been playing great on grass, that I've been preparing really well,' said Alcaraz, who beat Novak Djokovic in the 2023 and 2024 finals. 'Wimbledon is different. I could feel today that I was really nervous at the beginning.'
Next for Alcaraz will be a match Wednesday against Oliver Tarvet, a 21-year-old British qualifier who plays college tennis at the University of San Diego and is ranked 733rd.
Still, Alcaraz said: 'I have to improve in the next round.'
Fognini — whose wife, 2015 US Open champion Flavia Pennetta, held one of their children in the stands — is a self-described hothead and is known for mid-match flareups, including at Wimbledon, where he was fined $3,000 in 2019 for saying during a match that he wished 'a bomb would explode at the club' and a then-record $27,500 in 2014 for a series of outbursts. He was put on a two-year probation by the Grand Slam Board in 2017 after insulting a female chair umpire at the U.S. Open and getting kicked out of that tournament.
Such behavior wasn't displayed Monday. And when Alcaraz pushed a forehand long to cede the fourth set, Fognini nodded toward his guest box, where a member of his entourage stood to snap a photo with a cellphone. Things were picture-perfect for Fognini at that moment.
Advertisement
But at the outset of the fifth — the first time the previous year's male champ was pushed that far in the first round since Roger Federer in 2010 — Alcaraz recalibrated.
When the Spaniard broke to lead 2-0 in that set with a backhand volley winner, he pointed toward the stands, threw an uppercut and screamed, 'Vamos!' In the next game, he saved a pair of break points, before the match was paused for more than 10 minutes because a spectator felt ill amid record-breaking high temperatures for Day 1 of Wimbledon.
Temperatures hit 91 degrees on Monday, the hottest opening day ever at the All England Club.
Joanna Chan/Associated Press
When they resumed, Alcaraz outplayed Fognini the rest of the way. Fognini said he cried in the locker room afterward.
While Alcaraz escaped, seven seeded men exited on Day 1, including 2021 runner-up Matteo Berrettini, No. 8 Holger Rune, No. 9 Daniil Medvedev — who also lost in the first round at the French Open — No. 16 Francisco Cerundolo, No. 20 Alexei Popyrin, No. 24 Stefanos Tsitsipas — who quit because of a persistent lower-back problem — and No. 31 Tallon Griekspoor. No. 20 Jelena Ostapenko, the 2017 French Open champ, lost, while women's winners included No. 1 Aryna Sabalenka, No. 6 Madison Keys, 2023 Wimbledon winner Marketa Vondrousova, and 2021 US Open champion Emma Raducanu.
Fifth-seeded American Taylor Fritz's match against Giovanni Mpetshi Perricard — who hit a tournament-record 153-mile-per-hour serve — was suspended after four sets on Monday night in case they wouldn't be able to finish before the tournament's 11 p.m. curfew.
How to return the fastest ever serve at The Championships, by
— Wimbledon (@Wimbledon)
They'll resume on Tuesday. Mpetshi Perricard, whose speediest serve came in the opening game, took the initial two sets 7-6 (6), 7-6 (8), before Fritz grabbed the next two 6-4, 7-6 (6).
Advertisement
The 6-foot-8-inch Mpetshi Perricard bettered the previous Wimbledon mark of 148 m.p.h., by Taylor Dent in 2010. Fritz, though, not only managed to put his return in play, but also eventually won the point.
___
Howard Fendrich has been the AP's tennis writer since 2002. Find his stories here:
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
San Francisco Chronicle
31 minutes ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Soccer ban sparks fears of widening trans exclusion in the UK
LONDON (AP) — It was not her best goal or most important soccer match, but when the ball hit the back of the net in Natalie Washington's debut on a women's team in 2017, she felt a sense of belonging that had been missing. It was long in coming: Washington had struggled to fit in on a men's team and eventually stopped playing when she decided to transition to being a woman and go through gender-affirming surgery. When she joined a women's team, she quickly felt accepted. Now, after the United Kingdom's highest court in April said that for anti-discrimination purposes the terms 'woman' and 'man' refer to biological sex, Washington's opportunity to play the sport she loves in the league she wants is in doubt. The head of the U.K's Equality and Human Rights Commission followed the ruling a day later by saying the court had provided clarity and that transgender women would be excluded from women-only spaces such as toilets, single-sex hospital wards and sports teams. The Football Association, the regulatory body for soccer in the U.K., followed up by banning transgender players from women's teams in England and Scotland, a ban that took effect at the start of June. 'It feels like things are being taken away from trans people on an almost daily basis," Washington said. 'It's another blow, another kick at a time when people are already hurting.' Beyond Britain, inclusion of trans players in sports has long been a divisive issue, with arguments primarily focused on whether it's fair to have athletes born as boys compete against girls and women. In the U.S., it has been particularly politicized, with most Republican-controlled states banning transgender athletes in girls' sports and President Donald Trump signing an executive order to prohibit participation of transgender athletes from girls' and women's sports. The U.K. court said trans people were still protected from discrimination under British law, such as in employment, housing and education, but the ruling means access to certain single-sex facilities could be curtailed. Trans rights groups condemned the decision, which is likely to have a profound effect for thousands. Out of some 66 million people in England, Scotland and Wales, about 116,000 identified as trans in the latest census count. The feminist groups who led the legal challenge cheered the ruling and others, including Prime Minister Keir Starmer, welcomed the clarity it brought. 'Everyone knows what sex is and you can't change it,' said Susan Smith, co-director of For Women Scotland, which brought the case. A difficult decision Washington, who leads the group Football v Transphobia, was one of 28 transgender women registered with the Football Association to play amateur soccer. In order to play the women's game, they had to have testosterone levels reduced to the range of biologically born females. After the ruling, the organization changed its rules, saying that although it had aimed to make soccer accessible to as many people as possible, it was always prepared to alter its policy if there were changes in the law or science. 'We understand that this will be difficult for people who simply want to play the game they love in the gender by which they identify,' the FA said, adding that it would contact transgender women currently playing to explain the changes and how they can remain involved. Some clubs have responded by finding ways around the ban. Goal Diggers FC, a women and nonbinary inclusive soccer club based in London, has withdrawn from all FA-affiliated leagues. On June 1, the day the ban took effect, Goal Diggers hosted an inclusive women's tournament in London, drawing more than 100 players in a show of solidarity. 'I'll always have a place here and I'll always be a trans woman,' said Billie Sky, a 28-year-old trans player for Goal Diggers. 'No one can take that away from me.' Other voices, other sports Groups that have campaigned to keep trans athletes from girls' and women's teams, citing a matter of safety and fairness, welcomed the move by the FA. 'The FA had ample evidence of the harms to women and girls caused by its nonsensical policy of letting men who identify as women play in women's teams,' said Fiona McAnena of Sex Matters. Groups that oversee cricket and netball, an offshoot of basketball that is played mainly by women, also limited women's competition to those who were assigned at birth as females. The England and Wales Cricket Board said transgender women and girls could continue playing in open and mixed cricket. England Netball said it would allow anyone to play in a new mixed category beginning in September. How the ruling came about The legal case involved a 2018 Scottish law requiring at least half of the seats on public boards to be held by women. Trans women with certificates recognizing their gender were to be included in meeting the quota. The court said that using the certificates to identify someone's gender clashes with the definitions of man and woman. Under the ruling, a transgender person could not claim they had been discriminated against if barred from a single-sex space. Alexander Maine, a senior lecturer at The City Law School specializing in gender, sexuality and law, said the ruling clouds the value of a document sanctioned by the U.K. Gender Recognition Act that allows them to later update their birth certificate reflecting their acquired gender. 'There may be a challenge at the European Court of Human Rights brought by trans individuals who say that there is a problem where they may be two sexes at once," Maine said. Someone could hold 'a gender recognition certificate stating that they are their acquired gender, whereas under the U.K. Equality Act, they are still recognized in their birth gender,' he said. Washington and many others say they worry the ruling may lead to more hatred aimed at trans people. 'For the first time in a long time, I felt scared about how people are going to react to me in public,' Washington said. 'I don't feel anymore that I can guarantee I have support to turn to from authorities.' Brian Melley in London contributed to this report.
New York Times
an hour ago
- New York Times
How Taylor Fritz returned a 153 mph serve at Wimbledon: ‘They slow things down in their minds'
The speed is the thing you notice. When you attend any sort of sporting event in person — as opposed to watching it on TV — it's the speed that's most astonishing. From how quickly a top-class footballer might control the ball and pass it, to the velocity of a baseball being hurled at 90mph-plus. With tennis though, it's a little different. The speed of the ball is one thing. And yes, it is astonishingly quick. But it's more the speed of the players that is striking: how quickly they react to their opponents' shots. On day one of Wimbledon 2025, Giovanni Mpetshi Perricard produced the fastest serve in Wimbledon history. He sent down a ball at 153 miles per hour (246 kilometers per hour) — and Taylor Fritz sent it straight back. How to return the fastest ever serve at The Championships, by @Taylor_Fritz97 😳👏#Wimbledon — Wimbledon (@Wimbledon) July 1, 2025 Because Mpetshi Perricard's serve was so fast, all Fritz had to do was move his body out of its way and stick a racket out to send the ball rocketing back. This is what the best returners of big serves do (even if Fritz is not always one of them.) They defuse the grenade. They absorb the pace and give it right back to the server. Advertisement But first they have to get to the ball, and that has nothing to do with their racket. That is all about anticipation. 'It seems like he knows minutes before where you are going to serve,' the Italian Lorenzo Musetti about the mind-frazzling experience of facing 24-time Grand Slam champion Novak Djokovic, one of the best returners of all time. There's a famous clip of Andy Roddick from the 2007 US Open when he's facing Roger Federer. He sends down a serve at 140mph — not his fastest, but quick enough to put a hole straight through the head of any normal person who chooses to get in the way. Federer not only returned it but returned it so well that Roddick put his next shot wide and lost the point. Roddick puffs out his cheeks as if to say: 'What am I supposed to do?'. And that's the reaction of a Grand Slam winner. Those sorts of returns look superhuman, like the players have become Neo from The Matrix and have slowed down the world, able to make things move at their own pace and create time to play the shot. Which is because that's sort of what they're doing. 'What players are constantly trying to do is slow things down in their minds,' says Craig O'Shannessy, a strategy coach for the ATP Tour who has also worked with Djokovic. 'On grass, it may seem to be going fast, but they're just slowing it down.' This isn't — you'll be amazed to learn — some sort of magical power that all tennis players are granted once they join the tour. But more the endgame of a process, careful planning and preparation. The amount of time a tennis player will have to react to an opponent's shot varies, but let's use the example of a serve that a male player could expect to face in most top-level matches, which will be anything between 115 mph to 140 mph. Split the difference and the speed gun lands at 127 mph. Advertisement Travelling the 23.77 metres of a tennis court, this would mean a serve reaches the opponent in roughly 0.4 seconds. But there is a wide range of variables: for a start, a serve is travelling diagonally and from a reasonable height, so it will be travelling further than those 23.77 metres, and that's assuming the receiving player is standing on the baseline — which many don't. Then there's the fact the ball won't actually be travelling at 127 mph for its whole journey: air resistance will slow it down, as will bouncing and the effect the bounce has depends on the surface and a few other factors. So we basically have to estimate how quickly it will reach a player, but we can probably put it at something in the region of 0.7-0.8 seconds. For reference, a blink lasts about 0.4 seconds, so it's not quite blink and you'll miss it… but maybe blink twice and you'll miss it. Either way, it's fast. So players, one way or another, have to anticipate what's coming. 'Tennis looks like a game of pinball — but in fact, it's a game of patterns,' says O'Shannessy, who as part of his coaching and research uses HawkEye to break down a court into sections and is thus able to plan out where the ball goes for most of the time. 'They're picking up on positioning of the feet, positioning of the body, balance, the angle of the racquet — they see all of these things and they use that to anticipate what's coming back. 'A lot of what the speed of what they're doing out there — if you or I were to slow a video down to 25 or 50 per cent of what it is, you would be able to predict what was coming. These players can do that in real time. Through repetition and seeing the same patterns again and again and again, you start to try to get ahead of this.' Essentially players create databases in their heads, which they then draw upon as they anticipate what will come over the net. Advertisement That isn't possible all the time. At the 2023 tournament, former world No. 1 Victoria Azarenka said that not knowing about her opponent, China's Yuan Yue, made things more difficult. 'Sometimes you have no time to anticipate and you just have to react. For example, (playing against) an opponent like today, I didn't know much about her, I've never faced her, so it's a bit more difficult to anticipate because I need to understand or learn her patterns, her technique, her ball toss for the serve etc. When you play someone you know, the anticipation comes a bit more,' she said. 'With some players, you know how they'll toss the ball a certain way, or if they do a certain thing with their racket — so if you're able to pick up those cues, you're able to read them a little bit. But with opponents you don't know, you have to do it on the go. And sometimes it's just not enough time. Sometimes you do have to guess and just have to react.' Conditions can also throw off the best-laid plans/anticipations. Fritz faced Mpetshi Perricard under the roof on No. 1 Court, which took away the variable of wind. The Frenchman thrives in those conditions, because they give his serve less variables to resist and also take away some of the deficiencies in his groundstrokes which the wind can expose. Fritz went two sets down despite winning more points, but came back to level the match at 2-2 before the Wimbledon curfew took away his momentum. 'Some players will track the ball all the way onto the strings,' says O'Shannessy. 'Others will watch 95 per cent of the way, but the last five per cent, they know what it's going to do so their eyes are already forwards. There's no right or wrong way to do this.' O'Shannessy cites Federer as an example of a player who, if you watched him very closely at his peak, would already be looking ahead as he struck the ball rather than at the ball as it hit the strings. In effect, the absolute elite players are already preparing for the next shot before they've technically completed this one (which is mind-boggling), so when we talk about the greatest players we've seen being freaks, it's not meant as an insult. The speed is the thing you notice. But to the world's best tennis players, as it turns out, it's not actually that fast.
Hamilton Spectator
an hour ago
- Hamilton Spectator
Yes, Wimbledon can be serious about getting rid of line judges and switching to electronic calls
LONDON (AP) — John McEnroe — he of 'You cannot be serious!' call-arguing fame — is quite all right with Wimbledon's latest of many steps into the modern era, choosing technology over the human touch to decide whether a ball lands in or out. There were no line judges at the All England Club's matches for Monday's start of the oldest Grand Slam tournament, with rulings instead being made by an electronic system that uses recorded voices to announce when a shot lands astray. 'In some ways, the players, and even the fans, miss that interaction, but at the same time ... if it's accurate, I think it's great, because then at least you know that you're getting the right call,' said McEnroe, who won Wimbledon three times during his Hall of Fame career and is a TV analyst at this year's event for ESPN and the BBC. 'My hair,' the 66-year-old McEnroe joked , 'wouldn't be quite as white as it is now.' Wimbledon joins most top tennis tournaments with electronic line calls The new system puts Wimbledon in line with nearly ever other top-tier tennis event on all surfaces — although the French Open, played on red clay, remains an exception , sticking with judges — and Monday's debut seemed to be mostly seamless, as far as players were concerned. Indeed, Frances Tiafoe, an American seeded 12th, didn't even notice there were no line judges at his first-round victory. What he did notice, and chuckled about afterward, was when the chair umpire wasn't even paying all that much attention at one point, grabbing the phone on his stand to place a call and request that more towels be brought to the court on the hottest Day 1 in tournament history . 'It takes him completely out of play,' Tiafoe said about the on-court official, 'other than just calling the score and calling time violations.' Players like that Wimbledon's removal of line judges removes doubt, too No. 1-ranked Aryna Sabalenka liked that the All England Club's switch to electronic line-calling eliminated the need for her to question whether she should contest a ruling. From 2007 until last year, players were allowed to ask for a video replay to check whether a decision was correct. 'If you have line umpires, you (are) always thinking, like, 'Should I challenge or shouldn't I?'' she said. 'It's a lot of doubt in your head.' Cam Norrie was pleased that there no longer is a reason to get angry about what's perceived as a wrong decision, the way McEnroe — and plenty of others through the years — used to. 'To be honest, it's good. You get on with it. There's no kind of getting mad at anyone for missing a call or saying something or moving during the point or something happening,' said Norrie, a British player who won Monday. 'It's pretty black-or-white with the calls. In, out, and you hear it. There's no mistake.' Not everything is favorable in his view, though. The familiar scene of officials sitting or standing around the court 'looks cool,' Norrie said. Plus, he noted the loss of work for some of the 275 line judges the tournament used in the past (80 were brought back as 'match assistants' to help chair umpires from behind the scenes). 'The decision we've made there, I suppose, is very much about the way in which Wimbledon has always balanced heritage and tradition with innovation and how we walk that line. We're always very conscious of that. ... For us, it was time to make that change,' All England Club CEO Sally Bolton said. 'It's not a money-saving exercise. It's about evolving the tournament and making sure that we're providing the most effective possible line-calling.' At Wimbledon, 'You cannot complain against the machine' Frenchman Adrian Mannarino liked having what he called 'a machine' involved Monday, saying: 'You cannot complain against the machine.' 'When you feel like someone is judging the ball and ... is probably not seeing so well, and maybe not even concentrating, it's pretty annoying,' Mannarino said. 'But the fact that it's a robot calling the balls, there's nothing to complain about.' He did caution that it wasn't always easy to figure out which recorded announcements were for his win at Court 5, because it's wedged amid other courts. Sometimes he thought an 'Out!' call at an adjacent match was for his. 'It can be a little tricky with this,' Mannarino said, 'but overall, I think it's a good thing.' ___ AP tennis:
