
Schools to teach anti-misogyny lessons in bid to tackle ‘manosphere'
It also stresses the need to avoid 'stigmatising boys for being boys'.
As well as lessons on so-called incel (involuntary celibate) culture, secondary schools will be required to provide young people with greater awareness of AI, deepfakes and links between pornography and misogyny.
The guidance comes as the Department for Education (DfE) warned that misogynistic attitudes had reached 'epidemic scale' among young people, with 54% of those aged 11-19 saying they had witnessed misogynist comments.
Education Secretary Bridget Phillipson said: 'Before I was elected to Parliament, I managed a refuge for women and children fleeing domestic violence, so I have seen first-hand the devastating impact when we don't foster healthy attitudes from the youngest age.
'I want our children to be equipped to defy the malign forces that exist online. Schools and parents alike have a vital role to play, helping children identify positive role models and resist the manipulation too often used online to groom impressionable young minds.'
In its manifesto last year, Labour pledged to halve the rate of violence against women and girls in 10 years.
And earlier in 2025, Sir Keir Starmer praised the Netflix drama Adolescence for highlighting how misogyny had 'taken on a different form' and said he wanted a discussion on what could be done to stop young boys 'being dragged into this whirlpool of hatred and misogyny'.
Margaret Mulholland, of the Association of School and College Leaders, welcomed the new guidance and its focus on finding positive male role models for boys, saying it was 'important that we don't simply tell boys what is wrong'.
The previous Conservative government proposed changing the guidance on RSHE in May last year, with then-prime minister Rishi Sunak expressing concern children were being exposed to 'inappropriate' content.
The draft guidance, which was open to a nine-week consultation, proposed clear age limits on the teaching of certain topics to ensure children were not 'exposed to too much too soon'.
It said sex education should be taught no earlier than Year 5, when pupils are aged nine to 10, and that what is described as the 'contested topic of gender identity' should not be taught at all.
The proposed guidance said schools should 'at minimum' show parents a representative sample of teaching resources they plan to use and that schools 'should respond positively to requests from parents to see material that has not already been shared'.
While Tuesday's revised guidance includes the requirement to provide parents with teaching materials, the new Government has scrapped the proposal to prescribe specific ages at which individual topics are taught.
The DfE said there would be a 'strong new emphasis on age-appropriate' teaching, and a 'clear dividing line' between primary and secondary school.
But the guidance would allow teachers to 'sensitively respond to topics that children might have seen online or heard from their friends', with research suggesting 22% of primary school-aged girls had seen 'rude images online'.
Tuesday's guidance also includes requirements on helping children with their mental health, including working with mental health professionals to discuss suicide prevention 'in an age-appropriate way'.
Children will be taught the importance of 'grit and resilience' in order to help them 'feel able to take on challenges and risks'.
Andy Airey, Mike Palmer and Tim Owen – who founded suicide prevention charity 3 Dads Walking in memory of their daughters – said: 'Giving schools permission to talk about suicide prevention means more young people can be supported to open up about difficult feelings and know where to find help.
'We know, from painful personal experience, how much this matters. This change will save lives.'
Schools will be able to implement the guidance from September this year, and must follow it from September 2026.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


North Wales Chronicle
an hour ago
- North Wales Chronicle
Shadow minister hits back at claims she was in ‘hiding' when with her baby
Shadow energy secretary Claire Coutinho said Ed Miliband should reconsider his remarks, claiming it is an attitude faced by many new mothers when they return to work. Mr Miliband had pointed out the Conservative shadow minister's absence on Monday as he gave a statement to the Commons on climate and nature. He said: 'The trouble is we're in a situation now where the shadow secretary of state goes into hiding when there's a statement about the climate crisis, because it's just too embarrassing to try and articulate the opposition's position.' This was followed by energy minister Kerry McCarthy, who also remarked on her prior absence during energy questions on Tuesday. Ms Coutinho had asked her why the Government is 'offshoring' British industries, and replacing them with dirtier imports with higher emissions. Ms McCarthy replied: 'Perhaps if (she) had been here yesterday, she'd have been able to engage with the Secretary of State about that then.' Ms Coutinho later told MPs she had been missing from the Commons as she was looking after her son Rafael. The MP for East Surrey has recently returned to the Commons from maternity leave. Maternity leave for ministers and paid opposition figures, normally shadow secretaries of state, was introduced by the Conservative government in 2021. It entitles them to six months of maternity leave. She upbraided Mr Miliband as she began her questions to him. She said: 'I will just briefly say that yesterday the Secretary of State said I was hiding, when I was in fact with my six-month old baby who I know he's aware of. 'So, on behalf of all young mums who face these kinds of comments from their first few weeks back to work, can I gently suggest that he reflects on his remarks?' Mr Miliband apologised, telling her: 'I completely respect her decision to be with her young baby, and there was no offence intended. I think it's very, very important that we understand the needs of new parents and indeed parents across the country.' Ms Coutinho went on to ask the Government why it is now paying £82 per megawatt hour for offshore wind, up from £72 last year. 'That's the price he's paid for offshore wind, and he's set to do the same this year. And that's before the extra cost for grid for wasted wind and backup which are going through the roof thanks to his policies,' she said. 'Yesterday he admitted to radical honesty, will he either admit that he can't add up or that his policies can't bring down bills?' Mr Miliband said: 'She is gambling on fossil fuels, the same thing she did which led us to the worst cost-of-living crisis in our country's history. 'Family finances wrecked, business finances wrecked and public finances wrecked. The only way to bring down bills for good is cheap, home-grown power that we can control. We have an energy security plan, they have an energy surrender plan.'


Daily Mirror
an hour ago
- Daily Mirror
Man wrongly jailed for 17 years sparks compensation row as lawyer hits out
Ministers have announced that victims of justice who are wrongly imprisoned for 10 years or more in England and Wales could get up to £1.3million in compensation Andrew Malkinson's lawyer has said plans to increase an 'arbitrary' cap on compensation for victims of miscarriages of justice 'does not go nearly far enough'. Ministers have announced that victims of justice who are wrongly jailed for 10 years or more in England and Wales could get up to £1.3million in compensation. It is a 30% uplift from the current £1m cap, which has not been changed since 2008. The current £500,000 maximum amount of compensation payable to those who are wrongly jailed for up to 10 years will also be increased by 30% to £650,000. It follows calls from Malkinson, who served 17 years in prison for a rape he did not commit, to reform the compensation scheme. But Toby Wilton, a solicitor representing the 59-year-old, warned the 30% increase 'does not come close to addressing this unfairness'. He said: 'While this proposal is welcome, it does not go nearly far enough. The current maximum cap on compensation of £1m was introduced in 2008. Before that, compensation was not capped at all and applicants received compensation broadly in line with what they would receive in a Court of law. 'The government should return to this system, removing the arbitrary cap which unfairly penalises those who like Andrew Malkinson have suffered the longest lasting and most serious miscarriages of justice. "A 30% increase in the cap, whilst welcome, does not come close to addressing this unfairness. The Government and Parliament should think again.' He said the courts use RPI inflation to uprate compensation amounts, which if applied here, would mean £1m in 2008 would be closer to £2m today. Mr Malkinson's conviction was overturned in 2023 after an almost 20-year fight for justice for years. But he did not receive his first compensation payment until earlier this year, following a year and a half of struggling to get by on benefits. In February, Mr Malkinson described the compensation scheme as not "fit for purpose". "The ridiculous 2008 compensation cap which hasn't increased with inflation should be lifted, and people should automatically be accepted on to the scheme if their convictions are quashed," he said. Justice Secretary Shabana Mahmood said: 'Fairness is the ideal that underpins our justice system. Where it has failed to meet that ideal, victims of devastating miscarriages of justice must be able to rebuild their lives. T "his uplift will ensure victims are compensated for the crimes they did not commit and the years they cannot get back.' Malkinson, 59, had his conviction squashed in 2023 by the country's Court of Appeal after DNA evidence linked another suspect to the crime. He was working as a security guard in Salford when he was wrongly convicted in 2004 of an attack on a 33-year-old woman after she had picked him out form a police line-up.


The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
John Healey issues apology over data breach that put 100,000 Afghans at risk
Defence Secretary John Healey issued a sincere apology for a data breach that endangered nearly 100,000 Afghans. The breach involved a leaked spreadsheet containing details of 25,000 Afghan asylum applicants, MPs, and senior military officers. The sensitive information was mistakenly sent out in February 2022, putting lives at risk from the Taliban. Speaking in Parliament on Tuesday 15 July 2025, Mr Healey acknowledged the serious incident occurred under the previous government. Watch the video in full above.