NI ag minister receives death threat
Northern Ireland's Minister for Agriculture, Enterprise and Rural Affairs, Andrew Muir has received a death threat, that has been reported to the Police Service Northern Ireland (PSNI).
Minister Muir said that a comment was posted during a Zoom call he was attending, which threatened to 'have (the minister) shot'.
The PSNI said it has received reports of threats, and has launched an investigation.
Minister Muir said: 'I'm disappointed to see some of the online comments posted in recent times, both in terms of myself and also officials.
'This does not reflect the vast majority of people in farming, I have been welcomed into many farmers' homes and I'm grateful for the warm and respectful welcome since I took up ministerial office.'
The minister also believes it is important to 'lower the tone' in wider public discourse on the draft Nutrients Action Programme (NAP) proposals.
He said: 'This is a public consultation – there's no need to issue death threats against me, nor make discriminatory comments about anyone.
'We have a critical challenge in terms of improving water quality in Lough Neagh, and also giving financial stability and certainty for farming here.
'That will not change via death threats or anything else. I have a job to do for the people of Northern Ireland and I will continue to do that,' the minister added.
Minister Andrew Muir
The deputy leader of the Alliance Party, Eóin Tennyson has described the death threat as 'deplorable and unacceptable'.
Tennyson said: 'I am proud of the leadership Andrew has offered on Lough Neagh and the protection of our environment. Whilst there must always be space for honest, open and robust political debate; there can be no place for intimidation or threat of violence.
'Threats against any politician are an attack on the democratic process.'
The chief superintendent of the PSNI, Stephen Murray said that the PSNI will do all it can to ensure that politicians are supported, and that they can undertake their role 'free from fear and intimidation'.
Murray said: 'It is totally unacceptable that anyone should face abuse or threats simply for carrying out the duties of their office. We will thoroughly investigate any such incident.
'We regularly engage with our elected representatives in order to provide information on personal safety, how the police service can support them and, crucially, when to report an incident to police.'
'We regularly engage with assembly and parliamentary officials, and the electoral commission, in regard to elected representative safety,' Murray added.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Times
9 hours ago
- Irish Times
Farm incomes are up but EU subsidies are likely to fall, along with beef farming
While last year was good for Irish farmers, with income up 36 per cent on the difficult year of 2023, there are clouds on the horizon. Over a third of farm income comes from European Union subsidies. The current structure of the EU Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) runs out in 2027 and, given the demands on the EU Budget, the next CAP will likely be less generous than today's. Preparing for a reduced subsidy regime in the future, and the need to make major changes to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, poses difficult challenges for farmers. When Ireland joined the EU (then the European Economic Community) in 1973 there was an immediate huge boost for farmers, raising their income overnight by a quarter. Substantial subsidies from Brussels, combined with access to the higher prices available in the Common Market, transformed living standards in rural Ireland. READ MORE Today, access to the EU market for Irish agricultural produce remains a huge plus, but as EU prices are generally close to those on world markets, this is less important for farming than it was in 1973. However, the subsidy regime under the CAP remains vital. [ Ireland needs multi-functional farms with biodiversity benefits. But how can they be supported? Opens in new window ] As shown in Teagasc's report last week, there is considerable diversity in incomes across the farming community. In 2024, dairy farms made an average of around €108,000, or about €80,000 excluding the EU subsidies. With an average of two people working per farm, this amounted to an income of around €54,000 per person, somewhat higher than average incomes in the non-farm sector. Dairy farms account for less than 20 per cent of all farms. For the rest of the agriculture sector, the income situation is much less satisfactory. Agriculture accounts for 35 per cent of Irish greenhouse gas emissions. Policy should not be about farmers giving up, it should be about finding better ways to use their skills and their land sustainably In 2024, the income from rearing beef cattle averaged under €14,000 and, given that EU subsidies averaged €18,000, it's clear that beef farming is fundamentally loss-making. The average age of beef farmers was over 60, and given the tiny returns from cattle, most had either off-farm jobs or were pensioners. Similarly, sheep farming did not pay its way before subsidies. Tillage farming barely earned a return above the subsidy – EU subsidies accounted for €32,000 of the average €39,000 earned by tillage farmers. [ EU commissioner says young farmers should get more CAP subsidies Opens in new window ] In 1980, three-quarters of the EU budget went on farm support, but since then the share has been whittled back. The CAP now accounts for a quarter of that budget. Over the next two years the EU will determine its medium-term budget for 2028 onwards. Faced with so many other demands, not least for security, the allocation to agriculture is likely to fall. The extensive support for Irish farmers from Brussels substantially offsets the State's contribution to the EU budget. Although Ireland is one of the richest countries in the EU, its net contribution to the EU budget is limited. This leaves Ireland in a weak position to argue that CAP measures that favour us should continue to get major funding. So subsidies will be lower. [ Hedgerows are a shining example of nature benefiting from human intervention Opens in new window ] Future EU farming policy is also likely to have a strong focus on climate measures. Agriculture accounts for 35 per cent of Irish greenhouse gas emissions. Policy should not be about farmers giving up, it should be about finding better ways to use their skills and their land sustainably. Beef farming is likely to fall over the next decade, with fewer subsidies to keep it afloat. That will leave some room for increased milk production, which is very profitable. Given how labour-intensive dairying is, with twice-daily milking, that won't suit most part-time or older farmers. Other productive alternatives to beef rearing need to be identified. Agri- forestry could be very profitable – Ireland has an excellent climate for growing trees. It would also capture carbon, helping with our climate targets, as well as providing an important future resource of timber. However, the current red tape and regulation around establishing forestry make this impossible to deliver. No other crop is subject to the onerous licensing system around planting, thinning and harvesting. Fertiliser use is responsible for major emissions of long-lived greenhouse gases. A drop in farming's emissions was achieved as a side effect of the rise in gas prices, and consequently of the cost of fertiliser, following the invasion of Ukraine. When fertiliser prices rose 50 per cent between 2021 and 2023, Ireland's use dropped by 30 per cent. In this vein, rising charges for emissions, or an emissions trading system, may also be part of the future farming environment. Emissions pricing is not an alternative to developing more appropriate land uses, rather it should complement a strategic change in how we use land, and a focus on sustainable farming activities.
Irish Times
2 days ago
- Irish Times
Omagh bombing inquiry: bereaved families' long-standing quest for truth collides with reality
For those bereaved and injured in the August 1998 Omagh bombing , the inquiry into the atrocity brought hope that, finally, they might get answers. Could the UK authorities have prevented the bombing by Real IRA dissidents that killed 29 people including a woman who was pregnant with twins on a sunny Saturday afternoon? This week, that hope collided with reality. Over two days of opening statements, the inquiry heard from the UK government and Police Service of Northern Ireland (PSNI) on the logistical challenges they faced in providing documents and exhibits to the inquiry. READ MORE The slow pace of disclosure has led to an 'unfortunate' gap of nine months, as lawyer to the inquiry, Paul Greaney KC, put it; the inquiry cannot now begin considering the bombing itself until March 2026, almost two years after it opened. Michael Mansfield KC, representing the family of one of the victims, 57-year-old mother of three Libby Rush, cut to the chase. 'It cannot be said that government departments were not on notice,' he said. 'Once this happened on the 15th August, 1998, are we to imagine that state authorities didn't immediately have meetings ... which should have ensured the preservation [of materials] – not 'Oh, we only got notice yesterday'.' In fairness, the task facing them is not inconsiderable. The PSNI has so far made ready 26,000 documents and 2,000 exhibits and reassigned staff. This is a body that is so pushed for resources that earlier this month 24 police officers were reallocated from tackling domestic violence and sexual abuse to deal with public disorder. [ The stories of the Omagh bomb victims Opens in new window ] Both its barrister and that representing the UK government repeatedly stressed their commitment to assisting the inquiry. None of their explanations, Philip Henry KC said for the PSNI, were an excuse but rather 'a candid explanation of what is involved, so that expectations are realistic'. Yet the difficulties continued. It emerged that a document said to be missing, then destroyed, was subsequently found. The inquiry chairman, Lord Turnbull, echoed families' concerns 'over statements made by state bodies about apparent inability to locate relevant documents' and warned any such assertions would be subject to 'the most rigorous scrutiny'. Lord Turnbull. Photograph: Northern Ireland Office/PA Wire There were concerns, too, around sensitive material and how this will be approached, particularly given the relevance of intelligence, including warnings said to have been passed on by an alleged British agent, to the answers the inquiry is seeking. Last month it emerged a 'considerable body of material' had not been shared with the inquiry because of applications by the UK government and the PSNI to redact information. This, said barrister Stephen Toal KC, representing the families of five of those killed, 'speaks to a defensive instinct, not a transparent one.' Just ask the family of Seán Brown. The GAA official was abducted and murdered by loyalists in Bellaghy, Co Derry, in 1997, the year before the Omagh bombing. The UK government is currently challenging a court ruling that it must hold a public inquiry into his killing. That the Omagh investigation is happening at all is the result of decades of campaigns and courtroom battles, not least by Michael Gallagher, whose 21-year-old son, Aiden, was among the victims. He brought the judicial review which resulted in the High Court judgment ordering the UK government to set up the inquiry. [ Omagh inquiry: Father of victim describes toll taken by years of campaigning for justice Opens in new window ] That same judge also recommended a similar inquiry south of the Border. The Irish Government was repeatedly criticised this week for failing to do so, though Lord Turnbull said he took the repeated assurances he had received about Dublin's commitment to assisting the inquiry 'in good faith'. Alan Kane KC quoted the future taoiseach Enda Kenny in the Dáil in 2004: 'You will get your truth, and so will Ireland.' 'Talk is cheap,' said Toal of both governments. 'They make warm statements about solidarity, but these families have learned to measure words against deeds.' As Lord Turnbull observed, some of those listening to the proceedings 'may have been thinking to themselves that if the various secretaries of state and other ministers involved had not so staunchly set their face against a public inquiry over the very many years and very many times that such requests were made, the problems now being grappled with would not be so acute.' Yet, he said: 'We are where we are.' Where we are is that the legacy of the North's Troubles still has not been dealt with, and the Omagh inquiry goes to the heart of one of its enduring tensions, the interests of national security versus the rights of individuals to life, to justice and to truth. The bereaved and injured have already suffered through decades of delay, obstruction and denial, broken promises, frustration heaped on devastation, and it is clear this inquiry will be a lengthy and complex one. States will always seek to protect their secrets, but a way must be found to balance these interests with the 'moral imperative', as one family barrister put it, to provide the answers which have been so desperately sought by so many, for so long. This is the reality; ultimately the hope, said Michael Mansfield, representing the Rush family, is that 'this public inquiry represents the beginning of the end of the story of the Omagh bombing'.
The Journal
3 days ago
- The Journal
Ballymena to host first ever Pride Parade weeks after headline grabbing riots
THE ORGANISER OF the first ever Pride Parade in Ballymena has said he never considered cancelling the event, despite wide-scale rioting in the Co Antrim town earlier this month. Ballymena made headlines around the world after three nights of rioting earlier this month in which over 40 PSNI officers were injured. PSNI said the rioting erupted after a vigil to protest the alleged sexual assault in the town was 'hijacked' by 'racist thuggery'. Curtis Lee, the organiser of the first ever Pride Parade in Ballymena which will take place tomorrow, told The Journal: 'The committee's opinion was that, no matter what, we're going ahead with this because to cancel would be to give into fear. 'The theme of our event is 'love over fear' so to give into fear would have went against everything that Pride stands for.' He added that it 'didn't make any sense to us to cancel it because of the actions of a few individuals' and said that 'a lot of the people that caused damage were actually bused in to Ballymena'. During a visit to Ballymena by The Journal in the aftermath of the rioting, a member of a 'local regeneration group' remarked that there were 'definitely elements of the protest on Monday night that weren't local'. Lee told The Journal that while 'there is definitely racism in the town, to tarnish the whole town with the same brush is unfair'. He added that 'Pride will exist here to present an alternative vision of Ballymena'. Advertisement There will, however, be protests tomorrow from four evangelical Christian groups and Lee said this was something they expected would happen. 'Ballymena is the birthplace of Ian Paisley so it was always to be expected that there was going to be counter protests.' One of the four groups protesting is United Christian Witness, and the other three are local church groups. Lee said he is 'disappointed but not surprised' by the planned protests. Meanwhile, in one social media thread on the upcoming parade, someone commented that as a gay person, they 'couldn't wait to leave Ballymena'. 'I never thought I'd see the day there would be a Pride event there,' they added. Lee said that messages like these are 'the entire reason of why we're doing this'. 'Just that one day of visibility in the town can be life saving,' said Lee. 'I've had messages from parents of young people fearful for child's safety and who struggle with their mental health and they're excluded. 'To give a platform to make them feel welcome and to be seen is so important.' Lee added that he has spoke to many older people who said they never could have imagined that a Pride Parade could take place in Ballymena. Related Reads 'Bricks instead of beer': Stark images from NI photographer tell story of the Ballymena riots I went to talk to people in Ballymena, and was told to make myself 'scarce' or there'd be trouble 'Racist thuggery': How a peaceful vigil in Ballymena turned into anti-immigration violence 'As much as Pride has taken off around the world,' said Lee, 'I think there was always the expectation of, 'oh, that'll never happen here'.' But while there have been many messages of support, Lee acknowledged that some of the responses have taken him by 'surprise' and have been 'incredibly toxic'. Lee said he has been informed of an individual who is 'putting leaflets into local shops and businesses, asking them not to support Pride'. 'He's telling them that if they support pride, he will encourage local Christians to boycott their business.' Lee said many local business owners 'have been fearful of publicly supporting what we're doing'. 'We would never judge any business, because there is some uncertainty of what the response will be and things could escalate, especially after the riots,' said Lee. 'I would never expect any business to put themselves at risk. 'As much as I would like every business in the town to have rainbow flags, I can't expect everyone to scream from the rooftops about it. 'I hope we can get to that place down the line, but with this being our first parade, we expected this.' Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone... A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article. Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation. Learn More Support The Journal
