Calls for more funding to save Somerset youth clubs
"It's really important that young people have somewhere to go, somewhere that is affordable, somewhere that they can meet their friends, somewhere that they are safe, somewhere where they have got someone to talk to," Ms Nerton said."The government needs to actually look at the behaviour of young people out there."Have they noticed an increase in anti-social behaviour since they shut all the youth clubs? Have they noticed that there is a lot of problem with young people's mobile phones, a lot of young people don't like going to school?"They have taken away a service young people used to trust."
Ms Nerton's comments come as Chard Youth Club prepares to close after 70 years because of a lack of funds.Serena Wootton, a trustee of the Chard Area Youth Committee, said she is "devastated" by the decision, but ultimately the building and insurance had become too expensive.The centre, which was attended by about 270 young people across the week, will close its doors on Friday."We could see year on year it was getting more and more challenging to stay open and this (closure) felt like the only option for us," she said.
A recent report by the YMCA found that nationally there has been a 73% drop in funding for youth services across England – a cut of £1.2bn.It has left some estates and villages across the county without a place for young people to go.Mum-of-seven Tasha Reid said she is concerned that a lack of things for young people to do in Priorswood, Taunton, is fuelling anti-social behaviour (ASB)."There are a lot of children, some as young as 10, running around with knives, sometimes terrorising the local neighbourhood," she said.Avon and Somerset Police said while it has seen an increase in anti-social behaviour in young groups within Somerset generally, possession of weapons offences remain average, with no increase for Priorswood specifically.Insp Joe Piscina, of the Somerset West neighbourhood policing team, added: "We continue to target youths causing ASB within the area and as a force we target knife crime both through enforcement and through early intervention and engagement."He said the force is actively using social media, beat surgeries and school talks to engage with the community.But Ms Reid said more needs to be done. She is now trying to set up her own youth club, but said it is much harder than she thought."There is a lot of funding that needs to be gained, lots of training that you need," she said."It has not been easy at all and knowing where to go to get that help has been quite hard."
One of those also trying to help is Craig Lloyd, who has spent 30 years working in youth services in Somerset.He was made redundant when council youth cuts were made 10 years ago and has since set up his own community interest company called Youth Unlimited.It runs six youth clubs, including one at the Recreation Centre in Bridgwater, which is funded by the town council.But he said the sector is "fragmented" and provision is dependent on whether town and parish councils or private individuals have stepped in with funding or practical help."We've got a lot of people in small communities really trying to do their best and the difficulty they have is they are working in isolation," he added.
In a statement the government said that over the next year it is investing £145m into youth programmes across the country adding: "As part of our Plan for Change we have carried out the biggest listening exercise with young people in a generation."It added that local authorities have a "statutory duty to secure sufficient leisure-time activities and facilities in line with local needs".But Somerset Council said it receives "no national funding" for youth clubs."Due to national challenges, all Somerset services are under pressure and the council continues to work with partners and local organisations to seek innovative solutions," it said."We are very encouraged by the energy and ambition within communities to work with us in this area to improve access and provision."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
29 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Free speech under threat as Britons believe they can no longer speak their mind
Free speech is under threat because Britons feel they cannot speak out for fear of offending others over race, religion and immigration, a study has found. Nearly half of those polled (49 per cent) believe people are too easily offended, particularly if they speak out on race and immigration issues, according to research for the Commission for Countering Extremism, which advises the Government. The more outspoken people's views, the more likely they were to feel constrained by the risk of offending others. Older, white males without a university education are among the groups who feel the most restricted. The study, based on interviews with 2,500 people, was conducted by Ipsos to establish the state of free speech in Britain. It follows controversies such as the 2021 protests against a teacher in Batley, West Yorkshire, who received death threats and went into hiding after showing pupils a cartoon of the Prophet Mohammed from Charlie Hebdo, the French satirical magazine, during a religious studies lesson. Similar concerns over the right to freedom of expression and protest have been raised in the aftermath of the Oct 7 Hamas terror attack on Israel and the ensuing Gaza conflict. More than a third (36 per cent) felt they had to hold back on expressing their views on race or ethnicity, while 32 per cent said they did not feel they could freely speak out on immigration or religious extremism. On asylum and Gaza, 31 per cent felt constrained, rising to 41 per cent for transgender issues. Groups that were predominantly white, male, older and non-graduate were more strongly in favour of free speech, regardless of the issue, but aat the same time felt more constrained in their ability to freely share their views about most topics. Nearly half of this group (48 per cent) said they felt they had to restrain their comments on race, far higher than the average of 36 per cent. The same was true on immigration, where 43 per cent felt they had to hold back on their views compared to an overall average among the public of 32 per cent who felt constrained. Christians were more likely to back the right to free speech, but also more likely than average to feel they had to hold back on expressing their views. Conversely, women, younger Britons and people from ethnic minorities or non-Christian religions tended to think that people needed to be more sensitive in the way they spoke. Just under a third (29 per cent) of all those polled agreed that people needed to be more sensitive. But this rose to 34 per cent amongst women, 45 per cent from ethnic minorities and 45 per cent for non-Christians. By contrast, men, people aged over 65 and those from white ethnicities and Christians were more likely to think that people are too easily offended. While on average 49 per cent felt people were too easily offended, this rose to 56 per cent of men, 54 per cent of those from a white ethnicity and 59 per cent for Christians. These were nearly double the rates for people from ethnic minorities and non-Christians. Race and ethnicity was the only topic overall where the balance of opinion was more towards avoiding offence rather than speaking freely (by 42 per cent to 34 per cent), according to the research. People predominantly held back from expressing their views to avoid causing offence or starting an argument. Forty-six per cent resisted expressing their views on any religious figure, text or teaching and just 35 per cent held back their political views to avoid causing offence. Some said they held back because of heightened concerns about their safety. For religious topics, 25 per cent said they restrained themselves because of safety fears, and 17 per cent over political views. The report said there was a group of people for whom free speech was a significant issue. They represented about 37 per cent of the total sample and were described by researchers as those who were most concerned about the pace of change. But they were also the group most likely to express 'heightened concerns' about their ability to speak freely about race, immigration, asylum and religious extremism. Robert Jenrick, the shadow justice secretary, said: 'The Left's determination to shut down debate around immigration has created a chilling environment for free speech. In this context, a catch-all definition of Islamophobia would be a disaster, worsening the culture of fear that has spread throughout society.'
BBC News
31 minutes ago
- BBC News
Birmingham Sikh charity leader recognised for selfless service
The leader of a Birmingham-based Sikh charity has been recognised for his dedication to selfless service at an event in Sahib, Professor Mohinder Singh, spiritual leader of Guru Nanak Nishkam Sewak Jatha and chairman of the Nishkam Group of Charitable Organisations, has helped a variety of sectors grow across the UK and around the Sahib Ji was presented with the award "In recognition of his lifelong selfless service to the community" by British Sikh parliamentarians on Monday night. Rooted in Sikh principles, the charity has focused on interfaith dialogue and transformative community work in education, healthcare, heritage, and global humanitarian aid. Labour MP Jas Athwal called Bhai Sahib Ji a "true embodiment of humility, leadership and service".Speaking in Parliament, Bhai Sahib Ji said: "I am greatly overwhelmed and embarrassed to take any credit for what I have managed to do in my life."As Sikhs, we are lovingly advised to adopt the following strategy for spiritual and worldly success."Pray, work, share. To serve selflessly, sing, listen to and absorb divine praise."In a way we become what we serve. To serve the creator through serving creation is the path to living in God's image when done in tandem with prayer and devotion." Volunteers spoke of Bhai Sahib Ji's service, namely the creation of the peace charter for forgiveness and reconciliation in 2019, which promotes clemency as a way to pave the way for global peace.A trustee of the charity said: "We are celebrating 30 years, but it is not 30 years; it is a lifelong dedication."And added that "the whole foundation is built around humility".The Sikh charity has its headquarters in Birmingham and operates in cities across the UK, in India and in Handsworth, West Midlands, the charity helped regenerate 13 acres of inner-city launch of Zero Hunger and Nishkam SWAT (Sikh Welfare and Awareness Team) has fed thousands and is continuing to do Sahib Ji is the first Sikh to be awarded a Papal Knighthood of St Gregory the Great, which is usually reserved for Catholics, honouring his interfaith work.A volunteer described him as a reminder to "uplift and to unite", while he inspires others to "live truer and serve" through honouring the legacy of the Sikh Gurus.
The Independent
37 minutes ago
- The Independent
Housebuilders' £100m offer after probe ‘definitely looks dodgy', Parliament told
An agreement by seven housebuilders to pay a record £100 million to help fund affordable new homes after an investigation into concerns they shared commercially sensitive information 'definitely looks dodgy', Parliament has been told. Critics at Westminster suggested the developers made the offer to halt the investigation by the Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) 'into potentially illegal collusion … that could have inflated house prices'. They argued the Government should insist on the watchdog completing its probe. Assurances were also sought that the housebuilders at the centre of the inquiry would not be involved in building the affordable homes funded by the payout, which would see the firms 'simply get their money back'. The CMA announced last week that Barratt Redrow, Bellway, Berkeley Group, Bloor Homes, Persimmon, Taylor Wimpey and Vistry had offered the payment as part of a package of commitments to address concerns following the investigation, which was launched last year. The settlement, which is set to go into affordable housing programmes across the UK, would be the largest ever secured by the CMA through commitments from firms under investigation. The CMA will now consult on the commitments until July 24 and, if accepted, it will mean the regulator does not need to rule on whether the companies broke competition law. As well as the payment, the housebuilders have agreed legally binding commitments not to share commercially sensitive information with rivals, such as the prices that houses were sold for, except in 'limited circumstances', the CMA said. They also agreed to work with the Home Builders Federation and Homes for Scotland to develop industry-wide guidance on information sharing. The firms have said the offer of voluntary commitments does not mean they admit any wrongdoing. Speaking in the House of Lords, housing minister Baroness Taylor of Stevenage said: 'The £100 million additional funding proposed for affordable housing will mean more families can benefit from a safe and secure home.' But Liberal Democrat Baroness Thornhill, a vice president of the Local Government Association, said: 'There could be an alternative version to this – major housebuilders pay £100 million to halt the CMA's investigation into potential illegal collusion through the sharing of competitively sensitive information that could have inflated house prices. 'While this settlement might appear a pragmatic, cost-effective solution, would it not be more useful to have some evidence-led answers about whether the business models of the major developers are a significant factor in the slow delivery of housing? 'Therefore, should not the Government insist that the CMA actually completes its investigation, rather than allowing a financial settlement that obscures the fact and definitely looks dodgy?' Responding, Lady Taylor said: 'The CMA is continuing its work on this, and on July 9 it announced that it is consulting on its intention to accept commitments offered by the housebuilders in relation to the investigation. 'That consultation closes on July 25, and I have already set out some of the commitments that the seven companies have made. 'The £100 million payment, the largest secured through commitments from companies under investigation, will be split between affordable housing programmes across all our four nations. 'I hope that will make a significant contribution to delivering the affordable housing we all want to see.' Tory former housing minister Lord Young of Cookham said: 'If the Competition and Markets Authority confirms this £100 million payment for anti-competitive activity, can the minister give an assurance that none of the affordable homes to be built with that money will be built by the volume housebuilders responsible for this activity? Otherwise, they'll simply get their money back.' Lady Taylor said: 'I am sure that the Competition and Markets Authority, as part of its consultation, will be looking at the best way of distributing that money, so it is not just recycled to the people who caused the problem in the first place.' Liberal Democrat Lord Rennard said: 'The one-off payment of £100 million towards affordable housing is only about 3% of the operating profit of the five biggest housebuilders this year. Is this a relatively small penalty for them to pay for anti-competitive practices over many years?' Lady Taylor said: 'This is the biggest settlement ever achieved by the CMA.' She added: 'We have to consider what is appropriate in these circumstances. I am sure the CMA has done that.' A CMA spokesperson said: 'Our year-long study of the housing market found that the complex and unpredictable planning system, together with the limitations of speculative private development, was responsible for the persistent under-delivery of new homes in the UK. 'It was also clear that concerns about sharing of confidential information, while important, were not the main driver of the undersupply of housing. 'The £100 million payment we have secured for affordable housing would provide immediate benefits across the UK, without a lengthy further investigation. 'It is in line with fines levied in similar cases that have taken many years to conclude and comes alongside a set of commitments which fully addresses our competition concerns.' Bellway, which has agreed to pay £13.5 million, said: 'Bellway's offer of commitments does not constitute an admission of any wrongdoing, and the CMA has made no determination as to the existence of any infringement of competition law. 'Bellway welcomes the CMA's consultation on the voluntary commitments and will continue to work constructively with the CMA throughout the process.'
