logo
New workers' rights laws mean Joint Labour Committee system ‘not fit for purpose', Ibec says

New workers' rights laws mean Joint Labour Committee system ‘not fit for purpose', Ibec says

In a submission to a government department, Ibec is critical of the Joint Labour Committee system.
These committees, which include employer and union representatives, set legally binding employment conditions and rates of pay for workers in sectors including childcare, contract cleaning and security.
The employer group claimed that significant legislation on workers' rights recently means it is difficult to find an incentive for employers to participate.
Ibec said these laws include statutory sick pay, extra leave, and minimum-wage increases while legislation is pending on pension auto-enrolment and surrogacy leave. It made the submission to a recent Department of Enterprise public consultation on the promotion of collective bargaining.
Collective bargaining involves talks between employer and union representatives on behalf of groups of workers on their terms and conditions.
Under an EU directive, each member state in which collective bargaining coverage is less than 80pc must come up with an action plan to promote collective bargaining by the end of the year.
'Ibec is of the view that the Joint Labour Committee structure, as it currently operates, is not fit for purpose in the modern workplace,' its submission said.
It said 'employment regulation orders' drawn up by these committees are not collective agreements.
As a result, it said they will be of 'limited value' to any action plan on collective bargaining that Ireland produces.
It said it has become increasingly difficult to identify traditional areas of collective negotiation that are not regulated by statute.
ADVERTISEMENT
'In the last five years, we have seen a significant legislative-driven agenda resulting in the introduction of statutory sick pay, the extension of statutory leaves, introduction of new statutory leaves, increases in minimum wage, with further implementation or legislation pending on auto-enrolment for pensions and further leaves such as surrogacy leave, to name but a few,' it said.
It said the intent of the Joint Labour Committee system is to regulate pay and conditions of employment.
'If statute already does so, Ibec submits that it is difficult to identify an incentive for employers to participate in the operation of Joint Labour Committees.'
However, it said action is required to strengthen the capacity of the social partners to engage in collective bargaining on wage setting in individual workplaces.
It said dedicating funding to training will help promote collective bargaining.
It welcomed a government commitment to 'unlock' the National Training Fund, which will have a surplus near €2bn this year.
'We believe that the provision of collective bargaining training should focus on those employee and employer representatives in companies which are already engaged in collective bargaining or have agreements in place to recognise a union,' it said.
It said it believes that a 'good faith engagement' process involving a single meeting between an employer and union may play a role in Ireland's action plan to promote collective bargaining. However, after this it said an employer could continue to hold their position 'not to recognise a union'.
The employer representative group said it does not believe that a statutory entitlement to trade union access to the workplace should be introduced.
It said providing for a right of access to workplaces, whether physical or digital, would raise significant constitutional, legal and security issues.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Chambers warn Government to tackle critical infrastructure or face 'managed decline'
Chambers warn Government to tackle critical infrastructure or face 'managed decline'

Irish Examiner

time2 days ago

  • Irish Examiner

Chambers warn Government to tackle critical infrastructure or face 'managed decline'

Failure to deliver critical infrastructure now threatens Ireland's future prosperity, the chief executive of Chambers Ireland has warned, urging the Government to act or risk 'a period of managed decline'. Ian Talbot was speaking at the launch of Chambers Ireland's pre-budget submission, reflecting the shared concerns and aspirations of affiliated Chambers of Commerce around the country. The submission stressed that while the housing crisis remains front and centre, it has overshadowed other fundamental service shortfalls particularly in energy, public transport, water, and wastewater treatment. Mr Talbot said the Government now needs to take decisive and long-term action to tackle these areas. 'Our economy continues to grow but our critical infrastructure has not kept pace with rapidly increasing demand,' he said. 'Few would have predicted today's economic strength during the challenges of the past 20 years and inadequate delivery now means the infrastructure gap threatens our continued prosperity. Bridging that gap is critical and if we fail to act then we risk entering a period of managed decline. 'The era of being able to tolerate delays caused by lengthy planning challenges, judicial reviews and other hurdles is over.' Chambers Ireland includes 36 affiliated chambers representing 10,000 business right across the country. Some of Chambers Ireland's key recommendations include: A commitment to multiannual funding in water and wastewater treatment infrastructure. Continued investment in transport networks. Grid reinforcement and upgrades. Increased housing targets and investment, with a recommendation that Housing for All targets increase from 33,000 units per year to at least 60,000 units per year. Initiatives to stimulate modern methods of construction. Increased funding for port infrastructure. The introduction of a Strategic Capital Investment Scheme to support large scale, high growth projects across key sectors. Expansion and acceleration of non-domestic retrofitting supports. Further investment in childcare. "While the €1.37bn funding announced under Budget 2025 is a significant step forward, core funding should be increased and strategically allocated to address existing gaps in childcare accessibility and affordability," the report notes. Increased funding for apprenticeships. Facilitating SME engagement in international trade. Other recommendations include the roll-out of the single permit system for living and working in Ireland in advance of the 2027 deadline. It also calls for a portion of the National Training Fund surplus to deliver intensive language courses to people seeking international protection. The submission proposes the introduction of tax-incentivised investment schemes to channel household savings into more productive markets and opportunities that support infrastructure expansion and green energy projects. "Over €150bn in household savings remain in low-yield bank accounts, representing a missed opportunity for both savers and the wider economy. Redirecting even a portion of these funds into other productive markets could deliver stronger returns for individuals while providing much needed capital for essential infrastructure and generate increased tax revenues through improved returns and buoyancy," the report states. Mr Talbot drew attention to the State's competitiveness amid global uncertainty, driven by protectionist policies, tariffs and the mounting impact of climate change: 'The significant financial resources available to this Government mean there is a real opportunity to invest in core infrastructure and breathe new life into our towns and cities. This will help build a more sustainable economy and provide the certainty businesses need to stay competitive,' continued Mr Talbot. 'Our climate goals and energy security must also remain at the heart of the next Budget. The Sustainable Development Goals continue to guide the Chamber Network as we work to balance our economic ambition with environmental responsibility. "Economic growth and job creation is being constrained at a time of great opportunity to lead on sustainable growth and embrace new opportunities. We must now act with urgency.'

New poll reveals shift in attitude to law that would ban goods from illegal Israeli settlements
New poll reveals shift in attitude to law that would ban goods from illegal Israeli settlements

The Journal

time4 days ago

  • The Journal

New poll reveals shift in attitude to law that would ban goods from illegal Israeli settlements

AROUND ONE-IN-three people believe that a new law that would ban Ireland from importing goods from illegal Israeli settlements in Palestine should be passed quickly. Another 14% believe the scope of the law should be expanded to ban services which originate from settlements, while one-in-five people believe the law should be approved as soon as possible. The findings were contained in an Ipsos B&A poll published by The Irish Times today, which canvassed opinions on the Occupied Territories Bill. The bill, a version of which was originally proposed in 2018, seeks to ban trade with illegal Israeli settlements in occupied Palestine. It is being discussed at the Oireachtas foreign affairs committee to determine whether services should be added to the bill. The Irish Times poll found that over half of people are either not in favour of passing the law, or would prefer for the government to take more time to probe the consequences of passing it. Advertisement It comes after commercial lobbyist Ibec this week warned of the ban's economic impact. Most people have become hesitant over the quick implementation of the law. An overwhelming majority of people, 74%, are in favour of passing the bill – but a high minority of people, 38%, also said they want more scrutiny of it. According to the newspaper's commissioned poll, 17% of people did not know their stance or had no opinion, while only 10% of people were not in favour of the law. This week saw the US ambassador to Israel , American politicians, Israeli-relations lobby groups and business representatives warn of the potential impacts or retaliation that Ireland could face as a result of the trade ban. The government has said that it welcomes all views and opinions to the pre-legislative discussions, it does not intend to roll back on its promise to deliver the legislation - despite a push from the opposition benches that it is taking too long. The poll was conducted through face-to-face sampling through 1,200 interviews on 14 and 15 July. The accuracy is estimated at plus or minus 2.8%. A list of companies who operate in the Occupied Palestinian Territories and facilitate with the ongoing occupation of Palestinian land in the West Bank and the wide Israeli settlement movement, was published by the UN in 2020. Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone... A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article. Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation. Learn More Support The Journal

Ibec head labels Occupied Territories Bill ‘symbolism and moral positioning'
Ibec head labels Occupied Territories Bill ‘symbolism and moral positioning'

Irish Times

time5 days ago

  • Irish Times

Ibec head labels Occupied Territories Bill ‘symbolism and moral positioning'

The Republic's stand against Israel over Gaza and its failure to spend properly on defence are damaging its interests in the United States and with other EU member states, the head of Irish employers' association Ibec has warned. The Government's plan to pass legislation banning 'tiny' sums of trade with the Occupied Territories Bill is 'hypocritical', said Danny McCoy, the director general of Ibec . Last year, the State bought just €240,000 worth of goods from the Occupied Territories, he told the Patrick MacGill Summer School in Glenties, Co Donegal. 'We're not talking about millions here,' he said, adding: 'This is not about actually helping in any material way. It's symbolism and moral positioning, and so on. However, with moral positions, you can also reveal hypocrisy.' His comments follow a series of criticisms of the Bill by at least 10 members of the US Congress. The US ambassador to Israel, Mike Huckabee, accused Ireland of suffering from 'diplomatic intoxication' in progressing something as 'stupid' as this Bill. READ MORE Taoiseach Micheál Martin yesterday rejected the ambassador's comments and outlined the 'very serious' situation in Gaza. [ Taoiseach rejects US politicians' claims that Occupied Territories Bill is 'diplomatic intoxication' Opens in new window ] However, he said legislation to boycott, divest or sanction activity against Israel could 'inadvertently' affect companies. It would be 'counterproductive' for Irish companies to be punished, he said, adding that the Government will consider and take a legal opinion on this. The proposed Bill is expected to go before the Dáil in the autumn. The legislation would prohibit trading with companies operating in illegal settlements in the West Bank and other occupied territories. At the summer school on Thursday, Mr McCoy said the State's stand on Israel is 'well-intentioned' but 'causing us significant damage'. The consequences are not just from the United States and the Israeli position, he said. 'We've been completely insensitive to our other European colleagues who've also had really significant issues.' All of them have had struggles with anti-Semitism and Islamophobia in their societies in recent years: 'They have to go sensitively through that, and particularly in Europe as well. But we seem to be insensitive to that kind of dynamic.' He said he has personally experienced the Republic's fall in standing among fellow EU member states over the issues. Meanwhile, Irish attitudes to its own defence spending, but also to the defence spending of others, is losing the Republic support among EU states. 'We don't have many supporters,' Mr McCoy said. 'In terms of the business and economics, our goodwill is eroding significantly and substantially.' Also speaking at the summer school, Prof Brigid Laffan, chancellor of Limerick University, said Ireland should be 'more hard-nosed' and not endanger its diplomatic capital by passing the Occupied Territories Bill. 'We're a small state. We've limited influence. We must use our influence cleverly,' she said. 'Symbolic politics might make us feel good about the world. But unless it changes people's lives on the ground, you should not expend hard-earned diplomatic capacity.' . She added: 'In a world of such utter uncertainty, drawing attention to yourself in Washington might not be smart.' Often people in Ireland want to 'assure ourselves that we're good people', but we need to be 'a bit more hard-nosed', she said. 'I know the reaction saying things like this in this country gets, but I think we have to be able to have those conversations.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store