
Workshop on intellectual property rights law in Belagavi
Resource persons spoke on 'Empowering Innovations: One Day Workshop on Intellectual Property Right (IPR)'.
IP Attorney, Advocates and Solicitors, Bengaluru, Vivek Ananad Sagar was the chief guest. He emphasised on the relevance of IPR procedures and their significance.
HOD, Jain Institute of Technology, Santosh M. Nejakar explained various issues like filing procedures for patents and trademarks.
Faculty member at RL Law College Belagavi Satish Anikhindi conducted a session on Trade Marks and geographical recognitions for products and services.
Chairman, College Governing Council, R.S. Mutalik presided over the function. He stressed on the vital role of innovations and providing their commercial value.
Director KLS IMER Arif Shaikh welcomed the gathering. Praveen Kulkarni and Ameet V. Kulkarni coordinated the event. Faculty members, staff and students participated.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Hans India
7 hours ago
- Hans India
ALC celebrates Income Tax Day
Vijayawada: Commemorating Income Tax Day, Andhra Loyola College on Thursday hosted an insightful guest lecture on Income Tax, aimed at enhancing financial literacy among its students. The session was led by Assistant Director of Income Tax Dommeti Sridhar providing students with essential up-to-date financial knowledge directly from the Income Tax Department. The event also featured Manohar, an IIT Graduate, who emphasised that paying taxes is a civic duty akin to building one's family, underscoring its foundational role in national development. Vijay, an alumnus of Andhra Loyola College (ALC), highlighted the simplicity of online tax portals and the stability of current tax policies, encouraging seamless compliance. The overall objective of the session was to foster a 'Together for a Strong Nation' spirit among the youth. Discussions covered practical aspects of taxation, including popular tax deductions under Section 80C, the convenience of online taxpayer services, and the crucial link between Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) taxation and innovation. This comprehensive session empowered students with real-world knowledge vital for both personal financial management and active participation in nation-building. Approximately 200 students from the Commerce and BBA departments actively participated in the programme, demonstrating a keen interest in understanding their future financial responsibilities. Certificates were distributed to the prize winners as part of the celebration. Fr Kiran Kumar, Vice-Principal II year, Dr L Subha, Dean of Student Activities, Nirmala Rani, Head of the Department of Commerce and Durga Pavani, Head of the Department of Business Administration also participated.


The Hindu
15-07-2025
- The Hindu
How IPR applications by Mother Teresa varsity faculty are helping Kodaikanal tribespeople
Deep inside Palani Hills in Kodaikanal taluk live a group of tribespeople who could have a livelihood boost due to a bunch of Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) applications filed by a faculty member of Mother Teresa Women's University. A. Usha Raja Nanthini, Professor and Head, Biotechnology Department, has filed 150 separate applications under industrial design for jewellery made with naturally-occurring seeds. The project, funded by Tamil Nadu State Council for Science and Technology (TNSCST), aims to train the tribespeople in jewellery-making and help them market their products through a website. Five tribal women have come together to establish a company, Tulir, and registered it as a micro, small and medium enterprise. The website is being designed and will sell honey, nutmeg, lichens, benzoin resin (sambrani), and myrobalan (kadukkai), besides jewellery. Ms. Usha said, 'They live in 15-20 hamlets spread over Palani Hills and their population according to the 2011 Census was around 6,000. The children rarely go to school and they live a simple life collecting non-timber forest produce.' While being on a project to analyse different species of eucalyptus for anti-fungal properties, Ms. Usha and her team came across this habitation. Seeds of eucalyptus, adenanthera, coix and corymbia found in the area were colourful and tough, and they came in various sizes and shapes. 'An idea sparked: if we designed jewellery and taught them how to make them, they could sell the products for a living.' A few prototypes of the jewellery designs were submitted to the TNSCST in August 2023 and the Council approved the project in January 2024. Then began the tough task of bringing the villagers together. 'They were shy and would not entertain outsiders. So, we went through the tribal headman who helped us getting a few people,' Ms. Usha elaborated. The training for the villagers began in January, and she filed the IPR applications through the IPR cell set up by the Council at the university in March. 'The idea of setting up these cells is to protect our intellectual property and use them for the benefit of the people,' said S. Vincent, Member Secretary, TNSCST. The council has already set up 40 such cells. Fifty villagers from Pethuparai Bharathi Annanagar and Pallangi-Kombai hamlets have been trained in jewellery-making, Ms. Usha said. As an aside, members of a women's self help group from Vadakounji and Vadajaraparai were trained in apiculture (beekeeping), in collaboration with sisters from Society of Daughters of Mary Immaculate (DMI). The people living in these hamlets largely belonged to the Pazhiyar and Puliyar tribes and have been eking out a living, collecting lichens, soap nuts, gooseberry, honey and other non-timber forest produce and selling them to intermediaries for a pittance, Ms. Usha said. 'The place is so remote that the nearest bus stop is 29 kilometres away. Very few have studied till high school,' she added.
&w=3840&q=100)

Business Standard
15-07-2025
- Business Standard
Firms affected by IPR violations could press criminal charges as victim: SC
The Supreme Court has ruled that a company can be called a 'victim' under the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) and file an appeal against an acquittal order in criminal cases, including intellectual property rights (IPR) violations. This means that corporate entities affected by IPR violations could now pursue criminal proceedings as the victim. A bench of Justices Ahsanuddin Amanullah and Prashant Kumar Mishra was hearing a plea by Asian Paints, which had suffered losses due to the accused selling counterfeit paints. Asian Paints moved the apex court against the Rajasthan High Court's judgment dismissing its appeal against the acquittal of one Ram Babu, who was allegedly found selling counterfeit paint products under the brand name. The High Court had dismissed the appeal under the proviso to Section 372 CrPC, reasoning that an agent of Asian Paints, and not the company, was the "complainant", and therefore the company could not file an appeal against the acquittal. The Supreme Court, while disagreeing with this reasoning, questioned whether the appellant would fall under the definition of 'victim' in terms of Section 2(wa) read with the proviso to Section 372 of the CrPC, or whether Section 378 of the CrPC would prevail in the present case. ALSO READ: The proviso to Section 372 grants victims the right to appeal against acquittal of the accused, conviction for a lesser offence, or inadequate compensation. If the court orders insufficient compensation for the victim, the victim can appeal. The apex court bench held that 'Section 2(wa) of the CrPC has thoughtfully accorded an expansive understanding to the term 'victim' and not a narrow and restrictive meaning.' 'In the present case, there cannot be any two opinions that ultimately, it is the Appellant who has suffered due to the counterfeit/fake products being sold or attempted to be sold as having been manufactured by the Appellant. The Appellant would suffer financial loss and reputational injury if such products were bought by the public under the mistaken belief that they belonged to the Appellant's brand,' the apex court judgment said. Asian Paints, a manufacturer in the paint industry for over 73 years, had engaged an IPR consultancy firm, M/s Solution, to track and take action against counterfeiters. During a market investigation in February 2016, the firm found counterfeit products resembling Asian Paints' trademarks at the shop of "Ganpati Traders" in Tunga, Rajasthan, owned by the accused Ram Babu. After a police inspection, 12 buckets of allegedly fake paint were seized. The trial court acquitted Ram Babu, after which Asian Paints challenged the decision in the High Court. The High Court dismissed Asian Paints' appeal, prompting the company to move the Supreme Court. Advocate Ajay Singh and his team from Singh Law Chambers represented Asian Paints (petitioner), while Advocate Thakur Sumit and others appeared for the respondents.