
Self-identifying ‘hot girls' are mobilizing to elect a progressive as New York City mayor
It started in 2020, when the model Emily Ratajkowski officially endorsed Bernie Sanders's pre-pandemic presidential campaign. Inspired by Ratajkowski, self-professed hot girls piled on their endorsements, posting selfies with the hashtag #HotGirlsForBernie. Some saw it as a way to counter the persistent 'Bernie bro' narrative, a rebuke of the idea that Sanders's fandom consisted solely of obnoxious, socialist-in-name-only men who lived their lives on Twitter.
Five years later, 'Hot Girls for Bernie' is a relic, one of the last gasps of hope young progressives felt before the reality of Trump 2.0 took hold. Nevertheless the phrase has returned, this time in support of Zohran Mamdani, the 33-year-old democratic socialist and state assemblyman from Queens who is running for New York City mayor. This week, a social media account called 'Hot Girls 4 Zohran' dropped on X and Instagram to give away free Mamdani swag.
Though the account is unaffiliated with the Mamdani's official campaign (and Mamdani's representative declined to comment), it speaks to the grassroots enthusiasm fueling the millennial's run for office.
Mamdani does not have the widespread name recognition of contenders like the current mayor, Eric Adams, who is running as an independent after a series of scandals, or Andrew Cuomo, who resigned as governor of New York in 2021 after facing multiple sexual harassment accusations, which he denied. But Mamdani's campaign has tapped a hyper-progressive wellspring by putting forth policies that sound ripe for a Fox News scare segment. They include increasing the city's minimum wage from $16.50 to $30, opening city-owned grocery stores, and making childcare and bus fares free.
Mamdani, a failed rapper and son of the indie filmmaker Mira Nair, is most at home on social media, especially TikTok. He exudes a kind of nerdy-cool vibe, which has earned him a GQ profile and a spread in Interview Magazine, where he fielded questions from New York luminaries such as Chloë Sevigny, Cynthia Nixon, Eileen Myles and Julio Torres. Last month, more than 18,000 citywide donors helped his campaign secure $8m, hitting the fundraising limit set by the city.
Hot Girls 4 Zohran is run by two friends, Cait, 24, and Kaif, 28, who live in Brooklyn and did not want their last names published due to privacy concerns. Cait, who is very active on X, says she has been harassed by users who don't agree with her political opinions. But she's fine with her face being out there – she posed for the account next to a box of Hot Girls 4 Zohran T-shirts.
Cait and Kaif say they are supporting Mamdani because he wants to make the city more affordable for the working class and courts individual donors over the super-rich. 'We're both fairly skeptical of institutional politicians, especially given the last election,' said Cait, who works in marketing. 'We really just want to get his name out there.'
And hot girls help. Not in an ogling way, but as a tongue-in-cheek way for voters to self-identify and convince others to do so too. 'It's empowering for women, and it brings us together,' Cait said. 'There's an intersectionality to it.' Kaif says that they use the 'girl' descriptor liberally – it's more of a mindset than a gender classification. 'So many men have also reached out to us asking for T-shirts,' he said.
Ahh look at all those """BernieBros"""... Knocking doors on this cold Chicago evening ;) #HotGirlsForBernie #BernieBros pic.twitter.com/BkRIBkoEKd
Cait was in high school when Hot Girls for Bernie went viral. 'I was still pretty young, but I noticed it even back then,' she said.
She has Danaka Katovich to thank for the inspiration. In 2020, after seeing playful memes about Ratajkowski's support for Sanders, the then student at DePaul University in Chicago made a group chat for 'hot girl' Bernie supporters. Katovich told Vox that 50 friends joined the group, which dropped a social media campaign featuring equally sexy and silly selfies.
'I'm surprised people are still doing this,' said Katovich, who is now 25 and working for a feminist non-profit aimed at ending US warfare and imperialism. 'Back then, journalists asked me, 'What does Hot Girls for Bernie mean to you?' I was 20 – it didn't mean anything to me, since it started as a joke.'
Katovich remembers people criticizing the 'hot girls' label for being glib or exclusionary, but she insists it was inclusive. 'Anyone could post a picture, non-binary people were included,' she said. 'Sure, there were some dudes who would comment on a picture and say, 'You're actually more of a seven,' but at the time, it didn't feel like anyone who mattered really cared what you looked like at all.'
Kari Winter, a professor in the global gender and sexuality studies department at the University at Buffalo, agreed that 'hot girls' can mean whatever posters want. 'Although I personally would not use the term 'hot' or 'girl' as a trend, I like the way young women, LGBT, non-binary and disabled people use it to claim their own multi-faceted existence in the world,' she said. 'It reminds me of a time when a lot of us had bumper stickers and T-shirts that said, 'This is what a feminist looks like,' and the point was to be inclusive, because feminists look like everything and anything.'
A recent AARP New York and Siena College poll shows that Cuomo holds a strong lead of 34% in the Democratic primary pack, thanks to older voters. Mamdani follows at 16%, and 20% of Democratic voters say they are undecided among the nine total candidates. The June primary is ranked-choice voting, a confusing system that has New Yorkers listing candidates in order of preference. The winner will probably face off against Adams and a Republican in November.
Despite Cuomo's early lead, Winter says that Mamdani's intense focus on courting working-class voters can serve as a lesson to Democrats. 'Democrats need to understand that the way to energize people is not to keep trying to play to some mythical middle, but to galvanize people who are so sick of corruption and the pandering to wealth,' she said. 'The only way forward is to galvanize people who care about common people and the common good.'
The Democratic National Convention might not recognize a hot girl delegation, but Bernie evangelists say the movement wasn't all frivolous. Hadiya Afzal, a former DePaul University student who was active in the Sanders group chat, says that many of her friends went on to work in progressive politics and still dedicate much of their time to the causes they care about.
'I think that's what folks should take away from this kind of campaign: at the end of the day, it's about the policies,' Afzal said. 'There would have been no Hot Girls for Bernie without an actual policy platform. That's the backbone of what made it meaningful.'
Over at Hot Girls 4 Zohran, Cait and Kaif want people do more with the T-shirts than pose in them for social media. 'If you wear the shirt out and about, then it spreads the word, and we really want to mobilize voters of all ages,' Kaif said. Ultimately, he and Cait hope the moniker will aid the candidate in his goal of building 'the single largest volunteer operation' of any New York mayoral race ever. With a force of 10,000 door knockers, Mamdani is well on his way.
One of those volunteers is Joshua Leirer, a 37-year-old who lives in Ridgewood, Queens. When Leirer canvassed in one of Brooklyn's parks in March, there were so many volunteers that they had to spread into the 'outskirts'. And, crucially, 'the volunteers are hot.'
'The people I talked to were really cool and friendly,' Leirer said. 'A lot of glasses, a lot of beanies. I would call it a Brooklyn hot.'

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Sun
an hour ago
- The Sun
I was thrilled to get a council house after 6 months of waiting – but trolls hated me for calling it my ‘forever home'
GETTING the keys to a new home is a moment of pure joy, especially for a single mother looking to build a stable future for her kids. But for Mari, a recent move-in quickly turned sour when her happiness was attacked by online trolls. After waiting just six months on the council house list, Marika, who goes by @ marikikix on TikTok, was over the moon to get a house with a huge garden. In a viral video posted on May 18, she called it a "dream come true" and her "forever home." The video quickly gained over 150,000 views, but not all the comments were positive. The backlash focused on her use of the term "forever home," with many believing a council property shouldn't be considered one. One user wrote: "When people call council houses their 'forever home', what aspiration." Another added: "A council house should never be a 'forever home'," suggesting that the term should be reserved for owned properties. The criticism highlights a common misconception about council housing. homes are "free," which is far from the truth. As one TikTok user pointed out: "I live in a council house that I pay £600 a month for. "I've never claimed benefits in my life. I work two jobs! They are not free, believe me." Trolls say council houses can't look nice but my stunning hallway will prove them wrong Amidst the negativity, other users rushed to Marika's defense. "Why's everyone being so awful in the comments?? They're happy, and that's all that counts!" one person commented. Others, however, focused on the practical side of council housing, with one user asking for advice on how Marika got a place so quickly. A helpful reply noted that "everyone's circumstances are different" and advised speaking directly with a council caseworker. Major council home rule A significant policy shift is on the horizon for council house residents, as the Labour party plans to introduce stringent new restrictions on the Right to Buy scheme. The new rules would exempt newly built council houses from the Right to Buy for a period of 35 years. 2 This marks a major change to the long-standing government initiative. However, the proposed changes have already drawn criticism. Kevin Hollinrake, the shadow housing secretary, has labelled Deputy Labour Leader Angela Rayner a "hypocrite" for advocating the new restrictions. This is because Rayner herself previously benefited from the Right to Buy scheme. According to The Telegraph, Rayner purchased her former council house in Stockport for £79,000 in 2017, securing a 25% discount. She later sold the property for £48,500 more than her purchase price.


Daily Record
6 hours ago
- Daily Record
Good Morning Britain sparks outrage from viewers over migrant coverage
Good Morning Britain presenters Ed Balls and Kate Garraway delivered an update on the migrant crisis, leaving viewers absolutely outraged Good Morning Britain viewers were left furious after watching Tuesday's instalment of the show. The morning broadcast was presented by Ed Balls and Kate Garraway, as they shared the news of a new migrant policy, which will help to tackle those coming into the UK on small boats across the Channel. The presenters announced that the new "one in, one out" migrant deal between the UK and France has come into force. This means that some people crossing the channel in small boats can be detained and sent back to the continent, in exchange for taking an asylum seeker who hasn't tried to cross into the country illegally, the Express reports. Ed then asked news correspondent Nick Dixon when these changes would come into place. He replied: "The Government has said that it will be operationally ready to get moving with this pilot scheme in a few days' time, which presumably means by the end of the week." Nick, who was live on a beach in Dover, continued: "It will be able to start the process, at least, of sending migrants back to France and in addition to that, have the lawyers ready as well to fend off any legal challenges that come their way to try and derail and delay this scheme, as has happened, of course, with the Rwanda plan." He went on to explain the details of the deal, saying that "for every return, one eligible person in France can apply online to come legally to the UK". The UK Government has said they will be "willing to fight court cases" while the new scheme is starting up. Additionally, France will also add more coastal guards, up arrests and keep an eye on boat interceptions to try and disrupt criminal gangs. Nick went on to say that there are already concerns about the plans, with people questioning whether the scheme will actually have any "meaningful impact". The Conservative Party has shared that they believe the pilot scheme will make no different to the situation whatsoever. It has been reported that there are only 50 illegal migrants being sent back each week, as Nick stated: "Which, to be honest, is a very small number given the scale of this problem." Fans of Good Morning Britain rushed to social media to share their opinion on the morning broadcast. Taking to X, formally known as Twitter, one viewer expressed: "This is madness." Another fumed: "Pointless exercise. Until it is made a criminal offence to enter the country illegally nothing will ever change and definitely not under this @UKLabour govt. #GMB." While a third added: "Another pointless gimmick so a rotten government that has no intention of stopping illegal immigration, can pretend it's doing something."


The Guardian
6 hours ago
- The Guardian
Justice department to look into origins of 2016 election interference inquiry
The US attorney general, Pam Bondi, has directed the justice department to move forward with an inquiry into the origins of the Donald Trump-Russia investigation following the recent release of documents aimed at undermining the legitimacy of the inquiry which established that Moscow interfered on the president's behalf in the 2016 election that first sent him to the White House. Bondi has directed a prosecutor to present evidence to a grand jury after referrals from the Trump administration's top intelligence official, a person familiar with the matter said on Monday. That person was not authorized to discuss it by name and spoke on condition of anonymity to the Associated Press. Fox News first reported the development. It was not clear which former officials might be the target of any grand jury activity, where the grand jury that might ultimately hear evidence will be located or which prosecutors – whether career employees or political appointees – might be involved in pursuing the investigation. It was also not clear what precise claims of misconduct Trump administration officials believe could form the basis of criminal charges, which a grand jury would have to sign off on for an indictment to be issued. The development is likely to heighten concerns that the justice department is being used to achieve political ends given longstanding grievances over the Russia investigation voiced by Trump, who has called for the jailing of perceived political adversaries, and because any criminal investigation would revisit one of the most dissected chapters of modern American political history. It is also surfacing at a time when the Trump administration is being buffeted by criticism over its handling of documents from the Jeffrey Epstein sex-trafficking investigation. The initial, years-old investigation into Russian election interference resulted in the appointment of a special counsel, Robert Mueller, who secured multiple convictions against Trump aides and allies but did not establish proof of a criminal conspiracy between Moscow and the Republican's campaign. The inquiry shadowed much of Trump's first presidency, and he has long focused his ire on senior officials from the intelligence and law enforcement community, including former FBI director James Comey, whom he fired in May 2017, and ex-CIA director John Brennan. The justice department appeared to confirm an investigation into both men in an unusual statement in July but offered no details. Multiple special counsels, congressional committees and the justice department's own inspector general have studied and documented a multipronged effort by Russia to interfere in the 2016 presidential election on Trump's behalf, including through a hack-and-leak dump of Democratic emails and a covert social media operation aimed at sowing discord and swaying public opinion. But that conclusion has been aggressively challenged in recent weeks as Trump's director of national intelligence, Tulsi Gabbard, and other allies have released previously classified records that they hope will cast doubt on the extent of Russian interference and establish an Obama administration effort to falsely link Trump to Russia. In one batch of documents released in July, Gabbard disclosed emails showing that senior Barack Obama administration officials were aware in 2016 that Russians had not hacked state election systems to manipulate the votes in Trump's favor. But Obama's administration never alleged that votes were tampered with and had instead detailed other forms of election interference and foreign influence. A new outcry surfaced last week when Republican Senate judiciary committee chairperson Chuck Grassley released a set of emails that FBI director Kash Patel claimed on social media proved that Hillary Clinton's 2016 White House campaign 'plotted to frame president Trump and fabricate the Russia collusion hoax'. The emails were part of a classified annex of a report issued in 2023 by John Durham, the special counsel who was appointed during the first Trump administration to hunt for government misconduct during the Russia investigation. Durham did identify significant flaws in the investigation but uncovered no bombshells to disprove the existence of Russian election interference. His probe produced three criminal cases – two resulted in acquittals by a jury and the third was a guilty plea from a little-known FBI lawyer to a charge of making a false statement. Republicans seized on a 27 July 2016 email in Durham's newly declassified annex that claimed Clinton had approved a plan during the heat of the campaign to link Trump with Russia. But the purported author of the email, a senior official at a philanthropic organization founded by billionaire investor George Soros, told Durham's team he had never sent the email and the alleged recipient said she never recalled receiving it. Durham's own report took pain to note that investigators had not corroborated the communications as authentic and said the best assessment was that the message was 'a composites of several emails' the Russians had obtained from hacking – raising the likelihood that it was a product of Russian disinformation.