Wife can summon bank officials to uncover husband's real income: Delhi HC
Justice Ravinder Dudeja, in a detailed 11-page judgment, allowed a woman's plea under Section 311 of the Criminal Procedure Code (CrPC), setting aside the family court's earlier order that had denied her this right.
'Matrimonial litigation, particularly where financial dependency and concealment are alleged, demands a sensitive and pragmatic approach,' the court observed. Justice Dudeja emphasized that the evidence and witnesses the wife sought were directly relevant to the determination of maintenance and not collateral or extraneous.
He criticised the family court for taking a 'hyper-technical view' and stated that it should have interpreted its powers under Section 311 CrPC in a more purposive manner.
The court noted a common pattern in matrimonial disputes, where husbands attempt to hide their actual earnings or transfer assets to evade maintenance obligations. 'It is not uncommon that when there are matrimonial differences, husbands tend to suppress their real income and resort to transferring their assets to avoid payment of legitimate dues to their wives,' the judge remarked.
The case involved a couple married on February 16, 2012. The wife alleged that she faced domestic violence and dowry harassment post-marriage and that the husband, along with his family, deserted her, locking the matrimonial home and retaining her stridhan, jewellery, and cash.
She sought to summon witnesses to authenticate documents related to a Shakti Nagar property, alleging that the husband had concealed financial information, including the sale of a Noida property and his appointment as a CFO in 2014.
In response, the husband argued that the witnesses were not relevant and accused the wife of delaying the proceedings by filing multiple applications. He also claimed that she had approached the court with unclean hands.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Gujarat HC orders arrest of EU-sanctioned oil tanker at Alang
Ahmedabad: The Gujarat high court has ordered the arrest of the crude oil tanker MT Conico Atlas, currently docked at Alang, after a shipping firm sued the vessel's owner over an alleged breach of a sale agreement. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now The firm has claimed USD 4,342,233 in damages alleging that the vessel owners withheld information about sanctions on it by the European Union (EU) The petitioner, Global Maritime Limited, alleged that the vessel was falsely represented as free from international sanctions, when in fact it was sanctioned under multiple jurisdictions — including the United Kingdom, European Union, Australia, Canada, and New Zealand. The dispute stems from a Memorandum of Agreement (MoA) signed on May 29 for the vessel's sale by the owner, Tachio Trading Limited. The initial buyer, Moorgate Maritime LLC — now known as Global Maritime Limited — paid AED 3,109,932 (approx. USD 846,690) as a deposit under the agreement. Global Maritime submitted that though the ship owner had claimed that the vessel was not under any sanction, but itt was found to be under sanctions by several countries. The petitioner claimed that since the ship was under sanctions from various jurisdictions, the MoA should be declared annulled. Meanwhile, one Shri Gautam Ship Breaking India Pvt Ltd invested in scrapping the vessel, it sailed to Alang for dismantling. However, upon its arrival at Alang on June 17, financial institutions refused to process the remaining payment due to its sanctioned status, Global Maritime submitted. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now The petitioner's counsel assured the court that the company would compensate for any damage to the vessel caused by the arrest, as determined by the court. Following a preliminary hearing, Justice Mauna Bhatt directed Alang port authorities to arrest the vessel if the owner fails to pay the claimed amount. "The Port Officer and the Customs Authorities at Alang Port, Bhavnagar are directed to arrest the Defendant Vessel, MT Conico Atlas (IMO: 9288693), currently lying at Alang Port within Indian territorial waters, and to keep the Defendant Vessel under arrest until further orders of this Court," the court order states. The court has also issued a notice to the vessel owner and sought a reply by Sep 15, while clarifying that the defendants are free to approach the court before the returnable date, with prior notice to the plaintiff.
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Telangana high court slams police for repeated calls to petitioner in Bhoodan land case
Hyderabad: Maheshwaram police personnel on Tuesday informed high court that they made calls to a petitioner in the Bhoodan land case for the purpose of 'compiling the village history record'. A police constable, from whose mobile phone the calls went, informed the court that he made the calls following instructions from the station house officer (SHO). The SHO, who too was present in the court, said that the purpose of the calls was not the high court case, but the village history record. The calls were made only for the purpose of preparing a 'village history record', which is maintained by police for all villages, which is a routine practice, and not with any intention to intimidate, they explained. Justice K Lakshman was hearing a plea by Vadthya Ramulu, the petitioner, who complained about the revenue officials changing the web record of his 10 acre land at Nagaram village in Bhu Bharathi without any notice to him. The judge became furious on Monday upon being told that the petitioner was being frequently called by police and summoned the police officials from the Maheshwaram police station. The petitioner's counsel sought a restraining order from the court against police. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Use an AI Writing Tool That Actually Understands Your Voice Grammarly Install Now Undo The judge, however, said that there was now no need for any such order and police would face severe consequences, if they continue their duty this way, and disposed of the plea. You Can Also Check: Hyderabad AQI | Weather in Hyderabad | Bank Holidays in Hyderabad | Public Holidays in Hyderabad Ramulu was seeking a probe under the Commissions of Inquiry Act into the way the land in Nagaram village of Maheshwaram mandal changed hands. Several bureaucrats had bought land in the village and they were contending that their land has got nothing to do with the Bhoodan land. The judge heard the case of the petitioners and also the contentions of the state and the bureaucrats and reserved his orders last week. However, the issue resurfaced after one of the petitioners brought to the notice of the court the multiple calls he was getting from the Maheshwaram police.
Time of India
3 hours ago
- Time of India
Driver's murder: YSRCP MLC's wife moves Andhra Pradesh high court over investigation notices
Vijayawada: Lakshmi Durga, the wife of YSRCP MLC Ananta Uday Bhaskar (alias Ananta Babu), has moved the high court challenging the notices issued by the investigating officer in the case involving the murder of Subrahmanyam, the MLC's former driver. She sought directions to quash the notices issued under section 160 of CrPC as part of further investigation of the case. The counsel for the petitioner argued that the notices issued to Lakshmi Durga are contrary to the directions issued by the high court, which categorically said the investigation officer should conduct only a further investigation, not a reinvestigation of the case. However, in the absence of placing any new material on record, issuing notices to Lakshmi Durga would be a reinvestigation, not a further investigation, the counsel argued. Arguing on behalf of the police, public prosecutor Menda Lakshmi Narayana said the petition is infructuous as the notices have already been issued to others and statements have been recorded. He said there have been many judgements by the Supreme Court where the apex court said the investigation officer can summon anyone as part of further investigation of the case. He sought time to submit the details of Supreme Court orders setting forth judicial precedence in the matter. Considering the arguments, Justice Venkata Jyotirmayi Pratapa posted the matter for further hearing to Thursday.
