These 10 restaurant chains have the happiest workers, study finds
Among the nation's major restaurant chains, In-N-Out is still supreme when it comes to the satisfaction of its workers, according to a new study.
The California-based burger chain took the top spot for a 10th straight year, according to an analysis by William Blair, an investment bank and financial services company.
The annual report spans 11 years and is built on over 530,000 reviews of almost 90 restaurant brands, according to Nation's Restaurant News.
This year's study found that when they weren't serving up Double-Doubles and Animal-Style fries, 91 percent of In-N-Out workers would recommend the job to a friend. The percentage marked a 5 percent jump from last year's study, according to industry publication QSR Magazine.
The top three chains when it comes to employee satisfaction remained unchained from 2024 to 2025, with In-N-Out followed by Raising Cane's and Dutch Bros. Hardee's was the lowest-ranked brand at 39 percent.
See the top 10 below:
Rank
Chain
Recommendation Percentage
1.
In-N-Out
91%
2.
Raising Cane's
82%
3.
Dutch Bros
78%
4.
Chuy's
78%
5.
Peet's Coffee & Tee
76%
6.
Caribou Coffee
74%
7.
Lazy Dog
74%
8.
Portillo's
73%
9.
Longhorn Steakhouse
73%
10.
Chick-fil-A
72%
In-N-Out is the only chain that has been in the top 10 every year for a decade, according to William Blair's analysis.
So what is it that's making workers at In-N-Out, Raising Cane's and others feel good about their job?
Getting a raise isn't everything, according to the study. In fact, the authors found that compensation and benefits had the lowest correlation of six measured attributes, according to Nation's Restaurant News.
The top factors were instead culture/values, senior management and work/life balance.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Gizmodo
26 minutes ago
- Gizmodo
Mark Zuckerberg Wants to Win AI by Copying Everyone Smarter Than Him
Mark Zuckerberg's favorite move? Copy, poach, repeat. It made him one of the richest people on the planet. Now, he's dusting off that playbook for his biggest challenge yet: the AI race. Meta, the company behind Facebook, Instagram, and WhatsApp, is on a hiring and buying spree, throwing eye-watering sums at top AI researchers and startups in a last-ditch effort to catch up to OpenAI, Google, and upstart rivals like DeepSeek. It's a full-court press to convince the tech world and investors that Meta still matters in the AI race. But here's the twist: Zuckerberg is raiding everyone else's. In the past few weeks, Zuckerberg AI team has: So far, Meta has nabbed several big names: Lucas Beyer, Alexander Kolesnikov, Xiaohua Zhai (formerly OpenAI), and others like Trapit Bansal and Jack Rae, who left Google DeepMind. The company also reportedly tried (and failed) to lure high-profile AI researchers like OpenAI's Noam Brown and Google's Koray Kavukcuoglu. The unit's mission? To build AI systems smarter than humans. Yes, really. This is Zuckerberg's version of the Thanos snap: collect the stones, snap his fingers, and will himself to the front of the AI line. Zuckerberg is also throwing cash at startups. Meta invested $14.3 billion in Scale AI and is in talks to acquire PlayAI, which develops eerily human-sounding voice agents. There were also feelers sent to Ilya Sutskever's Safe Superintelligence and Mira Murati's new lab Thinking Machines. If it feels like Zuckerberg is panic-buying his way through the AI mall before the shelves are empty, that's because he kind of is. Meta's AI assistant, Meta AI, is currently no match for OpenAI's GPT-4o, Google's Gemini 2.5 Pro, or DeepSeek's R1. Those models can reason. Meta's can reply. It's like asking a toddler to outwit a chess master. And that's the problem: Meta doesn't just want to catch up; it wants to leapfrog. Zuckerberg knows he can't wait years for homegrown breakthroughs. So he's doing what he's always done best: copy, buy, and scale fast. It's the Facebook playbook all over again. Stories, Reels, Threads: all riffs on rival ideas. And now, AI. Meta is behind in the AI race. Big time. Tools like ChatGPT, Gemini, and DeepSeek's R1 can reason, plan, and problem-solve. Meta's AI? It's still playing catch-up, better at small talk than solving real problems. Build AI that can think and reason, like OpenAI's and Google's best systems, and do it fast enough to stay relevant in the AI arms race. OpenAI's next models are about to go open source. That could erase Meta's last advantage: its free, open AI models that developers love. Zuckerberg has declared 2025 the year of AI for Meta. It has to be. The company's ad business is under pressure, Threads is floundering, and TikTok is still eating Instagram's lunch. Meanwhile, OpenAI is flirting with becoming a full-on social network, threatening Meta on its home turf. The new plan is to go all-in on 'reasoning agents,' AI tools that can think through problems step-by-step, not just autocomplete your thoughts. These agents could power business assistants, customer support bots, or even future consumer apps. But Meta needs one thing first: actual intelligence. Even OpenAI's Sam Altman is rolling his eyes. In a recent podcast with his brother, he said Meta's strategy is obvious: 'copy OpenAI, try to poach talent, outspend everyone.' But Altman warns that copying doesn't build a culture of innovation, and culture is what wins in the long run. 'I've heard that Meta thinks of us as their biggest competitor,' Altman told his brother. But 'their current AI efforts have not worked as well as they've hoped. And I respect like being aggressive and continuing to try new things.' He didn't stop there. 'They started making these, like, giant offers to a lot of people on our team, you know, like $100 million signing bonuses,' Altman said, adding:'It is crazy.' He accused Meta of 'just trying to copy OpenAI, down to the UI mistakes,' Altman added. Altman even called out Facebook's addiction to attention-hacking, saying OpenAI wants to be 'the only tech company that doesn't feel adversarial.' Translation: Meta tries to hack your brain; we're trying to help it. New episode of Uncapped with @sama. Enjoy 🤗 — Jack Altman (@jaltma) June 17, 2025Zuckerberg has always been a fast follower, not a first mover. This worked for social media. And if history is any guide, he'll land a few hits. He's great at absorbing features, scaling fast, and bulldozing rivals with sheer force. But the AI race is different. It's about innovation. So far, Meta's biggest AI play is its wallet. Whether that's enough to win a race where originality matters as much as firepower remains to be seen. For now, Zuckerberg is betting that you can't lose if you buy everyone who knows how to win. But in a world where AI shapes power, privacy, and the future of work, we all have a stake in whether these strategies actually produce safe, useful tech, or just more hype.
Chicago Tribune
34 minutes ago
- Chicago Tribune
President of Daley's ambulance company, started by his dad, dies at 67
A memorial service is planned for John 'Jack' Daley III, president and chief executive officer of Daley's Medical Transportation, who died June 23, according to the company. The Oak Lawn resident was 67, and Daley's said he was surrounded by family and friends at home when he died following a long battle with pancreatic cancer. Dolton-based Daley's operates Bud's Ambulance, which provides paramedic-level ambulance response to 10 south suburbs. It also has a Joliet division that operates as Daley's Ambulance. Daley's Ambulance was founded in Harvey in 1950 by Daley's father, John 'Bud' Daley Jr. Daley's Medical said Daley was diagnosed with pancreatic cancer in May 2023, and he was 'determined not to let cancer hold him back. Even chemotherapy wasn't going to stop him from running ambulance calls.' 'Helping other people and caring for patients is what kept him alive,' the company said in announcing his passing. 'Jack Daley will always be the strongest and most resilient person we have ever known,' the company said. Daley's survivors include his wife and four daughters. The company said a memorial service will be announced at a later date. The company said Daley was a paramedic for 49 years in south Cook County and had been a police officer with the Burnham Police Department since 1980, rising to the rank of sergeant and serving on the South Suburban Major Crimes Task Force for more than 10 years. The company's main office has been in Dolton since 1972 and it also has a location in Joliet that opened in 2012. John 'Bud' Daley founded the business in September 1950 after serving in the military, first as a corpsman in Korea then later managing a military ambulance on the Philippine Islands, according to a company history. Daley left the military in 1949, then after returning stateside worked for an ambulance company in Fargo, North Dakota, according to the company's history. The business was based at his home in Harvey, and Daley, in 1955, married Betty, who became his partner in the business and would answer the phone and communicate on the radio perched on the kitchen table. Daley's Ambulance, as it was known at the time, started with two used ambulances — a 1936 LaSalle and 1946 Packard — according to the company. It was Daley's experience in the military and overseeing the Army ambulance that made him realize that 'medically trained personnel should be available to everyone in a time of need,' according to the company. Daley died in 2001, and Jack formed Bud's Ambulance at the time. Daley's Medical Transportation also operates Daley's Ambulance in Will County. It responds to 911 calls in Rockdale and also serves multiple health care facilities in Will County, according to the company. Nearly all of Daley's employees are either trained and certified as emergency medical technicians or paramedics, according to John McGehee, vice president of administration. The company requires that executives go out on ambulance runs and work alongside crews on a regular basis.
Forbes
37 minutes ago
- Forbes
Cannabis Tax Relief Dropped From California Budget Bill
California cannabis taxes will jump this week after a proposal to eliminate the planned hike was ... More left out of the state budget bill. California marijuana consumers will face higher taxes beginning July 1 after a plan to halt a planned increase in the state cannabis excise was left out of a state budget bill. The state's cannabis excise tax will rise from 15% to 19% on Tuesday, despite warnings from licensed operators that the increase will make it more difficult for the regulated industry to compete with unlicensed marijuana businesses. Democratic leaders including Gov. Gavin Newsom and California Assembly Speaker Robert Rivas reportedly supported a proposed provision for California's budget bill that would have dropped the planned cannabis tax increase, offering a bit of relief to the state's struggling industry. The proposal was rejected, however, by Sen. President Pro Tempore Mike McGuire, who represents California's famed Emerald Triangle cannabis cultivation region. Cannabis Tax Hike Coming July 1 Dropping the cannabis excise tax increase from the California budget bill leaves it to go into effect on July 1. At a hearing of the Senate Budget and Fiscal Review Committee on Wednesday, Democratic state Sen. Christopher Cabaldon bemoaned the omission of cannabis tax relief from the state budget. 'It would not be a budget if there weren't things to be disappointed about,' Democratic state Sen. Christopher Cabaldon said during a budget hearing, according to a report from online marijuana news source MJBizDaily. 'I wish we had reached an agreement on the cannabis tax increase.' 'I'm very concerned that this industry—that we're going to see less revenue as a result of the increase than we would have without it, as well as severely hampering the legal industry and significantly advantaging the illicit and illegal activities around our state,' he added, Marijuana Moment reported. 'So I hope we remain committed to solving that issue. I know the tax increase is scheduled to take effect next week, but that remains a problem.' California Cannabis Industry Reacts To Impending Tax Increase Representatives of California-licensed cannabis operators were also disappointed by the omission of cannabis excise tax relief from the state budget, a development that adds to challenges including competition from unregulated hemp products. Jeremy Zachary, found and CEO of weed edibles manufacturer Zen Brands, says that the failure to include cannabis tax relief in the budget leaves operators heavily invested in the California cannabis market with 'no other option but to struggle through the economic environment they're being served.' 'Hyper taxation and the unregulated hemp market will remain the biggest culprit to the sales decline California is experiencing,' Zachary writes in an email. 'Adding additional taxation to a heavily taxed environment will not make up for the lost tax revenue to the state, rather further compounding the failures in California cannabis and reduced tax revenues due to retailer attrition.' Chloe Kaleiokalani, co-founder and CEO of California cannabis brand CAKE She Hits Different, says the planned tax increase 'is setting the industry up for failure.' 'Many consumers and companies have already started digressing back into the black market just to survive, and this will only create more desperation, ultimately resulting in exactly opposite of what they are claiming to work towards—a loss of tax dollars being collected,' she writes in an email. 'The government is making it impossible for regulated cannabis operators to turn a profit while simultaneously allowing unregulated hemp to be used as a loophole for shipping untested products direct to consumer.' Democratic state Assemblymember Matt Haney introduced a standalone bill to eliminate the cannabis tax increase earlier this year, giving the state's industry and consumers another shot at potential relief. If passed, however, the legislation is not likely to go into effect until next year, leaving the tax increase in place for at least six months.
