Green Oceans Report Reveals Systematic Non-Compliance in Offshore Wind Development
The Bureau of Ocean Energy Management (BOEM) decisions to promulgate these contracts violate procedural law to justify projects that are causing irreversible environmental, cultural, and economic consequences.
Share
'This Report demonstrates that BOEM's review of these projects was fraught with omitted, misrepresented, and arguably false information regarding its ability to provide reliable electricity,' said Green Oceans President Lisa Quattrocki Knight. 'The projects also have significant adverse environmental, economic, and national security consequences. The Trump Administration has sufficient executive authority and reason to cancel the Rhode Island and Massachusetts Wind Energy Areas leases.'
Critical data and legal criteria in the report reveal possible omissions or misrepresentations by OSW project developers and government decision-makers. This is shown by citing OCSLA provisions, environmental protection statutes, state obligations to serve, Federal Power Act electricity system reliability rules, and federal requirements from the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). These include misrepresentations about:
Bulk transmission system reliability
Actual installed capacity requirements for fully decarbonized electricity generation
Actual amount of electricity generated by OSW operations versus ratepayer demand
Illegal segment-by-segment lease issuance
Encroachment on national security operations and training
Dire economic impacts on maritime activities like fishing and navigation
The North Atlantic right whale population resides in the RI/MA WEA. The region also encompasses one of the last remaining spawning grounds for Southern New England cod. Offshore wind development permitted by these leases could lead to the extinction of both species. Federal documents also confirm that offshore developments will compromise the East Coast's only Early Warning Radar system operated by Cape Cod Space Force Stations, underwater threat detection capabilities, military readiness, and Coast Guard search and rescue operations. BOEM's studies acknowledge long-term, major adverse and irreversible impacts on fishing and regional fisheries, and the historical and cultural resources of the Wampanoag Nation of Gay Head/Aquinnah. The Wampanoag Nation has inhabited Massachusetts and Eastern Rhode Island for more than 12,000 years. BOEM did not adequately consider the cumulative impact of all proposed development on the entire lease area, a legal requirement of their authority.
The Green Oceans report aligns with the ongoing comprehensive federal review of wind leasing and permitting practices, as directed by the Presidential Memorandum of January 20, 2025, and makes the case for immediate intervention overwhelming, both on legal and policy grounds. The six offshore wind projects referenced throughout this announcement are: Revolution Wind, Vineyard Wind, South Fork Wind, Sunrise Wind, SouthCoast Wind, and New England Wind.
You may access the full report here:
About Green Oceans
Green Oceans is a nonprofit, non-partisan group of community members dedicated to the preservation and protection of our nation's marine ecosystems and coastal communities. For more information or to get involved, visit: https://green-oceans.org/.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Wire
01-07-2025
- Business Wire
Green Oceans and Three Tribes Petition NOAA to Revoke Offshore Wind Companies' Authorizations That Harm 61% of the Critically Endangered North Atlantic Right Whales While Building their Projects
LITTLE COMPTON, R.I.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Three Native American tribes, the Shinnecock Nation, the Wampanoag Tribe of Gay Head/Aquinnah, the Narragansett Tribe, ACK for Whales, and Green Oceans have petitioned the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) to revoke the authorizations granted to harass and harm whales and other marine mammals during the construction of the Sunrise, Revolution, and New England Wind projects. In violation of the Marine Mammal Protection Act (MMPA), the Letters of Authorization (LOAs) issued by NOAA allow the offshore wind developers to illegally 'take' or harm an excessive number of marine mammals, including the critically endangered North Atlantic Right Whale (NARW), while building offshore wind projects.. The petition also provides hard evidence connecting the construction of offshore wind projects and the deaths of endangered NARW, of which there are fewer than 350 left and demonstrates that the government's basis for allowing the LOAs relies on incomplete and flawed analysis. 'The collective harm from these projects will be devastating and likely irreversible if they are not stopped,' said Dr. Lisa Quattrocki Knight, co-founder and President of Green Oceans. 'We urge Commerce Secretary Lutnick to look at the previous administration's reckless permitting that threatens the health of our ocean and the animals that live there. The facts speak for themselves: these projects should not be allowed to proceed.' On an annualized basis, Revolution Wind 'takes' constitute approximately 12% of the NARW population, a figure that the courts and the National Marine Fisheries Service have said exceeds the statutorily allowed 'small numbers.' Over a five-year period, the combined 'takes' by Revolution, Sunrise, and New England Wind constitute 61% of the NARW population alive today. Whales cannot discern the boundaries between projects so NOAA shouldn't evaluate projects as one-offs in the same general lease area that will engage in construction activities at the same time. 'This is a death sentence for the Right Whales and an egregious violation of the Marine Mammal Protection Act,' Dr. Knight said. 'NOAA's Letters of Authorization protect offshore wind investors at the expense of the environment. The law says the exact opposite.' About Green Oceans Green Oceans is a nonpartisan, nonprofit, community organization dedicated to combating climate change without jeopardizing the health of the ocean or the life it sustains.
Yahoo
07-06-2025
- Yahoo
Florida residents voice opposition to potential offshore drilling plans
The Bureau of Ocean Energy Management is taking public comments on a program that would open up nearly the entire U.S. coastline to oil drilling. As you can see on this map, the coasts of both Florida and Georgia are included. >>> STREAM ACTION NEWS JAX LIVE <<< The Florida state constitution bans drilling on the coastline, but that only applies to water within three miles of the coast. The rest is federally owned, and that's the water the Trump administration wants to open. Jahlonious Monk has been living in Jacksonville for the last 20 years. He is completely against the idea. 'I think it's messed up like I don't think that should happen. I think that the nature here is so amazing and it's such a beautiful place that we should protect and preserve,' said Monk. 'Who wants to visit here when it's full of pollution?' [DOWNLOAD: Free Action News Jax app for alerts as news breaks] Visitors such as Kenneth Smith, who traveled here from Ohio, felt the same way. 'No, I wouldn't come if there is drilling. I'd just leave everything like it is,' said Smith. While the White House tries to make the change, there's a bill in Congress to help. It would remove former President Biden's block on adding offshore drilling sites. [SIGN UP: Action News Jax Daily Headlines Newsletter] We reached out to all four U.S. representatives in our viewing area, whose district includes the Atlantic coast. Congressman Aaron Bean (R-FL) 'While I support responsible investments in American energy, I remain opposed to opening Florida's Atlantic Coast to offshore drilling. We must continue to safeguard our beautiful beaches and coastal waters that drive our state's economy,' U.S. Congressman Aaron Bean (R-FL) said. The Bureau of Ocean Energy Management's 45-day public comment period ends June 16th, 2025. To learn more about the oil and gas leasing program, click here. Click here to download the free Action News Jax news and weather apps, click here to download the Action News Jax Now app for your smart TV and click here to stream Action News Jax live.
Yahoo
04-06-2025
- Yahoo
Federal government discussing offshore drilling off on South Carolina, Georgia coast
BEAUFORT, S.C. (WSAV) — The beauty of the coastline is one big reason people come to the Coastal Empire and Lowcountry to visit. But once again, the federal government is talking about changing that look, by adding equipment to drill in the ocean on our coast. The Bureau of Ocean Energy Management (BOEM) is redoing its 5-year plan, evaluating the American coastline for potential sites to drill for natural energy resources. That includes potential new oil and gas leases on the Florida, Georgia, South Carolina and North Carolina coasts, which by a resolution signed by President Trump in his first term, are supposed to be protected until 2032. But Trump signed an executive order earlier this year reversing a Biden Administration policy that further protected those same waters. In this term, Trump has since asked for more natural resources to be found to find more energy, including gas and oil. Environmental officials said the impact even before the drilling starts could be devastating. 'I think that all of the area off our coast is potentially on the table if offshore drilling, if they decide to include the South Atlantic Zone,' Coastal Conservation League Energy and Climate Program Director Taylor Allred said. 'There would be seismic testing. The companies would use sonic cannons that blast very, very high pressure, sound waves through the water in order to survey the ocean floor and get an idea of good areas to do test drilling to see if there actually any oil and gas is there to try and recover.' Allred said the destructive steps might not yield anything but could kill thousands of marine animals. Test drilling could also destroy critical coral reefs and other underwater habitats. 'All along South Carolina and Georgia, we have a really vital ecosystem that's really fueled by the largest known deep-sea coral in the world that sits on the Blake Plateau,' Allred said. 'It takes thousands of years for a large coral like that to grow with only a few millimeters of growth per year. If these companies go in and start drilling, they're likely to destroy the coral and it could take thousands of years for it to regrow if it ever manages to do so.' South Carolina's coast is responsible for the majority of the state's $20 billion tourism industry and a $6 billion marine economy that employs about 80,000 people. 'We'd all really not want to see that destroyed for the sake of a little bit of potential oil and gas drilling,' said Allred. Local and state officials have also expressed that they are against drilling along South Carolina's coast. 'There's been seismic studies done already. There's very little oil offshore,' South Carolina State Senator Tom Davis (R – District 46) said. 'The risk reward thing just simply doesn't justify it in terms of the environmental disruption and things that would occur.' Alongside politicians such as South Carolina Governor Henry McMaster opposing the idea, 26 different communities, towns, counties and cities have passed resolutions against offshore drilling. 'Look, we have abundant sources of natural gas, abundant sources of fossil fuels in America, and we ought to take advantage of those and want to bring them online,' Davis said. 'But they are not present off the shore of South Carolina. Seismic studies have shown that. And when you weigh that particular fact against the fact that you're going to have environmental disruptions, you're going to have disruptions to tourism, I don't think it's a good bet for our part of South Carolina to engage in that.' First District Congresswoman Nancy Mace also made her opinions known on the issue and posted a letter she wrote to BOEM on X. That letter said in part that drilling threatens tourism and our way of life and that we need to 'hold the line,' 'keep the ban' and 'protect our coast.' In 2018, McMaster advocated against the drilling on behalf of South Carolina. 'Every city and town council along the South Carolina coastline has voted to oppose seismictesting and drilling, and I agree with them,' McMaster said in the letter to the Secretary of the Interior. 'Our commercial fishing industry enjoys a vibrant offshore ecosystem. The habitat disruption and other impacts that marine life could suffer due to seismic testing are simply not worth whatever benefit our state might see from placing oil rigs offshore.' He also said that as a state located in 'Hurricane Alley,' they can't add more risk by putting offshore drilling platforms in the path of potential storms. McMaster referenced the fact that in 2005 Hurricanes Katrina and Rita destroyed 115 oil platforms and damaged 52 others in the Gulf. The agency is accepting public comment on offshore drilling through June 16. You can click or tap here to write a comment with your thoughts. Allred said even a short comment against offshore drilling can go a long way to protecting South Carolina. Read Mace's letter in full below: Read McMaster's letter to the Interior from 2018 here: 2018-01-16-Gov.-McMaster-to-Sec.-Zinke-re-Offshore-DrillingDownload Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
