logo
England must not rush back Jofra Archer for the second India Test - the fast bowler's return is exciting, but hold him for Lord's, writes NASSER HUSSAIN

England must not rush back Jofra Archer for the second India Test - the fast bowler's return is exciting, but hold him for Lord's, writes NASSER HUSSAIN

Daily Mail​2 days ago

The return of Jofra Archer to an England Test squad for the first time in over four years is exciting news – both for him and the team – after all the injury problems he's had. And for that reason I wouldn't risk him in next week's second Test at Edgbaston, but hang on to him for the third game at Lord's.
I can understand the temptation to bring him straight back in to the starting XI, and clearly England wouldn't have selected him if they weren't sure of his fitness after he came through 18 economical overs for Sussex against Durham at Chester-le-Street.
But there are a couple of points to consider. First, what's the rush? Archer has only just played his first red-ball game since 2021, and Sussex have a Championship match starting against Warwickshire on Sunday at Hove. The Sussex head coach Paul Farbrace has said that he wouldn't pick him until the third Test.
Second, who do you drop to make way for him? We all know Chris Woakes gets better as a series progresses, and there were already signs in the second innings at Headingley that he had improved from the first day. Also, Edgbaston is his home ground.
Josh Tongue cleaned up India 's tail brilliantly, and that's something England have had a problem with in recent years. And I thought the spell Brydon Carse bowled at the start of India's second innings was exceptional. None of those three looks very droppable to me.
I get that England want to have a good look at Jofra before they fly to Australia in the winter, but they could do that just as well by having him around the squad at Edgbaston and building up his loads in net sessions and during intervals.
Mark Wood, the other quick bowler England are desperate to recall, made a good point the other day, when he said that the likes of him and Archer can't expect to waltz straight back into the side. They have to prove they're ready. In this instance, we have to take the ECB medics – and Jofra himself – at their word.
You can see why England might want a bit more cutting-edge against India's top order, after they scored five individual hundreds between them at Headingley. It's not just the pace Archer brings – it's the skills as well. There may also be concerns about playing Woakes in three back-to-back Tests when he himself is coming back from injury, but his record at Lord's is so good you'd be keen to play him there.
But Archer hasn't played a Test since the tour of India in early 2021, and however good you look in a county game or in the nets, there's nothing quite like international cricket to put your body through the wringer. Can he come back for a third spell and still be touching 90mph? Can he withstand a day and a half in the field?
He's a once-in-a-generation talent. And that's why I'd give him just a few more days to get ready for the rigours of Test cricket – before unleashing him on India at Lord's.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Smriti Mandhana sparkles as India dominate England at Trent Bridge
Smriti Mandhana sparkles as India dominate England at Trent Bridge

South Wales Argus

time32 minutes ago

  • South Wales Argus

Smriti Mandhana sparkles as India dominate England at Trent Bridge

Having clean swept the West Indies in T20s and ODIs to get Edwards' tenure off to a thrilling start, England put in a rusty fielding display as India piled up 210 for five, powered by Mandhana's 112. Mandhana clubbed three sixes – two of them off Sophie Ecclestone, who leaked 43 runs in three overs on her England return – and 15 fours in a majestic 62-ball innings, having been given a reprieve on 13. We take the loss at Trent Bridge in the 1st T20 😢 We will bounce back in Bristol 🤞 — England Cricket (@englandcricket) June 28, 2025 England's spin problems then resurfaced as they capitulated to 113 all out to suffer their heaviest defeat by runs in T20s, with only captain Nat Sciver-Brunt going past 15 as she made 66 off 42 balls. England lost 40 wickets to spin during last winter's 16-0 Ashes whitewash defeat and after Sophia Dunkley nicked off to seamer Amanjot Kaur in the first over, India's slow bowlers took centre stage. Danni Wyatt-Hodge was dismissed by finger spin for a third time to register her third successive duck when an attempted clip off her pads to Deepti Sharma took a thick leading edge to short third. Deepti, at the heart of the controversial Mankad incident in India's last tour to England three years ago, then took out the recalled Tammy Beaumont's leg stump after she missed a swipe across the line. Amy Jones was stumped despite wicketkeeper Richa Ghosh initially fumbling the ball and the writing was on the wall when Alice Capsey sliced to short third to give debutant Shree Charani her first wicket. Slow left-armer Charani finished with four for 12 from 3.5 overs, which included the key scalp over Sciver-Brunt, the penultimate wicket to fall when she feathered a cut through to Ghosh. India's Smriti Mandhana celebrates her century (Mike Egerton/PA) England's hopes of recording their highest T20 chase had long since receded despite the occasional counterpunch from their skipper, having been up against it after conceding their second highest total. Ecclestone's first involvement under Edwards' leadership – having missed the Windies series with a knee injury – saw her fumble at mid-off from the first ball, setting the tone for a poor fielding display. Mandhana might have departed in the second over when she miscued a pull off Em Arlott but a backtracking Capsey lost track of the ball, which landed next to her left shoulder at midwicket. Nat Sciver-Brunt was the only England player to go past 15 (Mike Egerton/PA) Mandhana, standing in as captain for the injured Harmanpreet Kaur, did not look back. Strong on the drive and cut, she slog swept Ecclestone's first ball back for six and did likewise from the fourth delivery as the left-arm spinner conceded an eye-watering 19 from her first over. She shared stands of 77 with Shafali Verma and 94 with Harleen Deol, who made 43 off 23 balls having been dropped on 26 after Wyatt-Hodge spilled a simple chance in the deep. Mandhana moved to three figures off 51 deliveries with back-to-back fours off Lauren Bell, who claimed three quick wickets by taking pace off the ball to finish with figures of 4-0-27-3. Ecclestone, who spent time out of county cricket this month to manage a sore quad and 'prioritise her wellbeing', had some reward in the final over when Mandhana miscued to Sciver-Brunt in the ring but the damage was done at the start of this five-match series, which resumes in Bristol on Tuesday.

In buyers' market art is in the sale, just look at Brighton (not United)
In buyers' market art is in the sale, just look at Brighton (not United)

Times

time37 minutes ago

  • Times

In buyers' market art is in the sale, just look at Brighton (not United)

The key to poker is understanding the value of what is in your hand. In the winter transfer window of 2023, when Chelsea offered £55million for Moisés Caicedo, Brighton & Hove Albion said 'no'. They said the same again when Arsenal followed with a £60million bid, and still no when they raised it to £70million. From the outside, there was consternation. Danny Murphy told talkSPORT Brighton's stance was 'ridiculous' and 'for £70million I would have driven Caicedo there'. But when the summer window opened and Chelsea returned with offers of £60million, then £70million and then £80million, Brighton's answers remained emphatic: no, no, and no again. It was another no when Manchester United entered the running and no when Chelsea suddenly raised the ante and went all the way to the £100million mark. At last, when Liverpool mooted £111million, Brighton accepted a bid — and yet still there were cards to play. Chelsea returned to the table with £115million and finally, in August 2023, Caicedo was on his way. Though not before Brighton, who had paid only £4million for the Ecuadorian midfielder 18 months previously, managed to insert a sell-on clause, guaranteeing a healthy slice of any transfer fee Chelsea get for Caicedo in future, into the deal. Brighton's owner, Tony Bloom, was known as 'The Lizard' during his professional poker career and there may be no one better in the game for the cold-blooded execution of player sales. There are a thousand books and courses on the art of selling but it is the most undervalued, unperfected element in English clubs' transfer operations; the overlooked secret of player trading. Bloom and Brighton are outliers. According to a senior figure in the recruitment department of a top Premier League club: 'Everyone invests loads and loads of money on scouting, talent ID, data, coaching, blah, blah, but very little on the sales side of things. There is no strategy. What's the plan when clubs want to sell a player? Sit there saying, 'I hope someone comes in for him.' ' The situation is made all the more curious by the fact that in this age of Profitability and Sustainability Rules (PSR) and inflated fees — which must be funded somehow — an ability to raise money through sales has never been more important. So many Premier League clubs, in this window, find their plans dependent on how effectively, and lucratively, they can offload players. United are the most obvious example, but Liverpool, Arsenal, Manchester City, Aston Villa and many others need to offload players. It doesn't excite fans, who focus on the shiny new stars arriving, but getting rid of the right ones, at the right prices, can be as crucial as signing well. United, in straightened times and in the straitjacket of PSR, are trying to fund a squad makeover to fit Ruben Amorim's style. Having spent £62.5million on Matheus Cunha and had two bids — the latest for £55million plus £7.5million in add-ons — rejected for Bryan Mbeumo, they want a striker, wingback, midfielder and goalkeeper but whether they recruit in all those positions will depend on what funds they can realise from offloading their unwanted players, such as Alejandro Garnacho, Marcus Rashford, Antony and Jadon Sancho. All bar Garnacho are on wages that severely restrict which clubs can afford them, and United's new director of football, Jason Wilcox, has the added headache of Amorim and/or those players themselves making clear it is time for them to leave United, taking away any chance of hard-balling would-be buyers. Arsenal are close to announcing deals for Martín Zubimendi, Christian Norgaard and Kepa Arrizabalaga and are working on the signing of Cristhian Mosquera from Valencia — all for sensible fees. Yet Mikel Arteta's main requirement is a new striker, and with targets Viktor Gyokeres and Benjamin Sesko priced in excess of £60million, the club are looking to raise about £50million from sales. They would listen to offers for Oleksandr Zinchenko, Jakub Kiwior, Reiss Nelson and perhaps even Gabriel Martinelli. With their income slashed by failing to reach the Champions League, Aston Villa are looking to reduce player costs by £80million this summer. They have sold cleverly in the past — getting €188million (£160million) for Jhon Durán, Moussa Diaby and Douglas Luiz last season — and will have to sell smartly again, ideally starting before the PSR 2024-25 accounting deadline of midnight Monday. Pep Guardiola has threatened to quit if City don't reduce the size of his squad, and Jack Grealish is the most eye-catching item in their shop window. Guardiola may benefit from having a new sporting director, Hugo Viana, whose experience (gained at Sporting Lisbon) is within a player-trading model as opposed to the departing Txiki Begiristain, one of the best sporting directors of all time but who has only worked at dominant clubs in periods where there was little emphasis on sales. After the £40million signing of Milos Kerkez pushed their summer spending beyond £200million, Liverpool are not finished recruiting but need to balance their expenditure with more sales on top of the £24million already received for Caoimhin Kelleher, Nat Phillips and Trent Alexander-Arnold. Jarell Quansah is expected to join Bayer Leverkusen for £35million after the European Under-21 Championship and Tyler Morton, also excelling at the tournament, is another asset they will seek to realise. Talks are continuing with Napoli over a deal to sell Darwin Núñez, while Federico Chiesa, who interests several Serie A clubs, is also likely to be sold. Ideally, with Kerkez aboard, the Liverpool would raise funds by disposing of a left back. Andrew Robertson is considering interest from Atletico Madrid but may stay for the final year of his contract, though, and Kostas Tsimikas is happy in a back-up role. A 'Greek Scouser' who describes Liverpool as 'the Broadway of football' may be hard to shift. The importance of sales was laid out at the end of the previous summer transfer window by the online football finance expert Swiss Ramble. From 2022-24, Brighton's gross spending on players (£411million) exceeded that of Liverpool, Newcastle United, Villa and — by a significant margin — the outlays of supposed peer clubs such as Brentford, Fulham and Crystal Palace. But their net spend? It was just £20million. They had traded their squad upwards — readying it to finish a club-record eighth in 2024-25 — for less than £7million per season, thanks to sales. The analysis showed Chelsea and City to have been by far the period's biggest sellers. The massive recruitment programmes undergone by both would have been impossible without recouping through player disposals. The pressure on Arsenal, United, Tottenham Hotspur and Newcastle was also clear in the figures. Those clubs' relatively low sales left them with big net spends. Arsenal's gross outlay on players was only £50million more than City's over a five-year period, but their net spend was £480million more. The problems that stores up perhaps explain why City can now spend with abandon to help Guardiola rebuild while Arteta is still waiting for his striker. Everton were the only club to make a transfer profit from 2020-24, showing how selling was fundamental to the club's very survival during the stricken final years of Farhad Moshiri's ownership. But selling is not just about how much you make, it's about which goods you are willing to part with, and though City raised £499million by offloading players from 2022-24 it was a period where they parted with talents including Cole Palmer, Morgan Rogers, Liam Delap, James Trafford and Julián Alvarez. None look like wise disposals now. There are different ways of measuring how 'good' a player sale is. One is to compare at the price achieved to market value and, using Transfermarkt's calculations, the best business of last summer included Newcastle realising £22.2million more than market value when selling Elliot Anderson to Nottingham Forest, Bournemouth achieving £20.8million more when selling Dominic Solanke to Tottenham and Wolves extracting £13.2million more for Max Kilman than the market said he was worth. However, another way is to look at the value of the player sold a year down the line. The blossoming of Anderson at Forest suggests Newcastle actually undervalued him. On the other hand the Kilman deal looks even better from Wolves' point of view — 12 months on he is now worth £19.2million less than West Ham paid for him. City selling Alvarez to Atletico Madrid for £64million seems a bad deal by both measures. The price was £13million below the Argentina forward's market value at the time and now it is £21.4million below his market value — albeit add-ons included in the deal may allow City to recoup up to £17million. United fare dreadfully in the analysis. They have made 14 significant sales in the past three seasons, 11 of whom now valued higher than the fees received for them, with Scott McTominay, Anthony Elanga and Álvaro Carreras worth a combined £63million more. To value players, Brighton use the unique information provided by Jamestown Analytics, an offshoot of Bloom's betting data company, Starlizard. They stick to those valuations and ignore distractions: back in January 2023, Caicedo agitated to go, even posting a plea to leave on Instagram. Brighton did not go to war with their asset but calmly asked him to stay away from training until the transfer window closed and then extended his contract, to further increase his value. Only selling when a replacement has been signed or lined up is also the Brighton way. Marc Cucurella was replaced by Pervis Estupiñán, Robert Sánchez by Bart Verbruggen and Leandro Trossard by João Pedro. Caicedo himself was the replacement for Yves Bissouma and on the same day he signed for Chelsea, Brighton entered talks with Lille for his replacement, Carlos Baleba. Now Baleba, 21, is projected to be a future £100million sale but a club who made gentle inquiries came away with the impression that Brighton are unlikely to let him go until next season, because his replacement has not been identified yet. Liverpool's headaches are eased by having Michael Edwards and Richard Hughes to oversee trading. Hughes sold well at Bournemouth and squeezing €10million from Real Madrid for the last month of Alexander-Arnold's contract was remarkable even by Edwards's standards. During the building phase of the modern Liverpool, as sporting director Edwards raised £396million from sales from 2014-17 — enabling the recruitment of Virgil van Dijk, Mo Salah, Sadio Mané, Roberto Firmino, Joël Matip, Gini Wijnaldum, Adam Lallana, Alex Oxlade-Chamberlain, Joe Gomez and Robertson on a pretty much obscene £58million net spend. There were many coups, like persuading Bournemouth to spend a club record £15million on Jordon Ibe, and Leicester £12.5million on Danny Ward, but none beat getting Barcelona to not just lavish £142million on Philippe Coutinho but agree a clause meaning they would pay a €100million (then £89million) premium in addition to any transfer fee if they signed a Liverpool player over the next 2½ seasons. It would prove the deterrent to Barça targeting Salah and Van Dijk. Selling, like buying in the transfer market, depends on relationships with clubs, agents and players; on planning ahead and having the right handle on valuations. 'It's not rocket science,' said the senior recruiter. 'I just think it's a cultural psyche because nearly everyone in England sees winning as points but a handful of clubs like Brighton rightly see winning as selling.' His suggestion is that clubs should have player sales specialists and, the moment a player signs, already have a plan for when they might be sold and involve that player and their agent in the process. A former sporting director, now working as an agent, agrees the issue is cultural. 'Managers in England often don't want to sell because there is a mindset of holding on to your assets. Fans get pissed off when you sell someone good and clubs have egos — for example Man United don't want to sell to Real Madrid and feel they are further down the food chain.' He remembers taking a player to a club in Serie A, where selling is embedded in a culture of player trading. As his client was signing the contract and they were posing for pictures he felt a hand on his shoulder. It was the sporting director. 'Now your job is to get English clubs to watch him,' the guy said, 'so we can sell.'

Tom Brady's Birmingham join transfer race for Nottingham Forest midfielder but will have to stump up £8million
Tom Brady's Birmingham join transfer race for Nottingham Forest midfielder but will have to stump up £8million

The Sun

time38 minutes ago

  • The Sun

Tom Brady's Birmingham join transfer race for Nottingham Forest midfielder but will have to stump up £8million

NOTTINGHAM FOREST have set their price for in-demand midfielder Lewis O'Brien amid interest from a slew of Championship clubs. Southampton, Hull and Tom Brady-owned Birmingham City are all keen on the 26-year-old this summer. 2 Forest want £8million O'Brien, a figure that could cool the interest of those monitoring him. O'Brien shone on loan at Swansea last season, where he made 16 Championship appearances after making the switch in the winter window. But his eye-catching performances may have worked against him as Forest now chase a bigger fee big fee. Hull have already launched an approach at £5m and may up their offer to land him. O'Brien is in the last year of his deal at Forest having joined the club back in 2022. His time at The City Ground has been a frustrating one, making just 17 first-team appearances since arriving from Huddersfield Town. Instead, O'Brien has had to settle for minutes elsewhere - heading on loan to four separate clubs since his move. Those temporary switches have included spells in the Championship with Middlesbrough and Swansea, as well as two forays to the USA with MLS clubs LA FC and DC United. O'Brien left the door open for a return to Swansea at the end of last season. He said: "I have really enjoyed my time here. It's never out of the question [returning], but sometimes it's not in my hands, especially having to go back to my parent club. "We will see what the summer holds. It's never say never really." Meanwhile Swans manager Alan Sheehan also made it clear he would love O'Brien back in South Wales. He said: "The effect he has had on the place, he has been exceptional. I cannot speak highly enough about him and I make no secret of that. "If he is available, should you try to re-sign him? I think that's quite an obvious answer." 2

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store